The Syndicate

Stop distracting me, jerks. I have one more school application to finish before monday.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:47 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:45 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:44 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:32 pm Marmot
This one intrigues me.
Marmot's placement on my list is more an absence of a reason to town read him than a specific reason to scum read him. The same is true for Long Con.
Why not yellow then?

Because he has made more than one or two substantial posts in the thread. Yellow is for people who don't have enough content for a firm read.

Mr Mac, please talk about Mr Jack

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:44 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:32 pm Marmot
This one intrigues me.

Marmot's placement on my list is more an absence of a reason to town read him than a specific reason to scum read him. The same is true for Long Con.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:39 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:33 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:28 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:22 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:13 pm I'd echo Mac but the explanation of his scum Sloonei read went in one eye and out the other so I'm not sure I even care.

@Sloonei your thoughts on it?

Jimmy's Nutella case is interesting to me because it's basically the same as my case on her early on in Mountains and my conclusion was wrong. Also, I don't see what he sees anyway. Opposite contrast with opposite conclusions.

Kinda feel like I'm dead ended on Jimmy atm anyway. Made looks worse but I'll let him talk before I decide where to move.
I don't know what "it" is here.
I really should have clarified after several linkis.

What do you think of Made's case on you?
He reads as authentic to me. He's not latching onto any traditional or easy arguments that I could see being made against me, which suggests to me these are genuine thoughts of his.
Lucky you. He hasn't even bothered to explain his read on me.

I had to work hard to extract it from him, to be fair. If there's one thing I find suspicious about Made, it's his strong resistance to sharing his thoughts. I don't get that, and it's not something I'm used to seeing from him as any alignment.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:28 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:22 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:13 pm I'd echo Mac but the explanation of his scum Sloonei read went in one eye and out the other so I'm not sure I even care.

@Sloonei your thoughts on it?

Jimmy's Nutella case is interesting to me because it's basically the same as my case on her early on in Mountains and my conclusion was wrong. Also, I don't see what he sees anyway. Opposite contrast with opposite conclusions.

Kinda feel like I'm dead ended on Jimmy atm anyway. Made looks worse but I'll let him talk before I decide where to move.
I don't know what "it" is here.
I really should have clarified after several linkis.

What do you think of Made's case on you?

He reads as authentic to me. He's not latching onto any traditional or easy arguments that I could see being made against me, which suggests to me these are genuine thoughts of his.

Here's a loose rainbow. Tiers aren't really ranked, although nutella and Jackofhearts feel like the players I'm most likely to vote for at this time. Lots of people I feel vaguely about. Ask me about any of these reads and I'll ignore you for a few hours and possibly answer later tonight.

JaggedJimmyJay
Glorfindel
novaselinenever
lapluie
Macdougall
Made
Quin
TonyStarkPrime
speedchuck
Elohcin
Kylemii
Dom
Gumshoe
birdwithteeth
Simon
sig
LongCon
Dave
DrWilgy
Marmot
nutella
Jackofhearts

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:13 pm I'd echo Mac but the explanation of his scum Sloonei read went in one eye and out the other so I'm not sure I even care.

@Sloonei your thoughts on it?

Jimmy's Nutella case is interesting to me because it's basically the same as my case on her early on in Mountains and my conclusion was wrong. Also, I don't see what he sees anyway. Opposite contrast with opposite conclusions.

Kinda feel like I'm dead ended on Jimmy atm anyway. Made looks worse but I'll let him talk before I decide where to move.

I don't know what "it" is here.

Made wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 10:56 pm wait, you said any not every. which are you interested in?

Jack and Mac.

Made wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 10:48 pm @slooni
2. this post reminded me of Jay's "tink is good do you know why" from last game, and that mixed with the fact you played pinged me.
3. comparing this to this post by JJJ made me think you got the joke and Jay missed it.
5. justifying every civvie read is annoying because it often it's multiple posts in tandem, and doing so allows baddies I read to just keep doing so, so will only do so if someone who's not you ask.

Jay and I are similar players. We might emulate one another from time to time. I'd argue that his Vocaroo post you allude to is Sloonei-esque.

I ask for detailed reads because I am trying to read you and I think that the best way we can progress the game is to be actively engaged in discussion of our ideas. I don't care for the theory that playing this way makes things easier for the scum in any way. Discussion is the primary tool civilians have to win the game. Use it.
That said, you don't need to say a single thing about any town reads. Tell me about your scum reads.

[mention]Made[/mention] coukd you elaborate on any of your other reads in the way you just did for me?

Made wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 10:27 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 10:16 pm
Made wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 10:13 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 9:59 pm @ Made, what was your interpretation of my argument for Quin to be bad? What about it drove you to read me negatively?
you are in my C tier because of that post.

you were on my M tier because of this post.
Tier names mean nothing to me. I want to know what thoughts you had in your head to produce your reads. I want to discuss ideas. I can't read you if you are only posting lists of names.
S
A
B
C
D
M
On day zero I didn't like
1.How much you wanted to distant your vote on the poll from your alignment
2.Mocking Jay's style of posting seemed like a weird attempt to buddy
3.Seeming to acknowledge that my first post in the game was a joke, then floating Quin as a suspect seemed scummy when JJJ seemed not to be joking seemed both off and opportunistic
4.In the moment backing up this argument felt forced and done by necessity.

having seen further posts and your reaction to my burnt orange/pinkish read I view you as C Tier.

regards,

Made's Secretary

1. I was involved in discussions about the Day 0 poll, but I wanted to be clear in these discussions that I had voted prior to giving any thought to the ideas being discussed. This was brought up in a single post and was in no way intended as any form of distancing from anything. I don't even know what I'd be distancing from.
2. What?
3. Not sure what you are referring to here.
4. My Quin ISO was a bit forced, yeah, but only in a "it's early in the game and I want to generate content" sort of way. I was simply sharing the argument I saw for Quin to be bad for the sake of discussion. I've not pursued him as a suspect since because I don't think it is the strongest argument to be made about him.

What have you liked better about me?

Food for thought: Jay reads me better than any other mafia player on Earth. I will arrogantly claim that I read him better than any other mafia player on Earth. We've both called each other "lock town reads" already in this game. How do people feel about this?

sig wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 10:17 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:11 pm Hahaha I just realized that Dunya isn't in this game. I was going to vote for her.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:58 am
MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:53 am Nobody is talking about Wilgy.

Vote 1 Quin. But yeah wilgy. That guy is bothersome.
I'm still curious about his bizarre tunneling of me. It seemed like an avant-garde mafia experiment, which is sort of a description of wilgy's meta in general I guess. In my head there's a link between Made and wilgy right now because they've been the only two to go after me in any manner this game, both neither of them seemed to be basing their reads on anything concrete, and in wilgy's case I doubt its sincerity entirely.

I don't know what this says about his alignment, but I do recall late in Mountain mafia when Eloh and wilgy (scum partners) seemed to make a coordinated push against me late in the game. The context was entirely different there, but wilgy's behavior is similar.

I don't like what you're saying about wilgy. He's always mislynched early on for being weird and it seems like your pushing that.

Kyle's looking good from his posts, I'm wary of sloonie.

linki: Didn't see that Made thanks.

Wilgy's a common mislynch target, yeah. Wilgy's also a player who has the same chance of drawing a scum role as everybody else. I discussed my thoughts on him there as they were in mind, acknowledging both sides of the coin.
If I was pushing for his mislynch there, you should be able to find more instances of this in my post history.

Made wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 10:13 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 9:59 pm @ Made, what was your interpretation of my argument for Quin to be bad? What about it drove you to read me negatively?
you are in my C tier because of that post.

you were on my M tier because of this post.

Tier names mean nothing to me. I want to know what thoughts you had in your head to produce your reads. I want to discuss ideas. I can't read you if you are only posting lists of names.

Made wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 9:07 pm
Made wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 8:47 am KK question time:
JJJ thoughts on Mac?
Slooni thoughts in Nutella?
Mac thoughts on Nutella?
Kyle thoughts on Dave?
Glorf thought on me?
Nutella thoughts on speedchuck?
Speedchuck thoughts Wilgy?
Wilgy current slooni thoughts?
green ones are answered
red ones are not
please answer these soon
and thanks a lot

I don't have strong thought on nutella yet. Been hella busy the last couple of days, so my focus here is linited.

Why are you intetested in what I have to say about her?

Who's got an argument for Jack to be town?

sig wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 9:37 pm I'm here! I'm here! I'm alive.

So I notice there's alot of day 0 talking is it serious or just fluff?

Also wow way to many posts.

It's mostly serious chatter, but don't bother reading it all if it would be too time-consuming.

[mention]Made[/mention], what was your interpretation of my argument for Quin to be bad? What about it drove you to read me negatively?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 5:39 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 5:26 pm Even with Jack's elaboration on his vote, I do not feel great about it. The "I could change to X or Y" disclaimer did not convey it as a confident vote and I could the sense that he was more focused on choreographing reads than actually developing them.
What makes you think I'm trying to seem confident about votes on Day 1?

Why do you think I'm "choreographing" reads? I'm not sure what that means.

I don't thin you're trying to be confident. A better way to put it is that I didn't sense conviction in your vote. By "choreographing reads" I mean I get the impression you are merely listing names to be pursued rather than doing anything meaningful in that post.

Glorfindel wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 5:37 pm @Sloonei :Buddy, I listened to some of your posts on the Vocaroo game and seriously, you could make a fortune recording e-books or something. I could listen to your voice for hours on end and be enthralled even if you were reading nursery rhymes. Just sayin’

I'm happy my voice is perceived as a pleasant one. I'll find a career as an e-book readse just for you

Even with Jack's elaboration on his vote, I do not feel great about it. The "I could change to X or Y" disclaimer did not convey it as a confident vote and I could the sense that he was more focused on choreographing reads than actually developing them.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 4:18 pm Dave is moderately suspicious. I won't be lynching him today. I refuse to lynch any player in their first game on the site on Day 1.

Ditto

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 4:29 pm Oh I understand the confusion.

You're reading that as "I will most likely switch to Kyle or Made instead of leaving my vote on Jimmy."

It should be read as "If I switch my vote, I will most likely switch to Kyle or Made."

But I just went through all the effort of casting and announcing thr vote. Ugh.

I feel like voting for Jackofhearts. His vote for Jay felt less than authentic.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 1:18 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:37 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 1:41 am
speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:06 am @Sloonei @Jackofhearts2005 @Long Con
Why not?
Is that a question or an answer?
Yes.

I'm voting Marmot because I see no reason not to.
I'm voting him because he voted for a newbie.

Why should I NOT vote for Marmot?

To expand upon that, there have been a lot of votes-for-no-stated-reason in this topic. But when I post one, I immediately get FOUR 'why?'s. I want an explanation as to why my vote is so danged baffling.
Sloonei just votes for people. You don't. Also, I was first to ask. It's not 4x baffling. 3x not paying attention.

As for Marmot, I have no reason not to vote for him at this time.

Is this to say you don't care about the reasons why I've voted for people?

[mention]Made[/mention] your reads are a point of confusion for myself and others in this game. I see that they exist, but I don't see where they come from. Your reads of myself and Macdougall are particularly confusing to me. When you have time, could you explain some of these reads in more detail?

Keeping my vote on TonyStarkPrime until he talks more about disagreeing with the concensus on me. I'm interested.

One more thing before I go: [mention]lapluie[/mention] I insist that you vote for somebody right now! You can always change it later if you don't like it. Go go go.

whoops, I dropped my vote and it landed on nutella. I need to go work on school applications now, bye.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 1:01 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:42 amIn what regard would I need to stand by it? I made it for the benefit of the lie detector in the game. I can't delete or edit the post, so it's there for them to fact check if they want. Otherwise, my denial of anti-towniness should be implicit.
I don't actually care that much about the lie detector for this, and it's not like they could let us know anyways.

If you're a dangerous role and Made knows something about you but is giving you a pass for possibly being the less dangerous indie then... I want to make sure that that can't happen because it could cause problems down the road.

If Made notices any contradictions then I'm sure he'll tell us about it.

How would Made have insight into my role? This is not a possibility which has entered my mind because if he did have insight, he would be less wrong about me.

[mention]lapluie[/mention] care to share a read on me and an expanded one on Quin? we're the players you know coming in, so we could be your most natural reads.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:53 am Nobody is talking about Wilgy.

Vote 1 Quin. But yeah wilgy. That guy is bothersome.

I'm still curious about his bizarre tunneling of me. It seemed like an avant-garde mafia experiment, which is sort of a description of wilgy's meta in general I guess. In my head there's a link between Made and wilgy right now because they've been the only two to go after me in any manner this game, both neither of them seemed to be basing their reads on anything concrete, and in wilgy's case I doubt its sincerity entirely.

I don't know what this says about his alignment, but I do recall late in Mountain mafia when Eloh and wilgy (scum partners) seemed to make a coordinated push against me late in the game. The context was entirely different there, but wilgy's behavior is similar.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:49 am Sloonei, whaddya think of Jack?

I don't have a clear read on him yet. I wasn't as alarmed by him as you were earlier in the day, but I also wasn't involved in the exchange and only glanced at it quickly. I had a vague sense that he was earnestly trying to read you.

ebwop

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:42 am
Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:36 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:30 amIf you'd like me to deny anything Made has said about me: I am neither a Loner role nor a member of the Outworld team. I don't see that there's anything for me to respond to directly besides that. He's not elaborated further than the existence of his read.
and you'll stand by this denial?

I'm interested in Made's thoughts still, and in his cryptic weirdness, but we're cool for now.
In what regard would I need to stand by it? I made it for the benefit of the lie detector in the game. I can't delete or edit the post, so it's there for them to fact check if they want. Otherwise, my denial of anti-towniness should be implicit.

lapluie wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:42 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:31 am
lapluie wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:28 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:29 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:27 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:25 pm I'm placing my vote on Marmot.
Why?
WHY!?
I laughed way too much at this
hey 'sup, how are you finding this game so far? Got any thoughts to share?
Hello, thanks for asking. Yes its quite well, a lot of chit chat has happend the past 48 hours. Many accusations of here & such, one thing I wanna point out is at speedchuck for their- "Why not" response in voting. isn't a suffice answer to a killing, we gotta be wise on who we are voting, I read a few replies as to why x is voting for x but just bluntly saying "why not" is a dangerous reply especially if we end up killing a town, now is there a real reason? if so would like to hear. Also for @marmot voting for @Nova (correct me if I'm wrong), out of the blue voting, I know votes can change but we can't be so quick to start voting off people who haven't done anything sketchy. (?) If otherwise clarify this for me.please. I dont like how quin is playing the game by saying hes too lazy to participate. . In earleir post.. >_> (reminds me of the game i played with him last year). for now I'm simply observing evryones behaviours, getting to know names & their reactions to such & such would help me understand the game play of everyone a bit better.

Voting early and often is the best strategy, but you're not wrong to be wary of unreasoned votes. I don't know why Marmot is voting for novaseline (nova is also a newcomer to the Syndicate like you. Marmot is a Syndicate veteran). Speedchuck is dangling his vote in front of us to generate discussion, I think. By saying "why not", he's inviting others to discuss the possible reasons for or against his vote.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:36 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:30 am
If you'd like me to deny anything Made has said about me: I am neither a Loner role nor a member of the Outworld team. I don't see that there's anything for me to respond to directly besides that. He's not elaborated further than the existence of his read.

and you'll stand by this denial?

I'm interested in Made's thoughts still, and in his cryptic weirdness, but we're cool for now.
[/quote]In what regard would I need to stand by it? I made it for the benefit of the lie detector in the game. I can't delete or edit the post, so it's there for them to fact check if they want. Otherwise, my denial of anti-towniness should be implicit.

lapluie wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:28 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:29 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:27 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:25 pm I'm placing my vote on Marmot.
Why?
WHY!?
I laughed way too much at this

hey 'sup, how are you finding this game so far? Got any thoughts to share?

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:24 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:09 am Kyle, what do you think about my vote on you?
i don't think anything of it really.... i've been killed a few times recently and put into consideration a few other times for early murder for seeming too genuine, Jay wanted to kill me in phenon, i died night one in vocaroo. and apparently jack and dunya have had conversations about how much easier i am to kill that to lynch.

so i don't really mind a little heat.

Okay but what does it tell you about me? I am the most important thing in this thread.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:16 am
Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:52 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:03 pm As for Made, I came out feeling good about him because he felt compelled to post a Day 0 rainbow unprompted. That's a bold move for scum to make. Since then, however, I've only had questions for him and none of them have been answered (I don't blame him for that, he's just been absent.) I can't offer a take on his read of me because I can't see where it comes from. He implied that he perceived me as feeling heat on Day 0, but I actually felt like I had achieved an inordinate amount of townie cred for that phase of the game. I don't know where any of his reads come from right now, and that's problematic. Maybe the boldness of the Day 0 rainbow was Made's principal motivation. He just played a solid scum game in Vocaroo but had his credibility destroyed when game mechanics all pointed to him. Maybe he drew another scum role in this game and wanted to come out swinging.
well.... sure, but your initial town read on Made came 2.5 hours before his day 0 rainbow list. you said you had a townread on Made shortly after Made came forward with his "pinkish shade of red" comment about you.

so i'm curious about your treatment of that read, it's strange to me that you in particular were so quick to decide that that was a good look for Made with only his confident claiming that you were probably the least dangerous indie role to use as context.
which causes me concern because you haven't verbally denied anything that made has said about you. which is troublesome behavior in a game with a lie detector. you haven't commented on his read on you other than to explain that you don't know where it comes from, which is technically true.

it seems like if Made has any kind of intel, that it indicated to him indie or at least not-civilian. Even if Made doesn't have any sort of intel, you still haven't responded positively or negatively, which bugs me because the only players in a mafia game like this who benefit from that sort of ambiguity are players with mafia roles and indies and... one of the indie roles needs to make sure 12 civilians die in order to win.

so that's my 2 cents on that

If you'd like me to deny anything Made has said about me: I am neither a Loner role nor a member of the Outworld team. I don't see that there's anything for me to respond to directly besides that. He's not elaborated further than the existence of his read.

Speedchuck, what do you think about my vote on kyle?

Kyle, what do you think about my vote on you?

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:52 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:03 pm As for Made, I came out feeling good about him because he felt compelled to post a Day 0 rainbow unprompted. That's a bold move for scum to make. Since then, however, I've only had questions for him and none of them have been answered (I don't blame him for that, he's just been absent.) I can't offer a take on his read of me because I can't see where it comes from. He implied that he perceived me as feeling heat on Day 0, but I actually felt like I had achieved an inordinate amount of townie cred for that phase of the game. I don't know where any of his reads come from right now, and that's problematic. Maybe the boldness of the Day 0 rainbow was Made's principal motivation. He just played a solid scum game in Vocaroo but had his credibility destroyed when game mechanics all pointed to him. Maybe he drew another scum role in this game and wanted to come out swinging.
well.... sure, but your initial town read on Made came 2.5 hours before his day 0 rainbow list. you said you had a townread on Made shortly after Made came forward with his "pinkish shade of red" comment about you.

so i'm curious about your treatment of that read, it's strange to me that you in particular were so quick to decide that that was a good look for Made with only his confident claiming that you were probably the least dangerous indie role to use as context.

It felt like an authentic play on his part. So did the rainbow. The game has progresed since then, but he hasn't.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:27 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:25 pm I'm placing my vote on Marmot.
Why?

WHY!?

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:25 pm I'm placing my vote on Marmot.

Why?

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:05 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 10:58 pm
Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 10:54 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 10:22 pm Starting the day with a vote on kyle.
can i ask why?

the only time you've mentioned me negatively was after my first post for "trepid introductory nonstance", is that it?

also, while you're here, can i ask for a (brief) explanation of your read on Made and Made's read on you, from your perspective?
You've seemed focused on the mechanics of the game so far. I'm wondering what people have to say about that.
"focused" seems like a little bit much. i was interested in the day 0 poll at the time because it was relevant and i haven't played a game where there was one in quite a while. I think that there's a lot to be gained by revealing mafia and indie secrets as soon as possible so we know what we're up against.

can you answer my questions about Made please? linki- oh there it is

I didn't say it's been your primary focus, it's just been something you've been attentive to. I also didn't say I necessarily see it as a bad thing. I'm just voting for you because of it.

As for Made, I came out feeling good about him because he felt compelled to post a Day 0 rainbow unprompted. That's a bold move for scum to make. Since then, however, I've only had questions for him and none of them have been answered (I don't blame him for that, he's just been absent.) I can't offer a take on his read of me because I can't see where it comes from. He implied that he perceived me as feeling heat on Day 0, but I actually felt like I had achieved an inordinate amount of townie cred for that phase of the game. I don't know where any of his reads come from right now, and that's problematic. Maybe the boldness of the Day 0 rainbow was Made's principal motivation. He just played a solid scum game in Vocaroo but had his credibility destroyed when game mechanics all pointed to him. Maybe he drew another scum role in this game and wanted to come out swinging.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 10:54 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 10:22 pm Starting the day with a vote on kyle.
can i ask why?

the only time you've mentioned me negatively was after my first post for "trepid introductory nonstance", is that it?

also, while you're here, can i ask for a (brief) explanation of your read on Made and Made's read on you, from your perspective?

You've seemed focused on the mechanics of the game so far. I'm wondering what people have to say about that.

If you care to, that is

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 10:31 pm Long Con can have a vote.

Tell me more

Search found 225 matches