Moderator: Community Team
Let me clarify - it's 3 missed actions in a row. This player may have missed votes but has used their night ability and voted in night polls.Lipsticklacey 2 wrote:@Roxy/FS: Was Blooper 2 replaced at some point, because as far as I can tell, they should be dead from missing votes otherwise.
Bass 2 wrote:Of course you wouldn't tell someone you want them to go away, that'd more likely than not annoy them and make them stick around even longer. I wasn't claiming you had said those direct words. Please don't play dumb, it's a waste of time.
I asked JUST him because I was only interested in HIS answer. If I had cared what Synonym 2, for instance, thought about it I would've asked Synonym 2. But I don't care what Synonym 2 thinks of that exchange. He wasn't involved in it, and I don't think I'll get any significant information from asking that. To turn your own logic back on you, why aren't you asking everyone why I asked MM2 that question?
To be perfectly honest that wouldn't have been a bad plan, but your reaction made you look bad, not anything I said to Metalmarsh 2.
Reywas 2 wrote:So you admit that I didn't say that. That you construed it that way, in a way to make me look bad, most likely intentionally. I hope you see the irony in that.
I know you were only interested in Metalmarsh 2's answer, you're proving my point. If you felt like your point was valid you would have opened it up to the whole thread. MM2 strikes me as an opinionated player capable of sharing his own opinions. He doesn't need your prompting. You did it to get buddy-buddy with him.
Also, yes, I saw those posts. I just don't think Roxy would show that kind of bias. For all we know GG2 was the real Bass, and she did swallow it.Golden 2 wrote:"Lipsticklacey", I believe "Rey" made a comment on who "Blooper" might be and then "SVS" made an OT remark on why, if that happens to be true, a modkill on him would be "tough to swallow" for the Host, as she put it.
Two posts out of 4 by "Blooper" were during the Night, so her sending actions around that time as well isn't a farfetched concept, despite her otherwise apathetic and inactive gameplay and is out of modkill range, on its own. The dark flip side, of course, is that "Blooper" is bad and her team sent all the actions in her place.
I mean the action wouldn't count towards the player actually being active if they didn't send it in, because that isn't that player being active.Golden 2 wrote:I don't follow. The Hosts have long clarified that the actions can be sent by anyone in the baddie team. Why would that action not count, simply because the player is inactive? It'd defeat the purpose of the team being allowed to send the action, in that player's absence.
It's true that, on other sites, the player still has to show up in BTSC and make a suggestion or have an opinion for the record, for the team to be validated to send it on his behalf. From what the Hosts said, this doesn't seem to be the case here.
linki - "TGG" was/is Wilgy.
Oh. Yes, that's true.Lipsticklacey 2 wrote:I mean the action wouldn't count towards the player actually being active if they didn't send it in, because that isn't that player being active.Golden 2 wrote:I don't follow. The Hosts have long clarified that the actions can be sent by anyone in the baddie team. Why would that action not count, simply because the player is inactive? It'd defeat the purpose of the team being allowed to send the action, in that player's absence.
It's true that, on other sites, the player still has to show up in BTSC and make a suggestion or have an opinion for the record, for the team to be validated to send it on his behalf. From what the Hosts said, this doesn't seem to be the case here.
linki - "TGG" was/is Wilgy.
I was thinking of Wilgy 2.
Sorry if you think I'm being obnoxious when I defend myself from what I believe are hyperbolic attacks from you. You've called me both ridiculous and obnoxious now, and apparently expect me to take that lying down.Bass 2 wrote:Reywas 2 wrote:So you admit that I didn't say that. That you construed it that way, in a way to make me look bad, most likely intentionally. I hope you see the irony in that.
I know you were only interested in Metalmarsh 2's answer, you're proving my point. If you felt like your point was valid you would have opened it up to the whole thread. MM2 strikes me as an opinionated player capable of sharing his own opinions. He doesn't need your prompting. You did it to get buddy-buddy with him.
You are getting obnoxious Reywas 2. I did not claim that you said the words "I want Metalmarsh 2 to get upset and leave." I claimed that the words you did say were said with that underlying intent. You were the only one to mention that claim of exact words. If you are of the belief that the only information we should work off of is the exact words that people post, with no context or interpretation whatsoever, then we'll have to agree to disagree.
Llama 2 wrote:Interesting.
@HOSTS Was there no mafia kill tonight? Or Blooper 2 just that?
Did you see his deleted post? He's upset because he was a jackass, and doesn't have free reign to continue being a jackass.Ricochet 2 wrote:Golden 2 is missing from the poll.
I went and checked and no living player has been missing from a poll before.
I'm very likely to vote for Cookie again today. I think it's pretty good that we got Eloh/ninja when we did, so I'm glad it wasn't cookie yesterday. But I still feel strongly about the slip.
Boo - I hope that you can come to a place where you are ok playing the game to its fullest. I'm not going to vote for you for being upset, but I do think that if you are not willing to post at all, you might consider asking for a replacement.
To be fair to others - I don't think voting for you is bad, I just don't like to vote someone when they are clearly upset.
Eloh was not town.Cobalt 2 wrote:Dom just voted Eloh, so if I'm right about him, then Eloh is town.
About Cookie, I find the zany reasons for voting there disquieting.
Look: Please consider that Dom's "ISO" of her was extra conscious of how BR would flip. He didn't even vote Cookie.
He has made it clear he isn't going to ask to be replaced. If you miss the point of this, fine. But this thread has had a hostility element and perhaps this will purge it if we come together to do this. Our hostesses are awesome, and why force them to modkill one of their roles?Reywas 2 wrote:I'd rather boo 2 get replaced or modkilled than waste a lynch on him. I'm not a fan of his attitude, but I'm also not a big fan of anyone using this as an opportunity to set up an easy vote. If he flips civ there's absolutely no accountability for those votes.
I got my eye on Lacey 2 and Cookie 2 for that.
Yes I did, and I think the mods did the right thing. And I think boo might be bad too, he is right at the top of my list of suspects.Lipsticklacey 2 wrote:Did you see his deleted post? He's upset because he was a jackass, and doesn't have free reign to continue being a jackass.Ricochet 2 wrote:Golden 2 is missing from the poll.
I went and checked and no living player has been missing from a poll before.
I'm very likely to vote for Cookie again today. I think it's pretty good that we got Eloh/ninja when we did, so I'm glad it wasn't cookie yesterday. But I still feel strongly about the slip.
Boo - I hope that you can come to a place where you are ok playing the game to its fullest. I'm not going to vote for you for being upset, but I do think that if you are not willing to post at all, you might consider asking for a replacement.
To be fair to others - I don't think voting for you is bad, I just don't like to vote someone when they are clearly upset.
One that can't be lynched? Yes.Cookie 2 wrote:Do you still think a baddie role that can't be lynched is ludicrous?
Dom 2 wrote:One that can't be lynched? Yes.Cookie 2 wrote:Do you still think a baddie role that can't be lynched is ludicrous?
As we've seen, Synonym was not a baddie and Long Con only had one chance to switch it. Do you still think it's viable?
So you think he could be bad, but that throwing his ass out would be behavior validation? How?Ricochet 2 wrote:Yes I did, and I think the mods did the right thing. And I think boo might be bad too, he is right at the top of my list of suspects.Lipsticklacey 2 wrote:Did you see his deleted post? He's upset because he was a jackass, and doesn't have free reign to continue being a jackass.Ricochet 2 wrote:Golden 2 is missing from the poll.
I went and checked and no living player has been missing from a poll before.
I'm very likely to vote for Cookie again today. I think it's pretty good that we got Eloh/ninja when we did, so I'm glad it wasn't cookie yesterday. But I still feel strongly about the slip.
Boo - I hope that you can come to a place where you are ok playing the game to its fullest. I'm not going to vote for you for being upset, but I do think that if you are not willing to post at all, you might consider asking for a replacement.
To be fair to others - I don't think voting for you is bad, I just don't like to vote someone when they are clearly upset.
I just feel like voting him right now is kind of behaviour validation. I would rather he settle down and play or get a replacement, so I can judge the sock, not the person behind it.
boo 2 wrote:For the record, I hate being censored. I am in the process of making amends with a certain somebody, but only because the line was actually closer to my foot rather than farther. I am not apologizing because anybody wants me to, or is attempting to make me to, but because I want to, and when you fuck up with a friend you gotta eat your words and smooth that shit over.
That said, I am about done with this game because I will not play with a fucking muzzle on my face and a potential ban sentence dangling over my head. The only thing stopping me from replying to certain people in the true way that I normally speak, is my respect for certain other people who I happen to enjoy the company of. Even then, only barely does it hinder me.
I will come in here and place votes so as to not make the hosts resort to mod killing me out of respect for having created and hosting the game.
Certain other changes will happen, but that is tied to my real account. Not this one.
Friendly life tip: Lighten up. Enjoy life more. None of us really has that long to do so.
That will be my final post in this thread.
What is this supposed to mean? Do you think Daisy made this up?Dom 2 wrote:Whether boo flips good or bad, it is an easy lynch. Anyone who thinks otherwise needs to reevaluate.
The votes for him have been because he made "dumb" comments (some of which none of us have even seen). This does not correlate to alignment in the slightest.
If he refuses to play then he needs to be replaced or modkilled. I agree that our hostesses are awesome. But I'm not willing to waste the civvies' most valuable tool just because a player has a bad attitude.Cookie 2 wrote:He has made it clear he isn't going to ask to be replaced. If you miss the point of this, fine. But this thread has had a hostility element and perhaps this will purge it if we come together to do this. Our hostesses are awesome, and why force them to modkill one of their roles?Reywas 2 wrote:I'd rather boo 2 get replaced or modkilled than waste a lynch on him. I'm not a fan of his attitude, but I'm also not a big fan of anyone using this as an opportunity to set up an easy vote. If he flips civ there's absolutely no accountability for those votes.
I got my eye on Lacey 2 and Cookie 2 for that.
I find your fear-mongering highly suspect.Cookie 2 wrote:Dom 2 wrote:One that can't be lynched? Yes.Cookie 2 wrote:Do you still think a baddie role that can't be lynched is ludicrous?
As we've seen, Synonym was not a baddie and Long Con only had one chance to switch it. Do you still think it's viable?
I think it was a valid possiblity at the time I said it. the fact that you blew it off and implied it was a ludicrous when i know, and I think you do too, that it is actually rather a common thing. Your post was disingenuous in the extreme. Incredibly so.
There are tons of bad roles that cannot be lynched until they are the last one on their team. Which would be unlikley during day one or two when i said that. You're full of it, tbh.
I didn't say in my post that it was about his alignment.Dom 2 wrote:Whether boo flips good or bad, it is an easy lynch. Anyone who thinks otherwise needs to reevaluate.
The votes for him have been because he made "dumb" comments (some of which none of us have even seen). This does not correlate to alignment in the slightest.
