Trust is a heavy word. Too early to trust anyone.Quin wrote:Who do you trust among us in the hatch?Black Rock wrote:Well this kinda sucks. I don't have any suspicions of any one in the hatch. Mafia is hard.
2016 Game of Champions - Hatch [Night 2]
- Black Rock
- Loan Shark
- Posts in topic: 6
- Posts: 2542
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 4:40 pm
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
- Black Rock
- Loan Shark
- Posts in topic: 6
- Posts: 2542
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 4:40 pm
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
timmer wrote:Sorry guys, mega long day, souble shift. My thoughts are the same as this morning. I have another double tmorrow, so I'll tune in around lunch and figure out where my vote will go. I could see a MacD vote, but in case he is silenced, MACD you need to post in other non-mafia areas of the site to show that you are around but can't post in here.
I'm currently suspicious of Timmer and Floyd because of this post. Something doesn't smell right about it. I'm going to put my vote on Floyd at this moment.
- DharmaHelper
- Capo Regime (Street Boss)
- Posts in topic: 75
- Posts: 16565
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:29 pm
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Why are you suspicious of Floyd because of that post? Why not vote timmer?
our Linkitis is our lives.
- DharmaHelper
- Capo Regime (Street Boss)
- Posts in topic: 75
- Posts: 16565
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:29 pm
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Surely Black Rock hasn't just pulled a quote entirely unrelated to Floyd to justify a vote for him to break the tie and save a teammate.
Surely.
Surely.
our Linkitis is our lives.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 36
- Posts: 10894
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
I'm not being lazy.DrWilgy wrote:Idk, same reason why I'd be willing to vote BR, Sig, BWT, or Sriracha. I got a whole lotta null from you.Professor Farnsworth wrote:Wilgy, why did you vote me?
You just happened to be the player in that group to use the "Priz" meme.
I'm hesitant to vote Floyd atm due to me not trusting Quin. I think I'm seeing "Hey, I'm off the ballot! Time to be lazy" Quin.
I'm hesitant to trust LC currently. I've been tone reading him bad. I can't pin point this though, and it's not a vote worthy read.
Lastly I'm finding myself agreeing with DH often. Perhaps too often, and I should reevaluate.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 36
- Posts: 10894
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
[insert activity]
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 36
- Posts: 10894
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Her train of thought supports a timmer vote, not a Floyd one. I don't like it much.DharmaHelper wrote:Surely Black Rock hasn't just pulled a quote entirely unrelated to Floyd to justify a vote for him to break the tie and save a teammate.
Surely.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 36
- Posts: 10894
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
It looks like today is going to be a bad internet day.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 36
- Posts: 10894
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
I meant it synonymously with 'civ-read'. Do you have any of them?Black Rock wrote:Trust is a heavy word. Too early to trust anyone.Quin wrote:Who do you trust among us in the hatch?Black Rock wrote:Well this kinda sucks. I don't have any suspicions of any one in the hatch. Mafia is hard.
- DharmaHelper
- Capo Regime (Street Boss)
- Posts in topic: 75
- Posts: 16565
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:29 pm
- Sorsha
- Money Launderer
- Posts in topic: 31
- Posts: 2128
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:26 pm
- Location: MKE
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Why not who she was saving?
- Sorsha
- Money Launderer
- Posts in topic: 31
- Posts: 2128
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:26 pm
- Location: MKE
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
You think it's LC just to be clear?
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 36
- Posts: 10894
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
I could. I'll wait on BR's explanation before I do anything though.
- DharmaHelper
- Capo Regime (Street Boss)
- Posts in topic: 75
- Posts: 16565
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:29 pm
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Sorsha wrote:You think it's LC just to be clear?
I dunno who it could be, but "Here's a post by timmer that doesn't mention Floyd so I suspect Floyd and will vote for him" Doesn't track.
our Linkitis is our lives.
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Hey hey hey I'm alive, kinda.
I'd like to apologize for my absences, I've got a paper and test due tomorrow and then like four tests next week I've been studying for that are next week. I'll catch up on the thread right now, I do have to say lynching me will result in very little knowledge. I'll be reading over LC logic for lynching me, but a very good rule of thumb with LC is that if he is voting for me he is mafia. This isn't some wild accusation this is a meta driven thought process.
I'd like to apologize for my absences, I've got a paper and test due tomorrow and then like four tests next week I've been studying for that are next week. I'll catch up on the thread right now, I do have to say lynching me will result in very little knowledge. I'll be reading over LC logic for lynching me, but a very good rule of thumb with LC is that if he is voting for me he is mafia. This isn't some wild accusation this is a meta driven thought process.
- Sorsha
- Money Launderer
- Posts in topic: 31
- Posts: 2128
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:26 pm
- Location: MKE
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
I've got some suspicion of BR from main thread regarding her Mac posts & vote but I'm also eyeing LC and LoRab for entertaining the thought that Floyd might be silenced.
- DharmaHelper
- Capo Regime (Street Boss)
- Posts in topic: 75
- Posts: 16565
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:29 pm
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Quin and Farnsworth could put BR into the tie.
our Linkitis is our lives.
- Long Con
- So Divine
- Posts in topic: 47
- Posts: 21901
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 12:57 pm
- Location: Canada
- Gender: Dude
- Preferred Pronouns: boy ones
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
This thread turned into an explosion of bullshit, hard to decide where to begin.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 36
- Posts: 10894
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Where do you stand on BR?Long Con wrote:This thread turned into an explosion of bullshit, hard to decide where to begin.
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
I think we should ask why would Epi be killed day 1? He was right on Mac which would be one reason but without seeing the thread I can't do a veyr good NKA. So if I live through this phase I'll do one for sure, if not I suggest a few players do, since I suspect he named more than one mafia member.
Also I'm reading and posting as I go, so if a question was answered or an issue resolved to bad I'm addressing it.
I always use tons of smilies look at any game of mine and you'll see them. In fact I reckon I use fewer as a baddie.
This is however, in no way a mafia/civ identification.
I'm pretty sure Farnsworth was suspected by Priz for posting without providing context? I do recall Farnsy posting, but I don't remember what he said.
Why do you feel good about LC and DH?
Nothing concrete at all and nothing that fits into my baddie meta, in fact baddie Sig can very easily copy a civ outrage freak out, look at Scrimmage I'm pretty sure I did that there.
Page 1 done onto page 2
Sorsha makes a good point on Lorab, scum slips do happen, but I'm always wary on lynching on them seeing how often I get band wagoned for that.
I didn't see anything that interesting on page two just some back and forth between lorab and Sorsha some things on Farnsworth, nothing I can think to comment on.
Page 3 point for Quin due to the South park thingy (I can't think of the word I want source? Nah that isn't it stupid college it's making me dumber) guess I won't be lynching him today.
This is weird? Bringing up silencing when we literally have no idea if it is real, it's like when people talk about their role to spite the silenced player.
This is very very telling.
This was page three I'm posting this, going to work on my paper and be back in a bit.
Also I'm reading and posting as I go, so if a question was answered or an issue resolved to bad I'm addressing it.
Can you explain your thoughts on BK?Sorsha wrote:Llama called me out as bad in the Felt 2 game based on my very first post of the game and my use of smilies/tone so I will put some stock in his read of sig so far this game.DharmaHelper wrote:So Sorsha, of the Hatchies, whom do you suspect, and why?
Black Rock's posts about Mac had me feeling a bit of suspicion towards her yesterday. Without being able to see the main thread its going to be difficult to explain though.
I always use tons of smilies look at any game of mine and you'll see them. In fact I reckon I use fewer as a baddie.
This is however, in no way a mafia/civ identification.
Ah See I really dislike this post, LC literally names the two low posters/inactive players (floyd and BWT) and then the two players who came close to being lynched last phase, Wilgy and myself. He is going after low hanging fruit for sure.Long Con wrote:BWT, Wilgy, sig, Sorsha, Floyd... those are the players that I feel most negative about in this here Hatch. BWT and Floyd are low-posters as I recall, maybe the lowest? Sorsha is down there as well. sig, I think some of his posts made me suspicious. I'd love to be able to look back over that one. And dear Wilgy... maybe I don't suspect Wilgy so much.
This doesn't need to be about low-posters yet though. 48 hours in this Hatch, right?
Yeah good point y'all are just dinosaurs who don't understand youth slang and lingo.Quin wrote:I could vote for Floyd. I dislike the support he gave for your bullshit BTSC thing earlier.DharmaHelper wrote:So quin of our hostages...I mean contemporaries, who do you suspect and why?
I can't recall a single thing Farnsworth has said so far. I could put him in the timmer pile of people I expect content from. timmer is no longer in the timmer pile, FYI.
I want to understand the sig suspicion, but I can already tell you I don't agree that his smiley use is suspicious. He's probably the youngest guy here, and I think smiley use is just the standard for people his age. What else is there?
I do have an unjustified ping for Black Rock. I'm not sure why I have it. I just do. I won't act on it until I can read her main thread posts again.
I'm pretty sure Farnsworth was suspected by Priz for posting without providing context? I do recall Farnsy posting, but I don't remember what he said.
Why a sig vote?timmer wrote:I could see a Sig vote, I guess he would be my new default choice but I want to flesh some things out. I had noticed a few people mentioning Floyd and the prof as being potentially shady but I don't remember why. Anyone remember?Quin wrote:Who else is a contender for your vote?timmer wrote:Ahh Pisces ftw... that's too bad quin would have been a contender for my vote.
Also I feel pretty good about LC and DH.
Why do you feel good about LC and DH?
I've done nothing that warrants a day 2 lynch, apparently I was to calm when people suspected me, while in reality I just didn't have the time to freak out like I normally would, I used to many smiley faces, and for my thoughts on Scotty.LoRab wrote:OK, agreed with all who stated above that it's really annoying to not be able to see the main thread, in order to see what was said previously. As is obvious, I suspect Wilgy, although less so than Day 1, based on lynch result--knowing that mafia has game-related roles (or at least some mafia), the slip seems less likely to be a slip. That said, his defense still doesn't sit right. And I still don't like that he never answered my question about why he automatically went to the conclsion that the first player to post about being from a game was lying about what game they were from, and what motivation he thinks they would have for lying about what game they were from.
I also suspect sig. Suspicion of him has been brought up a few times. He had one post that definitely pinged me and I didn't mention it at the time because I had cut and pasted a bunch of quotes and then lost them and didn't get around to going back to getting them all again and needed to get on with posting. And I don't remember exactly what it was or why it pinged me. And I realize that isn't at all helpful. And I really wish I could go back and reread his posts now. Dammit.
Nothing concrete at all and nothing that fits into my baddie meta, in fact baddie Sig can very easily copy a civ outrage freak out, look at Scrimmage I'm pretty sure I did that there.
Page 1 done onto page 2
Sorsha makes a good point on Lorab, scum slips do happen, but I'm always wary on lynching on them seeing how often I get band wagoned for that.
I didn't see anything that interesting on page two just some back and forth between lorab and Sorsha some things on Farnsworth, nothing I can think to comment on.
Page 3 point for Quin due to the South park thingy (I can't think of the word I want source? Nah that isn't it stupid college it's making me dumber) guess I won't be lynching him today.
This is floyd's normal meta though isn't it?timmer wrote:By the way Floyd was reading the thread about an hour ago. His lack of posting now becomes more of an issue when I know he has been here, knows he is in the hatch, and chose to say nothing. It suggests eother complete ennui or he's hanging in btsc somewhere. Either way it doesn't look good.
I'm here. Let's partyLoRab wrote:Thus far, BR, Professor Farnsworth, Sig, and Floyd haven't posted yet. Yes?
Just to track if someone is silenced....or someone is pretending to be.
Long Con wrote:Yes, this.LoRab wrote:Why not? If there is a silencing role or roles, I'd assume that role/those roles would still go through...I don't see why not?DrWilgy wrote:I would hope that silencing wouldn't be a thing in a scenario where we are split into groups.LoRab wrote:Thus far, BR, Professor Farnsworth, Sig, and Floyd haven't posted yet. Yes?
Just to track if someone is silenced....or someone is pretending to be.
I don't think BR is silenced. Hopefully she will get in here. I know she just hasn't played Mafia in a while, so it's hard for her to fit time for it into her normal routine.
This is weird? Bringing up silencing when we literally have no idea if it is real, it's like when people talk about their role to spite the silenced player.
DharmaHelper wrote:I sense a disturbance in the force.Sorsha wrote:Why?DharmaHelper wrote:I think I'll take this opportunity to vote LC.
This is very very telling.
This was page three I'm posting this, going to work on my paper and be back in a bit.
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Also quick thing I really don't think lynching Floyd is the way to go, he could be mafia yes, but its hard to tell since he hasn't really posted at all. I know mafia floyd does this, but that was also like his first and second game here which could play into his low posting. If I had to pick a player to lynch I think I'd go with DH and lynch LC. Unless I'm misreading DH and really screwing up my read of LC, I believe LC isn't a civ.
- Sorsha
- Money Launderer
- Posts in topic: 31
- Posts: 2128
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:26 pm
- Location: MKE
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
I would like to hear your reasons for thinking either a civ or mafia silencer would target Floyd.Long Con wrote:This thread turned into an explosion of bullshit, hard to decide where to begin.
- DharmaHelper
- Capo Regime (Street Boss)
- Posts in topic: 75
- Posts: 16565
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:29 pm
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Weren't you riding my jock D1? What changed?sig wrote:Also quick thing I really don't think lynching Floyd is the way to go, he could be mafia yes, but its hard to tell since he hasn't really posted at all. I know mafia floyd does this, but that was also like his first and second game here which could play into his low posting. If I had to pick a player to lynch I think I'd go with DH and lynch LC. Unless I'm misreading DH and really screwing up my read of LC, I believe LC isn't a civ.
our Linkitis is our lives.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 36
- Posts: 10894
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
What South Park thingy are you talking about, sig?
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 36
- Posts: 10894
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Yeah, I don't want to vote for Floyd if it turns out he's been silenced. It's too early for that.sig wrote:Also quick thing I really don't think lynching Floyd is the way to go, he could be mafia yes, but its hard to tell since he hasn't really posted at all. I know mafia floyd does this, but that was also like his first and second game here which could play into his low posting. If I had to pick a player to lynch I think I'd go with DH and lynch LC. Unless I'm misreading DH and really screwing up my read of LC, I believe LC isn't a civ.
I'll vote for Black Rock.
- Long Con
- So Divine
- Posts in topic: 47
- Posts: 21901
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 12:57 pm
- Location: Canada
- Gender: Dude
- Preferred Pronouns: boy ones
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
The post is not unrelated to Floyd. Timmer made it clear he meant Floyd when he said Mac. Quit showboating and start playing the game.DharmaHelper wrote:Surely Black Rock hasn't just pulled a quote entirely unrelated to Floyd to justify a vote for him to break the tie and save a teammate.
You are clearly more dedicated to leading a bandwagon than understanding something that takes just a little bit of critical thought.DharmaHelper wrote:I dunno who it could be, but "Here's a post by timmer that doesn't mention Floyd so I suspect Floyd and will vote for him" Doesn't track.
Ok, if it's meta-driven, prove it. You're making it up.sig wrote: I'll be reading over LC logic for lynching me, but a very good rule of thumb with LC is that if he is voting for me he is mafia. This isn't some wild accusation this is a meta driven thought process.
Floyd has been seen reading the thread several times, and has not posted once, despite being discussed. How do you explain this, Sorsha? I agree that he's not a likely silencing target. Maybe a silence got redirected to him. I don't know.Sorsha wrote:I'm also eyeing LC and LoRab for entertaining the thought that Floyd might be silenced.
I don't think she's bad.Quin wrote:Where do you stand on BR?
- DharmaHelper
- Capo Regime (Street Boss)
- Posts in topic: 75
- Posts: 16565
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:29 pm
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
I feel pretty confident with my LC vote actually.
our Linkitis is our lives.
- Sorsha
- Money Launderer
- Posts in topic: 31
- Posts: 2128
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:26 pm
- Location: MKE
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
That's Floyd being Floyd. That's how I explain it.
- Long Con
- So Divine
- Posts in topic: 47
- Posts: 21901
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 12:57 pm
- Location: Canada
- Gender: Dude
- Preferred Pronouns: boy ones
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Are you eyeing me or Lorab here?sig wrote:Long Con wrote:Yes, this.LoRab wrote:Why not? If there is a silencing role or roles, I'd assume that role/those roles would still go through...I don't see why not?DrWilgy wrote:I would hope that silencing wouldn't be a thing in a scenario where we are split into groups.LoRab wrote:Thus far, BR, Professor Farnsworth, Sig, and Floyd haven't posted yet. Yes?
Just to track if someone is silenced....or someone is pretending to be.
I don't think BR is silenced. Hopefully she will get in here. I know she just hasn't played Mafia in a while, so it's hard for her to fit time for it into her normal routine.
This is weird? Bringing up silencing when we literally have no idea if it is real, it's like when people talk about their role to spite the silenced player.
Probably, but not in the way you seem to mean it.DharmaHelper wrote:I sense a disturbance in the force.Sorsha wrote:Why?DharmaHelper wrote:I think I'll take this opportunity to vote LC.
This is very very telling.
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Well you were right I guess, also mainly I picked up a few hints and connected a few dots. I also don't remember thinking you were mafia I just disliked your ideas.DharmaHelper wrote:Weren't you riding my jock D1? What changed?sig wrote:Also quick thing I really don't think lynching Floyd is the way to go, he could be mafia yes, but its hard to tell since he hasn't really posted at all. I know mafia floyd does this, but that was also like his first and second game here which could play into his low posting. If I had to pick a player to lynch I think I'd go with DH and lynch LC. Unless I'm misreading DH and really screwing up my read of LC, I believe LC isn't a civ.
@LC that's alot of work for someone who is already busy but fine. I'll try to find and link the games.
I don't see why Floyd would be silenced, I think he is just inactive.
linki: How do you think I mean it?
- DharmaHelper
- Capo Regime (Street Boss)
- Posts in topic: 75
- Posts: 16565
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:29 pm
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
It's possible I confused BR's post. Might not be the best place to put a vote.
our Linkitis is our lives.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 36
- Posts: 10894
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
I thought our reasons for putting her name out there were the same. Was I wrong?DharmaHelper wrote:It's possible I confused BR's post. Might not be the best place to put a vote.
- Black Rock
- Loan Shark
- Posts in topic: 6
- Posts: 2542
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 4:40 pm
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
It was entirely related to Floyd, Timmer cleared that up. I think that post reeks like a teammate talking to a teammate and I think Mac was the other teammate. I think Timmer screwed up and put the wrong teammate into his post.DharmaHelper wrote:Surely Black Rock hasn't just pulled a quote entirely unrelated to Floyd to justify a vote for him to break the tie and save a teammate.
Surely.
- Black Rock
- Loan Shark
- Posts in topic: 6
- Posts: 2542
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 4:40 pm
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
I chose to vote Floyd over Timmer because Floyd already had votes and I didn't need to spread the votes out anymore. I suspect them equally.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 36
- Posts: 10894
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
I can understand that.Black Rock wrote:I chose to vote Floyd over Timmer because Floyd already had votes and I didn't need to spread the votes out anymore. I suspect them equally.
- DharmaHelper
- Capo Regime (Street Boss)
- Posts in topic: 75
- Posts: 16565
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:29 pm
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Was your reason because her post/vote seemed opportunistic and hasty?Quin wrote:I thought our reasons for putting her name out there were the same. Was I wrong?DharmaHelper wrote:It's possible I confused BR's post. Might not be the best place to put a vote.
our Linkitis is our lives.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 36
- Posts: 10894
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
I'm back on Floyd.
linki: No, it was because her post gave the impression that she was primarily suspicious of timmer and that a bad timmer flip would influence her read on Floyd.
linki: No, it was because her post gave the impression that she was primarily suspicious of timmer and that a bad timmer flip would influence her read on Floyd.
- DharmaHelper
- Capo Regime (Street Boss)
- Posts in topic: 75
- Posts: 16565
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:29 pm
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
LC reasons for voting for me is the scummiest reason ever which gets him out of blame when I flip civ. So you should stop over half of the thread from making this decision to allow things to start fresher? This is even more foolish since Epi, a dead civ who caught a baddie, disagreed with my lynch.Long Con wrote:I'm disappointed with the activity in here. Sig hasn't even posted, I'm thinking maybe we should just do the Main Thread a favour and lynch him today, to end the sig debate and get to start a little fresher on Day 3.
What if I have a powerful civ role? What if I was silenced? There is no good reason for a civ to use this logic, this is again LC trying to go after a low hanging fruit who isn't around to defend himself. I'd also point out LC could get away with this and not incur any blame very easily, since he could just use the defense he already set up in the above post to get out of blame.
This is one example that comes to mind right away of baddie LC trying to lynch me. It was in Talking Head and I was getting attacked for certain wording, LC very close to the end of the phase jumped on my bandwagon and voted for me and he ended up getting lynched the next phase and flipping mafia.Long Con wrote:I have to get ready and leave for work soon, so it's time to cast a real vote. The bea vote was actually fake. I thought, since votes are changeable, I'd make a fake case and see if I could catch any opportunistic baddies trying to latch on to it and follow the vote. It didn't really bear fruit; looking over BWT's reasons for voting bea, he is coming from a completely different angle. The truth is, bea's behaviour is pretty normal for her, and I don't suspect her much at all.FZ. wrote:LC's vote for Bea did strike me as fake...
My real vote today will go to sig. Despite the reasonable explanation he had for my original suspicion of him (that he was crafting his posts too much, in a baddie way), I've found a few of his reactions suspicious. His reaction that I was "distancing" from him when I forgot he was the third player involved in an earlier discussion was bizarre, as was his assertion that I (and others) are "desperate to try and get him lynched".
sig, saying we're desperate to try and get you lynched strikes me in two ways, neither of them making me feel comfortable about you. On one hand, it's overdefensive and paranoid, and on the other, it's a way to buffalo us out of voting for you... because who wants to looks "desperate" to lynch someone on Day 1?
It's not much, but it's the behaviour I found most suspicious today, and it's time for me to lock in a vote.
Sorry for using you, bea!
Long Con wrote:I agree, in that Mafia have more need to "craft" their posts than Civvies. Sig's accidental reveal that he was going back over his post before posting it to make sure it's just right is a little suspicious to me.birdwithteeth11 wrote:This might be small, but I've seen people get lynched for wordplay on Day 1 enough in the past.sig wrote:Matt F wrote:Not sure how I feel about Rbz's theory, however, if you are civ, then shouldn't this read "...but this IS very weak" as opposed to "seems" and "kinda" ?sig wrote:...I understand it is Day 1 and we have little to go on but this seems kinda very weak.
Also It could read is very weak, but it isn't very weak it just seems kinda weak. Writing is very weak is more confrontation in my opinion as well as implying it was meant to be weak. While seems kinda weak is just that is seems weak but it might not be.
This is quibbling over something very small, why if I'm civ would I right it the first way instead of the second way?
Same as it ever was.
I should also point out that I suspected LC based on very weird/gut reasoning, which I'm getting again here.
Another factor is that I don't think in a single game I've played with LC when he is a civ and he has never lynched me when we are both civs and someone gives weak reasoning. In fact he's defended me in the past agaisnt these accusations, I'm pretty sure this happened in BSG.
- DharmaHelper
- Capo Regime (Street Boss)
- Posts in topic: 75
- Posts: 16565
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:29 pm
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
What was leading about it?Long Con wrote:Nice leading question, DH.
our Linkitis is our lives.
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
How would I or Floyd advance any discussion? We haven't posted enough to really make links, the only person who defended me was Epi who's dead.DrWilgy wrote:Idk. He was here earlier today.Long Con wrote:What if Floyd is silenced?
Floyd isn't a bad vote really. Kinda the same case as Sig in which I'd be OK with him being lynched for the sake of advancing discussion. My reason to vote Sig over Floyd is that Quin thing.
Also who was it that tried to put suspicion on Epi after mac flipped? Anyone remember?
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Again why? You remember something vague that you can't name? It obviously didn't leave that big of an impression on you. Why are you assuming floyd was silenced where is your logic for this at all?LoRab wrote:I'm not seeing baddie LC, I don't think. At least he's not reading bad to me. I have an eye on him always, but for now I'm thinking he's civ.
I'm going to vote sig. Because I remember being suspish of him from posts of his in the main thread. And as folks have indicated that floyd has been seen in the thread but hasn't posted, so may be silenced.
1. why would anyone pick Floyd who was super inactive
2. Couldn't the same be said for MP who saw the thread but didn't post at first?
3. Couldn't I have been silenced?
4. Why do we assuming if he was silenced that this is a mafia role? many games have a civ silencer.
5. How do you even justify this reasons? Not only is it very improbable there is a silencer or that they targeted floyd, we don't have access to half the thread! So we have no clue if someone there was silenced.
This stinks of a mafia member who silenced someone in the other thread and is using that as an excuse to direct the lynch/there vote. Or just a bandwagon vote.
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Oh I'd also add on to Wilgy
Didn't you suspect Golden? If so why are you pursing someone who he was agaisnt? Espaiclly since he defended Mac.
Didn't you suspect Golden? If so why are you pursing someone who he was agaisnt? Espaiclly since he defended Mac.
- DharmaHelper
- Capo Regime (Street Boss)
- Posts in topic: 75
- Posts: 16565
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:29 pm
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
I bet the beach is some boring shit compared to this thread, this here is the bomb.
our Linkitis is our lives.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 36
- Posts: 10894
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
My internet keeps cutting out every time I go to post this. Maybe it's a sign.
I suspect LC now.
I suspect LC now.
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Also if you wanna meander on over to JTM (jesus Toast Mafia) and take a look at this game
http://jesustoastmafia.com/index.php/topic,153.0.html
You'll see Long Con (who was mafia) doing the same thing he did in Talking Head and what he is kind off doing here, that's as mafia trying to lynch me, voting for me, or pushing my lycnh based on very weak non existent reasoning.
linki: Quin vote for LC with me.
Also I wouldn't be surprised if the mafia has decided they want me gone, so be careful for any last minute weird votes from players. I wouldn't be shocked if we had some last minute vote changes to lynch me to save LC/floyd. Though I still do believe we have a better chance of lynching mafia if we go with LC.
http://jesustoastmafia.com/index.php/topic,153.0.html
You'll see Long Con (who was mafia) doing the same thing he did in Talking Head and what he is kind off doing here, that's as mafia trying to lynch me, voting for me, or pushing my lycnh based on very weak non existent reasoning.
linki: Quin vote for LC with me.
Also I wouldn't be surprised if the mafia has decided they want me gone, so be careful for any last minute weird votes from players. I wouldn't be shocked if we had some last minute vote changes to lynch me to save LC/floyd. Though I still do believe we have a better chance of lynching mafia if we go with LC.
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
If Lorab could answer why she thinks I'm amfia and address my points that would be great, however I've gotta go now. I'll try to phone post, but I have school junk to do from now until past EOD. So it will vary just a quick summary.
Mafia LC in every game we've played has tried to lynch me for weak reasons.
Civ LC has almost never gone along with the lynch mob when we were both civs.
LC is giving very anti-civ reasons for his vote on me which doesn't fit within his normal civ behavior.
The other people who voted for/suspected me are
1. Lorab who can't remember why she thinks I'm mafia, but is still voting for me.
2. Golden, who defended MAc who flipped mafia, and who I believe tried to lay some groundwork for an Epi lynch.
3. I was the counterwagon to Mac day 1 who flipped mafia
4. Epi thought the theory agaisnt me wasn't good, which is the same reason people are voting me today
5. There was never a case or any semblance of a case for my lynch it was literally around smiles and me saying Scotty could be indy.
6. This is a typical reason for why I'm lynched and is a common reason for why the mafia tries to lynch me or joins my wagon.
7. I got lynched day 2 in GOC 2015 and I was the civ protector (guess what I gave my protection to LC who defended me and incidentally he was also a civ)
8. I can almost always read LC when he is mafia. Why? Since he always tries to lynch me.
Mafia LC in every game we've played has tried to lynch me for weak reasons.
Civ LC has almost never gone along with the lynch mob when we were both civs.
LC is giving very anti-civ reasons for his vote on me which doesn't fit within his normal civ behavior.
The other people who voted for/suspected me are
1. Lorab who can't remember why she thinks I'm mafia, but is still voting for me.
2. Golden, who defended MAc who flipped mafia, and who I believe tried to lay some groundwork for an Epi lynch.
3. I was the counterwagon to Mac day 1 who flipped mafia
4. Epi thought the theory agaisnt me wasn't good, which is the same reason people are voting me today
5. There was never a case or any semblance of a case for my lynch it was literally around smiles and me saying Scotty could be indy.
6. This is a typical reason for why I'm lynched and is a common reason for why the mafia tries to lynch me or joins my wagon.
7. I got lynched day 2 in GOC 2015 and I was the civ protector (guess what I gave my protection to LC who defended me and incidentally he was also a civ)
8. I can almost always read LC when he is mafia. Why? Since he always tries to lynch me.
- Long Con
- So Divine
- Posts in topic: 47
- Posts: 21901
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 12:57 pm
- Location: Canada
- Gender: Dude
- Preferred Pronouns: boy ones
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Sig. Changeable votes. You are overreacting. I am Civ. I was just trying to rev up the thread.