A Game About Chinese Food [Endgame]

#361

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Actually, it does help. Baddis have to alternate sending in the kill, and we've had two in a row, which means it can't be Made and it likely isn't Glorf. That leaves Epi, Juliets, and JJJ. Hmmm.

Vote JJJ
What do you mean alternate sending in the kill?

I ain't kill shit

It was in the rules - they have to alternate sending in the kill.

#362

I didn't even see that rule until now.

#363

Glorfindel wrote:
Glorfindel wrote:What if it IS Made? What if there is no Mafia 'team'. Might explain Sprityo's confidence...
Scratch that...

OR

You were spot on and now youre second guessing yourself

#364

I agree it can't be Made who sent in either kill. It can technically be Glorf.

#365

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I didn't even see that rule until now.

Clever.

#366

juliets wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Actually, it does help. Baddis have to alternate sending in the kill, and we've had two in a row, which means it can't be Made and it likely isn't Glorf. That leaves Epi, Juliets, and JJJ. Hmmm.

Vote JJJ
What do you mean alternate sending in the kill?

I ain't kill shit
It was in the rules - they have to alternate sending in the kill.

Who's to say i cant act for my teammate if say, they were busy driving a car, or onboard a transit?

#367

Epignosis

#368

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Later S~V~S.

Epi, if I recall you said earlier that you didn't think sprityo slipped but could still be bad. In that scenario is there a need for a plan to exist?

No there isn't. But after llama's theatrical back and forth with sprityo, combined with the fact that he buddied MP and S~V~S (the first two NK victims), I am adamant in my view.

#369

sprityo wrote:
juliets wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Actually, it does help. Baddis have to alternate sending in the kill, and we've had two in a row, which means it can't be Made and it likely isn't Glorf. That leaves Epi, Juliets, and JJJ. Hmmm.

Vote JJJ
What do you mean alternate sending in the kill?

I ain't kill shit
It was in the rules - they have to alternate sending in the kill.

Who's to say i cant act for my teammate if say, they were busy driving a car, or onboard a transit?

HOST: When you say a kill must be "performed" by alternate mafia members, does that mean their teammate cannot send the action in for them?

#370

thellama73 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I didn't even see that rule until now.
Clever.

I'm serious. I jumped into this thread once it was in motion during EOD of the other game and barely skimmed the rules. I had no clue.

#371

Epignosis wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Later S~V~S.

Epi, if I recall you said earlier that you didn't think sprityo slipped but could still be bad. In that scenario is there a need for a plan to exist?
No there isn't. But after llama's theatrical back and forth with sprityo, combined with the fact that he buddied MP and S~V~S (the first two NK victims), I am adamant in my view.

You should really lower your standards

Like our Orange Chicken. It's Orange. It's Chicken.

It uh.....it tastes!

#372

thellama73 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Later S~V~S.

Epi, if I recall you said earlier that you didn't think sprityo slipped but could still be bad. In that scenario is there a need for a plan to exist?

JJJ, I've determined that the remaining baddie must be you, jules, or Epi. You will no doubt claim it's not you, so is it Jules or Epi?

Jules and Epi, same question.

Well, I really don't believe you had time to plan a fake slip with sprityo so Epi's suspicion seems misplaced to me. If I had to pick one of them as bad at this point I'd pick Epi.

#373

It's also plausible that llama did the killing. I still think he looks civilian though.

#374

Epignosis wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Later S~V~S.

Epi, if I recall you said earlier that you didn't think sprityo slipped but could still be bad. In that scenario is there a need for a plan to exist?
No there isn't. But after llama's theatrical back and forth with sprityo, combined with the fact that he buddied MP and S~V~S (the first two NK victims), I am adamant in my view.

And why do you suppose those were the first two NK targets?

#375

thellama73 wrote:
sprityo wrote:
juliets wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Actually, it does help. Baddis have to alternate sending in the kill, and we've had two in a row, which means it can't be Made and it likely isn't Glorf. That leaves Epi, Juliets, and JJJ. Hmmm.

Vote JJJ
What do you mean alternate sending in the kill?

I ain't kill shit
It was in the rules - they have to alternate sending in the kill.

Who's to say i cant act for my teammate if say, they were busy driving a car, or onboard a transit?
HOST: When you say a kill must be "performed" by alternate mafia members, does that mean their teammate cannot send the action in for them?

I would allow a teammate to send in the actions of their teammate if they were absent.

#376

juliets wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Later S~V~S.

Epi, if I recall you said earlier that you didn't think sprityo slipped but could still be bad. In that scenario is there a need for a plan to exist?

JJJ, I've determined that the remaining baddie must be you, jules, or Epi. You will no doubt claim it's not you, so is it Jules or Epi?

Jules and Epi, same question.
Well, I really don't believe you had time to plan a fake slip with sprityo so Epi's suspicion seems misplaced to me. If I had to pick one of them as bad at this point I'd pick Epi.

To be fair I recieved my chatzy at about 1728 (EST) and had a solid like 8 minutes to talk before the game opened

#377

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I didn't even see that rule until now.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Epignosis

The guy who doesn't read the rules votes for me.

#378

Quin wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
sprityo wrote:
juliets wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Actually, it does help. Baddis have to alternate sending in the kill, and we've had two in a row, which means it can't be Made and it likely isn't Glorf. That leaves Epi, Juliets, and JJJ. Hmmm.

Vote JJJ
What do you mean alternate sending in the kill?

I ain't kill shit
It was in the rules - they have to alternate sending in the kill.

Who's to say i cant act for my teammate if say, they were busy driving a car, or onboard a transit?
HOST: When you say a kill must be "performed" by alternate mafia members, does that mean their teammate cannot send the action in for them?
I would allow a teammate to send in the actions of their teammate if they were absent.

I hate that answer. It destroys what I thought I knew. Made and Glorf are back on the table.

#379

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:It's also plausible that llama did the killing. I still think he looks civilian though.

See look, now he's undecided. top defacto baddie :nod:

#380

Vote Epi

There simply is no better baddie

#381

Let me ask you this: Raise your hand if you think sprityo accidentally slipped in his first post?

#382

Quin wrote:I would allow a teammate to send in the actions of their teammate if they were absent.

That kind of negates the reductive potential of the rule then.

#383

Glorfindel wrote:Vote Epi

There simply is no better baddie

Oh for God's sake. Read my third post of the game.

#384

Epignosis wrote:Let me ask you this: Raise your hand if you think sprityo accidentally slipped in his first post?

*raises hand*

#385

That wasn't intended to be critical of you Quin, it's a game comment.

#386

*raises hand*

but not intentionally

it was a legitimate question that was taken as a slip

HOST: what are the votes?

#387

If I'm getting lynched, let me know now. I want a shower.

#388

thellama73

#389

I don't like Glorf's vote for Epi. Feels insincere.

Unvote JJJ
Vote: Glorfindel

#390

Epignosis wrote:If I'm getting lynched, let me know now. I want a shower.

Im sorry if this isnt going too well for you epi

#391

Epignosis wrote:Let me ask you this: Raise your hand if you think sprityo accidentally slipped in his first post?

Not really. I thought his responses to the accusations were the problem.

#392

3J - llama
Epi - 3J, Glorfindel

Day ends in 9 minutes.

#393

Epignosis wrote:Let me ask you this: Raise your hand if you think sprityo accidentally slipped in his first post?

I don't know. That is not why I voted for him.

#394

Quin wrote:3J - llama
Epi - 3J, Glorfindel

Day ends in 9 minutes.

I changed mine to Glorfindel.

#395

Quin wrote:3J - llama, Epi
Epi - 3J, Glorfindel

*fixed

#396

Glorfindel wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Let me ask you this: Raise your hand if you think sprityo accidentally slipped in his first post?
I don't know. That is not why I voted for him.

Yeah, you voted for him because you wanted to look good by bussing your unkillable teammate.

#397

thellama73 wrote:
Quin wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
sprityo wrote:
juliets wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Actually, it does help. Baddis have to alternate sending in the kill, and we've had two in a row, which means it can't be Made and it likely isn't Glorf. That leaves Epi, Juliets, and JJJ. Hmmm.

Vote JJJ
What do you mean alternate sending in the kill?

I ain't kill shit
It was in the rules - they have to alternate sending in the kill.

Who's to say i cant act for my teammate if say, they were busy driving a car, or onboard a transit?
HOST: When you say a kill must be "performed" by alternate mafia members, does that mean their teammate cannot send the action in for them?
I would allow a teammate to send in the actions of their teammate if they were absent.
I hate that answer. It destroys what I thought I knew. Made and Glorf are back on the table.

I'm voting Glorf

I think he's bad before I think Epi is bad. Or it could be Made.

#398

I think it's 4:2:1. A mislynch sends the game to a LyLo reliant upon the indy.

#399

Epi - 3J, Glorfindel
llama - Epi
Glorfindel - llama

7 minutes.

#400

sprityo wrote:
Quin wrote:Glorf - llama
Epi - 3J, Glorfindel
the llama- Epi
*fixed

Fixed for realz this time

#401

I don't suspect Made.

#402

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I think it's 4:2:1. A mislynch sends the game to a LyLo reliant upon the indy.

I say this with my mind on Made. We have to make that decision now. Do we eliminate the question mark or do we carry it on and hope for the best? I vote for the latter. It's a shit sandwich but I want to vote for a suspect.

#403

Vote: Epi

#404

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I think it's 4:2:1. A mislynch sends the game to a LyLo reliant upon the indy.

If you lynch me, you're there and that's a promise.

#405

Glorfindel wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Let me ask you this: Raise your hand if you think sprityo accidentally slipped in his first post?
I don't know. That is not why I voted for him.

Why did you vote for him?

#406

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I think it's 4:2:1. A mislynch sends the game to a LyLo reliant upon the indy.
I say this with my mind on Made. We have to make that decision now. Do we eliminate the question mark or do we carry it on and hope for the best? I vote for the latter. It's a shit sandwich but I want to vote for a suspect.

I don't know why, but something tells me it's not Made.

#407

If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.

I don't want to live in that universe.

#408

It would be funny if Made got a free win for not being here

hahaha

#409

sprityo wrote:Vote: Epi

You smarmy bastard

#410

Also Epi I do think sprityo slipped in that post. it seemed genuine to me.

Are you here?