I'm sure you wouldn't mind elaborating on your read, in that case.Dom wrote:Quin-- no.
MAD MAX: GAME OVER
Moderator: Community Team
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 334
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
- JaggedJimmyJay
- The Brassiere of The Syndicate
- Posts in topic: 879
- Posts: 40022
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 11:42 pm
- Location: United States
- Gender: Man
- Preferred Pronouns: He/him/his/himself
- Aka: Jay | JJJ | J3 | 3J | jagged | Jimmy | KOFM
- Contact:
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
I've elected to do a more thorough sort of night kill analysis by checking into each of the night kill targets (Epignosis 1.0, S~V~S, me, MP, and Mac) to determine what trends may exist if any. At least a couple of those were curious choices; I was surprised by each of the last two. That might provide an opportunity to see clues about motives.
Suspicions stated by each victim or attempted victim about living players somewhat near to the time of their demise:
Epignosis 1.0
Dom
S~V~S
~all dead~
JJJ as of Night 3
sprityo / Scotty 2.0
motel room
insertnamehere
DrWilgy
MovingPictures07
a2thezebra / Epignosis 2.0
Glorfindel
DrWilgy
sprityo / Scotty 2.0
MacDougall
Glorfindel
DrWilgy
a2thezebra / Epignosis 2.0
If I missed any important names, speak up. The first two may have been killed primarily for their suspicion of Elohcin, so it's hard to make much of those now. It's also possible they tried to kill me just because of how I looked after the Elohcin lynch.
Twice appearing
Thrice appearing
The reason I care about this at all is primarily that the MP and Mac kills both seemed to be okay for town -- they were suspected by enough people that they could have ended up mislynched. So for the baddies to kill them in spite of that implies to me that they had a unique motive for doing so. Maybe those two were on the right track. Maybe it was LOL RANDOM, which some baddies definitely prefer.
Suspicions stated by each victim or attempted victim about living players somewhat near to the time of their demise:
Epignosis 1.0
Dom
S~V~S
~all dead~
JJJ as of Night 3
sprityo / Scotty 2.0
motel room
insertnamehere
DrWilgy
MovingPictures07
a2thezebra / Epignosis 2.0
Glorfindel
DrWilgy
sprityo / Scotty 2.0
MacDougall
Glorfindel
DrWilgy
a2thezebra / Epignosis 2.0
If I missed any important names, speak up. The first two may have been killed primarily for their suspicion of Elohcin, so it's hard to make much of those now. It's also possible they tried to kill me just because of how I looked after the Elohcin lynch.
Twice appearing
Thrice appearing
The reason I care about this at all is primarily that the MP and Mac kills both seemed to be okay for town -- they were suspected by enough people that they could have ended up mislynched. So for the baddies to kill them in spite of that implies to me that they had a unique motive for doing so. Maybe those two were on the right track. Maybe it was LOL RANDOM, which some baddies definitely prefer.
Spoiler: show
- DrWilgy
- Capo Regime (Street Boss)
- Posts in topic: 125
- Posts: 15363
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 10:54 am
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
Just got blasted at work. I'll try to finish my response for you JJJ. U 2 Sloonei.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 334
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
Actually, I'm voting for you until you do elaborate. This is the only game related post you've written to or about me prior to my post yesterday, and I'm not even sure about this one because I don't know which paragraph you were referring to:Quin wrote:I'm sure you wouldn't mind elaborating on your read, in that case.Dom wrote:Quin-- no.
Spoiler: show
- JaggedJimmyJay
- The Brassiere of The Syndicate
- Posts in topic: 879
- Posts: 40022
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 11:42 pm
- Location: United States
- Gender: Man
- Preferred Pronouns: He/him/his/himself
- Aka: Jay | JJJ | J3 | 3J | jagged | Jimmy | KOFM
- Contact:
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
I could also say Mac suspected Dom, though that subsided later in his lifespan.
Spoiler: show
- Dom
- mayor of gaytown
- Posts in topic: 274
- Posts: 9997
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:36 pm
- Location: Wherever Niall is TBH
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
Why?Quin wrote:I'm sure you wouldn't mind elaborating on your read, in that case.Dom wrote:Quin-- no.
I said what I feel is relevant. I didn't suspect you until Day 6. I didn't suspect Sloonei until Day 6. What elaborating is there to do?
This is non-sensical.Quin wrote:Actually, I'm voting for you until you do elaborate. This is the only game related post you've written to or about me prior to my post yesterday, and I'm not even sure about this one because I don't know which paragraph you were referring to:Quin wrote:I'm sure you wouldn't mind elaborating on your read, in that case.Dom wrote:Quin-- no.
I'm not buying what you're selling.Spoiler: show
Spoiler: show
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 334
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
You literally just said our conversation on Day 6 was not relevant to your suspicion of me.Dom wrote:Why?Quin wrote:I'm sure you wouldn't mind elaborating on your read, in that case.Dom wrote:Quin-- no.
I said what I feel is relevant. I didn't suspect you until Day 6. I didn't suspect Sloonei until Day 6. What elaborating is there to do?This is non-sensical.Quin wrote:Actually, I'm voting for you until you do elaborate. This is the only game related post you've written to or about me prior to my post yesterday, and I'm not even sure about this one because I don't know which paragraph you were referring to:Quin wrote:I'm sure you wouldn't mind elaborating on your read, in that case.Dom wrote:Quin-- no.
I'm not buying what you're selling.Spoiler: show

- Dom
- mayor of gaytown
- Posts in topic: 274
- Posts: 9997
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:36 pm
- Location: Wherever Niall is TBH
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
The answer is no.Quin wrote:I'll get around to doing those ISO's today. Maybe more if I have the energy. In the meantime, I have a nasty ass rash under my armpit that's damn near impossible to ignore and I need to do something about it
I would also like an answer to this.
Sloonei wrote:Am I on this list for anything that happened prior to an hour ago?Dom wrote:You, Glorf, Quin, Lorab, and Scotty.Sloonei wrote:I wanted to hear his thoughts. He gave them. I am satisfied with his response for now.Dom wrote:When did you replace in?Quin wrote:No, I didn't know that the post you quoted even existed.
TBH, if you want to make a claim why not research it at all?
Did you?Sloonei wrote:I have a funny way of saying things.Dom wrote:That's not what you asked.
And you didn't answer my question(s).
Yes I did.
Why expect Epi to have a next suspect to vote when you didn't name one if Glorf was suddenly dead?
Who are you considering voting for?
That is not what you have interpreted from the text.
Spoiler: show
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 334
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
Then enlighten me.
- Dom
- mayor of gaytown
- Posts in topic: 274
- Posts: 9997
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:36 pm
- Location: Wherever Niall is TBH
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
What are you even talking about?
I didn't suspect either of you until Day 6
I didn't suspect either of you until Day 6
Spoiler: show
- JaggedJimmyJay
- The Brassiere of The Syndicate
- Posts in topic: 879
- Posts: 40022
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 11:42 pm
- Location: United States
- Gender: Man
- Preferred Pronouns: He/him/his/himself
- Aka: Jay | JJJ | J3 | 3J | jagged | Jimmy | KOFM
- Contact:
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
Why do you suspect them now?Dom wrote:What are you even talking about?
I didn't suspect either of you until Day 6
Spoiler: show
- LoRab
- Loan Shark
- Posts in topic: 149
- Posts: 2725
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:42 pm
- Location: Phily
- Preferred Pronouns: She series
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
I tend to have tunnel vision when I latch onto a suspect. That has not inhibited my engagement. My schedule IRL, on the other hand, has limited my time. I'm going away tomorrow and have been swamped at work getting everything in place for me to be away. Plus, it's a trip that requires a bunch of prep work. But I have some time tonight to play.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Perhaps a little too consistent. Your focus in recent phases has been narrowed enough that it has inhibited your engagement with the broader scope of discussion, and that's beneficial to you if you're bad.LoRab wrote:I've been consistent enough in my thought that he's bad that I didn't really feel the need to say it again at that point.
LoRab
I don't know how to convince you that I'm civ. But if it's just that I'm stubborn and continue to suspect INH, then I don't really know what to say. Yes, I still suspect him. But that's not indicative of anything other than my suspecting him.
As for other suspects...
I could reconsider Glorf. I hadn't been suspecting him because of his vote in the Elo lynch, but maybe he would vote for a counterwagon in the end of a lynch in hopes of saving a teammate. It seemed unlikely at the time, but maybe it was done because it was unlikely, and because it presented a chance for a save. On the other hand, I still find it unlikely (thinking back) because of the Elo confusion of who had been replaced and who hadn't--it read like an honest error; and I find it hard to believe that a baddie would forget who was on their team. So, that makes me doubt Glorf is bad. So, I'd like to hear explanations of how that could make sense for Elo to have thought Glorf was replaced if Glorf were on her team.
Wilgy, I had suspected a bit back--I need to look back at my posts to remember why. I think it was in part that he celebrated the death of a civ in the thread, which is inherently suspish to me, but I seem to remember there was something else to my eyeballing him.
Sloonei I have had a basic neutral read of for most of the game. He's been very active, so I want to assume civ. But he actively pushed for the Elo counter-wagon, so that doesn't seem great. Now, given that said wagon was against me, means that I can't help but read that personally, so I recognize that colors my reading of it, so I'm also hesitant to suspect him because of it. But maybe I shouldn't hesitate. Maybe he's the wolf that's been hiding in sheep's clothing. I'm not ready to really go down that road yet, but it's a suspicion that's been growing in the back of my mind.
Scotty has seemed civ since he started participating, but he can be wiley, so an eyeball is still there. Knowing that Indiglo took suspicion because she didn't participate much as a sub in, it's possible that a baddie subbing in would actively decide to do the opposite. He hasn't done anything to make me suspect him, but an eye is there just because he is smart enough to be careful subbing in--especially into a role that had the majority of players, IIRC, ready to lynch them.
Dom, I'm currently reading as civ, based entirely on vibe. I mention this because I had suspected him earlier. I've gone back and forth, but I'm not currently suspecting him.
I have some residual suspicion of Epi because I had some vague suspicion of zebra, but I need to look back to remember why. My brain is mushy enough at the moment that I'm not recalling why I had any suspicion there. If I recall, it was more neutral read and therefore not sure if civ than baddie read. So, I guess that's still neutral.
Everyone else is between civ and neutral.
- Dom
- mayor of gaytown
- Posts in topic: 274
- Posts: 9997
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:36 pm
- Location: Wherever Niall is TBH
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
Sloonei: afraid to answer questions he asksJaggedJimmyJay wrote:Why do you suspect them now?Dom wrote:What are you even talking about?
I didn't suspect either of you until Day 6
Quin: lies.
Spoiler: show
- JaggedJimmyJay
- The Brassiere of The Syndicate
- Posts in topic: 879
- Posts: 40022
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 11:42 pm
- Location: United States
- Gender: Man
- Preferred Pronouns: He/him/his/himself
- Aka: Jay | JJJ | J3 | 3J | jagged | Jimmy | KOFM
- Contact:
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
Please point to specific examples.Dom wrote:Sloonei: afraid to answer questions he asksJaggedJimmyJay wrote:Why do you suspect them now?Dom wrote:What are you even talking about?
I didn't suspect either of you until Day 6
Quin: lies.
Spoiler: show
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 334
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
Why did it take someone who is not me or Sloonei to get you to share that information?Dom wrote:Sloonei: afraid to answer questions he asksJaggedJimmyJay wrote:Why do you suspect them now?Dom wrote:What are you even talking about?
I didn't suspect either of you until Day 6
Quin: lies.
- Dom
- mayor of gaytown
- Posts in topic: 274
- Posts: 9997
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:36 pm
- Location: Wherever Niall is TBH
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
Sloonei:JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Please point to specific examples.Dom wrote:Sloonei: afraid to answer questions he asksJaggedJimmyJay wrote:Why do you suspect them now?Dom wrote:What are you even talking about?
I didn't suspect either of you until Day 6
Quin: lies.
Asked epi who'd he'd lynch IMMEDIATELY after his biggest suspect died. Was clearly peeved he didn't get an answer. When I asked him who he'd lynch if Glorfindel died, he had no answer.
Quin: Said Mac suspected me. Mac did not.
Spoiler: show
- Dom
- mayor of gaytown
- Posts in topic: 274
- Posts: 9997
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:36 pm
- Location: Wherever Niall is TBH
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
Maybe I was unclear, but I didn't intend that.Quin wrote:Why did it take someone who is not me or Sloonei to get you to share that information?Dom wrote:Sloonei: afraid to answer questions he asksJaggedJimmyJay wrote:Why do you suspect them now?Dom wrote:What are you even talking about?
I didn't suspect either of you until Day 6
Quin: lies.
Spoiler: show
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 334
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
Mac did suspect you. Then Mac didn't. I only knew about the former.Dom wrote:Sloonei:JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Please point to specific examples.Dom wrote:Sloonei: afraid to answer questions he asksJaggedJimmyJay wrote:Why do you suspect them now?Dom wrote:What are you even talking about?
I didn't suspect either of you until Day 6
Quin: lies.
Asked epi who'd he'd lynch IMMEDIATELY after his biggest suspect died. Was clearly peeved he didn't get an answer. When I asked him who he'd lynch if Glorfindel died, he had no answer.
Quin: Said Mac suspected me. Mac did not.
You claimed you don't suspect me based on the dialogue we had on Day 6, yet your case against me is entirely based on that dialogue. I think that you had no intention on elaborating on your suspicions until 3J pushed it, and now you've contradicted yourself.
- Dom
- mayor of gaytown
- Posts in topic: 274
- Posts: 9997
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:36 pm
- Location: Wherever Niall is TBH
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
That is literally not what I said.
You asked if there was antyhing other than the events of the last hour (meaning Day 6) that makes me suspect you. I said no. What is so hard to understand about that?
You asked if there was antyhing other than the events of the last hour (meaning Day 6) that makes me suspect you. I said no. What is so hard to understand about that?
Spoiler: show
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 334
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
You're right Dom. I misinterpreted it the other way around. 

- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 334
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
To better answer to your suspicion of me, I named you among three based entirely on GTH reads at that moment. A few pages back 3J reposted his GTH results, and I remember that you and Mac had a back and forth pretty much all game, so I made an inference. You proved me wrong, so I removed you from that pool.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 334
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
When I made this post.Quin wrote:I recalled a bunch of dialogue between you two and remembered 3J's GTH thing. Your post was more recent, though.Dom wrote:Quinn is a liar.![]()
I still want to read you, just based on the fact that I haven't since I first subbed in.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Night 3 GTH chart re-uploaded:
Spoiler: show
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 334
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
I used the grin emoticon.Dom wrote:How am I supposed to see that you no longer suspect me from that?
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 334
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
Besides, if my basis for GTH reading you as bad is based on the fact that Mac suspected you, and I'm proved otherwise, that suspicion has no business existing.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 334
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
Works for me. I'll move my vote eventually.Dom wrote:I'm unlikely to vote for you-- but I've got myon you.
- JaggedJimmyJay
- The Brassiere of The Syndicate
- Posts in topic: 879
- Posts: 40022
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 11:42 pm
- Location: United States
- Gender: Man
- Preferred Pronouns: He/him/his/himself
- Aka: Jay | JJJ | J3 | 3J | jagged | Jimmy | KOFM
- Contact:
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
My concern is that after sharing all of those takes on the other players, you didn't seem willing to call anyone a suspect. There were some "eyes" here and there, but on Day 6 I'd expect a more concrete set of reads. You have a clear read on INH, but otherwise it's a pile of waffles.LoRab wrote:As for other suspects...
Spoiler: show
- JaggedJimmyJay
- The Brassiere of The Syndicate
- Posts in topic: 879
- Posts: 40022
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 11:42 pm
- Location: United States
- Gender: Man
- Preferred Pronouns: He/him/his/himself
- Aka: Jay | JJJ | J3 | 3J | jagged | Jimmy | KOFM
- Contact:
- LoRab
- Loan Shark
- Posts in topic: 149
- Posts: 2725
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:42 pm
- Location: Phily
- Preferred Pronouns: She series
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
That's how I play. I won't apologize for that. If you suspect me for it, so be it. I won't pretend to have greater suspicions that I actually have. I don't see any obvious baddies out there. It would be lovely if they showed themselves, but that doesn't often happen so obviously. So, we're stuck with vagueness. I'm just doing the best I can.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:My concern is that after sharing all of those takes on the other players, you didn't seem willing to call anyone a suspect. There were some "eyes" here and there, but on Day 6 I'd expect a more concrete set of reads. You have a clear read on INH, but otherwise it's a pile of waffles.LoRab wrote:As for other suspects...
- LoRab
- Loan Shark
- Posts in topic: 149
- Posts: 2725
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:42 pm
- Location: Phily
- Preferred Pronouns: She series
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
Putting vote on Wilgy for now. Mainly because I don't want to forget to vote tomorrow.
I may change. Likely will. But Wilgy feels like the right choice for the moment.
I may change. Likely will. But Wilgy feels like the right choice for the moment.
- Sloonei
- Cap'n Sloonbeard
- Posts in topic: 823
- Posts: 26594
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:05 pm
- Location: Buffalo
- Gender: Male
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
Why do you suspect me?Dom wrote:Why?Quin wrote:I'm sure you wouldn't mind elaborating on your read, in that case.Dom wrote:Quin-- no.
I said what I feel is relevant. I didn't suspect you until Day 6. I didn't suspect Sloonei until Day 6. What elaborating is there to do?This is non-sensical.Quin wrote:Actually, I'm voting for you until you do elaborate. This is the only game related post you've written to or about me prior to my post yesterday, and I'm not even sure about this one because I don't know which paragraph you were referring to:Quin wrote:I'm sure you wouldn't mind elaborating on your read, in that case.Dom wrote:Quin-- no.
I'm not buying what you're selling.Spoiler: show
My banners:
Spoiler: show
- JaggedJimmyJay
- The Brassiere of The Syndicate
- Posts in topic: 879
- Posts: 40022
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 11:42 pm
- Location: United States
- Gender: Man
- Preferred Pronouns: He/him/his/himself
- Aka: Jay | JJJ | J3 | 3J | jagged | Jimmy | KOFM
- Contact:
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
This isn't a point I am inclined to keep pushing, because I don't necessarily feel differently about this game right now.LoRab wrote:That's how I play. I won't apologize for that. If you suspect me for it, so be it. I won't pretend to have greater suspicions that I actually have. I don't see any obvious baddies out there. It would be lovely if they showed themselves, but that doesn't often happen so obviously. So, we're stuck with vagueness. I'm just doing the best I can.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:My concern is that after sharing all of those takes on the other players, you didn't seem willing to call anyone a suspect. There were some "eyes" here and there, but on Day 6 I'd expect a more concrete set of reads. You have a clear read on INH, but otherwise it's a pile of waffles.LoRab wrote:As for other suspects...
Spoiler: show
- JaggedJimmyJay
- The Brassiere of The Syndicate
- Posts in topic: 879
- Posts: 40022
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 11:42 pm
- Location: United States
- Gender: Man
- Preferred Pronouns: He/him/his/himself
- Aka: Jay | JJJ | J3 | 3J | jagged | Jimmy | KOFM
- Contact:
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
What is nonsensical? That's a strong word.Dom wrote:This is non-sensical.
Spoiler: show
- LoRab
- Loan Shark
- Posts in topic: 149
- Posts: 2725
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:42 pm
- Location: Phily
- Preferred Pronouns: She series
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
@Dom:
What if you reframed people you perceive as lying as being mistaken? And things being nonsensical as being different from what you'd think?
I don't suspect you currently, but your posts seem to unfairly target folks. I think if you step back, their posts may seem more innocuous. Also, that may allow you to find more suspicious behavior.
What if you reframed people you perceive as lying as being mistaken? And things being nonsensical as being different from what you'd think?
I don't suspect you currently, but your posts seem to unfairly target folks. I think if you step back, their posts may seem more innocuous. Also, that may allow you to find more suspicious behavior.
- DrWilgy
- Capo Regime (Street Boss)
- Posts in topic: 125
- Posts: 15363
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 10:54 am
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
-__-LoRab wrote:Putting vote on Wilgy for now. Mainly because I don't want to forget to vote tomorrow.
I may change. Likely will. But Wilgy feels like the right choice for the moment.
Hmm... I don't think this is the case, but how would the votes look if both Elo and Lorab were bad?
- JaggedJimmyJay
- The Brassiere of The Syndicate
- Posts in topic: 879
- Posts: 40022
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 11:42 pm
- Location: United States
- Gender: Man
- Preferred Pronouns: He/him/his/himself
- Aka: Jay | JJJ | J3 | 3J | jagged | Jimmy | KOFM
- Contact:
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
If you don't think it's the case, what interest is it to you?DrWilgy wrote:-__-LoRab wrote:Putting vote on Wilgy for now. Mainly because I don't want to forget to vote tomorrow.
I may change. Likely will. But Wilgy feels like the right choice for the moment.
Hmm... I don't think this is the case, but how would the votes look if both Elo and Lorab were bad?
Spoiler: show
- Sloonei
- Cap'n Sloonbeard
- Posts in topic: 823
- Posts: 26594
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:05 pm
- Location: Buffalo
- Gender: Male
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
wait what? Is this really how you interpreted that exchange? This is nonsensical.Dom wrote:Sloonei:JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Please point to specific examples.Dom wrote:Sloonei: afraid to answer questions he asksJaggedJimmyJay wrote:Why do you suspect them now?Dom wrote:What are you even talking about?
I didn't suspect either of you until Day 6
Quin: lies.
Asked epi who'd he'd lynch IMMEDIATELY after his biggest suspect died. Was clearly peeved he didn't get an answer. When I asked him who he'd lynch if Glorfindel died, he had no answer.
Quin: Said Mac suspected me. Mac did not.
My banners:
Spoiler: show
- Dom
- mayor of gaytown
- Posts in topic: 274
- Posts: 9997
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:36 pm
- Location: Wherever Niall is TBH
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
Quin admitted that he read my post wrong. Why are you taking issue with me being very confused as to why someone was arguing with me when we seemingly agreed?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:What is nonsensical? That's a strong word.Dom wrote:This is non-sensical.
I think it's posible Quin was just mistaken, sure. I just am watching out for Quin now. That was pretty blatant if you ask me, though.LoRab wrote:@Dom:
What if you reframed people you perceive as lying as being mistaken? And things being nonsensical as being different from what you'd think?
I don't suspect you currently, but your posts seem to unfairly target folks. I think if you step back, their posts may seem more innocuous. Also, that may allow you to find more suspicious behavior.
Yes. I asked you who you suspected and you did't even answer the question. You said you'll owrry about it after Glorfindel is dead which is about as non-town of an answer as I'd expect.Sloonei wrote:wait what? Is this really how you interpreted that exchange? This is nonsensical.Dom wrote:Sloonei:JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Please point to specific examples.Dom wrote:Sloonei: afraid to answer questions he asksJaggedJimmyJay wrote:Why do you suspect them now?Dom wrote:What are you even talking about?
I didn't suspect either of you until Day 6
Quin: lies.
Asked epi who'd he'd lynch IMMEDIATELY after his biggest suspect died. Was clearly peeved he didn't get an answer. When I asked him who he'd lynch if Glorfindel died, he had no answer.
Quin: Said Mac suspected me. Mac did not.
Spoiler: show
- Sloonei
- Cap'n Sloonbeard
- Posts in topic: 823
- Posts: 26594
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:05 pm
- Location: Buffalo
- Gender: Male
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
This was my answer to your question, Dom. Please point out the parts of it which you object to:
Sloonei wrote:I am currently voting for Glorfindel until further notice. I am also considering everyone else.Dom wrote:Sloonei who are you going to vote for?
if they die who are you going to vote for?
if they die who are you going to vote for?
Quinn: Citation needed that Mac didn't like me.
My banners:
Spoiler: show
- Sloonei
- Cap'n Sloonbeard
- Posts in topic: 823
- Posts: 26594
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:05 pm
- Location: Buffalo
- Gender: Male
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
And I also need to address the idea that my "Who are you gonna vote for?" question was some sort of far-fetched framing scheme of mine. Here's the original post, right at the start of Day 6:
Note the second question addressed to Quin. This is just a light conversation-starter type of post. I'm just peppering the two players I can see in the thread with standard mafia questions. These are really the same question: "Who are your suspects?" But, as I am a player who asks a ton of questions in this game, I get bored of typing the same words over and over and over and over again, so sometimes I like to spice it up! I throw whole new, colorful sets of words at people! One way that I like to do this is to ask people "Who they're voting for" instead "who they suspect". Don't believe me? Here's some more examples from this game:Sloonei wrote:Epi, who you gonna vote for now that Mr Mac is dead?
Quin, who's your supposed 3 person scum team?
linkSloonei wrote:Who are you gonna vote for, Mr Quin?
linkSloonei wrote:who you gonna vote for, champ?motel room wrote:righty-o
link (admittedly the context is a little different on this one)Sloonei wrote:Who do you want to vote for, mac?
linkSloonei wrote:Who you gonna vote for, Dom?
My banners:
Spoiler: show
- DrWilgy
- Capo Regime (Street Boss)
- Posts in topic: 125
- Posts: 15363
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 10:54 am
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
Simply because we can't ignore plausible options. If enough evidence appears for me to believe that Lorab may be bad it will be a good thought.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:If you don't think it's the case, what interest is it to you?DrWilgy wrote:-__-LoRab wrote:Putting vote on Wilgy for now. Mainly because I don't want to forget to vote tomorrow.
I may change. Likely will. But Wilgy feels like the right choice for the moment.
Hmm... I don't think this is the case, but how would the votes look if both Elo and Lorab were bad?
- Sloonei
- Cap'n Sloonbeard
- Posts in topic: 823
- Posts: 26594
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:05 pm
- Location: Buffalo
- Gender: Male
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
So now that I've had some time to adjust and let my skepticism grow, I can see the possibility for Dom and Epi to have coordinated an attack against me during the night. Both of them pounced on the very first thing I said today. At the time I thought Epi felt good, but he's still not delivered on the promise to read me further, so I'm growing more uneasy about the way he spun that thing against me. I can see why I'd make sense as a person to frame, too. I've pushed a couple misguided bandwagons and have no definitive townie points in this game behind vibes and feels. I don't want to get ahead of myself and and take this OMGUS to the bank, but it's a thought and it's out there.
My banners:
Spoiler: show
- Sloonei
- Cap'n Sloonbeard
- Posts in topic: 823
- Posts: 26594
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:05 pm
- Location: Buffalo
- Gender: Male
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
I am not sure I understand your original question here.DrWilgy wrote:Simply because we can't ignore plausible options. If enough evidence appears for me to believe that Lorab may be bad it will be a good thought.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:If you don't think it's the case, what interest is it to you?DrWilgy wrote:-__-LoRab wrote:Putting vote on Wilgy for now. Mainly because I don't want to forget to vote tomorrow.
I may change. Likely will. But Wilgy feels like the right choice for the moment.
Hmm... I don't think this is the case, but how would the votes look if both Elo and Lorab were bad?
My banners:
Spoiler: show
- DrWilgy
- Capo Regime (Street Boss)
- Posts in topic: 125
- Posts: 15363
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 10:54 am
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
*FixedSloonei wrote:I am not sure I understand your original question here.DrWilgy wrote:Simply because we can't ignore plausible options. If enough evidence appears for me to believe that Lorab may be bad it will be a good thought.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:If you don't think it's the case, what interest is it to you?DrWilgy wrote:-__-LoRab wrote:Putting vote on Wilgy for now. Mainly because I don't want to forget to vote tomorrow.
I may change. Likely will. But Wilgy feels like the right choice for the moment.
Hmm... I don't think this is the case, but how would the votes have looked if both Elo and Lorab were bad? Those few days ago
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
I probably won't end up reading through your posts, Sloonei.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
At least not today or tomorrow.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
- Sloonei
- Cap'n Sloonbeard
- Posts in topic: 823
- Posts: 26594
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:05 pm
- Location: Buffalo
- Gender: Male
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: MAD MAX: Day 4
I was not.DrWilgy wrote:While a single sentence may be hard, the strongest cause of suspicion is in the above quote.DrWilgy wrote:Actually, you are bad. Explain this Sloonei.Sloonei wrote:if INH is town, Wilgy looks bad right now.
I feel that Sloonei was fully expecting a INH civ flip and over eagerly tried to throw fault at me for thus flip.
RE: The orange: How is that irrelevant to what you asked? You asked my explain why you looked bad. I think you look bad because you appear to have forgotten what your read on me was. That's the #1 reason I suspect you, how can you say it's irrelevant to the question of why I think you are bad. And I added the "from my perspective" thing because I don't think anyone else would be as hyper-aware of what your read on me is/was as I am. Yeah, it's a bit of a redundancy but whatever.This is irrelevant to the question I asked. "from my perspective" is also a fodder statement. Of course this is from your perspective, this is your thought. I get baddie vibes from fodder statements like this, as it's symptoms of a skittling player. Baddies skittle more than civs.Sloonei wrote:Mostly your treatment of after the deadline. I only qualified the statement because if INH flipped bad it'd be hard to argue that the guy who just hammered on a baddie is also a baddie. But, from my perspective, it looks like you genuinely just forgot that you'd dropped your suspicion of me and then had to cover your tracks.
Plus you never told us why you went from INH to indi and back to INH in the final minutes. What inspired you to move your vote to indiglo? How do you feel about Glorfindel?
This is just false as I explained my vote changes in the following quotes.
[a bunch of quotes where Wilgy explains what he was doing at the end of Day 5]
Linki - Stop saying things that aren't happening Sloonei.
I admit the blue part is false. It was a chaotic end of day. I suppose I was hoping you'd give a more substantive reason to suspect either indiglo or INH, rather than just eyeballing the bandwagon participants.
But since we're on the subject, you looked a little skittish at that end of day yourself, the way you danced around with your vote. Regardless of what your reasoning was, you appeared very indecisive.
My banners:
Spoiler: show