The Syndicate

Golden, can we please search~

bea wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:So say we all.

S~V~S wrote:How horrible

He wanted to die, and now he was rezzed? He is a rezzed baddie?

So say we all.

What makes you think he was rezzed as a baddie?

Isn't that role, Sharon Agaton,a baddie? She's a Cylon, right?

there were 2 number 8s at the beginning - boomer and athena. boomer was a human who had the cylon switch fliped - and though before it fliped she was human, once the switch fliped she sided cylon.

Athena was a cylon that knew she was model 8 cylon who ended up being the replacement for the hole boomer left in the fleet. If there were *any* cylon I could think would be civ it'd be Athena.

linki - @ Rico -how else would you have me do it?

I'm about done for tonight - I know I have very little to do early tomorrow but my catsup will be the same.

Yeah, I started watching the series last night;I had tried before but only made a few episodesinand hadno idea what I was watching. I think I will have to buckup & buy the mini series though, a lot happened apparently before season 1, it waskind if like starting in the middle of a story. Had I not known about it from *this game* I would have been pretty perplexed by teh multiple Sharons. Even knowing it, I got their plotlines a bit mixed up.

@OA, I know your voting reason was in someone elses post, but I wanted to hear it from you. Look at it this way; I feel pretty good about Polo, and you voted him not giving a reason in your vote post in a thread with a billion posts over a holiday weekend, and when I look it up all I see is a spat you had with him over puzzle solving. I am not sure why you think that makes him bad. That is why I asked. Vague vote in insane thread is double vague. It stood out to me so I questioned it.

Hopefully with the holiday weekend gone, we can settle into a more normal game routine.

Post game it is fair game, but ongoing is not, imo. If you avoid mentioning it specifically, like say "I have see X do this when bad"; without saying where you saw it, that should be fine, though.

indiglo wrote:@ SVS

Your mission this morning, should you choose to accept it is to send Kat and Hot Dog on a sortie at 5:49am EST. If you choose to continue our original checkerboard pattern, go with sector B2.


You also have many other sector options. Take a look at the grid below, you may choose a random sector that tickles or fancy, or start a diagonal off one of the other blue sectors.

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6
B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6
E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6

@Rico~ when Indi posted this she said pattern or not as we please. I went with the pattern, but if any of the sectors was an "8" I might have deviated. Deviation will keep it from being predictable if the cylons know where the ship is. I thought we worked this out yesterday?

ebwop, also I can take 5:49 AM posts most weekdays. I would know the night before if I can't.

Epignosis wrote:Please vote for me. I do not want to be in the game anymore.

Sunday 11:13 PM

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:VOTE EPIGNOSIS

I think he'd be a better lynch than Ricochet, and it might just be for the best under the circumstances anyway. I really hate the way this EOD has worked out.

His vote 4 minutes later, 11:17 PM

When Epi was then lynched & revealed, in retrospect, I thought that maybe he WANTED to be lynched becasue he knew he would come back & be revealed a friendly Cylon

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

S~V~S wrote:When Epi was then lynched & revealed, in retrospect, I thought that maybe he WANTED to be lynched becasue he knew he would come back & be revealed a friendly Cylon

Is that to imply that you think Epi wanted to self-reveal as a good guy or as the appearance of a good guy?

I wasn't sure. His reaction to being rezzed 15 minutes after asking to be lynched was:

Epignosis wrote:Did the post actually say So say we all?

I'm not sure.

at 11:28

then

Epignosis wrote:I'm in it for the long haul. If you want to lynch me Day 2 is up to you.

at 11:29.

At that stage I thought he was a rezzed cylon baddie, and then the show lore people stepped in to explain the character.

So I went from one (bad) to the other extreme (potentially good) but still kind of thought he knew he was coming back. For someone who was just asking to be lynched 15 minutes ago, his reaction to living was not what I expected. With everything else I doubt there is a Seemer, so I am thinking he is actually not bad.

Golden wrote:You have found and destroyed a resurrection ship in square B2. Hot Dog and Kat have returned alive.

Yay!! Also yay that Hot Dog & Kat returned alive

And yeah, "A" ship, plus like someone said, the event would have ended.

@Nero,I kinda did get a rough start. But so did a lot of people with the Holiday weekend. I think I am getting my feet back under me.

Right now I am still looking at G Man who is amusing but not saying too much. Also plan on rereading Nutella in wake of JJJs case. Hoping to hear more from Glorfindel & Faraday, too.

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote:When Epi was then lynched & revealed, in retrospect, I thought that maybe he WANTED to be lynched becasue he knew he would come back & be revealed a friendly Cylon

I can assure you that wasn't the case. I was initially indignant about taking votes for the "reasons" ( ) I was taking them, and then later I was bowing out. I had no expectation of returning.

OK, cool. It just struck me at the time, so when I saw JJJ say that about you wanting to take votes I knew just what he meant. Also keep in mind that this impression came at a time when I assumed all cylons were bad. Up to thatvpoint, people were calling people "toasters"; no one had said there might be GOOD toasters.

You just seemed so upset over the direction the conversation was going, and then 15 minutes later, you were "meh". But everyone who knows the canon says you are a good toaster.

Matt wrote:Nero, do you still think "something is off" with SVS?

Also, speaking of SVS, was that her who named "B2" or was that someone else? Either way, good job!

Thanks, but I just took the assigned square.

Was this Drumbeats original pattern?

Matt wrote:

juliets wrote:

Matt wrote:

juliets wrote:I want to hear what nutella has to say about JJJ's and others points before I make up my mind.

In the meantime, who you lookin' at?

What are you thoughts on the following players...

SVS?

Polo?

Drumbeats?

OA?

Right now I read SVS and Drumbeats as civ and I read OA and Polo neutral. As I said in my earlier post I am trying to find someone who pings me. So far nobody is standing out. I need to do some iso's to see what I can dig up. And, I'm waiting for nutella's replay to JJJ so I know both sides of the story.

I'm wondering if SVS and Drum are connected somehow, not saying they are evil, but connected.

Hrm.

Zeebs, when you catch up, do you know Obscure from back in the day?

No, I just followed the pattern. I asked that becasue I recall people thinking he might be sabotaging us with a rigid pattern, that's all. I don't think he is. I am not connected to Drum.

EBWOP I don't think Zeebs played at RM or STV, did she? If she did it was a different name.

I also posted a post or two later that Imixed up Drum with Nero. HE had me on his lit.

Matt wrote:

Glorfindel wrote: So Say We All!

As much as I'm struggling with this game, I am enjoying very much the challenging theories you are proposing. I'm not fully caught up yet but in relation to your comments above, from my reading of things Gaius Baltar (Human) fills the detective role in this game and can determine whether any given player is either Human or Cylon. The detective role is from my experience, exclusively a Town role. Apart from the possibility of a Human traitor, surely that suggests that the bulk of the Mafia team is indeed Cylon (not necessarily all of the Cylons either as I believe the situation with Epi evidences). Is it unreasonable to make this assumption? Otherwise, surely the detective role would be nothing but a farce

Hmm, you're probably right about that. I still think, almost above any other pairing from the show, that Gaius and Six may be connected in the game, so whoever brought up the possibility of them having a Lovers role would be right, I think.

Glorfy! I screamed and screamed at Golden for not allowing us to be Mafia mates like I asked in the sign up chat. He got a strong lecture, let me tell you!

Either Lovers, or possibly Marilyn MonRobot can recruit him? I have been doing ALOT of reading today,wikis etc. but I am not sure if that is possible in the story arc?

Silverwolf wrote:What you two are missing is Epi's attitude towards me since I started playing on this site.

"Real Epi" is a Sweetie; it's his game face that is abrasive. He is a nice guy with 3 little kids & Julius Ceasar bangs. Think of game face Epi as "Skeletor", and remember it is not really him, AND YOU are not the only person who has felt that way about him Totally not personal, I can vouch for that.

And yeah, I have to agree with your point that ika was an odd NK. He could have been almost guaranteed to steer/distract the thread today, so what would be the point in killing him?

I have a slow after noon at work today, so I should have plenty of time to reread cases and sort out my thoughts,maybe do some GTH.

And @Daisy, I think Indi just felt one person running the search & coordinating was important so she started doing it.

That should be green, and Caesar is spelled wrong

G-Man, thank you for this; you are someone I have never seen as tentative, so your initial lack of being willing to commit to an opinion had me worried.

POSSIBLY MAFIA
Black Rock
Glorfindel
Long Con
LoRab
Metalmarsh89
Nutella
Spacedaisy

I think BR is probably civ; she said something to me, asked me a very pointed question, when I assumed Epi being a Cylon made him bad. I don't see bad BR asking pointed questions. I think Glorfindel, not unlike yourself, has been rather tentative. That seems more in character with him, but he is definitely a question mark for me. LC I always think is bad, but I liked the case on him. Plus as someone that I know appreciates a good plan, his gleeful wrench throwing seemed a bit "evil" glee rather than "just for fun" kind of glee. Same for Nutella, really~ I always think she is bad. I recall little from MM, even though he is a top 10 poster. So I want to reread him. I have little recollection of LoRabs posts, either. Hrm.

NEUTRAL READ
a2thezebra
bea
JaggedJimmyJay
juliets
Matt
Nerolunar
Polo
Ricochet
sig

G Man, I have moved you to this group. I liked Ricos point about Zebra, BEA WHERE ARE YOUR OPINIONS?

I lean civ on JJJ, I doubt he would come into the thread and announce he was going to play differently if he was bad. Matt is barely derping at all, I think he is supatown. Juliets, also null. I think Polo seems townier to me than not, but "I SAID OLYMPIC CARRIER" is not helping him. We know, Polo, you totally did. I feel better about Rico since he started making more pointed, Rico-y posts. Sig no clue.

POSSIBLY CIVVIE
DrumBeats
Epignosis
Indiglo
ObscureAllure
S~V~S
Silverwolf

I have no problem with this group. OA definitely made me feel better with her at me for mentioning her. I disagree with her re Polo, but in Mafia games "so say we all" is rather rare.

NO READ YET
DFaraday
inawordyes
Scotty
SokothQultuq
Vompatti

I think if Vomps was bad he would have totally Ninjaed the rotation. Plus I think he has not had one on topic post. Leaning civ. Faraday leaning bad more than neutral; he keeps making "OMG SO BEHIND" remarks but they all have a little nugget in them that implies he has, in fact, read. IAWY no idea. Is her here or not?

Inawordyes wrote:@Silverwolf, Ika

A quick side point, but judging my scum meta to be that I'm a no-show inactive lurker because I couldn't be here for the last game is not a fair assessment to read me as scum in this game just because the same IRL circumstances are playing a part here too. How active I am is not alignment-indicative, especially at the moment where I can't be as active as I used to, and if that's the was the crux of your whole scumread argument on me D1, it's a bad one.

he said in one of his other posts that he read the flips, but here he talks to ika who is dead? And activity level is definitely a tell for some people and no one here really knows his Meta. I think Glorfindel knows him? Glorfindel, any thoughts on him, if so?

I lean civ on Scotty. KlingonGuy has not said much re suspects, but I love this post:

SokothQultuq wrote:No hidden meaning. I was just poking fun. 8-) As for suspecting anyone... I'm not sure how your supposed to get a feel that sort of thing yet. I'm reading along and spotting little hints about peoples potential characters but outside of this there is nothing to justify that anyone is any particular person and therefore its hard to make an educated decision. Most of you have played together for some time based on the banter and have a clue about how each of you react so it kind of puts the noob in the room at a disadvantage. LOL

Based on certain people's actions and reactions I've yet to see anyone do anything outright damaging. Some people who were quick to assist are suspect to me sometimes but that is difficult to gauge because normal people would be helpful. I think I've got a read on at least two peoples background characters based on activity, paranoia, and mentions of Heath Issues assuming that was not intended as a RL outburst which it could have been.

I find it very difficult to point a finger without enough evidence to say that they are a baddie or a goodie. I do think it odd to encourage voting for players who've not yet participated though. Especially coming off a holiday weekend. Giving it a couple of days would yield better results to see how they jump in. But that is my humble read of the current situation.

But I hope to see him jump in sooner rather than later.

After more reading, I will qualify some of this more.

Linki~ Yay Bea & 34,675,243,480 linkitis

indiglo wrote:Re - Does it matter who sends in the sortie? I don't imagine it would have to be a non-cylon to have a successful sortie. Ont he show, there were Cylons involved in destroying the Rezz Hub, and other cylons. But SVS did do a boss job, and she said she can do most 5:49am calls... so she may end up doing quite a few!



@ Zeebs, are you not going to be around at EoD? So needed to vote now?



Oh linki~

Do you need me tomorrow 5:49 AM? I can do it, Friday AM, too if you need me to. I can't do any 11:49 PMs and I can't commit for sure at work, my boss may actually want me to work at 11:49 AM, lol.

a2thezebra wrote:

bea wrote:why for the rico vote zeebs? I feel pretty good about him - what are you seeing that I'm not?

He's trying too hard.

I thought he was trying hard since he was taking early accusations of not trying enough?

a2thezebra wrote:

nutella wrote:Oh, I misremembered, only OA talked about zebra, zebra never responded. I was thinking of Zebra's odd vote for BR -- I don't think she ever acknowledged that BR had in fact posted before then, and she never conceded to others' (including myself) claims that BR tends to be quiet at first.

Looking at her ISO, I do in fact get an odd vibe from zebra, right from the start with her gung-ho "hey matt let's chat" and general eager, almost flippant tone. She participates in the "could some cylons be good"/win condition debate and I actually agree with everything she said on that topic, but otherwise I don't feel great about her. She also said "don't lynch me because I'm town" verbatim two separate times, unprompted, here and here. Does she usually do that? It feels off to me.

nutella wrote: If anyone's ignoring suspicions against her it's Zebra. I made a post about her last night and she hasn't acknowledged it, and she continues to post in her odd, spontaneous, minimalist manner, barely responding to anything. I found it strange just now how she said she would vote for BR, was told that BR had responded, asked/said she would look for the response and reassess, and then spontaneously voted for Ricochet before even seeing BR's responses. She didn't give a reason for her sudden vote on Ricochet and when asked she said he was "trying too hard" and explained that a bit more, but her vote post just felt so out of the blue.

I will most likely be voting for Zebra today. I would like to see her respond to this and my earlier post about her.

I don't know if this is what I'm supposed to be obligated to respond to or not since you haven't asked me any questions or anything. Um...I disagree? You haven't mentioned anything about my behavior this game with either of these posts that I feel is alignment-indicative for any player, so I don't have anything to deny or clarify. I find it a little suspicious that your focus is on me for elements that are consistent with my play style regardless of alignment.

These two quotes you post look like she is looking for a reason to vote for you, manufacturing a suspicion, to look like she has one.

The first one especially, "Well she talked about this non-suspish topic, and I totally agree with her, but otherwise, meh".

More than anything this makes me want to vote for her.

Ricochet wrote:So first of all, status on past suspects:

zebra - lynch candidate. Stuff that made me wary from Day One heightened by pattern of what she might try to pull when bad. Late show up toDay only to moodswing from insisting to the same candidate she had a Day ago to me. Her two votes now stand as "vote for a player with no activity, because I know that's the meta of that player when it has no/low activity" and "vote for a player for tryhardism, because I know that's what I'd do". Weaksauces all around.

MetalMarsh89 - gives me the impression of being more focused and preocuppied during Night One, compared to having to plow through banter and reasonless votes during the two Day phases so far. For the life of me, I can't find this trustworthy. FoS

SVS - suss matter from previous Day seems defused, in which at least in one half of the story we seemed to arrived to some idea that it was all strange interpretation, nevertheless I haven't quite completely shaken the feeling of her knitting me into a lynch, with misrepresentation thrown in the mix and everything, and I don't remember her actually ever addressing that part eloquently. If this is perhaps on a personal interaction level, on a game level, I had to resort to ISO, because I didn't remember seeing her post much or any major input in her posts, and indeed her Day Two looks sparse, reads are sparse, except when she rather made use of G-Man's list to cover everyone herself in at least a few mentions. Don't know what to make of this. I'd somewhat have expectations of a more resolute SVS, even at this stage already, with at least one or two elaborated leads. I'd keep the FoS on her as well.

oh my frak so much linki

I "used" his list because I had also suspected him, and I was pleased to see him post reads. So easier to use an existing list than make my own.

Any opinon on Nutella or LC?

Linki, but I have known her for a looong time Zebra. I know I tend to think that she is bad, but that looks like grasping at straws Nutella to me.

Black Rock wrote:So say we all

Epignosis wrote:

Black Rock wrote:I voted for Marmot because I don't like his game. I would have voted Epig out of Mercy but he will have enough. I hope he's bad. I just don't see it.

I'm not. But this game is crazy.

Indeed. I'm not even sure if we have a mafia team.

SVS, what would make you ask if he was rezzed a baddie?

If by show, several of the humans are the final five in the show and Cylons.

Athena was Cylon but not evil.

That is in respnse to several linkis

@bea, this is why I don't think BR is bad. She asked me this question less than a minute after my original reaction post.

If she was bad, I think she would not have asked a direct question like this of me. I always want to hear more from her, but I don't think she is bad.

Why do you? What am I missing?

Also Hi Wilgy

Linki, @ Wilgy, he was blendy. I felt sketchy about him, tbh.

My vote is Nutella. LC sounds more sincere to me in his defenses, although that whole evil glee thing still nags at me. I think Rico v. Zeeb may be civ/civ, so I prefer not to vote there. But the tip point for me was her feint at Zebra. It did not feel to me like Nutella believed it. I also thnk her posts re ika/Epi did not feel sincere to me.

*Voting Nutella*

linki @ bea, I feel similarly re trust, but trusting someone =/= following their suspicions.

@sig~ this is the best case. I feel that her subsequent responses & reactions to suspicion feels insincere to me.

Golden has replaced this quote with a link to the post that was quoted.

Wow, I did not spoiler it, I just quoted it :O

http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... la#p274912

Here's a link, sig, sorry. Not sure how that happened.

Polo wrote:I think I'll abstain from voting tonight. There's a lot of stuff going on and I don't think I can isolate everyone in time for the vote, but I'll give it a try.

LoRab wrote:LA's latest posts are not feeling so good to me. She is starting to feel cornered baddie.

She is putting me in mind of her game in Recruitment. That same "Anyone but me" thing.

@Golden, I will not quote it again, sorry

I already voted, bea.

nutella wrote:

LoRab wrote:LA's latest posts are not feeling so good to me. She is starting to feel cornered baddie.

I am neither cornered nor a baddie I'm afraid I'll get lynched for basically the same reasons I do in almost every game, it's really frustrating at this point but I don't know what to do since no matter how or what I post people seem to read it as suspicious.

linki @ SVS I have no memory of how I played in recruitment (I assume you're talking about the latest one) and I don't know what you mean by "anyone but me" but I swear I'm just innocent and clueless this game.

linki @ bea: I might still vote for zebra even though I feel less strongly about her, but I kind of think I'll be voting more out of self preservation at this point and she has some votes to compete with those on me anyway. I'd rather not vote LC but if it ends up being a choice between voting him and getting lynched myself I'll do it. I'll wait as close to the end as I can though (without missing it this time )

Yes, the most recent recruitment where you were bad.

You know what, I meant A world Reborn, not Recruitment. You were bad in that one, too. It was posts like this your last day, as you were taking suspcion:

nutella wrote:I'm kind of lost as to who I want to vote for today, in both groups. I could see myself voting for Bubbles, I guess. I'm still waffling on Sig -- sometimes I really want to agree with Golden that it's a weak bandwagon, and sometimes I really find him suspicious. In group 2 I could also see voting for Luke or maybe HB.

nutella wrote:

juliets wrote:I have gone back and looked at Matt's case on nutella. Basically, though nutella contributed during the day it took her only 8 minutes to decide to throw her vote on Sorsha. This is ironic because at the same time she said she wanted to give Bubbles a chance to respond to the allegations against her. Why not, then, let Sorsha have an opportunity to respond? In addition, there was a 4 - 4 - 4 tie on Dom, Bugla and Banana. She avoided getting involved in that tie vote.

I would like to hear what Epi and Golden say about their thoughts on nutella. I might consider her as an alternative to sig since i have Epi, HamBoy, Golden, TH all saying I am not reading sig correctly in the genuineness of his sincerity and I don't know him at all.

juliets wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

juliets wrote:Epi I missed your post while I was posting. Since there is no case would you mind sharing your thoughts on why you voted nutella? I am looking for a good reason to pull my vote off of sig since so many of you think I am misreading him.

I think it would be better if you read nutella and decided for yourself. Why must your reason for voting sig, or nutella, or anybody else come from another person?

There is no reason my reason has to come from anyone else. You have been trying to convince me not to vote sig and I thought you might be helpful in finding an alternative.

@nutella - I have read through your posts several times and I don't see a response as to why you gave Bubbles a chance to respond but you didn't give Sorsha a chance. I see the part where you voted Sorsha first and then saw the Bubbles comment but that still doesn't answer the question as to why not give Sorsha the same chance you were giving Bubbles.

Once again you are misinterpreting my comment on Bubbles, and ignoring my explanation of the timing of my Day 1 posts. At the time that I quickly read Sorsha's posts and decided to vote for her, there was about half an hour left on the poll and I had to leave before then, so I could not stick around for her response. The Bubbles comment pinged me, but not nearly as strongly as Sorsha's posts had, so by saying I would wait for Bubbles' response I meant I would wait UNTIL THE NEXT DAY to pursue her further, since there wasn't enough time left and I had to run. My ping on Sorsha was strong enough at the time to go ahead and vote for her, and I knew it wouldn't actually have an effect on the lynch but I often use my Day 1 vote as a symbolic indication of my strongest suspicion.

You're comparing two things which in my mind are not comparable. I couldn't give Sorsha time to respond because I had to vote right then. I was not even considering voting for Bubbles that day, I was merely recording that it was an interesting point and I looked forward to her response for the next day.

Matt F wrote:nutella, splints, Sorsha - Do you plan on keeping your votes on Bubbles in Group 1 even though it looks like she'll already be lynched in Group 2?

I mean, it looks like I have the most votes in group 1 so if someone else gets a couple more I would change it Also I'm not sure if what Tranq said is right or if two players will get lynched. I hope he's right because otherwise it looks like I'll be lynched (for very weak, if any, reasoning ) but I had assumed both groups would have a lynch.



Dom, Sorsha, care to give reasoning for your votes? I'd like to be given a chance to defend and perhaps change your minds. Lots of incorrect assumptions have been made about my posts and I just want to know what your reasoning is.

You have the same feel tome, you sound the same. Unspirited. You seem to be fighting back yet resigned at the same time, if that makes sense?

I am sorry if I am wrong, but you sound just the same to me.

LC, are you trying to get lynched?

S~V~S wrote:LC, are you trying to get lynched?

You basically dared Epi to vote for you, and then made a fairly early vote that does nothing to save you.

Long Con wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

S~V~S wrote:LC, are you trying to get lynched?

You basically dared Epi to vote for you, and then made a fairly early vote that does nothing to save you.

I don't think Epi will vote for me. He doesn't think I'm bad.

So you are not trying to get lynched?

Long Con wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Long Con wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

S~V~S wrote:LC, are you trying to get lynched?

You basically dared Epi to vote for you, and then made a fairly early vote that does nothing to save you.

I don't think Epi will vote for me. He doesn't think I'm bad.

So you are not trying to get lynched?

No, I am stating sig and JJJ as my top suspicions. I already said, please don't lynch me. Let Gaius check me tonight.

So you are not answering my question? Why didn't you vote to save yourself? You are not acting like someone trying to not die. You are acting like someone trying to goad people into voting for him.

Long Con wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Long Con wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Long Con wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

S~V~S wrote:LC, are you trying to get lynched?

You basically dared Epi to vote for you, and then made a fairly early vote that does nothing to save you.

I don't think Epi will vote for me. He doesn't think I'm bad.

So you are not trying to get lynched?

No, I am stating sig and JJJ as my top suspicions. I already said, please don't lynch me. Let Gaius check me tonight.

So you are not answering my question? Why didn't you vote to save yourself? You are not acting like someone trying to not die. You are acting like someone trying to goad people into voting for him.

I'm just crazy ol' LC, S~V~S. No goading, I don't think enough people are convinced I'm bad to vote for me anyway. If you want to catch a baddie, or even a Cylon, then don't vote for me. It's so simple! I'm going out to buy diapers now.

You're trying to get lynched.

Epignosis wrote:I've made a deal with Long Con, and unless he accepts, my vote goes to him. I'm sorry.

He's trying to get lynched. I think he is not gonna die. There could be civvie reasons for this,but if he were a civvie I doubt he would play them up. He is egging people on, he made a vote that could not save him when he had the most votes, or the second most votes.

He wants to be lynched.

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I've made a deal with Long Con, and unless he accepts, my vote goes to him. I'm sorry.

He's trying to get lynched. I think he is not gonna die. There could be civvie reasons for this,but if he were a civvie I doubt he would play them up. He is egging people on, he made a vote that could not save him when he had the most votes, or the second most votes.

He wants to be lynched.

What happens if he gets lynched? Does he flip or not?

I have no clue. But it seems to me that he wants to be lynched. Have you ever seen LC not vote to save himself? He's taking votes, and he swoops in and instead of schmoozing people or fighting back, he pokes JJJ & you with sticks, and makes a tangent vote?

linki, sarcasm ftw, "I like how" is always said with a raised eyebrow

Black Rock, do you think LC could be trying to get lynched, or do I much too much tinfoil?

ebwop, *munch* toomuch tinfoil

Well, if I am going to make that 5:49 I need to go to walk the dog & go to bed. Or walk my dog & come back, lol., to see what BR says about my theory.

Linki @ sif, I think EPi is probably a nice cylon. The kind that pets your dog without squishing his head... much. Becasue Golden has specified where he HAS veered from lore, like in the identities of the Final Five, I think that for the most part he has stuck to canon. I have not gone far in the series, but i have been spending tons of time in the Wikis.

Matt wrote:Epi and Black Rock, follow Marmot!

No,vote Nutella

Long Con wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Long Con wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Long Con wrote:But why? Why can't you just leave me alone?

Why can't you just leave me alone?

I need a declaration from you before I can help you.

I trust you the most out of any Cylon I have met.

That isn't good enough. I want to save you.

Maybe I don't need saving.

This is what I have been saying.

So,Bea, you found Lorab MORE suspect than Nutella who had votes,and was suspect for similar reasons?

sig wrote:That nutella portion of your post was very fencey Daisy.

Yeah, "I have no clue, but Nutella isn't bad".

Linki @ bea~ did you miss this?

S~V~S wrote:So,Bea, you found Lorab MORE suspect than Nutella who had votes,and was suspect for similar reasons?

Did Scotty post his vote?

sig wrote:all these last minute votes on nutella are worrying to me.

Though I really dislike Glorfs vote for LC.

Well, let's see how it goes. If Nutella flips bad, I don't see how Daisy is civ. A few other votes would worry me too.

Long Con wrote:

sig wrote:all these last minute votes on nutella are worrying to me.

Though I really dislike Glorfs vote for LC.

What mad that more people aren't voting for you? :P

Holy SHit! Thats a cylon! I had to look at the roles, lol!!

So say we all, crap I screwed up.

Night all, I will see you at 5:49

Nutella