Mongoose wrote:But did I actually quote from one thread to another or just think Boomslang had and without thinking, addressed his thoughts while thinking about the wrong game?

Moderator: Community Team
Mongoose wrote:But did I actually quote from one thread to another or just think Boomslang had and without thinking, addressed his thoughts while thinking about the wrong game?
This is true (both quotes are).Epignosis wrote:I can't tell you what you were thinking. That's hearsay.Mongoose wrote:But did I actually quote from one thread to another or just think Boomslang had and without thinking, addressed his thoughts while thinking about the wrong game?
I watch Judge Judy.
How are both quotes true? One of them is a question.Devin the Omniscient wrote:This is true (both quotes are).Epignosis wrote:I can't tell you what you were thinking. That's hearsay.Mongoose wrote:But did I actually quote from one thread to another or just think Boomslang had and without thinking, addressed his thoughts while thinking about the wrong game?
I watch Judge Judy.
In the same way that this statement is falseEpignosis wrote:How are both quotes true? One of them is a question.Devin the Omniscient wrote:This is true (both quotes are).Epignosis wrote:I can't tell you what you were thinking. That's hearsay.Mongoose wrote:But did I actually quote from one thread to another or just think Boomslang had and without thinking, addressed his thoughts while thinking about the wrong game?
I watch Judge Judy.
I tried to quote this in my other post when it popped up as linki. FAILMongoose wrote:I see BWT's post, and Boomslang's quote of BWT's post in this thread, so it must be the latter since both posts are addressing WWE.
Epignosis wrote:At least I don't hide mine behind a mop of unwashed hair, hippie.birdwithteeth11 wrote:So is your face, but I'm nice enough to not point it out all the time.Epignosis wrote:This is getting silly.
Mongoose wrote:I see BWT's post, and Boomslang's quote of BWT's post in this thread, so it must be the latter since both posts are addressing WWE.
@ HOST. I am PROFUSELY, that is COPIOUSLY sorry, and please do not hesitate to MK me for being such a PITA.
Gah, that led to a long and unfruitful tangent, and I'm not entirely sure how. Confirming that WWE is the only game I'm in right now.Epignosis wrote:Quote aside, Boomslang is in this game, and thellama73 is not. Boomslang is not in the side game. Why would you be talking to Boomslang about thellama73?Mongoose wrote:Whoa, good catch, Boomslang. I'm glad I switched to Llama then, just to be safe. I feel like I can read him better than BWT anyway.
Join the club~ I am super confused all the timeDom wrote:I'm really confused as to what just happened.
Why? This post got my eye, and i just read back and did not see much of a prior interest in K4J.Mister Rearranger wrote:BwIT!
*votes K4J*
A: Was drunkS~V~S wrote:Bye BWT![]()
Join the club~ I am super confused all the timeDom wrote:I'm really confused as to what just happened.![]()
Why? This post got my eye, and i just read back and did not see much of a prior interest in K4J.Mister Rearranger wrote:BwIT!
*votes K4J*
No explanation from MR? Da' fuck?Mister Rearranger wrote:BwIT!
*votes K4J*
See the post after that, mang?Devin the Omniscient wrote:No explanation from MR? Da' fuck?Mister Rearranger wrote:BwIT!
*votes K4J*
linki: good timing. But which smilies? You only used the sad face. Are you a depressed drunk?
How is your nail(s)? Are you going to lose them? I can't even imagine.S~V~S wrote:Bye BWT![]()
I agree, I have no idea why whatever happened last night would give any indication of anyone's allegiance. It's just a weird thing that happened and we should just move past it.Turnip Head wrote:I for one believe you Mongoose and hope that we can move on from this strange but seemingly irrelevant occurrence.
Anyone have any theories on why the baddies chose BWT to kill last night?
I was just goofing off and taking an opportunity to cause a bit of chaos, I didn't realize people wouldn't get it immediately.Mongoose wrote:10. I have no idea what is up with AP's apparent x-post.
13. S'mores?
Wat?Bullzeye wrote:I agree, I have no idea why whatever happened last night would give any indication of anyone's allegiance. It's just a weird thing that happened and we should just move past it.Turnip Head wrote:I for one believe you Mongoose and hope that we can move on from this strange but seemingly irrelevant occurrence.
Anyone have any theories on why the baddies chose BWT to kill last night?
It has been discussed as much as necessary though, there's really nothing else to say. Do you disagree with that?Mister Rearranger wrote:Wat?Bullzeye wrote:I agree, I have no idea why whatever happened last night would give any indication of anyone's allegiance. It's just a weird thing that happened and we should just move past it.Turnip Head wrote:I for one believe you Mongoose and hope that we can move on from this strange but seemingly irrelevant occurrence.
Anyone have any theories on why the baddies chose BWT to kill last night?
While I may not think that every piece of a game thread should be dissected in so much detail, the thread does exist for a reason: Discussing anything and everything before the lynch. Otherwise, everyone would just vote like I did.
I would never dissuade the game's participants from discussing something, no matter how trivial I personally believe it is.
Were you talking about Mongoose or BwIT?Bullzeye wrote:It has been discussed as much as necessary though, there's really nothing else to say. Do you disagree with that?Mister Rearranger wrote:Wat?Bullzeye wrote:I agree, I have no idea why whatever happened last night would give any indication of anyone's allegiance. It's just a weird thing that happened and we should just move past it.Turnip Head wrote:I for one believe you Mongoose and hope that we can move on from this strange but seemingly irrelevant occurrence.
Anyone have any theories on why the baddies chose BWT to kill last night?
While I may not think that every piece of a game thread should be dissected in so much detail, the thread does exist for a reason: Discussing anything and everything before the lynch. Otherwise, everyone would just vote like I did.
I would never dissuade the game's participants from discussing something, no matter how trivial I personally believe it is.
Why did you randomize in one thread and actively look for a place to leave your vote in the other?Lizzy wrote:Like I said in the other thread, I'll be out of the country for a few days and I'm not sure about the internet connection there, so I'll vote now. The only one that caught my eye the other day was Goosey, thus, my vote shall go her way today.
Because I can.Mister Rearranger wrote:Why did you randomize in one thread and actively look for a place to leave your vote in the other?Lizzy wrote:Like I said in the other thread, I'll be out of the country for a few days and I'm not sure about the internet connection there, so I'll vote now. The only one that caught my eye the other day was Goosey, thus, my vote shall go her way today.
Lizzy wrote:Because I can.Mister Rearranger wrote:Why did you randomize in one thread and actively look for a place to leave your vote in the other?Lizzy wrote:Like I said in the other thread, I'll be out of the country for a few days and I'm not sure about the internet connection there, so I'll vote now. The only one that caught my eye the other day was Goosey, thus, my vote shall go her way today.
Heeeeeeeeeeeeey... now wait just a minute there, buster! Why can't I be an indie without much time on my hands? Poor indies, no-one gives a toss about them.MovingPictures07 wrote: Lizzy's drive-by vote is pingworthy. One has to seriously consider whether it's a baddie without much time on her hands or just a civvie without much time on her hands. Thoughts?
Too bad you can't change your vote. That would've shown me.Mister Rearranger wrote:Lizzy wrote:Because I can.Mister Rearranger wrote:Why did you randomize in one thread and actively look for a place to leave your vote in the other?Lizzy wrote:Like I said in the other thread, I'll be out of the country for a few days and I'm not sure about the internet connection there, so I'll vote now. The only one that caught my eye the other day was Goosey, thus, my vote shall go her way today.
An operator is not available at this time, please enjoy the automated message located further up this page with regards to SVS and have a pleasant day.MovingPictures07 wrote:MR, I'm getting some pretty good vibes from you in this game, but I have to say I'm puzzled by your vote. Is it just a vibes thing? I honestly can't tell from K4J one way or the other, though I do suppose I was intrigued by how quickly he seemed to come out of the gates, then sort of backed off of me, then hasn't been around much since. I look forward to his thoughts too whenever he comes back around!
There is this....birdwithteeth11 wrote:I was referring just to Mongoose's comment there. Not Boomslang's original one.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Does anyone else think this sounded a little too....helpful?Mongoose wrote:Oooh, math'd! Thanks, that was cool, Boomslang. I'm visual, so it helped to see that.Boomslang wrote:Well, just for clarification, the odds of a civ lynch are (18/30)*100%, or 60%. If you include the independents, the chances go up to 70%, but as the role descriptions lead me to believe that at least two indies are last man standing roles, I don't think that's accurate. So it's not quite as hopeless!Mongoose wrote:If we lynch any, I promise not to look them in the mouth!
And yes, I agree that a civ lynch has less impact on the game. The chances are SO high we will lynch a civ on Day 1 (I mean so, so high. 80%?) that I feel like a no-lynch is a nice respite. A chance to take a deep breath before being plunged in to icy cold water again for another day of The Tumble Cycle. (I wish I could narrate this for you).
We get one more day to get our bearings. Cause then if we do lynch a baddie on Day 2, we have enough info for the intel we gained from it to actually be meaningful and helpful.
And then his vote. Interesting that he voted Epig.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Going to go with Epignosis today. I feel like he started the whole questioning Mongoose thing and it doesn't feel genuine to me.
I see, haha, so you got trigger happy. Understood. I just wanted to see if you had any underlying reasons.Mister Rearranger wrote:An operator is not available at this time, please enjoy the automated message located further up this page with regards to SVS and have a pleasant day.MovingPictures07 wrote:MR, I'm getting some pretty good vibes from you in this game, but I have to say I'm puzzled by your vote. Is it just a vibes thing? I honestly can't tell from K4J one way or the other, though I do suppose I was intrigued by how quickly he seemed to come out of the gates, then sort of backed off of me, then hasn't been around much since. I look forward to his thoughts too whenever he comes back around!
Lizzy wrote: Too bad you can't change your vote. That would've shown me.