Sig's mentions and interactions with Nerolunar since Night 2.
sig wrote:Nerolunar wrote:Its unreadable.
Maybe you intended for it to be unreadable?
Probably not.
Well I think it is very readable and a very nice color. I should lynch you for insulting my color choices. :P
Banter with regards to post colour.
sig wrote:Long Con
He is more likely to be scum then Nero imo. I also know I'm not scum so that leaves LC. I believe LC end of day last minute vote for Ika is much more suspicious then my vote, espacilly since I was active in the thread giving my views.
linki: I"m leaning yes, and it is widely being ignored by people who are intent on lynching me. I also made this point for why Golden was suspicious. BUT wait me being agaisnt a CFD is more suspicious then you trying to redirect the it onto another player who was then killed so obviously not mafia? You attempted to redirect the wagon onto a civ from the mafia member.
Says Long Con is more likely to be mafia.
sig wrote:Serge wrote:Is it possible to hear what the cases are for sig, Nerolunar and Long Con?
I defended agaisnt the CFD last night and I defended Fuzz who I believe was a civ and that the CFD was b eing used to save a scum which is what usually happens.
Long Con has been extremely inactive and literally seconds before yesterday's poll closed he tied Fuzz to ika. The difference between me and him is that I was active and involved and had been defending players since day 1 such as Gleam. LC committed the most fly by team save attempt I've ever seen.
No idea on Nero
Responds to Serge with the cases on himself, as well as Long Con. However has no idea on Nero.
sig wrote:Lets all switch to Nero I mean he has rolled mafia 2 out of 2 games good odds. :P
Jokingly suggests we should lynch Nerolunar for rolling a mafia role in his only other two games here.
I'd be fine with a sig or Nero lynch today. I don't want to lynch Long Con though.