Mafia: A World Reborn Game Thread - Game Over

#1801

Got here early and am going back through today's posts to see if Luke answered any questions. Will vote soon.

#1802

juliets wrote:Got here early and am going back through today's posts to see if Luke answered any questions. Will vote soon.

I can give you some spoilers if you like.

Spoiler: show

#1803

Epignosis wrote:Also, I don't know why sig should have to "accurately describe his initial slip post or characterize what pinged several people."

Not only is that a loaded statement, that's not his responsibility. How is he supposed to "accurately describe his initial slip?" How should he "characterize what pinged several people?"

Bullshit vote right here.

Lorab

It is not a bs vote. I suspected him initially I continue to.

To clarify: he mischaracterized what he actually posted. He did not post that it appeared as if Nadia was killing low posters. He said that they were. There is a huge difference between those two statements. His posting revisionist history which changes his initial post in a way that is not as suspicious as his post was. That is what I find suspicious.

Eye me all you want.

#1804

LoRab wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Also, I don't know why sig should have to "accurately describe his initial slip post or characterize what pinged several people."

Not only is that a loaded statement, that's not his responsibility. How is he supposed to "accurately describe his initial slip?" How should he "characterize what pinged several people?"

Bullshit vote right here.

Lorab
It is not a bs vote. I suspected him initially I continue to.

To clarify: he mischaracterized what he actually posted. He did not post that it appeared as if Nadia was killing low posters. He said that they were. There is a huge difference between those two statements. His posting revisionist history which changes his initial post in a way that is not as suspicious as his post was. That is what I find suspicious.

Eye me all you want.

I'm going to do more than eye you.

#1805

LoRab wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Also, I don't know why sig should have to "accurately describe his initial slip post or characterize what pinged several people."

Not only is that a loaded statement, that's not his responsibility. How is he supposed to "accurately describe his initial slip?" How should he "characterize what pinged several people?"

Bullshit vote right here.

Lorab
It is not a bs vote. I suspected him initially I continue to.

To clarify: he mischaracterized what he actually posted. He did not post that it appeared as if Nadia was killing low posters. He said that they were. There is a huge difference between those two statements. His posting revisionist history which changes his initial post in a way that is not as suspicious as his post was. That is what I find suspicious.

Eye me all you want.

Who's Nadia? I just went over the host posts, and didn't see any mention of a Nadia.

#1806

#1807

Epignosis wrote:
LoRab wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Also, I don't know why sig should have to "accurately describe his initial slip post or characterize what pinged several people."

Not only is that a loaded statement, that's not his responsibility. How is he supposed to "accurately describe his initial slip?" How should he "characterize what pinged several people?"

Bullshit vote right here.

Lorab
It is not a bs vote. I suspected him initially I continue to.

To clarify: he mischaracterized what he actually posted. He did not post that it appeared as if Nadia was killing low posters. He said that they were. There is a huge difference between those two statements. His posting revisionist history which changes his initial post in a way that is not as suspicious as his post was. That is what I find suspicious.

Eye me all you want.
I'm going to do more than eye you.

Examine me all you want. I have nothing to hide.

#1808

Matt F wrote:
LoRab wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Also, I don't know why sig should have to "accurately describe his initial slip post or characterize what pinged several people."

Not only is that a loaded statement, that's not his responsibility. How is he supposed to "accurately describe his initial slip?" How should he "characterize what pinged several people?"

Bullshit vote right here.

Lorab
It is not a bs vote. I suspected him initially I continue to.

To clarify: he mischaracterized what he actually posted. He did not post that it appeared as if Nadia was killing low posters. He said that they were. There is a huge difference between those two statements. His posting revisionist history which changes his initial post in a way that is not as suspicious as his post was. That is what I find suspicious.

Eye me all you want.
Who's Nadia? I just went over the host posts, and didn't see any mention of a Nadia.

Autocorrect of mafia. I should learn to proofread.

#1809

Tranq wrote:

LOL

I haven't even thought of Lost in forever.

Thanks Lorab. I was like "wtf did she just say?" Lol

#1810

Tranq wrote:
juliets wrote:I parked my vote on the host option because i do not have a decision made as to who I will vote for.
What happened to your sig suspicion?

And why is this in OT?

Several people who know sig convinced me that this is the way sig is and that my read on him was not correct. So I moved my vote from him. Nothing has happened that has made me go back to my original suspicion.

I don't know why I put that in green except for I was writing my reminder about my trip and it just led into explaining why my vote was sitting in the host area. I turned the whole paragraph green.

I found where Luke attempted to answer some questions and no offense to Luke but the answers left a lot to be desired. I'm going to vote for Luke.

#1811

Hamburgerboy = sig defender

Hamburgerboy = votes MacDougall when sig has six

#1812

Epignosis wrote:Hamburgerboy = sig defender

Hamburgerboy = votes MacDougall when sig has six

Luke = 9 votes

Plus, Mac is self-confessed scum.

#1813

HamburgerBoy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Hamburgerboy = sig defender

Hamburgerboy = votes MacDougall when sig has six

Luke = 9 votes

Plus, Mac is self-confessed scum.

Fine. Vote for Mac Day 5. He obviously wants your vote to do shit to you.

#1814

Epignosis wrote:Fine. Vote for Mac Day 5. He obviously wants your vote to do shit to you.

Why day 5?

#1815

HamburgerBoy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Fine. Vote for Mac Day 5. He obviously wants your vote to do shit to you.
Why day 5?

Because Mac ain't getting lynched Day 4.

#1816

LoRab wrote:Voted sig. His last post tipped the decision. He continues to not accurately describe his initial slip post or characterize what pinged several people. And his defenses in general continue to make him more suspish.

Compare the initial slip vs his descriptions. Characterize those pings for me, and what exactly makes them more suspish?

I don't know any bit of the Sig case, but what I do know is that it's hard to lynch mafia. It was pretty easy for you to vote based on a defense, rather than discuss it and point out the exact flaws in the defense.

#1817

Changing my vote to sig. He cum.

#1818

Edit to the last post.

Sig was called baddie for saying "Mafia are killing low posters" vs "I think mafia are killing low posters?"

LOL, Sig you would get yourself caught in this situation.

Ok I'm not going to be voting you today babe <3

I propose a LoRab CFD

#1819

Sorsha wrote:Luke... I think you're getting some of your points confused with the other game, the forced votes were in Dune.

Opps.

#1820

Epignosis wrote:Hamburgerboy = sig defender

Hamburgerboy = votes MacDougall when sig has six

Nah.

#1821

Mac, don't worry bout that and just vote LoRab

#1822

#1823

MacDougall wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Hamburgerboy = sig defender

Hamburgerboy = votes MacDougall when sig has six

Nah.

Nah?

That wasn't an opinion. Those are facts.

Thanks for playing. Try again next time.

#1824

This Lukewagon is lel. U guiz r nub.

Linki: Epi plz.

#1825

DrWilgy wrote:
LoRab wrote:Voted sig. His last post tipped the decision. He continues to not accurately describe his initial slip post or characterize what pinged several people. And his defenses in general continue to make him more suspish.
Compare the initial slip vs his descriptions. Characterize those pings for me, and what exactly makes them more suspish?

I don't know any bit of the Sig case, but what I do know is that it's hard to lynch mafia. It was pretty easy for you to vote based on a defense, rather than discuss it and point out the exact flaws in the defense.

I voted for him for thto second time based on my ongoing suspicion of him. I had several posts last Kung outlining my reasons for suspecting him. Don't have time right now to make fuller case or explanation.

#1826

How does being a sig defender and then voting me when sig is safe = suspicious. You should stop being supatown. You are ordinary at this game.

#1827

Are we really lynching another new guy?

#1828

LoRab wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
LoRab wrote:Voted sig. His last post tipped the decision. He continues to not accurately describe his initial slip post or characterize what pinged several people. And his defenses in general continue to make him more suspish.
Compare the initial slip vs his descriptions. Characterize those pings for me, and what exactly makes them more suspish?

I don't know any bit of the Sig case, but what I do know is that it's hard to lynch mafia. It was pretty easy for you to vote based on a defense, rather than discuss it and point out the exact flaws in the defense.
I voted for him for thto second time based on my ongoing suspicion of him. I had several posts last Kung outlining my reasons for suspecting him. Don't have time right now to make fuller case or explanation.

Busy LoRab have excuses. LoRab plz u r cum.

#1829

<3 ya Mac, join us at our shirtless bonfire.

Epi, join us.

Ok then LoRab, why shouldn't I vote for you?

Indeed. Matt join us.

#1830

LoRab wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
LoRab wrote:Voted sig. His last post tipped the decision. He continues to not accurately describe his initial slip post or characterize what pinged several people. And his defenses in general continue to make him more suspish.
Compare the initial slip vs his descriptions. Characterize those pings for me, and what exactly makes them more suspish?

I don't know any bit of the Sig case, but what I do know is that it's hard to lynch mafia. It was pretty easy for you to vote based on a defense, rather than discuss it and point out the exact flaws in the defense.
I voted for him for thto second time based on my ongoing suspicion of him. I had several posts last Kung outlining my reasons for suspecting him. Don't have time right now to make fuller case or explanation.

You don't have a fuller case or explanation.

#1831

Join us. It's blissss.

#1832

DrWilgy wrote:<3 ya Mac, join us at our shirtless bonfire.

Epi, join us.

Ok then LoRab, why shouldn't I vote for you?

Indeed. Matt join us.

I don't want to see Mac at a shirtless bonfire. Or Lorab, if you are proposing such.

#1833

I don't have any sort of read on Lorab. If anything, I was thinking of joining the sig train to stop this new guy massacre.

Or we can all vote for Metalmarsh

#1834

Dr w: Nice way to ask me a question, decide i'm suspicious, make a few assumptions, and vote for me before I have a chance to even answer your question.

When I'm done with this convention, in happy to further explain my suspicion of sig. Right now, I'm listening to Vice President Biden speak. That is somehow more important than worrying about having a vote.

Linkitis: you shouldn't vote for me because I'm not bad. Mac, you are wrong. And also bad. And I posted before I went away that I'd be away. So yeah, I'm busy. That doesn't mean I'm bad, it means I'm busy

Linkitis: I am fairly certain I had posts about sig the first time he came up, when I initially suspected him.

#1835

Epignosis wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:<3 ya Mac, join us at our shirtless bonfire.

Epi, join us.

Ok then LoRab, why shouldn't I vote for you?

Indeed. Matt join us.
I don't want to see Mac at a shirtless bonfire. Or Lorab, if you are proposing such.

But you do want to see Wilgy.

That's cool bro.

Linki: Matt ya nub vote 4 LoRab. The doctor knows best.

#1836

LoRab wrote:Dr w: Nice way to ask me a question, decide i'm suspicious, make a few assumptions, and vote for me before I have a chance to even answer your question.

When I'm done with this convention, in happy to further explain my suspicion of sig. Right now, I'm listening to Vice President Biden speak. That is somehow more important than worrying about having a vote.

Linkitis: you shouldn't vote for me because I'm not bad. Mac, you are wrong. And also bad. And I posted before I went away that I'd be away. So yeah, I'm busy. That doesn't mean I'm bad, it means I'm busy

Linkitis: I am fairly certain I had posts about sig the first time he came up, when I initially suspected him.

I am bussing you.

#1837

MacDougall wrote:Changing my vote to sig. He cum.

Not for you I won't

DrWilgy wrote:Edit to the last post.

Sig was called baddie for saying "Mafia are killing low posters" vs "I think mafia are killing low posters?"

LOL, Sig you would get yourself caught in this situation.

Ok I'm not going to be voting you today babe <3

I propose a LoRab CFD

You're going to make me blush Wilgy.

and who else could get caught in such a situation.

linki: Matt maybe the new guy is mafia he has been playing a rather suspicious game.

#1838

Epignosis wrote:
LoRab wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
LoRab wrote:Voted sig. His last post tipped the decision. He continues to not accurately describe his initial slip post or characterize what pinged several people. And his defenses in general continue to make him more suspish.
Compare the initial slip vs his descriptions. Characterize those pings for me, and what exactly makes them more suspish?

I don't know any bit of the Sig case, but what I do know is that it's hard to lynch mafia. It was pretty easy for you to vote based on a defense, rather than discuss it and point out the exact flaws in the defense.
I voted for him for thto second time based on my ongoing suspicion of him. I had several posts last Kung outlining my reasons for suspecting him. Don't have time right now to make fuller case or explanation.
You don't have a fuller case or explanation.

D-d-d-daaaammmnn!!!

Ty epi, I wasn't going to read through Rab anyways.

Nah, LoRab isn't at the bonfire, he is the bonfire

it's just me MM, Matt and Mac currently.

I wanna lynch you more now Rabbi

Linki - *blushes* it's not like I wanted to see you shirtless or anything!! Dummy!

#1839

Could be, sig. Tell me, would you pull the same exact move you did in the other game and attempt to NK your accusers?

#1840

Sig kills hos accusers? Thank God I don't wanna lynch him! Sig, come join the bonfire, we got marshmallows and booze!!

#1841

And to those saying I never explained, here's one post where I did. So, not true.

LoRab wrote:
sig wrote:I am seeing the difference . When people in the thread pretend to be so shocked by his death. This is more scummy then myself not being shocked by it and I still say there is a difference. it is very small wording but paraphrasing what I said in a way that appears to make what I said slightly more scummy is pingy.
"so hope you don't think I'm twisitng your words by saying baddie" You seem to be acting slightly inmature here. baddie scum it is the same changing my words right after quoting me isn't. Especially when Bull's argument revolves around a SPECIFIC word, if Bulls argument is based on that which it is then yes it does matter when later in trying to get me lynched he says I said something I didn't say. That you fail to comprehend the importance when Bulls whole argument is based around my wording is strange.
There is no difference. I found the same think suspish as Bullz did and your subsequent posts have made it seem worse. His point was not based on word use, it was the gist of what you said. And people may have been surprised at the kill without "pretending." I disagree that there is a difference--and those who posted suprise may also be bad. But you seem more bad.

And I was making a joke with the word twisting. I'm likely older than you, so please don't call me immature, because that's just insulting.. My joke was making the point that baddie means the same thing as some people mean when they say scum (I will never like that term in mafia, but it's just how I was mafia raised)...just like unsurprised and not shocked mean the same thing. And I don't even get how you'd see that as immature. Or maybe you're defining immature difrerenly than my understanding of it.

MacDougall wrote:It's not a personal insult when he is playing a bad guy in a a game. I am sure he is lovely.
Your posts were more personal than that. "You play like an asshole," and, "[is he} this much of a douchebag in BTSC," are both personally insulting a player, not the player in that role. In the mafia world that I play in (and that I believe this forum is part of), personal insults aren't part of the game.

linkitis: I recall that Black Rock was once lynched based on an "us" thing--and she was bad. Pretty sure that was BR. Just saying.

#1842

LoRab wrote:When I'm done with this convention, in happy to further explain my suspicion of sig. Right now, I'm listening to Vice President Biden speak. That is somehow more important than worrying about having a vote.

Joe Biden shouldn't be talking to people who have a vote.

#1843

Voted LoRab. His last post tipped the decision. He continues to not accurately describe his initial slip post or characterize what pinged several people. And his defenses in general continue to make him more suspish.

#1844

DrWilgy wrote:Voted LoRab. His last post tipped the decision. He continues to not accurately describe his initial slip post or characterize what pinged several people. And his defenses in general continue to make him more suspish.

LoRab's a chica. Unless she's already had the operation.

#1845

-= Goblin =-

Luke11646 snarled and struggled against the ones who held him, but to no avail. "Watch him!" warned Gladius Mechaspark. "He's got hidden weapons - they're small, but they will kill you all the same!"

Luke glared at him, spitting and rasping, "I'll find ye! Ye'll be sorrryyyyy!" Gladius leaned back, disgust apparent on his face.

"We need to put him down, permanently!" said Smirk, shaking his head. "He's too dangerous." He looked at the Lich of Khastor Keep. "Will you so the honours?"

The Lich nodded silently, and moved closer to Luke, who froze, his eyes wide, when he saw the undead figure approaching. The Lich put a skeletal hand on Luke's chest, and Luke let out a long, high, keening shriek, as his green skin turned bluish-grey, and his eyes became blank white orbs.

As his final breath left his shrivelled lungs, Luke fell to the ground, a drained husk.

Luke11646 has been lynched. He was the Infectious Goblin, a member of the Witherdeath Cabal.

It is now Night 4. Movements and Night actions please!

Turnip Head awoke with a start. Alive? How? He gingerly pulled open his shirt and looked down, wincing at the sight of the rough stitches he saw holding his chest cavity closed. What had that damn doctor done to him?

#1846

That wasn't my idea and I had a different strategy behind those kills. If we wanna talk about that game, nobody thought I was mafia and had avoided detection if not for all those "forced" votes and the tie going wrong I'd have sailed to end game.

and bringing up a current game tsk tsk?

linki: but I'm underage and you might just all be old perverts wanting me to get shirtless

linki 2: Told you so

#1847

Boom like that.

#1848

Matt F wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Voted LoRab. His last post tipped the decision. He continues to not accurately describe his initial slip post or characterize what pinged several people. And his defenses in general continue to make him more suspish.
LoRab's a chica. Unless she's already had the operation.

Ummmmm Zebra, I just realized you might not think that was funny. Just so ya know, I support the LGBT community very much, and I was just being immature right there.

Linki - Okey dokey Luke was bad. Don't lynch me, town.

#1849

Who did I confuse LoRab with... Sorry LoRab! Didn't mean to goof that up. You can call me MsDrWilgette for the rest of the game for being a turd.

Linki: Yay! Good thing no one listens to me!!

#1850

Well done everyone. I'm very pleased to see the back of the infectious goblin.

Who to lynch? 24 hour day!