Moderator: Community Team
Spiral wrote:Epi has been doing this in most games he's in lately, I doubt it's a mechanic or anything.Havok wrote:So the Danger Room index shows us a listing of everyone's posts. Is this just the host being helpful, or is there something more to it?
I don't know. But I would be nervous as a host putting a baddie out front and center on Day One, knowing that ANYTHING that makes someone stand out is fairly likely to get them lynched.Havok wrote: So, you are saying that Epig would make sure to pick a civvie as the first person to have a Danger Room ID just so as to not put suspicion on someone? I don't see the logic with this. Polaris didn't receive any suspicion whatsoever for having a Danger Room ID first.
Yes I was making fun, because your deduction was quite redundant considering I had just stated the exact same conclusion you came to. Maybe it was genuine, but it very well could be someone trying to make something of nothing. It is Day 1 after all.Havok wrote:Polaris wrote:I didn't voice any suspicion, so I must not have any suspicions yet!!! Nice work detective.Havok wrote:Polaris wrote:These books don't sound very pleasant; I went with My Latest Invention.
I realize I did miss the vote deadline, but I don't feel particularly bad, I didn't really have anyone I wanted to vote for. At least there's no penalty in this game.
This post really caught my eye. So, I took a look at what you have posted so far in the game, and you haven't voiced any suspicion so far. You seem content to sit back and not call anyone out. You seem to be saying in this post "Hey, everyone, I didn't vote for the civvie that just got lynched".
So, you have not suspicions whatsoever???
And no, I did not see anything that made me want to vote. Sure, I could have popped in and dropped a meaningless vote on someone, but what good would that have done?
And yes, that's how I usually play. I'm not good at fabricating crazy stories from tiny little 'slip-ups' on Day 1 (which by the way doesn't really work anyway). So I prefer to observe at the beginning. And you're welcome for at least stating my reasons for not voting.
Snarkily responding to a genuine point. That doesn't do you any favors.
And, just to clarify, I didn't point you out because you "don't have any suspicions yet". I find it odd that you just don't seem to care about finding suspicions whatsoever. You seem content just sitting back and doing nothing.
I don't even know how to respond to this. While I know I'm good, I don't think the fact that my ID (which hasn't shown any significance in the game yet) was revealed on Day 1 is a good way to prove it. And yes, I am as curious as everyone else as to what the ID means.Avalanche wrote:I don't know. But I would be nervous as a host putting a baddie out front and center on Day One, knowing that ANYTHING that makes someone stand out is fairly likely to get them lynched.Havok wrote: So, you are saying that Epig would make sure to pick a civvie as the first person to have a Danger Room ID just so as to not put suspicion on someone? I don't see the logic with this. Polaris didn't receive any suspicion whatsoever for having a Danger Room ID first.
I have a few individuals I want to reread.The writing is literary decoration. Please don't read into it.Longshot wrote:HOST: Did you receive all the pm's expected* last night? Are the posts just storytelling or might there be hints about what happened in them?
*not counting people who use a power on an inconsistent basis or/and people who didn't have powers last night
Yeah, I saw that Mojo reread. I actually just reread his statement to make sure I didn't misinterpret what went on, myself. I suppose him being "confused" as to who the Morlocks were could explain his change in opinion of Avalanche, but I'm not sure that is the case. My problem is, he started out 1. agreeing with Avalanche about looking into conformists, and 2. defending him yet leaving his options open. Both of which to me are kind of scummy considering he switched his opinion so quickly. I'm all for changing opinions, but what I do not understand is why he took the morlock discussion so seriously. How does ignoring or debating with those who say morlocks are good, make him scum? I don't feel like that is a reason to vote (I ask, why would a baddie draw such attention to themselves when unnecessary?), and I feel like he was using the morlock discussion to help force a suspicion. Especially since he is also in a way contradicting the agreeing with #1 (to look at conformists) which should have had nothing to do with Avalanche's alignment (it was an actual opinion that he just contradicted, in my eyes). It doesn't come across sincere to me.White Queen wrote:@Exodus; I believe Mojo said he reread, and that caused him to change his mind.
While I agree with the whole logic that is being argued against Avalanche as far as how choosing that option wasn't the best, I do wonder why Shadowcat said that she was leaning towards him doing this because he had an ulterior motive, rather than being goofy because I read it the opposite, since it kept continuing it came across as clearly chaotic/antagonizing behavior. So, Shadowcat, if you haven't explained, can you explain some more about this? If you have I'll hopefully see when catching up.Hawkeye wrote:I would have liked to hear more from Shadowcat because I really didn't like this post and it's what bugged me the most so far.
I'll be placing my vote here today.Shadowcat wrote:Sorry I haven't been around much. I am quite busy fighting supervillians, and will continue to be doing so for a few days. I will try to make some time when I can though.
I thought it was very interesting how Avalance really kept pushing the Morlock Tunnels, when I felt like we had sound logic/advice not to do so. Not sure if he has an ulterior motive or was just being goofy, but I would lean towards the first one. I also thought this was interesting.
If you're going to go fight someone, this option makes a lot more sense.Bastion wrote:Why do you want to fight a group of outcasts when the leader of the brotherhood base is on the list?Avalanche wrote:Yes. My motive is that I don't want to go there. I want to fight Morlocks.White Queen wrote: Do you have a motive for wanting people to not go to the school?
As for the Polaris having an ID thing, I think we'll need more information before we start putting that puzzle together.
Avoid what? Being lynched? I am not understanding your statement.Mojo wrote:The timing of those two votes just pinged me a bit for a minute. Not enough to make me change my vote though.White Queen wrote:"Quick"? The poll ended at 6:30, I voted at 6:04.Mojo wrote:Did bastion just vote and not post? I'm not feeling the greatest about those two quick votes for avalanche so quickly at the end of the poll here..
Linki- ok then
I think if avalanche wanted to avoid this he could have answered more of the questions brought to him instead of morlock tunnel vision.
My problem is, doesn't that imply he didn't care about being lynched? Wouldn't a scum care about being lynched?Mojo wrote:Avoid getting votes/almost being lynched. I'm not sure what it so confusing about that statement.?
I'd think most roles in this game would care about being lynched, civvie or scum.Exodus wrote:My problem is, doesn't that imply he didn't care about being lynched? Wouldn't a scum care about being lynched?Mojo wrote:Avoid getting votes/almost being lynched. I'm not sure what it so confusing about that statement.?
I thought your statement was showing your suspicion of Avalanche more. If I misinterpreted it, nevermind.Mojo wrote:I'd think most roles in this game would care about being lynched, civvie or scum.Exodus wrote:My problem is, doesn't that imply he didn't care about being lynched? Wouldn't a scum care about being lynched?Mojo wrote:Avoid getting votes/almost being lynched. I'm not sure what it so confusing about that statement.?
very interesting night otherwise 
I thought you said that if Avalanche wanted to avoid getting votes he would have answered the questions, which contradicts the idea that a baddie (you thought he was bad) wants to survive. I don't know how else to explain myself.Mojo wrote:You are confusing me and I'm not really sure where you are even going with this. I voted for avalanche because I didn't think his actions day one were civvie-like. He spent most of the time talking about killing morlocks, and the other part not answering questions people were asking him.
Okay, I didn't realize it was in response to that. As for your points, I am not sure a baddie would risk that behavior (I feel it's suicidal), but I have seen it done before. Time will tell.Mojo wrote:Yeah because he was saying "guys please don't lynch me," well.... If you ignore questions and have a focus on something (morlocks) that a) doesn't appear to be something we even have to worry about in this game and b) don't appear to be bad to the x-men anyway, then yeah... I think you're bad-or at least less likely to be civvie.
I'm not going to act like I know what goes on in avalanches head or why he acts as he does.
I'm here! Catching up!!Exodus wrote:Where is everyone? Finally when I have some time, no one's here lol
Havok, I'd like to hear from you about this post. Are you unaware of the poll thread, or did you have a different reason for asking this? Considering what such info might have helped reveal, if Epig had answered yes, it feels like the question isn't very civ friendly...Havok wrote:Epignosis: Was the lynch a tie?
White Queen, I have asked you multiple times now, what about my posts is contradictory?White Queen wrote:LOL, it isn't somehow now contradictory. It was contradictory when you said it. But please note subsequent posts; I said I thought you actually sounded sincere.Spiral wrote:I went with Deathlok. Again you are overlooking facts when it comes to me. I haven't made any cotradicotrynposts. I made loose connections tht I admitted should have been more spelled out big time. Yet somehow that is now "contradictory".White Queen wrote:I am not ignoring facts. You made a number of contradictory and weak statements.
So, will you be going with Deathlok, or with Rasputin? Or perhaps Avalanche?
I am not harping on you, I am stirring the pot, as it were. I am asking questions, and assessing answers. This is how I play Mafia. This kind of sounds like Avalanches post where he asks why, basically, I am picking on him.
Catching up that definitely stands out to me also. The vote was clearly posted in the polls and Deathlok had the majority. So either Havok expected a different outcome because he/she knows something, or some type of manipulation Havok may have done to the votes didn't turn out as expected is my thought.The Vision wrote:Havok, I'd like to hear from you about this post. Are you unaware of the poll thread, or did you have a different reason for asking this? Considering what such info might have helped reveal, if Epig had answered yes, it feels like the question isn't very civ friendly...Havok wrote:Epignosis: Was the lynch a tie?
Isn't part of the reason you suspect Havok for "setting up" Polaris?Quicksilver wrote:Catching up that definitely stands out to me also. The vote was clearly posted in the polls and Deathlok had the majority. So either Havok expected a different outcome because he/she knows something, or some type of manipulation Havok may have done to the votes didn't turn out as expected is my thought.The Vision wrote:Havok, I'd like to hear from you about this post. Are you unaware of the poll thread, or did you have a different reason for asking this? Considering what such info might have helped reveal, if Epig had answered yes, it feels like the question isn't very civ friendly...Havok wrote:Epignosis: Was the lynch a tie?
I'm looking at Havok or Polaris so far today...
Boy, you just jumped right on there, didn't ya?Quicksilver wrote:The Vision wrote:Catching up that definitely stands out to me also. The vote was clearly posted in the polls and Deathlok had the majority. So either Havok expected a different outcome because he/she knows something, or some type of manipulation Havok may have done to the votes didn't turn out as expected is my thought.Havok wrote:Epignosis: Was the lynch a tie?
I'm looking at Havok or Polaris so far today...
I do think he wants to get Polaris eyed, which Polaris should be for the ingenuity... But I feel one here being Bad, and the other Indy IMO. Which like I said, I feel I need to vote one of them out today.Spiral wrote:Isn't part of the reason you suspect Havok for "setting up" Polaris?Quicksilver wrote:Catching up that definitely stands out to me also. The vote was clearly posted in the polls and Deathlok had the majority. So either Havok expected a different outcome because he/she knows something, or some type of manipulation Havok may have done to the votes didn't turn out as expected is my thought.The Vision wrote:Havok, I'd like to hear from you about this post. Are you unaware of the poll thread, or did you have a different reason for asking this? Considering what such info might have helped reveal, if Epig had answered yes, it feels like the question isn't very civ friendly...Havok wrote:Epignosis: Was the lynch a tie?
I'm looking at Havok or Polaris so far today...
Polaris "not caring" about missing the vote because he/she didn't have anyone to vote for. I know Indy characters have their own agendas, but to me if someone were Civ, they would be trying to help because every vote counts. If they were bad, they would vote to help make sure one of their teammates stayed alive and get someone Civ out. But, if they were Indy, it could go either way. So I think either Polaris is bad where neither of his/her teammates were on the line to die, so they cared less. OR, Polaris may be an Indy and cared less because someone would die that wouldn't help their cause. Just how I'm feeling here. Professor X urged us to step up and work together, so I'm trying to think things out this time and be more confident in who I vote for to get us back on our A game.Longshot wrote:Quicksilver, just to clarify your post what do you mean by Polaris's ingenuity? I saw the post about not caring that she didn't vote but where does the ingenuity come in? Also, what are you seeing that makes one of them a possible indy?
The Vision wrote:Havok, I'd like to hear from you about this post. Are you unaware of the poll thread, or did you have a different reason for asking this? Considering what such info might have helped reveal, if Epig had answered yes, it feels like the question isn't very civ friendly...Havok wrote:Epignosis: Was the lynch a tie?
How can you say that that question isn't civvie friendly? It sounds like you are saying that it could have only been a tie for civvie reasons? You should look over the role list. Wolverine is not the only role with vote manipulation.Epignosis wrote:
X-Men Mafia
Whereas Masters of the Universe took us all over a planet, X-Men will keep us...in one room.
Expect heavy manipulation.
lol, yes, he did.The Vision wrote:Boy, you just jumped right on there, didn't ya?Quicksilver wrote:The Vision wrote:Catching up that definitely stands out to me also. The vote was clearly posted in the polls and Deathlok had the majority. So either Havok expected a different outcome because he/she knows something, or some type of manipulation Havok may have done to the votes didn't turn out as expected is my thought.Havok wrote:Epignosis: Was the lynch a tie?
I'm looking at Havok or Polaris so far today...
We've actually got two silencers in the game - Iceman and Toad, one bad one good. I totally agree with your idea that people chime in today so we will know who is silenced - should be 2 if both Ice and Toad got their pm's in.The Vision wrote:Who hasn't posted yet? We've got a silencer in the game, it would be nice to get everyone to chime in and roll call if they haven't posted yet today so we can at least figure out who is shut down.
The way I look at it is that it was Day 1. No night actions had yet occurred. The only two roles, barring secrets, that have naturally occurring vote weirdness are Wolverine and Cyclops. So with no Magneto or Sentinel or Omega Red manipulations in play since it was Day 1, your question seemed engineered to potentially reveal a shortlist of who could be one of our most important roles. That is absolutely not a civ-friendly question to have asked.Havok wrote:
How can you say that that question isn't civvie friendly? It sounds like you are saying that it could have only been a tie for civvie reasons? You should look over the role list. Wolverine is not the only role with vote manipulation.
