Lightning Mafia - Halloween Edition [Game Over]

#401

S~V~S wrote:I meant seriously, one of your reasons for suspecting me was that I was No U-ey, and that was bullshit.

It's frustrating when people are right in their suspicions, but for the wrong reasons, isn't it?

#402

No-U bars by Eloh. Enjoy that No U-ey goodness, with a satisfying, lynchy center.

#403

Epignosis wrote:No-U bars by Eloh. Enjoy that No U-ey goodness, with a satisfying, lynchy center.

I would buy one.

#404

thellama73 wrote:
S~V~S wrote: And now I have talked myself out of voting for her and will instead be likely voting for you.
Good. Let's trade.

(Also, Made brought up your name at 6:01, you said you were voting for him at 6:56)

Do you mean when he said he was voting her, me or mp for not liking halloween?

#405

You are wrong. Dead wrong. And for the record, I think trapping people is weak, even when that isn't what actually happened.

#406

fingersplints wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
S~V~S wrote: And now I have talked myself out of voting for her and will instead be likely voting for you.
Good. Let's trade.

(Also, Made brought up your name at 6:01, you said you were voting for him at 6:56)
Do you mean when he said he was voting her, me or mp for not liking halloween?

I do mean that, but I mean it in a more or less jokey way.

I am a jokey sort of fellow, you may have noticed.

#407

Epi I see you voted for SVS - can you tell us why? If I missed it I apologize.

#408

S~V~S wrote:You are wrong. Dead wrong. And for the record, I think trapping people is weak, even when that isn't what actually happened.

Well, I'm not voting for her anyway, so there's nothing to worry about.

#409

Epignosis wrote:No-U bars by Eloh. Enjoy that No U-ey goodness, with a satisfying, lynchy center.

I remember when you said No U's were bullshit, lol. Now you are voting for civs based on it.

#410

Epignosis wrote:No-U bars by Eloh. Enjoy that No U-ey goodness, with a satisfying, lynchy center.

I'd buy that for a dollar!

#411

juliets wrote:Epi I see you voted for SVS - can you tell us why? If I missed it I apologize.

Becasue he always thinks I am bad, I guess.

#412

Everyone that is playing this, remember these bullshit reasons, K? I will be back to vote.

#413

juliets wrote:Epi I see you voted for SVS - can you tell us why? If I missed it I apologize.

The first post of hers that bothered me was this one:

S~V~S wrote:All right 2 civs down, not an auspicious start. We need to get a baddie today, or we're toast.

This sounds like she is trying to include herself with the civilians AND create a sense of urgency.

Also, I could see her icing MP.

#414

I am reading SVS as angry that she is being caught for BS reasons. I recognize it from myself. I don't really mind being lynched as a baddie if the civs did good detective work. I HATE it when I get lynched for the wrong reasons. I think that's what we are seeing here, and I am voting SVS because of it.

#415

thellama73 wrote:
S~V~S wrote:I meant seriously, one of your reasons for suspecting me was that I was No U-ey, and that was bullshit.
It's frustrating when people are right in their suspicions, but for the wrong reasons, isn't it?

It's also frustrating when people are adamant in their wrong suspicions.

#416

yep that is what Epi said - he always feels she is bad and no you can;t change your vote >.<

#417

fingersplints wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
S~V~S wrote:I meant seriously, one of your reasons for suspecting me was that I was No U-ey, and that was bullshit.
It's frustrating when people are right in their suspicions, but for the wrong reasons, isn't it?
It's also frustrating when people are adamant in their wrong suspicions.

Not as frustrating. Why are you so sure SVS is good?

#418

Roxy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:No-U bars by Eloh. Enjoy that No U-ey goodness, with a satisfying, lynchy center.
I'd buy that for a dollar!

I love that line so much.

#419

I am included with the civs, which is why I said that. Had i said it in a way so as not to include myself, you would have thought that suspicious. And Juliets, while I still kinda suspect you, i am sorry I asked you that question allowing you to fall into a ludicrous non trap by discussing something that would be perfectly normal to discuss.

#420

thellama73 wrote:I am reading SVS as angry that she is being caught for BS reasons. I recognize it from myself. I don't really mind being lynched as a baddie if the civs did good detective work. I HATE it when I get lynched for the wrong reasons. I think that's what we are seeing here, and I am voting SVS because of it.

But she could also be mad because she is a civvie? I feel like you are now doing what you did to me the first day. Why are you jumping on others suspicions like this? First MP now Epi

#421

I always think SV is bad too, so my reasons are at least as good as Rob's.

#422

Ok thanks Epi. I just took her comment as a normal "lets go get a baddie" comment so we interpreted it differently.

#423

thellama73 wrote:
fingersplints wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
S~V~S wrote:I meant seriously, one of your reasons for suspecting me was that I was No U-ey, and that was bullshit.
It's frustrating when people are right in their suspicions, but for the wrong reasons, isn't it?
It's also frustrating when people are adamant in their wrong suspicions.
Not as frustrating. Why are you so sure SVS is good?

I'm not SURE anyone other than myself is good. But I have spent half this game frustrated for people being wrong about me and not listening to me. This seems exactly the same to me. SVS is sounding reasonable. You are not.

#424

fingersplints wrote:
thellama73 wrote:I am reading SVS as angry that she is being caught for BS reasons. I recognize it from myself. I don't really mind being lynched as a baddie if the civs did good detective work. I HATE it when I get lynched for the wrong reasons. I think that's what we are seeing here, and I am voting SVS because of it.
But she could also be mad because she is a civvie? I feel like you are now doing what you did to me the first day. Why are you jumping on others suspicions like this? First MP now Epi

Personally, I get madder when I am bad. That's just my experience, but I think SVS and me are a lot alike.

I don't remember when Rob first said he suspected her, but I certainly did not jump on it. I suspected her a long time before I posted about it.

#425

I have to cook the fish now so I won't be here for about 15 minutes. Voted for llama. I think that trap stuff is a sham.

#426

thellama73 wrote:
fingersplints wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
S~V~S wrote:I meant seriously, one of your reasons for suspecting me was that I was No U-ey, and that was bullshit.
It's frustrating when people are right in their suspicions, but for the wrong reasons, isn't it?
It's also frustrating when people are adamant in their wrong suspicions.
Not as frustrating. Why are you so sure SVS is good?

Since the No U thing was wrong, why are you so sure I am not?

And seriously, voting now, so I can walk away for a bit.

#427

Epignosis wrote:
juliets wrote:Epi I see you voted for SVS - can you tell us why? If I missed it I apologize.
The first post of hers that bothered me was this one:

S~V~S wrote:All right 2 civs down, not an auspicious start. We need to get a baddie today, or we're toast.
This sounds like she is trying to include herself with the civilians AND create a sense of urgency.

Also, I could see her icing MP.

ok missed this in unlinky

I see what you are saying not sure if i agree with the logic.

fingersplints wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
S~V~S wrote:I meant seriously, one of your reasons for suspecting me was that I was No U-ey, and that was bullshit.
It's frustrating when people are right in their suspicions, but for the wrong reasons, isn't it?
It's also frustrating when people are adamant in their wrong suspicions.

This whole game is just butting heads, no one is looking at all sides.

Epignosis wrote:
Roxy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:No-U bars by Eloh. Enjoy that No U-ey goodness, with a satisfying, lynchy center.
I'd buy that for a dollar!
I love that line so much.

Me too I use it a lot

#428

thellama73 wrote:
fingersplints wrote:
thellama73 wrote:I am reading SVS as angry that she is being caught for BS reasons. I recognize it from myself. I don't really mind being lynched as a baddie if the civs did good detective work. I HATE it when I get lynched for the wrong reasons. I think that's what we are seeing here, and I am voting SVS because of it.
But she could also be mad because she is a civvie? I feel like you are now doing what you did to me the first day. Why are you jumping on others suspicions like this? First MP now Epi
Personally, I get madder when I am bad. That's just my experience, but I think SVS and me are a lot alike.

I don't remember when Rob first said he suspected her, but I certainly did not jump on it. I suspected her a long time before I posted about it.

Ok so why do you keep conveniently waiting until someone brings up a suspicion before posting about it? That is not very civvie like behavior. The civvies need to work together in the thread. Not hoard their suspicions til the last moment

#429

fingersplints wrote:SVS is sounding reasonable. You are not.

Of course I'm not sounding reasonable. Have you met me?

#430

fingersplints wrote: Ok so why do you keep conveniently waiting until someone brings up a suspicion before posting about it? That is not very civvie like behavior. The civvies need to work together in the thread. Not hoard their suspicions til the last moment

I was not intending to "hoard" anything. There's not a lot of time in this game, and I can't immediately post everything I am thinking. I don't think it is very convenient at all, actually.

Additionally, there are good reasons not to let people know you are onto them too early.

#431

thellama73 wrote:
fingersplints wrote:SVS is sounding reasonable. You are not.
Of course I'm not sounding reasonable. Have you met me?

No but I have met SVS :yay:

#432

SVS is sounding the most genuine in her frustration and llama is all cool as a cucumber.

#433

Roxy wrote:SVS is sounding the most genuine in her frustration and llama is all cool as a cucumber.

Probably because I am not frustrated.

#434

thellama73 wrote:
fingersplints wrote: Ok so why do you keep conveniently waiting until someone brings up a suspicion before posting about it? That is not very civvie like behavior. The civvies need to work together in the thread. Not hoard their suspicions til the last moment
I was not intending to "hoard" anything. There's not a lot of time in this game, and I can't immediately post everything I am thinking. I don't think it is very convenient at all, actually.

Additionally, there are good reasons not to let people know you are onto them too early.

I am immediately posting everything I am thinking

Srsly though, I don't get why you wouldn't want to get all your thoughts out there. We don't have a lot of time to work so it has to be fast.

#435

Rox, I agree that she sounds genuine in her frustration. THAT's a big part of why I suspect her.

#436

fingersplints wrote: I am immediately posting everything I am thinking

Then, and please please please don't take this the wrong way. You are thinking a lot less things than I am. It is physically impossible for me to type everything I am thinking about this game in the designated hour. I have to filter.

#437

Oh but I do think you are frustrated a bit you just are hiding it - your post tone has improved immensely since the very first time we played. Its harder to see the real intent of your posts.

#438

So your fates are in the hands of fingersplints and Roxy.

#439

Also, I see that I already have two votes. I urge others not to vote for me please. SVS is the droids you're looking for.

#440

Aaaaaaaaaaand it ain't looking too hot for Llama.

#441

thellama73 wrote:Rox, I agree that she sounds genuine in her frustration. THAT's a big part of why I suspect her.

Then you don't know me at all. I tend to stay cooler when i am bad, I win way more games bad than civ, unless someone asshats me and I have problems handing confrontation sometimes for various reasons. So if you are reading this as baddie frustration you are dead wrong.

#442

Roxy wrote:Oh but I do think you are frustrated a bit you just are hiding it - your post tone has improved immensely since the very first time we played. Its harder to see the real intent of your posts.

I am confident right now, which is a good place to be. Although I am a little less confident now that I see I am one vote away from being killed.

Also: thank you?

#443

I am not feeling like SVS is the droid I am looking for tbph llama

#444

thellama73 wrote:
fingersplints wrote: I am immediately posting everything I am thinking
Then, and please please please don't take this the wrong way. You are thinking a lot less things than I am. It is physically impossible for me to type everything I am thinking about this game in the designated hour. I have to filter.

You should be able to type a bunch of it though is all I am saying. How does not mentioning suspicions til nearly the end of the lynch helpful? The only purpose it has is so that the person you "suspect" has no time to respond or retaliate.
I'm not even sure you are bad. I just don't think that holding onto suspicions is a good thing to do.

#445

thellama73 wrote:Also, I see that I already have two votes. I urge others not to vote for me please. SVS is the droids you're looking for.

No she isn't. There was no No U, and there is no baddie anything.

#446

fingersplints wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
fingersplints wrote: I am immediately posting everything I am thinking
Then, and please please please don't take this the wrong way. You are thinking a lot less things than I am. It is physically impossible for me to type everything I am thinking about this game in the designated hour. I have to filter.
You should be able to type a bunch of it though is all I am saying. How does not mentioning suspicions til nearly the end of the lynch helpful? The only purpose it has is so that the person you "suspect" has no time to respond or retaliate.
I'm not even sure you are bad. I just don't think that holding onto suspicions is a good thing to do.

Less than a half hour in is not "nearly the end of the lynch."

#447

It was a compliment llama bc it is hard to read you anymore

#448

thellama73 wrote:
fingersplints wrote: I am immediately posting everything I am thinking
Then, and please please please don't take this the wrong way. You are thinking a lot less things than I am. It is physically impossible for me to type everything I am thinking about this game in the designated hour. I have to filter.

Also I was kind of just joking because I don't really have much of a filter to begin with. I just blurt out whatever I think

#449

Guys, seriously, please don't lynch me. I'd like to win this one. Also, SVS is bad.

#450

thellama73 wrote:
fingersplints wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
fingersplints wrote: I am immediately posting everything I am thinking
Then, and please please please don't take this the wrong way. You are thinking a lot less things than I am. It is physically impossible for me to type everything I am thinking about this game in the designated hour. I have to filter.
You should be able to type a bunch of it though is all I am saying. How does not mentioning suspicions til nearly the end of the lynch helpful? The only purpose it has is so that the person you "suspect" has no time to respond or retaliate.
I'm not even sure you are bad. I just don't think that holding onto suspicions is a good thing to do.
Less than a half hour in is not "nearly the end of the lynch."

Less than half an hour is more than half. So if someone just decided to start posting well into Day 2 of a lynch that'd be ok by you?

What do you guys think about another game like this the Friday following Thanksgiving?