The Syndicate

So are we gonna lynch Juliets today or nah?

Sorsha wrote:
Dom wrote:So are we gonna lynch Juliets today or nah?
That was my plan. I am fine with a Floyd lynch too though.

I'd rather lynch Mac before Floyd.

Mac-- list everyone you think is "scum"

You must be up to 10 or 11+ people by now.

MacDougall wrote:
Dom wrote:Mac-- list everyone you think is "scum"

You must be up to 10 or 11+ people by now.

What is there to gain by this barbed comment?

I believe juliets and wilgy are scum.

I have no other reads.

I rescind my suspicion of sorsha.

Why do you cause conflict every time you post?

MacDougall wrote:
Dom wrote:
MacDougall wrote:
Dom wrote:Mac-- list everyone you think is "scum"

You must be up to 10 or 11+ people by now.

What is there to gain by this barbed comment?

I believe juliets and wilgy are scum.

I have no other reads.

I rescind my suspicion of sorsha.
Why do you cause conflict every time you post?
Dom, you clearly don't like me personally and that's fine I probably deserve your vitriol for calling you names earlier which I already apologised for but don't necessarily deserve an acceptance.

I do not cause conflict with every post, or at the very least I do not intend to. I don't think it's fair to say that I do that either.

I've already explained why I have been playing the way I have played up until now, and it was very recently. Perhaps you should read my recent few posts on the subject again.

I never once implicated I don't like you personally. I just think you're bad.
Over and over again, you sidestep questions that are directed at you and create a new situation out of it. This is an example. another is when I asked you who you suspect, and you responded with a question and a list of two people-- yet you call someone scum every day.
So-- why do you seek to sidestep questions directed at you?

lol bye

MacDougall wrote:Team Floyd:

Dom
Timmer

Team Juliets:

Tranq +
1 of Draconus or DFaraday

I'll take a look in detail when I have a moment. Just leaving work.

EL OH EL
I literally just asked you who you were suspicious of and the only name that you listed that is also here is Juliets.
I couldn't take you less seriously if I tried.

MacDougall wrote:
Dom wrote:Dfaraday-- why Floyd?

I'm more interested in Mac.

But i'd also like to lynch Juliets.

Dom wrote:
Sorsha wrote:
Dom wrote:So are we gonna lynch Juliets today or nah?
That was my plan. I am fine with a Floyd lynch too though.
I'd rather lynch Mac before Floyd.
Only two references to Floyd that Dom has. Just steering the suspicion away from him.

Because my opinion on Floyd is dependent on how you flip. I think you guys are potentially on a team.
You seriously are doing everything I just accused you of.

I think Timmer might have been misrepresented. I was gone during his almost-lynch and the leaders of that lynch no longer seem to support a Timmer lynch, so I won't either.

Mac, I was unaware that it couldn't be considered suspicious to consistently rotate your suspicion list like a rotisserie chicken.

S~V~S wrote:
Dom wrote:Mac, I was unaware that it couldn't be considered suspicious to consistently rotate your suspicion list like a rotisserie chicken.
All right, I am not 100% sure I agree with you here re Mac anymore, since he was the first person I started rereading, but this post made me actually laugh out loud for realsies (at work, not a good thing)

Just thought you might want to know

I'm glad.

What makes you back off Mac, though?

Turnip Head wrote:I would like to lynch juliets by a landslide today.

DFaraday wrote:
Golden wrote: Why do people think Floyd is bad?
Affinity for Luke, vote for Nutella, Tranq's convenient death, coached-sounding comments...

Although I am starting to think there may be something to the Juliets case, if for no other reason than she's somehow gotten out of being lynched despite being the top discussion point for this long. Still, I feel more strongly about Floyd.
I think Floyd's affinity for Luke stems from outside of the game where they are RL friends. In my opinion the case on Luke wasn't that strong in the first place so I'm not condemning Floyd for not voting for his buddy there. I think it would be a coincidence if they were teammates. I wouldn't call Tranq's death convenient for Floyd if it ended up making him a suspect... Tranq was really the only one on Floyd's case, and no one was listening to Tranq. You don't think it could be a setup?

Golden wrote:What do people think of Wilgy?
I think he looks bad for how cavalierly he moved his vote off of juliets in a close lynch. I think Bass looks just as bad for similar reasons, because he said Canuck and juliets were both worth lynching but chose Canuck over juliets with no added justification for doing so.

Which is why I think Juliets needs to go even more.

yipee!!

Turnip Head wrote:Matt, did you know Epi and I shared that same square the night I "died"?

My interaction with MM is just how I play against him, he is my shinigami bro. Do you think it's odd that I was looking at him after I came back and woke up in a square with him?

The truth is I don't know if anyone else was also in the area when I died. Do you know if anyone else was in the area when I died?

I would be very shocked if Epig was the Doc.

juliets wrote:Thank you LC and BR for another outstanding game. Your games just get better and better. And thanks to those of you who said goodbye in some way to me. I likely won't be in another game for awhile so have fun with the rest of this game and going forward.

I'm open to Floyd, Mac, or Wildgy maybe.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:My main beef with Bass is his posts during the Canuck vs juliets lynch. Here are his only two posts from that Day:

3:37pm
Bass_the_Clever wrote:Sorry haven't been around . I'm catching up now.

9:12pm
Bass_the_Clever wrote:I ag ree I think juliets and canuck are both wroth lynching but I think Canuck is where my vote is going tonight.
What pings me is that he didn't justify why he chose Canuck over juliets when the lynch was 8-5 in juliets' favor when he voted. If he had said why he voted that way I would feel better, but it looks like a save. If he thoughts juliets was worth lynching, why didn't he vote for the frontrunner? There's also a 6 hour gap between when he said he was catching up and when he voted with nothing in between, which makes it feel like he was intentionally trying to stay out of the discussion that Day.

He doesn't have any on-topic posts since that vote. He just votes in the night polls.

Basically I'd like to hear from Bass about why he voted the way he did.
I voted that way because more people I trusted voted that way and I wasn't keeping up as much as I should have been.

OK so you have people you trust?
So.. ergo.. you have people you don't trust... people you think are bad?
Who are they?

FS can you explain how your vote was out of self preservation when you have zero votes?

Even so.... other people (Floyd) have WAY more votes than her and so does (and did) DrWildgy

fingersplints wrote:Dr wilgy had two votes (one of which - golden - talked of voting me) so self preservation again makes sense. Why shouldn't I vote to save myself Dom?

I didn't say you shouldn't

I said you didn't really have to. Those are different things. Please don't conflate them.

I'm pinged by FS's recent comments and her ability to only speak about defending herself-- nothing really beyond that. She seems only concerned that she ISN'T lynched.

I also have been suspicious of both Floyd and Mac since the beginning and wouldn't mind lynching one of them.

fingersplints wrote:I have not only spoke about defending myself. I commented on Floyd quitting, and bass. And damn right I am concerned about getting lynched atm. I'd be fucking crazy not to be.

Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

Come on.. you can't honestly say that you've been trying to find baddies.

Voted floyd. I've been looking at him/Mac for a long time, and it took a back burner for juliets.

Nice result!

I voted Puppet Master

BAss, since you're around-- want to respond to this?

Dom wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:My main beef with Bass is his posts during the Canuck vs juliets lynch. Here are his only two posts from that Day:

3:37pm
Bass_the_Clever wrote:Sorry haven't been around . I'm catching up now.

9:12pm
Bass_the_Clever wrote:I ag ree I think juliets and canuck are both wroth lynching but I think Canuck is where my vote is going tonight.
What pings me is that he didn't justify why he chose Canuck over juliets when the lynch was 8-5 in juliets' favor when he voted. If he had said why he voted that way I would feel better, but it looks like a save. If he thoughts juliets was worth lynching, why didn't he vote for the frontrunner? There's also a 6 hour gap between when he said he was catching up and when he voted with nothing in between, which makes it feel like he was intentionally trying to stay out of the discussion that Day.

He doesn't have any on-topic posts since that vote. He just votes in the night polls.

Basically I'd like to hear from Bass about why he voted the way he did.
I voted that way because more people I trusted voted that way and I wasn't keeping up as much as I should have been.
OK so you have people you trust?
So.. ergo.. you have people you don't trust... people you think are bad?
Who are they?

Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Dom wrote:BAss, since you're around-- want to respond to this?

Dom wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:My main beef with Bass is his posts during the Canuck vs juliets lynch. Here are his only two posts from that Day:

3:37pm
Bass_the_Clever wrote:Sorry haven't been around . I'm catching up now.

9:12pm
Bass_the_Clever wrote:I ag ree I think juliets and canuck are both wroth lynching but I think Canuck is where my vote is going tonight.
What pings me is that he didn't justify why he chose Canuck over juliets when the lynch was 8-5 in juliets' favor when he voted. If he had said why he voted that way I would feel better, but it looks like a save. If he thoughts juliets was worth lynching, why didn't he vote for the frontrunner? There's also a 6 hour gap between when he said he was catching up and when he voted with nothing in between, which makes it feel like he was intentionally trying to stay out of the discussion that Day.

He doesn't have any on-topic posts since that vote. He just votes in the night polls.

Basically I'd like to hear from Bass about why he voted the way he did.
I voted that way because more people I trusted voted that way and I wasn't keeping up as much as I should have been.
OK so you have people you trust?
So.. ergo.. you have people you don't trust... people you think are bad?
Who are they?
I would say my vote was based on people I trusted more then people I didn't trust. Like I trusted HB I trust SVS . I wasn't sure about mac or MM so that's where I am.

So you suspect no living players?

Tranq wrote:I think Bass sounds genuine.

He didn't really answer the question though.

I'm definitely in favor of a Wildgy lynch, but I've got my eyes on Bass and FS too.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Why aren't we lynching timmer anymore?

timmer

I never fully understood the case against him. So

Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Dom wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Why aren't we lynching timmer anymore?

timmer
I never fully understood the case against him. So
Who do you trust and not trust ?

I'm feeling good about Golden, I think. I'm looking at you, FS, and Wildgy. I'm on the fence about most players.

This however, STILL does not answer the question I asked you.

Turnip Head wrote:
Dom wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Dom wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Why aren't we lynching timmer anymore?

timmer
I never fully understood the case against him. So
Who do you trust and not trust ?
I'm feeling good about Golden, I think. I'm looking at you, FS, and Wildgy. I'm on the fence about most players.

This however, STILL does not answer the question I asked you.
What makes you feel good about Golden?

I agree with you about splintsy and to a lesser extent Bass. What do you see in Wilgy? He's a bit of an enigma to me.

Golden? IDK it's more of a slight civ read-- gut feeling.

Wilgy I do not trust after he asked to be killed. It seemed so staged and he's hardly contributed since-- not even to really name his own suspects as far s I can tell.

I'm voting wilgy. I'd like a larger discussion on Bass's inability to name a suspect soon.

fingersplints wrote:
I'm probably voting Bass. I feel alright about the Wilgy vote though. like I said this seems more like his baddie game vs what I saw when I hosted him. I was hoping to reread the game this reminds me most of (90's Mafia on jtm) but haven't had a chance to, and seems it probably won't be necessary at this point.

fingersplints wrote:
Dom wrote:
fingersplints wrote:
I'm probably voting Bass. I feel alright about the Wilgy vote though. like I said this seems more like his baddie game vs what I saw when I hosted him. I was hoping to reread the game this reminds me most of (90's Mafia on jtm) but haven't had a chance to, and seems it probably won't be necessary at this point.

What?

If Wilgy doesn't flip the way I think he will-- you might be my next vote.

"Wilgy is probably bad, but I won't vote there."
Why?
To avoid having responsibility for his death.

IDK highly contingent on Wilgy's allignment, but this post stank to me.

fingersplints wrote:
Dom wrote:
fingersplints wrote:
Dom wrote:
fingersplints wrote:
I'm probably voting Bass. I feel alright about the Wilgy vote though. like I said this seems more like his baddie game vs what I saw when I hosted him. I was hoping to reread the game this reminds me most of (90's Mafia on jtm) but haven't had a chance to, and seems it probably won't be necessary at this point.

What?
If Wilgy doesn't flip the way I think he will-- you might be my next vote.

"Wilgy is probably bad, but I won't vote there."
Why?
To avoid having responsibility for his death.

IDK highly contingent on Wilgy's allignment, but this post stank to me.
Umm except I did vote him before you gave me the eye, and already explained why I was reluctant to vote for him.

So statements you backpedalled from can't be considered suspicious?

Playing the victim?

I mean, I gave you some eyes, you already knew I suspected you-- why is this such a surprise to you?

fingersplints wrote:I'm not playing the victim. This just isn't productive. You have been on my ass since the second I said I wasn't so sure you were a civvie anymore. I never said I was surprised. Perhaps you should stop putting words in my mouth.

That isn't true.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:Voted.

You haven't mentioned Wilgy all game...
Not once....

Here is where FS said she isn't so sure I'm civ anymore. On Day Five.

Here is where I start my FS suspicion on Day 8.

I will admit to rebuffing her here. However, I never intended to vote for her until Day 8.

Nice narrative re-writing.

fingersplints wrote:How is it not true? This I literally your first mention/interaction with me:

Dom wrote:
fingersplints wrote:TH: Because I don't agree with your points on someone it does not mean I thought you were bad. I thought you were wrong, but that you had good intentions. I was looking forward to discussing Dom with you more before you were killed. I had reread him some from other games and I became less confident about him being a civvie. That suspicion seems to have dropped off anyways
Now I don't get the same feeling about you having good intetnions. I wouldn't say I suspect you yet. Hopefully the results of this lynch will help me decide about a few people.
This reads rather contrived to me.

What games didyou read?

I never included you in my suspect lists until Day 8.

you are lying.

fingersplints wrote:Because you don't say "you are my suspect" doesn't mean you can't indicate suspicion. I'm not lying or rewriting anything. Everyone can read the posts for themselves. I think it is absolute BS for you to say you weren't suspicious of me until day 8 though.

When asked my suspects prior to that post, I did not mention you.
You are lying.

Tranq-- I'd say Bass. Bass refuses to acknowledge posts against him. Bass hasn't listed a single person that's alive that he suspects in days. Bass didn't want two days in a row. That doesn't sit right with me.

Though, this last slough of splints posts has me raising my eyebrow even more.

fingersplints wrote:Repeating I am lying does not make it true. I'm not sure what I was supposed to make off the tone of your posts like this one if it wasn't you suspect me.

Because when asked who I suspect and who I'd like to see lynched between your specified post and the post I already pointed out I listed my candidates for lynching three times and you were not on that list.

fingersplints wrote:And he didn't mention me for a few days, but those were also the days of my absence. It halfway like most everything I say has been returned with an eye since that initial post I pointed out.

Also he said I was lying after I said he was on my ass since I questioned whether he was a civvie. We can debate all we want how much he was on my ass but the point still stands he didn't have a problem with me when I was defending him earlier. Only once I started questioning him did I seem "contrived"

Nah. I just seemed rather convenient that you had something to say once TH no longer factored in. To me, it read as buddying to TH.

But hey-- you can lie about what I've done and said all you want. It won't make it true.

LoRab wrote:
Golden wrote:In favour of Wilgy being legitimately that role, he was not on the poll until day 4.
But wouldn't he have taken himself off this lynch? when odds were strongly in favor of him being next to be voted?

It seems he had already used that power. :/

you save me so much time and energy tbh, golden.

Matt F wrote:My bad, 12 hour shift, I'm zonked. Anyway, so what, ya all think Wilgy was Trickster?

Golden, you think the Statue is evil now? I feel like that is a strong possibility, actually, or the Statue is dead.

So I'm going to want to lynch MM again tomorrow probably. Maybe another look at Lorab. And Dom, def Dom.

What does everyone think of Dom?

Definitely civvie.

Voted.

Tranq wrote: Dom, what are your thoughts on LoRab?
LoRab, what are your thoughts on Dom?

The more I hear from LoRab the better I feel about her.

Voted D and E.

SVS-- who are you looking at and why?

Nice to see I didn't die.

Matt F wrote:
Dom wrote:SVS-- who are you looking at and why?

Nice to see I didn't die.
That's swell. Man, we could've been the best of friends.

Dom

So you're on Witherdeath, then?

No....
that would make no sense either. I have voted for every member lynched except (maybe) Luke. Can't remember who I voted for then... maybe Mac. I was quite vocal about Juliets and definitely wanted floyd out.

Whatever you think you know-- you don't.

Bass-- any suspects yet or????

I think I can trust LoRab and think you are very wrong about her.
I do not trust Matt F because he clearly has no idea what he's talking about.
Timmer? I could see. I'm more inclined to think Bass or FS are bad.

Search found 337 matches