The Syndicate

I say we lynch LC right away. He is always evil, right?







I'm just kidding.

I voted for nothing. Because there was nothing left you greedy swine.

thellama73 wrote:

juliets wrote:I'm not familiar with Harry Stephen Keeler either so I'm hoping that won't matter.

No one is familiar with Harry Stephen Keeler. He's the most obscure guy ever. But if you are smart, you will seek out and read his books because they are worth it.

Lies! You must be a baddie. Because I've read some of his series back in the day, or night. I can't really remember I was stoned out of my mind. Also, I'm not very smart. Damn it now I will have to go through my stuff to see which ones I've read and which ones I actually remember.

S~V~S wrote:I don't like acronyms that are too long, although I am an acronym myself lol. I would go with something different were I to rename myself today, but it is what it is.

I Am thinking I'll call him what he wants to be called if he states a preference. Until then, Shep it is since that is the first part of the name.

I am intrigued by BF & Golden. Positioning themselves as a Batman & Robin of sorts right out of the gate, sticking cred right onto each other. Then, as Epi pointed out, BF did the same in another game. That is still in progress, but Golden at least was civ there.

And don't get me started on socks, you guys I really was excited for this becasue I was excited about socks, the works of HSK, not so much. I was sad to see that sabotage-eed. I already have an alarming lack of dignity for my age

Why are you awake nemesis?

I voted no for socks to spite you.

My two favorite ladies are awake, and here I am drunk in China about to go to dinner with some fuckers who I need to invest in my shit. I wish I could punch Diggs in the face....right now!!!!!

bea wrote:He loves you too wabbit. I am sadly not drunk. *sigh*

Get to work on that!!!!! OK, got to go to Dinner. Fuck the Cardinals. Texans RULE!

Maybe we can get a quarterback this year? I don't know we have the worst drafts in history. Our fucking first round pick sat out all season.

Kinds, all you going to get, girls.

bea wrote:I have missed my durnken wabbit! Play nice with the investers. You want their yen!!!

Renminbi these day., or RMB

I thought I was a drunk. The Chinese, well they put me to shame. I can't believe it!!!!

Later Bea, and SVS.

juliets wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:My two favorite ladies are awake, and here I am drunk in China about to go to dinner with some fuckers who I need to invest in my shit. I wish I could punch Diggs in the face....right now!!!!!

I could threaten to pay you back for this but I know I never would. I am deeply hurt however.

My goodness.

Now you're bringing out my mushy side. Are you trying to embarrasses me in front of the whole thread? How could I admit there are more than 2 peeps I actually like and think are awesome without feeling like a nub? It's like you want me to commit suicide. The rep, JC, the REP!!!!! Plus, I was drunk. Like drunk dialing, it's never accurate and there is always a better booty call you miss.......................................................... Not that you're like a booty call or anything of the sort, just well shit I better stop now. I just got confirmation that my trip was worth, well a lot and fuck. Damn you JC, you has me flustered!!!

juliets wrote:Never would I want you to be flustered nor ruin your Rep! I think it just reinforces your big bad wabbitness. And congratulations on China - good to know all that traveling wasn't in vain much less all the imbibing with the chinese.

Gah, now I feel like I need to Skype my wife and tell her feelings and stuff. Like I like my kids or something. She would like that, so I wont.

This should prolly be in OT or something, that's a lot of work though, fuck it.

Epignosis wrote:Well, I was going to try to post using quotes, but all the profanity has now tripped my work's "Adult Material" filter. So now I can't read anything further on page 3. I am only able to post this from the quick reply feature on another page of the thread. Thanks rabbit!

Dom, I used the verb tense I did because it made the most sense. Why do you find it odd that there are fewer Day 0 choices than people?

S~V~S isn't an acronym unless you pronounce it "Svvvsss."

llama, I like moving things along.

I would blame the prudeness of your work environment. I could never work for someone who edits my language. Maybe that's why I work for myself? I don't know? Tell the to screw off......Nubs are nubs. Like a little foul language is going to hurt anyone? You need me to filter my self for your cause?

Not likely to happen. But I could try......................Is there no filter for this site?

How do you host games, considering in I'm in Roger Rabbit?

fingersplints wrote:Epi works for a school rabbit. I'm ok with them being "anti swear"

Well.....that makes a big difference. Sorry I admit I'm not up to date with all the players.

I will try to tone it down for school purposes. I cant be held responsible for 100% compliance though.

Golden can kiss my arse though.

thellama73 wrote:Speaking of reading the rules. It's a shame more of you didn't vote for "Nothing."

thellama73 wrote: Only the first person to vote for each item will receive it.

I should get something for my nothing, no?

Golden wrote:@SVS

Would bf buddy up to me if he was civ? Yes. I know he gets confidence and energy from us seeing eye to eye. That part is absolute truth.
Would bf buddy up to me if he is bad? Yes. Bf is constantly aware that I am also the best at ratting out his baddie game, and I think he would be particularly aware of the fact I might be able to call him out.

The thing that makes me feel most comfortable about him? Our heads actually are in a very similar space, with eyes on the same people. This does give me some confidence. Also, why put such a big target on your back so early if you are bad?
The thing that makes me feel least comfortable about him? I don't like that I feel this drawn in to defending him so vehemently so early.

His posts still seem pretty - just normal bf to me. He isn't making me ping.

@epi - only when Phil Collins is in a gorilla suit. Hang on, I might be getting things confused there...

I purposely put a target on myself early and often. I will this game when I get a chance. It's helpful to baddie and civvie games. Why would you think it's not?

Can we not reference on going games? Seems rude and I would be pissed if I was hosteing said game. Plus we don't know how that game will turn out yet.

I will likely vote for one of BF or Golden so I don't have to read this buddy cop shit all game. Frankly, it's annoying.

Golden wrote:OK Epi... but in that case... why come after me?

@rabbit - If Epi takes offence, my apologies. I don't think it is unreasonable for me to make reference to my alignment in that game given it is known. MP did this in Roger Rabbit about Aces, so I'm assuming it's in keeping with the rules of the site.

I did not say you broke any rules. I just think it's bad form to keep bringing up a game that is not finished. You can do as you wish, I'm not your overlord. Just putting my opinion out there.

I also like Bullz, detest info dumping but don't really think BF has info dumped anything at all.

Iagree with Epi that BF has missed a huge opportunity here.

So when are we going to get to the low poster debate?

Dom wrote:

thellama73 wrote:Hey everyone!
Since we have a little extra time today, let's have a fun game. The roles on the front page need pictures to go along with them. Please submit a picture of your role to me via PM by the end of Night 1. My favorite gets a prize. Please nothing too racist for the Celestials.

how about nothing racist at all???

Buzz kill.

blindfaeth wrote:

Golden wrote:Which is it. Do you suspect me or do you suspect blindfaeth???

I am quite literally tearing my hair out with you!

Lol he's worse than rabbit. I'd be down for an epig lynch personally. Or bullz.

Offensive much? I take great pride in my ability to be a pain in the ass, thanks you very much.

link: Just for fuck with Epi......

Is anyone planning to self vote this game? That would be awesome.

Golden wrote:You know how MP was feeling about MM's self-voting being anti-civilian, and it got him real mad?

That's exactly how I feel about the kind of thing epi is pulling right now. I'd lynch him day one every time until it stopped. It's utterly anti-civilian behaviour. I don't know why anyone would put up with it, honestly..

linki - TH, sorry its not a 'brand', its just a cop out.

You don't get to decide what is civilian behavior and dictate it to others. What you think is anti civilian, others don't. Deal with it. I hate this argument I always have and you always make it. You can get it in our head what you think it should be. Please don't shame others into seeing things how you do.

If 1+1 always equaled 2 in mafia this game would be boring. Do please try to get over yourself. :P

Golden wrote:Well, that post wasn't ironic at all, rabbit!

I don't get to dictate to others how they play, but I can say I think it's anti-civilian and I can vote for them. And if I want to be the borg and make people assimilate, I'll damn well try. You have exactly the same rights when it comes to me, ok?

I think this game is real basic. If you want people to know you are civilian, you gotta adapt to how they take it in. I got some getting used to epi to do, but he also has some getting used to me to do.

I think it's a cop out, and I want him to shoot straight. If he doesn't, I see myself voting for him. Ok?

I didn't find it ironic in the least.

Make assumptions if you must. Just don't think others will placate your feelings because you feel them. Why you think everyone has to prove to be civvie is absurd. The mafia are trying to prove they are civvies. The game is that simple. No matter what is done you can't prove you're a civvie in the thread without outing yourself. Is that what you want us to do?

I don't adapt because someone does not like how I play. I don't think Epi seems like the type to either.

You want people to shoot straight, some people don't like to be NKed, that's simple. I would think after getting NKed and lynched early so many times in the past you would have reasoned this on your own. Apparently not.

Golden wrote:Honestly, I don't really get the sus of MP at all.

@rabbit - I'm sorry you feel that way. I'm just playing my game. I know you don't like being on the end of what you would call my self-righteous approach. And I do care. It would be easier if I didn't, but I do. I like everyone, and I don't want to hurt feelings or make people think I feel superior to them. Quite the opposite actually - I recognise that guys like you and Epi are a heck of a lot better than me at winning. But I gotta play my game.

People have all sorts of opinions in this game... the inevitable low poster discussion (people should come out and play), the info dumping discussion (it wrecks the game)... people also sometimes have the 'content' discussion (it's not volume, it's how much you contribute).

I'm having discussion number three. I don't think epi is contributing. Also, to me, epi seems like the kind of guy who can take what I'm dishing out. If Epi wants me to think he is contributing, he can be clear about whether or not he is considering each of me and bf for a vote. If he doesn't want to do it, I won't see him as contributing.

And he himself has essentially given me permission to take the line that 'thats just epi' isn't good enough. Wasn't his cautionary tale about him and elo a pretty good signal that he wouldn't buy that argument himself?

Oh Golden, you're a real fun time.

Why would I lead a lynch on you? I don't think you're bad. I always have fun when I play. Thus the reason I play. If it was not fun I would not play.....Hound you? Because we disagree I'm hounding you? OK.

Where do you come up with this stuff?

rabbit8 wrote:

Golden wrote:Honestly, I don't really get the sus of MP at all.

@rabbit - I'm sorry you feel that way. I'm just playing my game. I know you don't like being on the end of what you would call my self-righteous approach. And I do care. It would be easier if I didn't, but I do. I like everyone, and I don't want to hurt feelings or make people think I feel superior to them. Quite the opposite actually - I recognise that guys like you and Epi are a heck of a lot better than me at winning. But I gotta play my game.

People have all sorts of opinions in this game... the inevitable low poster discussion (people should come out and play), the info dumping discussion (it wrecks the game)... people also sometimes have the 'content' discussion (it's not volume, it's how much you contribute).

I'm having discussion number three. I don't think epi is contributing. Also, to me, epi seems like the kind of guy who can take what I'm dishing out. If Epi wants me to think he is contributing, he can be clear about whether or not he is considering each of me and bf for a vote. If he doesn't want to do it, I won't see him as contributing.

And he himself has essentially given me permission to take the line that 'thats just epi' isn't good enough. Wasn't his cautionary tale about him and elo a pretty good signal that he wouldn't buy that argument himself?

Oh Golden, you're a real fun time.

I think you may have misinterpreted this. I was not being sarcastic. I know, shocking. Don't let words hurt your feelings, Dude. We are never going to agree on how to play this game. But to not play because you don't like my opinions is weird man. I will never not respond to any player who is telling someone they are not being very civvie. Don't for one second think you're some special case for me. I much prefer to give LC shit.

As for Roger Rabbit. I don't like using other games to justify things, especially when the game is not over. I may have responded directly to you but it was not an attack on you. Stop taking shit so personally. It's just a game.

Golden wrote:And I'm sorta sorry I voted for you, but I think I needed to.

Lets just move on, eh?

You know me, I'm all for water under the bridge. But I have to say, voting that early like that is not very civvie like.......
....................
...............................
..................................................

I couldn't resist.

I'm waiting to see what BF does with this information he has. I don't having this said info makes him good or bad. I think the calling players out and saying I as expecting that kind of reply is a little odd. It just comes across wrong. The using the reply to point to guilt. I don't know...........

I want to look more into the votes for items. I need to reread the roles and see if there is anything in there that could make what someone voted for have any meaning. I think some brought up this point about some votes for items. I can't remember off the top of my head who, but I had the exact same feeling. Maybe I'm biased though since I got, NOTHING!

No one is trying to look bad. You can't look civvie. Absurd argument is absurd. Push away.

Did I miss this info? I thought you just said you have a name and think you get rich when they die, BF?
You think this leads you to believe you know who the Millionaire is, correct? How come you don't think it could be the The Wealthy Gad-About-Town? Did I miss your explanation on why?

Golden wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:I'm waiting to see what BF does with this information he has. I don't having this said info makes him good or bad. I think the calling players out and saying I as expecting that kind of reply is a little odd. It just comes across wrong. The using the reply to point to guilt. I don't know...........

I want to look more into the votes for items. I need to reread the roles and see if there is anything in there that could make what someone voted for have any meaning. I think some brought up this point about some votes for items. I can't remember off the top of my head who, but I had the exact same feeling. Maybe I'm biased though since I got, NOTHING!

It was ME rabbit

I said the key + safe is one thing I had an eye on, and also people who went for papers, because the baddies have a paper-storing vault.

Figures.

[quote="Zomberella12"]Man! I've been reading for almost 2 hours :P

So it's 4:00 and I have to start dinner and take the boys to scouts. So this post is going to be quick. But I'll be back tonight after I put the kids to bed.

My stock certificate it turns out is a worthless penny stock that is only good for starting fires. Whatever that means.

BF started out with vague suspicions before hardly anyone even posted and just snowballed from there. B/c I'm friends with MP and Spacedaisy IRL I have to fight the urge to buddy up with them in these games.

Golden, are you really mad about Rabbit or are you faking? I am of the persuasion that telling what you know is good for civs, but as I recently learned, doing so gives your enemies info about you and your team that can easily come back to bite you in the butt. I am going to resist all of my "infodumping" like urges in this game for sure. I really wish that you hadn't said that about your will. The way I see it, if you are civ, you just gave the baddies a target because they get the stuff you have if they kill you. If you are bad, then you just make me mad because you are probably going to be able to use what you said to convince others to vote for someone you know is civ - possibly to save one of your baddie teammates.

BR - I think your post about MP was legit baddie hunting but...I know that MP has been working really hard on school and I'm willing to give him BOTD.

Sheep - Hi! Nice to have you! I'm fairly new to this site also. I think you'll have fun.

TH - You seem different then you did in Death Note.

Epi - You seem the same as you do in every game. That being said, I will now call you out - just like I do in every game - for making the weirdest most unhelpful posts possible. However, as I said before, I do agree with you that BF shouldn't have said what he did about his will. Also, high school for sure is the most swearyest place on the planet.

Rabbit - Ha! I mentioned two prior games. I dare you to vote for me. Also,

Everyone else - no comment for now.

Mega linki that I'm not going to read cause I have to go.[/quote}
You dare me? Do you think I'm like MM, Impulsive?
I like my votes to count for something. I will not waste, ever. If I think you're bad, I will vote for you.
Votes are important. If you try to trivialize them or use them in a non helpful way it's something that should be looked at IMO.

Damn it. Well You can get where my post starts easily enough.

Long Con wrote:

Dom wrote:

Black Rock wrote:I'm going to start slapping these early self voters.

I might vote one of them tbh.

Oh yeah! MM also has my eye for his opportunistic self-vote.

Behavior modification? Does it work? Ever?

Long Con wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:

Long Con wrote:

Dom wrote:

Black Rock wrote:I'm going to start slapping these early self voters.

I might vote one of them tbh.

Oh yeah! MM also has my eye for his opportunistic self-vote.

Behavior modification? Does it work? Ever?

Ongoing experiment.

At least there are a few choices. I hate self votes. I don't think they point to civvie or baddie in anyway. They also don't help in anyway either.

Good luck with the experiment. Are you using the mafiatific method?

^^I think that's what Dom was getting at. But that's a streeeeeeeeeetch.

Self votes are useless and dumb, IMO. You're supposed to be voting for player you think are bad.

Do as you please though.

Your vote, your prerogative.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Why does Golden think you will self-vote.

Ooh, just noticed. Post #4,000 incoming.

I'm sorry, I have no idea how Golden thinks. My name is Rabbit. Even when I try to think like Golden I have no idea how he comes to some of his conclusions because I'm not Golden. I think you should direct questions about why Golden thinks a certain way to him.

I'm also not sure what you're talking about.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Golden wrote:Somewhere in there Vompatti self-voted.

If everyone else just follows suit, rabbit would be lynched. Rabbit, you'd be ok voting for yourself to clinch your lynch, right?

Given the baddie role that has been talked about - the one who gains strength from votes that don't lynch him - I think we ought to be uber-wary about self-voting in this game.

Sarcasm? I just skipped it.

Why would I want to be lynched because Golden got upset and threw his vote away for me?

And again your question should be directed to Golden, No?

So I will have to vote when I wake up. I will be leaving for the states and will not be around for the lynch, I think. So my best vote right now would be, Epi.........


Fuck you Golden. I know you are going to be biting at the bit to respond to this thought. So don't.

Because my other thought would be BF. Who does not consider all roles when they get info. Baddies with an agenda, or....................civvies who are too gung ho to actually think before they post. So this one is, meh.

The again I could always vote for a self voter. But nah, I'm not into behavior modification through punishments. They have been proven through study to do more harm than good. What, corpral punishment next for self voting?

Long Con wrote:Ok, so I had a plan here. My plan was to try and bolster the BF suspicion a little in order to make it seem like a BF lynch is a possibility. The next step was to watch and see who voted FIRST for BF, my logic being that IF BF has an item that could identify a baddie, the baddies would want to get a hold of it. Even if it's not pointing to The Millionaire, the baddies might want to grab it just because they aren't sure.

So S~V~S has voted for BF now, and she has been one of BF's biggest detractors all along. I'm not so sure if this plan of mine is credible, but I wanted to share it anyways.

In the beginning, I was "after" BF just for the plan, but now I'm actually suspicious of him. And if he's a baddie, then S~V~S deserves no suspicion for being the first voter.

I was feeling the Dom vote, but actually his explanation (that he saw juliets as buddying up to Civs with the "us" comment) makes sense to me.

My other likely vote then, is Metalmarsh, for his self-vote. Still deciding between him and BF right now.

Why even being this up about the plan if you're just going to back peddle in the same post?

I have to vote now. BF.

RIP BF.

S~V~S wrote:Also, I did receive the will. All it says is that if Zomba dies, whoever holds the will will get everything she has. It does NOT say she is wealthy. Just becasue she has a will does not mean she is rich. Normally I would not even post this, but since her name was already out there, I just want to confirm that BF was not lying, but that there is nothing that indicates a specific role holds the will. I thought BF might have been witholding something, but he was not.

I kind of feel like you're painting BF as even worse for what he did with this post. Like you pushed the lynch on BF and want him to look worse off for it. But I can't imagine what you had to gain from doing it after what Zomba has posted. And lets face it made it even worse as she dug he grave a little deeper back there basically confirming she is a baddie.

Why SVS? Why the need to do this? You did not have to. With Zombas posts you could have just confirmed what BF said and went along with the day. You know you have been pushing Oliver hard. This is odd.

Long Con wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Long Con wrote:

Epignosis wrote:Question for Mr. Con and Mme. JC:

Both of you voted for MM after he voted himself and after bf had five votes. Correct me if I am wrong about this, but I can't recall anytime you two have ever voted someone because of chronic self-voting. I understand the reasoning, sure, but why now? Why today?

You are lying about what you can recall. Why?

Nah, not lying. You're being evasive.

How about you go ahead and answer the implied question: Have you ever voted someone because of chronic self-voting?

We both know that you already know the answer to this, so saying you can't recall it is a lie. Why don't you just get to the point you're trying to make, I'm not playing an Epig mind-game.

I'm a bit perplexed and await Epis response.

Why the accusations on LC then in your posts?

Ok, I want to know. I feel left out and everyone knows I want to vote LC all the time. Let ME know!!!!

Epignosis wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:Why the accusations on LC then in your posts?

Loaded questions are for children who hit their siblings and need something stronger than a yes/no question to be tricked.

If you don't get my meaning, then please point me to these accusations in my posts.

Why do you hit your siblings? Offhanded accusations are easy to make and pointless. Take a stand, be a man.

Violence is never the answer.

Epignosis wrote:Posting this here in case rabbit is playing the fun card to get people to forget about the business card.

I'm never easy to forget. Neither is anything I do.

Epignosis wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:Violence is never the answer.

I have a vote that says otherwise.

What a strange reply.