No.Job wrote:At Rachel, saying I've dismissed your points is not a good reason to stop talking about them. I may disagree with you, but you shouldn't stop pursuing shit because of me. I am not the boss, so don't use me as an excuse.
I did not use you as an excuse. I am blaming you.
Mostly Day 2.Balaam wrote:Rachel- just to help me out, are you referring to posts you made during Day 2 or all game?
My problem lies with the fact that Job caught my eye all Day 1 and continues to make me suspicious today. All three are suspciious to me though.Balaam wrote:Okay, Rachel, I'm assuming you're talking about your Day 2 posts. Hopefully my assumption is correct, otherwise, well- you know what happens when you assume...
Your first three posts were regarding Paul's absence and those who were calling attention to it. In your 3rd post you say you like my breakdown of Paul's lack of participation Day 2 and what that could mean for him and those who raise awareness of his silence. You state that you will keep an eye on Job specifically. Jephthah was the first person to actually refer to Paul's silence. Job reiterated this about two hours later. About 17 minutes later, Jonathan states that he would like to hear from Paul today. I asked you......but you never replied. Why do you single out Job from that group? If anything, Jonathan's post could be interpreted as the shadiest because he actually says he wants to hear from Paul before making up his mind. He commented on the suspicion over Uzziah and hasn't been back since.Balaam wrote:And only three people have pondered Paul's silence or mentioned wanting to hear his thoughts: Jephthah, Job, & Jonathan.
Is it the number 3 that bothers you or their proximity to each other in the thread?
In a later post you accuse me of ignoring discussion of other people. Have I made up for that yet or are there other names you want to talk about?
Next thing you say is that you might vote for me over my big long posts that are rich in data but light on suspicion-pushing because you think it makes me look like I'm trying hard to look helpful without being helpful. Then you vote for Job instead because he tries to bring up the Paul/Absalom possibility over Martha's death.
And that's it. Am I missing something or do you want me to talk about the suspicions other people were tossing about?
Or do you want us to go back to Day 1's talking points?
What was the theory on Mary Mag again?Jephthah wrote:I like Job. Will not be voting there. Maybe Ballam, maybe Uzziah, maybe someone else. I still have time.
I wonder if Jonah was silenced, because he was quite talkative last day, and maybe killing him would have been too obvious, so the baddies silenced him, which would make me believe we were right about Mary Magdalene
But you don't think he is bad?Balaam wrote:I see Cain lurking but no posts. There's quirky behavior and then there's behavior that gets you killed. If you've been kidnapped, silenced, plagued, or whatever else'd by something secret, I feel bad for you. It sucks to get taken out when you can't speak. But the timing of all those votes after you became tied with Samson, Samuel, and Uzziah is too hard for me to ignore. Yesterday I voted for you because I wanted to keep the vote close. Today I'm genuinely curious to know who you are. I hope you're bad. If you are, it gives us a few things to talk about come Day 3.
