The Syndicate

thellama73 wrote:What level am I?

Roxy wrote:I just want to apologize for the crap I did this game.

DH you are a mafia god and played a beautiful game. Sorry if I made it un-fun for you.

I really, really loved this game and set up Epi and apologize to you as well. Great role though and great fun while it lasted!

Long Con wrote:

Dom wrote:

Made wrote:

Dom wrote:

Made wrote:JFC!?!? Dh, Dom, Mongoose, AND Snow? Foul?

what does this mean

JFC=Jesus Fucking Christ
No, but that baddie team sounds op af
(Op= overpowered)(af= as fuck)

you didn't say op af.
you said foul

Players don't make a team overpowered.

Seriously? There's not a player on that team that under Level 40. Totally stacked, they're probably a Clan.

juliets wrote:You're a 100 in my book Dom.

Dom wrote:

juliets wrote:You're a 100 in my book Dom.

You're off the charts, julietsss

Russtifinko wrote:Smaug has won the game!

MovingPictures07 wrote:juliets remains, hands down, perhaps the greatest player I've ever seen at seeming like a civilian. I don't understand how she does it.

Epignosis wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:juliets remains, hands down, perhaps the greatest player I've ever seen at seeming like a civilian. I don't understand how she does it.

Uncompromising, unbridled, unrelenting and unnerving consistency.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:juliets remains, hands down, perhaps the greatest player I've ever seen at seeming like a civilian. I don't understand how she does it.

Uncompromising, unbridled, unrelenting and unnerving consistency.

That's a good description.

thellama73 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:juliets remains, hands down, perhaps the greatest player I've ever seen at seeming like a civilian. I don't understand how she does it.

Uncompromising, unbridled, unrelenting and unnerving consistency.

That's a good description.

If only I could be so consistent.

But lynching low posters kept getting me in trouble.

Oh wait, I still get into trouble. Maybe I should go back to lynching low posters.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Thu Jan 08, 2015 10:22 pm

Long Con wrote:

Made wrote:Hey, yo guys, so uh my vote was forced so I'm just gonna get that out of the way now.

Voting Boomslang.

I'm not going to post the exact message, so that way we can have a sort of key to prove when someone is telling the truth, and someone is lying about being vote forced.

So next time someone claims votes force i'll ask for like the 5th or 3rd word in the message and if they match up, they're clear.

Thoughts?

There's no guarantee Epig would write the PM the same every time. Especially after you say something like that. You really think Epig would be able to stop himself from messing with you?

BR pretty much only went after DH and TH. If they're connected, then that would be a good reason to kill BR.

I voted for DH last time and not a lot has happened since then to make me say "Hey, that person is more suspicious!". That, in addition to the BR kill and her suspicions, supported by the concept that votes are still changeable... makes it easy to vote for DH again right away. *votes DharmaHelper*

Now, I have Lorab as a Tag Team partner. She hasn't said a lot so far, and I sometimes like to be chatty. So it will be a difficult balance. There'll be no back-and-forths unless it's between partners. I think that's another reason to lay my cards on the table early, discussion will be more difficult, so it's good to let people know where you stand right away.

Of course, if I really feel like I have to say something, maybe I'll just have to double-talk after people I like!

I'm surprised that you can't see the obvious frame-up in killing BR.

Anyway, I have a lot to say and since this is gonna be a tough day to post things;

Close to 90% of my Day 1 antics were a ploy. I was concerned at first that I would be caught out, and the facade ruined (particularly with INH's post, and several posts pointing out how strange and/or funny I had been acting). Yes, a ploy. Built carefully with one goal in mind: The careful observation of the reactions to my plot. One in particular caught my eye. I hinted only once at this falsehood, when I mentioned the sweet irony of the similarity of this game to Misfits mafia.

This being a Championship game, and an opportunity to reflect on our past victories, I decided to play this game (for at least day one) in as much of a contrast to my Misfits game as possible. Where in Misfits I was the rational, careful and plucky manipulator, I decided here to abandon that strategy and go balls out.

One man should have seen through my facade, and did not. I suspect due to his own baddieness. So, my vote will go to Made.

As Long Con points out, we can change our votes whenever. I doubt mine will change, though.

Now that I've successfully pulled an INH, lets get back to this posting contest.

Ricochet wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 3:59 am This was in 2015.