RIP Epig.
Elohcin wrote:S~V~S wrote:Elohcin wrote:Epignosis wrote:7 MovingPictures07 was on a journey to the temple, as was his custom. A shepherd observed him, saying "Traveler, the means of sending forth your seed has been severed."
Maybe Epi voted Lizzy to subtly say that he thinks I am civvie this game. He would be right.
But you randomized. How would following a random vote because he trusts you make him civ? If anything it looks like him kissing up to you.
You convinced me.
*voting Epi*
I didn't say he did it because he trusted my randomized vote. I said he may voted my way to subtly show he thought I was civ. Really it was mostly a joke though anyway b/c you all were talking (again) about how he is so good at reading me.
Still, I am unsure of why everyone voted for Epi b/c he was having fun with the theme of the game. That sounds like a lame excuse to be suspicious of someone. I have my eye on Epi voters.
I'm not sure why you think everyone voted him for that reason; I personally did not, and it seems Vomps and SVS did not either.
I was actually incredibly entertained by his posting and I hated to vote him for it, but he never even stated any reason why he voted for Lizzy, and considering she already had one vote cast upon her before that, it struck me as suspicious. Also, I thought a tie would be cool. But then other people voted for Epig and it was no longer a tie. (But that didn't really matter, it's really just me being silly, the real reason is his vote).
I was wrong, but I think it's silly to fixate on "Epig voters" any more than it is to fixate on voters who randomized.
Sure, there could be a baddie or even both among the Epig voters, but one is not me, and I think it's silly to set ourselves up for possibly a second civvie lynch already by concentrating on Epig voters when we really don't have any better evidence of any of them being bad than anyone else at this point, no? There's hardly been anything to base suspicions off of thus far.
Personally, I'm getting sincere vibes from S~V~S, I think Blooper's vote being cast first seemed genuine, Vompatti seems like he's actually enjoying this game and I don't have any reason to believe he's bad yet, so that leaves AP. So if any of the Epig voters are bad at this point, I'd be willing to look at AP, but not really any more closely than any of the voters who threw away their votes today. In fact, I'm a bit more apt to look that way, if anything.