The Syndicate

Game on!

DrWilgy wrote:Turned on! Er... I'm a Doctor!


So, general rule I would like everyone to follow. Treat your vote as if it isn't changeable.

Our Don's don't want to vote around very much because of the traitor yes? Let's not make it easy for the police to spot who is hesitant to vote.

DrWilgy

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:So Zebra, you think Wilgy is wrong or did you vote just to piss him off?

I think it's a scheme. I think he knows he is wrong.

Not really, I just wanted to piss him off.

Did you two miss this?

a2thezebra wrote:Not really, I just wanted to piss him off.

Golden wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:Did you two miss this?

a2thezebra wrote:Not really, I just wanted to piss him off.

How does that minimise what you said the very post before? "I think he knows he's wrong".

lol what part of "not really" do you not understand?

I agree with DDL that this should be discussed.

Enrique, why did you hop on my joke vote?

Enrique wrote:

k

Long Con wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Civilians

I'm sorry, but I can't handle this. I'll save you the trouble, but please fix it! I know I'm a pain in the ass.

Civilians

You're civ.

Long Con wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I have been known to have a snifter of brandy around the holidays.

International Women's Day is on March 8th... and I hope to see you on Friday March 10th for World Kidney Day!

a2thezebra wrote:Enrique, why did you hop on my joke vote?

Looks like we have some gen-u-wine suspicion goin' on here! Zebra, baddie or Civvie, what's your history of savage attacks on Day 1 actions?

Don't know, don't care. In any case, that's not a savage attack.

RadicalFuzz wrote:Refusal to elaborate on a lynch vote isn't enough for a lynch? I disagree, Luffy. Saying "X should be dead" and not explaining the why is either poor play that needs to be pruned or intentional manipulation of mob mentality to keep motives for X's death hidden. I don't like it.

Or it's to gauge reactions of the "X should be dead" statement, to fish for baddie opportunism or manipulation. I'm not sure that it's that but keep the possibility open.

Epignosis wrote:

agleaminranks wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I'm taking my vote off Long Con. I wouldn't want anyone to think that I suspect him.

agleaminranks, come say something.

Hiii, I'm trying to catch up on the posts so far. I didn't get a chance to read through it yet because I just started my new job today as an afterschool math and physics tutor. I'll have something solid to go on in the next few hours hopefully~

Damn, that was fast.

What are you implying?

Epignosis wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

agleaminranks wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I'm taking my vote off Long Con. I wouldn't want anyone to think that I suspect him.

agleaminranks, come say something.

Hiii, I'm trying to catch up on the posts so far. I didn't get a chance to read through it yet because I just started my new job today as an afterschool math and physics tutor. I'll have something solid to go on in the next few hours hopefully~

Damn, that was fast.

What are you implying?

I'm not implying anything. What I said was explicit. I told gleam to say something and gleam did. Hence "Damn, that was fast."

What did you think I was implying?

That it was too fast for comfort.

Hey, at least there's no Day 0. When there's a Day 0 with such frequent posting you have people that never catch up.

Serge wrote:Hello everyone, I'm Serge.

The traitor thing could theoretically work if everyone votes for everyone in the first day but how would that even be noticed by the moderators? Would we need to post our votes in the thread for this to kick in?

The effect of this would eventually level the playing field of both families if it works out, but still a traitor in the family could be an advantage or a disadvantage that could turn the tide.

Logistics of setting and executing this up is improbable, so I think it won't work.

With the numbers between the families I think we should first focus on scumhunting.

You're civ.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Serge wrote:Hello everyone, I'm Serge.

The traitor thing could theoretically work if everyone votes for everyone in the first day but how would that even be noticed by the moderators? Would we need to post our votes in the thread for this to kick in?

The effect of this would eventually level the playing field of both families if it works out, but still a traitor in the family could be an advantage or a disadvantage that could turn the tide.

Logistics of setting and executing this up is improbable, so I think it won't work.

With the numbers between the families I think we should first focus on scumhunting.

You're civ.

Why?

Gut. Mafia doesn't tend to open with a post like that. It's possible, but I doubt it.

It's a nice day, isn't it?

From now on, I am the only one who decides whether or not Diiny should be lynched.

Not really.

These are some tough calls.

thellama73 wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:These are some tough calls.

Fluff. The illusion of participation. Come on zebra, you're better than that.

It's not the illusion of anything, that's a pretty transparent fluff post.

Ask me something and you shall receive answers.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:Ask me something and you shall receive answers.

Will you survive beyond Night 3?

If I continue this low-key approach, I would be surprised if I didn't. However, I don't intend to continue this low-key approach, so probably not.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Zebra, where did the poll go?

I don't know.

RadicalFuzz wrote:Zebra what is your general strategy going to be in this game?

That information is classified.

thellama73 wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:Ask me something and you shall receive answers.

Who are you voting for? Who are six people you won't vote for?

If I say who I'm voting for, it might not be as effective as if I were to just vote for him/her without making a post about it. Although, despite them saying that it's more effective going about it that way (even though they made a vote post while saying this, not following through with what they claim to believe) my silent vote on them yesterday wasn't mentioned by anyone, including that very person. However, the poll is nowhere to be found...

Six People I Won't Vote For:

sig
Dragon D. Luffy
DrWilgy
S~V~S
Mongoose
Matt

I also won't vote for anyone with under ten posts.

sig wrote:Why Gleam?

@Zebra why wouldn't you vote for me?

You're one of my strongest civ reads.

I don't see how agleaminranks is suspicious to anyone.

If someone could explain to me how agleaminranks is being disingenuous, I would love to hear it.

In the meantime, I need to get my game over at RYM started. I'll return tomorrow and I await your responses.

Voting ika because gleam is civ.

Sloonei wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:Voting ika because gleam is civ.

why are you settling for just these two options?

I'm not, town is. But I hope that changes before the day is over, because it's not a vote that I like.

S~V~S wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Quin wrote:I am curious as to why you would label me as 'Under the radar', though. I feel like I've been in the thick of things since the beginning.

Under the radar may have nothing to do with what you're doing, at least directly. If nobody is talking about you (as you just pointed out recently), that's also flying under the radar.

To me having no real opinions counts as flying low. Quin is not flying low, IMO.

I strongly agree. This is a pretty big game so can be under the radar without flying under the radar, you dig?

I love Epi but he's bad.

What I mean is that I'm not suspecting him because of his play style, I'm suspecting him based on gut.

RadicalFuzz wrote:Do you disagree with their assessments?

I do.

Matt wrote: Linki - Hi Zeebs! We haven't sparred yet so far. What do you think of Supatown MVP Golden not having any suspects, omgusing me, then layin' low for the rest of the phase?

I think you're misrepresenting as usual. But you do this regardless of alignment so I don't feel like sparring with you over it.

Sloonei wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

RadicalFuzz wrote:Do you disagree with their assessments?

I do.

How so?

I've suspected him since early on in the game. I feel like the assessments that his meta is off are either to justify similar gut reads or are simply disingenuous, because meta-wise I don't see anything out of the ordinary for him in this game.

Enrique wrote:ika are you a baddie?

Are you?

Serge, you just put ika in the lead over an Epi lynch.

Fucking Xanatos.

ika wrote:

Enrique wrote:ika are you a baddie?

I wish i was. i might have more fun then

I hope you don't die, ika. My biggest pet peeve with this community is our tendency to kill off newbies the first day of their first game.

WE DON'T KNOW THIS PERSON! THEIR BEHAVIOR MUST BE INDICATIVE OF BADDIENESS! SOMEHOW!

I voted for Epi yesterday too.

Both the gleam and ika wagons are highly suspicious/dubious.

Enrique wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Enrique wrote:ika are you a baddie?

Are you?

A lot has happened since I last visited this thread...very recently.

sig wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Enrique wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Enrique wrote:ika are you a baddie?

Are you?

Yo zebra, what do you think of this sudden Fuzz wagon? You should vote for Ike.

I also really dislike Silvers insists to only lynch Fuzz even though she never once mentioned him yet know this is a good scum wagon?

Silver doesn't want an ika lynch, I think it's that simple. Why should I vote for ika? I think they're civ. I'm neutral on Fuzz which isn't better enough to make me vote for them. I'm staying on Epi for now.

linki - I would like to know this as well, sig. Why is an ika lynch preferable to a Fuzz lynch?

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:Fucking Xanatos.

Xanatos is awesome.

He really is.

If there's anyone like me that isn't feeling good about either an ika or a Fuzz lynch, please switch your vote to Epi.

I'm gut-reading him as a baddie.

Epignosis wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:If there's anyone like me that isn't feeling good about either an ika or a Fuzz lynch, please switch your vote to Epi.

a2thezebra

There. You finally got a reaction.

I mean you said it was a more effective approach, but I only got my reaction after calling attention to it. :P

sig wrote: Linki: I dislike the speed of this wagon I dislike how quicly everyone jumped on it, I dislike both Silver's and Ikas posts. The lack of good reasoning and the fact no one ever voiced anything about fuzz until know.

But does the Fuzz wagon being suspect make ika automatically bad?

Sloonei wrote:

RadicalFuzz wrote:Silver where did I say I wouldn't vote for ika?

With that constraint I'm not sure Sloonei. I suppose the players I would like to see last-minute bandwagoned are all easy targets.

Luffy you also asked me for reads. Context is important.

The whole game is on the line from your perspective and you can't name a single other suspect?

If he was a baddie, don't you think he would pretend like he suspected more people in this situation?

Epignosis wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:If there's anyone like me that isn't feeling good about either an ika or a Fuzz lynch, please switch your vote to Epi.

a2thezebra

There. You finally got a reaction.

I mean you said it was a more effective approach, but I only got my reaction after calling attention to it. :P

I knew what you were doing. I was just being stubborn.

I figured.