S~V~S wrote:Golden wrote:S~V~S wrote:Plus now would be a good time to discuss the baddies in the other thread now that we have had a Lynch.
Linki @ Golden, Sloonei
Sloonei was my bet too. It fits with him understanding Mac's meta, but missing a lot of RM people.
The other three I have in mind as not ruled out are - rico (who I know can play up fake meta tells to appear to be others), zebra, and nutella.
Re the other thread, I hope that they lynched sig. I feel very strongly about him.
It's Sloonei. I have the same dynamic I had in host wars. I will be amazed if it isn't him.
And I have seen too many sigwagons to be so sure. Why so sure?
My hesitation on believing it was sloonei is that he's been so much more busy and more quiet recently. It's good to see him in full form if it is him.
I've defended most of those sigwagons. He gets taken out for poor choice of words, things that look so overtly bad, usually specific commentary on individuals that appears contrived. The only time I went after sig and was wrong was in Turf Wars, where his apparent obvious baddieness was so outrageous that I felt he couldn't possibly be good (I was wrong).
My point being, this sig doesn't look like any of those bad wagons. Sig isn't getting himself into trouble for word usage, but rather for lack of genuine content, blendiness, and the way he handled the Mac lynch. None of these behaviours are things I associate with civ sig - neither the civ sig who gets himself in trouble (because usually that one is still opinionated), nor super-sig like what was recently seen in Unfortunate Events. Civ sig throws his thoughts out there and doesn't worry about how he looks.