2016 Game of Champions - Hatch [Night 2]

#121

Well that's a bummer.

#122

DharmaHelper wrote:Well that's a bummer.

Sorry, I shouldn't have asked the Hosts.

#123

Better to ask for forgiveness than for permission, I say.

#124

I AM A BADDIE AND NO ONE WILL BELIEVE YOU CUZ THIS THREAD IS GETTING REDACTED

#125

Fuck there's like a whole day left to vote nevermind I'm a civ.

#126

My vote is on LC for now because:

A) My original points from the first thread
B) His defensive reaction to the "Hm" posts
C) His MacDougall Vote
D) General vibes.

#127

Maybe you should reiterate A) a little, I don't specifically remember what you were saying.

#128

Long Con wrote:Maybe you should reiterate A) a little, I don't specifically remember what you were saying.

Your initial entry into the thread was aggressively minded, even if it was a joke. Its a hoaky psuedo-suspicion but I've got nothing to lose since I'm retired so if I'm right I'm right.

#129

Aggressively-minded, eh? Ok, let's leave that till we get back, not sure what I did exactly. Unless I get lynched today, then we don't have to wait!

Do you really want to get into it with me? I'm almost tempted, just due to the lack of action currently in the thread.

Or we could focus on someone else.

Or we could focus on you. What are you all about this game? You're carving yourself some sort of unique niche. What's that all about? It's nice and ballsy, the kind of thing I look at and say "Yeah, I should do something like that someday!"

#130

I just have my vote on you for now, I wouldn't feel more or less comfortable with a sig or a floyd vote. They happen to be suspiciously absent though.

#131

Long Con wrote:Aggressively-minded, eh? Ok, let's leave that till we get back, not sure what I did exactly. Unless I get lynched today, then we don't have to wait!

Do you really want to get into it with me? I'm almost tempted, just due to the lack of action currently in the thread.

Or we could focus on someone else.

Or we could focus on you. What are you all about this game? You're carving yourself some sort of unique niche. What's that all about? It's nice and ballsy, the kind of thing I look at and say "Yeah, I should do something like that someday!"

It's essentially Day 1 again for me, since I missed 1/2 of the Day 1 discussion and didn't get the opportunity I thought I would to re-read it.

If you wanna square up, we can.

#132

I saw Floyd online earlier, later than it was first referenced - somewhere above, "ennui or BTSC?" I don't really feel like reading the thread multiple times without posting leads me to believe BTSC. Seems more like silencing. That's a whole other can of worms. He certainly wasn't silenced in the Main Thread, and yet, not much content.

I didn't ask you to explain the details of your vote on me. "I just have my vote on you for now", sure dude, thanks for letting me know. I was as interested as you to see what would happen. That's why I didn't respond to it. Then Sorsha asked why, and you acted all aloof, with a smarmy answer instead of something that anyone in the thread can ever use or reference seriously.

Later you decided to do what you should have done in the first place: explain some reasons for your vote. Like... what was it all about before? Reaction fishing? Sure, I guess it has its merits, but it didn't go so well from what I saw. Very little response, you need to bait your hook better if that's the case.

If it's any consolation, you got thew best rise out of me with B). So close to starting it up over that.

Linki: I'm your huckleberry

#133

Sorry guys, mega long day, souble shift. My thoughts are the same as this morning. I have another double tmorrow, so I'll tune in around lunch and figure out where my vote will go. I could see a MacD vote, but in case he is silenced, MACD you need to post in other non-mafia areas of the site to show that you are around but can't post in here.

#134

timmer wrote:Sorry guys, mega long day, souble shift. My thoughts are the same as this morning. I have another double tmorrow, so I'll tune in around lunch and figure out where my vote will go. I could see a MacD vote, but in case he is silenced, MACD you need to post in other non-mafia areas of the site to show that you are around but can't post in here.

Dude.. I don't know how to break it to you... Macdougall is dead. We lynched him already. He was bad. He's not silenced, I get it, it's hard, but.. he's not coming back.

#135

Oof, I mean Floyd, sorry I'm so tired.

#136

Hope you got some sleep.

#137

I'm disappointed with the activity in here. Sig hasn't even posted, I'm thinking maybe we should just do the Main Thread a favour and lynch him today, to end the sig debate and get to start a little fresher on Day 3.

#138

Why do you constantly assume my suspicion of you is only to bait reactions to it

I may vote sign in this thread but I may also get you lynched in the main thread.

#139

Sig, not sign.

#140

DharmaHelper wrote:Why do you constantly assume my suspicion of you is only to bait reactions to it

I may vote sign in this thread but I may also get you lynched in the main thread.

I don't think "constantly" is appropriate.

And it's your method of accusing me that lead me to that conclusion. You vote without explanation, and then you were asked why, and you fluffed it off. Then 7 hours later - one might say, after you didn't get the reactions you hoped to see one way or another - you come back and list your reasons.

#141

I dunno about you, LC. I just don't know.

Paprika · #142

Long Con wrote:However, I will place a vote on Farnsworth until he gives a full explanation of his Floyd suspicion.

Voting for sockpuppets is a victimless crime - like punching someone in the dark!

Priz said something about his "sources" telling him something.

DH was like, "Sources? YOU MUST HAVE BADDIE BTSC!" in an obviously joking manner.

Then Floyd came along like, "Yeah, that sounds good." *votes Priz*

He also, to my recollection did not mention Priz again after that point (if he even posted at all afterwards). I know the word opportunistic gets thrown around a lot on here, but there's no better way to describe Floyd's vote. Hiding behind someone else's suspicion then offering no independent thought on the matter.

I'll go ahead and vote Floyd for now. I wouldn't be opposed to a sig lynch either, but I don't actively suspect him the way I do Floyd.

Paprika · #143

Wilgy, why did you vote me?

#144

Maybe I'll vote Floyd. At least for now.

#145

DharmaHelper wrote:I dunno about you, LC. I just don't know.

Welcome to Mafia.

Professor Farnsworth wrote:Priz said something about his "sources" telling him something.

DH was like, "Sources? YOU MUST HAVE BADDIE BTSC!" in an obviously joking manner.

Then Floyd came along like, "Yeah, that sounds good." *votes Priz*

He also, to my recollection did not mention Priz again after that point (if he even posted at all afterwards). I know the word opportunistic gets thrown around a lot on here, but there's no better way to describe Floyd's vote. Hiding behind someone else's suspicion

Thanks, Professor.

I'm going to change my vote to sig for now. I'm also cool with a Floyd lynch.

#146

Long Con wrote:I'm disappointed with the activity in here. Sig hasn't even posted, I'm thinking maybe we should just do the Main Thread a favour and lynch him today, to end the sig debate and get to start a little fresher on Day 3.

If Sig is silenced, this is the scummiest thing I've read this game lol.

Since he hasn't been online since last Tuesday I don't think silence is the case. I may be able to support this idea.

#147

What if Floyd is silenced?

#148

Professor Farnsworth wrote:Wilgy, why did you vote me?

Idk, same reason why I'd be willing to vote BR, Sig, BWT, or Sriracha. I got a whole lotta null from you.

You just happened to be the player in that group to use the "Priz" meme.

I'm hesitant to vote Floyd atm due to me not trusting Quin. I think I'm seeing "Hey, I'm off the ballot! Time to be lazy" Quin.

I'm hesitant to trust LC currently. I've been tone reading him bad. I can't pin point this though, and it's not a vote worthy read.

Lastly I'm finding myself agreeing with DH often. Perhaps too often, and I should reevaluate.

#149

Long Con wrote:What if Floyd is silenced?

Idk. He was here earlier today.

Floyd isn't a bad vote really. Kinda the same case as Sig in which I'd be OK with him being lynched for the sake of advancing discussion. My reason to vote Sig over Floyd is that Quin thing.

#150

DrWilgy wrote:
Long Con wrote:What if Floyd is silenced?
Idk. He was here earlier today.

Floyd isn't a bad vote really. Kinda the same case as Sig in which I'd be OK with him being lynched for the sake of advancing discussion. My reason to vote Sig over Floyd is that Quin thing.

...but you wouldn't consider your statement as among the scummiest of the game?

#151

DharmaHelper wrote:Why do you constantly assume my suspicion of you is only to bait reactions to it

I may vote sign in this thread but I may also get you lynched in the main thread.

Do you have access to the main thread?

#152

LoRab wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Why do you constantly assume my suspicion of you is only to bait reactions to it

I may vote sign in this thread but I may also get you lynched in the main thread.
Do you have access to the main thread?

Not yet.

#153

I'm not seeing baddie LC, I don't think. At least he's not reading bad to me. I have an eye on him always, but for now I'm thinking he's civ.

I'm going to vote sig. Because I remember being suspish of him from posts of his in the main thread. And as folks have indicated that floyd has been seen in the thread but hasn't posted, so may be silenced.

#154

Uh oh I switched to LC so that Floyd/Sig would be tied

U H O H

#155

Long Con wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Long Con wrote:What if Floyd is silenced?
Idk. He was here earlier today.

Floyd isn't a bad vote really. Kinda the same case as Sig in which I'd be OK with him being lynched for the sake of advancing discussion. My reason to vote Sig over Floyd is that Quin thing.
...but you wouldn't consider your statement as among the scummiest of the game?

Not really, that was more so a joke as I don't think it's the case. In a closed set up we should play to what we know.
- I know Floyd is a notorious lurker
- I don't know if silencing really is a thing

#156

DharmaHelper wrote:Uh oh I switched to LC so that Floyd/Sig would be tied

U H O H

I'm in.

#157

Why on earth would someone silence Floyd?

Paprika · #158

Sorsha wrote:Why on earth would someone silence Floyd?

Agreed. There's no reason to silence Floyd, since he was contributing almost nothing even before we entered the Hatch.

Paprika · #159

DharmaHelper wrote:My vote is on LC for now because:

A) My original points from the first thread
B) His defensive reaction to the "Hm" posts
C) His MacDougall Vote
D) General vibes.

What about LC's Mac vote was suspicious?

#160

Professor Farnsworth wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:My vote is on LC for now because:

A) My original points from the first thread
B) His defensive reaction to the "Hm" posts
C) His MacDougall Vote
D) General vibes.
What about LC's Mac vote was suspicious?

Smells like a bus.

#161

Quin wrote:
Black Rock wrote:Well this kinda sucks. I don't have any suspicions of any one in the hatch. Mafia is hard.
Who do you trust among us in the hatch?

Trust is a heavy word. Too early to trust anyone.

#162

timmer wrote:Sorry guys, mega long day, souble shift. My thoughts are the same as this morning. I have another double tmorrow, so I'll tune in around lunch and figure out where my vote will go. I could see a MacD vote, but in case he is silenced, MACD you need to post in other non-mafia areas of the site to show that you are around but can't post in here.

I'm currently suspicious of Timmer and Floyd because of this post. Something doesn't smell right about it. I'm going to put my vote on Floyd at this moment.

#163

Why are you suspicious of Floyd because of that post? Why not vote timmer?

#164

Surely Black Rock hasn't just pulled a quote entirely unrelated to Floyd to justify a vote for him to break the tie and save a teammate.

Surely.

#165

DrWilgy wrote:
Professor Farnsworth wrote:Wilgy, why did you vote me?
Idk, same reason why I'd be willing to vote BR, Sig, BWT, or Sriracha. I got a whole lotta null from you.

You just happened to be the player in that group to use the "Priz" meme.

I'm hesitant to vote Floyd atm due to me not trusting Quin. I think I'm seeing "Hey, I'm off the ballot! Time to be lazy" Quin.

I'm hesitant to trust LC currently. I've been tone reading him bad. I can't pin point this though, and it's not a vote worthy read.

Lastly I'm finding myself agreeing with DH often. Perhaps too often, and I should reevaluate.

I'm not being lazy.

#166

What? BR, can you please explain that thought process?

linki - Hi Quin.

#167

DrWilgy wrote:What? BR, can you please explain that thought process?

linki - Hi Quin.

[insert activity]

#168

DharmaHelper wrote:Surely Black Rock hasn't just pulled a quote entirely unrelated to Floyd to justify a vote for him to break the tie and save a teammate.

Surely.

Her train of thought supports a timmer vote, not a Floyd one. I don't like it much.

#169

It looks like today is going to be a bad internet day.

#170

Black Rock wrote:
Quin wrote:
Black Rock wrote:Well this kinda sucks. I don't have any suspicions of any one in the hatch. Mafia is hard.
Who do you trust among us in the hatch?
Trust is a heavy word. Too early to trust anyone.

I meant it synonymously with 'civ-read'. Do you have any of them?

Who's a Russian infiltrator?