I get the joke..S~V~S wrote:Actually, i thought it was kinda funny, since all the choices were John Barrowman

I just think it's a bit odd to only make a joke when people are talking about your activity and what that might mean.
Moderator: Community Team
I get the joke..S~V~S wrote:Actually, i thought it was kinda funny, since all the choices were John Barrowman
I don't want to jump to conclusions but I don't think either Elohcin or Nijuukyugou are playing. Would be fairer to let somebody else play. Especially since somebody's been skipped more than once on the replace-back-in list. >_>Dom wrote:Keys, personally, I don't think anyone's bailed here.
I just feel Elohcin has added virtually nothing in days, but has "participated". I'm wondering if she has nefarious purposes. I am far more suspicious of DFaraday, though.
I respect your assessment, but I strongly disagree.keys56000000000 wrote:OK MP7, I has read through what you've got to say on SD and my feelings are basically that you are confusing a misguided civ for a bad guy.
SD is someone who has made mistakes. He's the victim of unfortunate circunstances. He's been frustrated, paranoid, misguided -- literally, when you declared TH was The Master and voted for him. He is not someone with a team passing him info, advice, anything. He is a lone civvie who has got stuck into this game, found himself in unfortunate circumstances, and is finding it hard to defend himself against articulate players. Of this I am convinced.
See, keys, this is another type of post that just screams teammate to me.Snow Dog wrote:I am voting Barrowman too. I literally did not know that Bass was the Cyber Controller. Literally.
I don't know whether to be happy or sad that you are defending me. Happy because you are, but sad because you think I am not sufficiently articulate.keys56000000000 wrote:OK MP7, I has read through what you've got to say on SD and my feelings are basically that you are confusing a misguided civ for a bad guy.
SD is someone who has made mistakes. He's the victim of unfortunate circunstances. He's been frustrated, paranoid, misguided -- literally, when you declared TH was The Master and voted for him. He is not someone with a team passing him info, advice, anything. He is a lone civvie who has got stuck into this game, found himself in unfortunate circumstances, and is finding it hard to defend himself against articulate players. Of this I am convinced.
I'll have to Google that one.MovingPictures07 wrote:Snowy, it makes you sound like Chris Traeger. :P
MovingPictures07 wrote:Snowy, it makes you sound like Chris Traeger. :P
Do you mean where I sympathised with bass because nobody believed him? Is that wrong now? I was in the same position of being hounded.MovingPictures07 wrote:It's not proof, it's unnecessary wording.
Snowy adds unnecessary words to his posts like that when he's bad.
I also offered plenty of more "meaty", primary reasons that he's bad, and I stand by them, since you didn't dispute any of them (just disagree with a conclusion).
It's not ONLY that Snowy sounds insincere though, that's misreprensenting my argument. It's the fact that he casually defended Sabie, and also Bass. It's the fact, along with Bass, tried pushing Hedgeowl being the recruiter but never addressed my arguments, and the TIMING is what's most important here -- he did it to draw attention away from Sabie. It's the fact that he asserts himself with confidence in a way that he didn't earlier (I'll give him credit, he at least addressed this one, but I don't buy his explanation) and the tone of his posts don't have the same nervous civ quality that they had before.
His interactions with Bass ALONE are damning.
Look, I understand how Snow Dog expresses himself. I've played way more games with him than you have, and in his first game ever I was on a baddie team with him. I'm pretty sure you're wrong, keys.keys56000000000 wrote:I looked at his interactions with Bass and I don't see what you see. TBH, when you say they're DAMNING, you sound like Chris! And I didn't go into specific examples because they all fall under the same categories: civ errors that you mistake for baddie behaviour, unfortunate coincidences. I'd just be repeating myself.
Perhaps unneccessary words to you, but Snow Dog expresses himself differently from you. I don't think you fully appreciate that. I don't personally see what's so bad about him saying he literally didn't know. It's a simple statement. For whatever reason, it rubs you up the wrong way, and you think he's lying.
You're going to make this difficult aren't you, lol. Ahhhh. Snow, gonna need your help defending you. Try not to say anything that can be twisted against you.
Uh-huh. Where'd you learn that trick?MovingPictures07 wrote:Snowy adds unnecessary words to his posts like that when he's bad.
You know, I don't really know. So I went back and looked at Snowy's posts just now to see where he talks about Bass.Dom wrote:MP, I'm suspicious of SD (more of DFaraday, I think, but...) but let me just present you with something:
Why the hell would SD, as Bass's teammate continue to defend him, especially after the Sabie lynch?
That's midway through D9, the first Bass lynch.Snow Dog wrote:I don't feel I can vote bass for holding the same suspicion of Hedge that I do. That'd be unfair. Chris got me convinced (with input from others) that he is jack. But now I'm unsure again.
Dammit this game has got me so paranoid.
Snow Dog wrote:Did he? Maybe he just assumed something? I'll try and find that post.Dom wrote:Just curious, how did you react when MP did this?Chris wrote:Snow Dog... I know you're itching to vote for me. Just do it.
I've really given up. Every time I make a post, someone turns it into an issue. I'm distracting from the game . I just want to pack it in.
Do me the favor. Put me out of my misery. Vote for me man...That's not why I'm voting Bass....Snow Dog wrote:I don't feel I can vote bass for holding the same suspicion of Hedge that I do. That'd be unfair. Chris got me convinced (with input from others) that he is jack. But now I'm unsure again.
Dammit this game has got me so paranoid.
He implied knowledge of how the recruitments work, which someone on the team would know.
Snow Dog wrote:Yes I found that post. I see nothing there but i want to know what Dom made of it.Chris wrote:Remember, the MM/Epig lynch was a tie on paper, but the hosts said it was not a tie.
Amy knows where she voted... If she voted for Epig, then she knows that The CyberHead found the body.
And Snow was one of the MM voters.
Linki @ Snow: Oh no you don't You don't get to go suddenly find a reason to vote Bass. Bass merely said that he thought there were three recruits using the same logic I did. Odd day recruitments.
Dom, why didn't you find it suspicious that I used that same logic that Bass did. I said it before Bass did even.
Snow Dog wrote:@Dom.
I don't know. It seemed to me he was just making suppositions. Certainly not enough to warrant a vote(from me anyway) . Seems we'll find out later either way.
Snow Dog wrote:It is both reasons. More than one reason. Two reasons. I had doubts about the case and that he was going to be lynched anyway solidified it. I can't understand why you can't understand this process..Chris wrote:Both?Snow Dog wrote:Both reasons.
1 reason sounds like you would vote for him no problem, but he's already got a huge lead.
The other reason says that you won't vote for him because he suspected Hedgie like you did.
You do see the difference in meaning, don't you?
You're bullshitting... badly.
It's how i work anyway.
If I had extra votes I could just as easily have voted bass and be done with it. Hidden votes. But i didn't. For two reasons.
Now stop being so rude. I am a person playing a game here.
Snow Dog wrote:Don't bother man, they've made there minds up and ain't nothing gonna change it.Bass_the_Clever wrote:Why because how I voted?
Snow Dog wrote:i don't know about bass, but show me how I'm bad. Where does this consensus come from? what evidence? or is it bad info? What trickery is afoot? I despair I really do. No one engages with me besides Chris. I answer accusations and am ignored. this sucks so much.MovingPictures07 wrote:What are you even talking about?Snow Dog wrote:Is everyone here recruited ffs?
You and Bass couldn't be any more bad; it's not even funny. So that makes everyone else recruited?
Snow Dog wrote:ntyzeek wrote:zeek wrote:What makes you more sure of those two, over Bass?Snow Dog wrote:Kind of I guess. But not as certain as I am of Hedge and now i am getting convinced of DF.
Zeek! You are one of the ones I trust...am i wrong too?
I'm glad you trust me but I feel like if I disagree with you you'll say I've been recruited as well. I haven't, I'm the same old loveable zeek.
I have played with Hedge plentyi of times so i know her but the clincher for me was...she hadn't mentioned me as suspicious all game then suddenly its "Snow DOg" . just felt forced to me. Thev right thing to say..whatever. It pinged the hell out of me. she is bad. I hate this keyboard
DF. Ok not certain of him at all but he seems to fit the bill and the Mast is a prority. The cases on him seem sound. it appeals. seems right.
Bass. i havev read his posts and i don't see it. He could be bad and if he's lynched I hope you are right. Not my top prority though But i hardly know him so maybe i am not seeing the case. think I pkayed with hi once on another site.
Snow Dog wrote:I have had my head in the sand regarding bass. A switch and then a block. Can he survive a further lynch?
Great game though if a bit stressing and when I was posting this morning I had been drinking and was sooooo tired. How do you manage it Zeek?
Snow Dog wrote:Is Bass the Master?
Seems to me he doesn't really say that much about him, considering how much Bass came up over the past two cycles, but when he does it's casually defending up until the end where he finally switches his tune. And THEN he says:Snow Dog wrote:I think Hedge does the minimum required. Doesn't contribute much.Dom wrote:Would you consider these players engaged? Would you consider them to be contributing? Would you consider them suspicious?Snow Dog wrote:My thoughts on Hedgowl are well documented. The popular opinion is that DF is the Master.
Sorry. i don't really know what you are getting at.
Hedgeowl: 118
Gotrees: 93
DFaraday: 66
Bass_The_Clever: 58
Elohcin: 55
nijuukyugou: 42
Bass and DF -- to an extent Hedgeowl-- are the only ones being seriously discussed. I don't disagree with a bass vote-- I just found this very surprising.
Gotrees. hardly any contribution. likes to help in night polls.
DF. Again, not much from him. Pops up now and then. But I think he is often this way.
Bass. Almost certainly bad now. Probably getting my next vote.
Elo. We really are not getting anything worthwhile from her. Possible baddie I suppose.
Nij. That is lower than I expected. No opinion but worth a look at.
I don't understand what this has to do with sympathizing.Snow Dog wrote:Do you mean where I sympathised with bass because nobody believed him? Is that wrong now? I was in the same position of being hounded.MovingPictures07 wrote:It's not proof, it's unnecessary wording.
Snowy adds unnecessary words to his posts like that when he's bad.
I also offered plenty of more "meaty", primary reasons that he's bad, and I stand by them, since you didn't dispute any of them (just disagree with a conclusion).
It's not ONLY that Snowy sounds insincere though, that's misreprensenting my argument. It's the fact that he casually defended Sabie, and also Bass. It's the fact, along with Bass, tried pushing Hedgeowl being the recruiter but never addressed my arguments, and the TIMING is what's most important here -- he did it to draw attention away from Sabie. It's the fact that he asserts himself with confidence in a way that he didn't earlier (I'll give him credit, he at least addressed this one, but I don't buy his explanation) and the tone of his posts don't have the same nervous civ quality that they had before.
His interactions with Bass ALONE are damning.
And I thought i had addresed your arguments re Hedgie? If I havent it is remiss of me and i will.
Also, this. And all the other reasons I think Snowy is bad.Chris wrote:Snow Dog voted for Metalmarsh day 6.
It wasn't a tie, and LC voted for Epig.
I'll give credit to you here too; I started to notice it more out of Snowy when paying closer attention.Epignosis wrote:Uh-huh. Where'd you learn that trick?MovingPictures07 wrote:Snowy adds unnecessary words to his posts like that when he's bad.
Posts like what? Are you referring to MP's quote-gathering, where he literally defends Bass casually a whole bunch of different times?Epignosis wrote:I realize I have no credibility on the subject, but I don't suspect Snow Dog. He posts like that normally.
LC, you just made my night.Long Con wrote:Posts like what? Are you referring to MP's quote-gathering, where he literally defends Bass casually a whole bunch of different times?Epignosis wrote:I realize I have no credibility on the subject, but I don't suspect Snow Dog. He posts like that normally.
He does use adverbs, sure, but I don't understand the need for a double literally emphasis. That's OTT for even Snowy.Epignosis wrote:I mean adverbs, damn it.
I usually use adverbs rarely, but occasionally I'll cautiously slip one into the conversation in a sneaky fashion.Epignosis wrote:I mean adverbs, damn it.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
-2 points for not going OTT with "sneakily".thellama73 wrote:I usually use adverbs rarely, but occasionally I'll cautiously slip one into the conversation in a sneaky fashion.Epignosis wrote:I mean adverbs, damn it.
I only just watched the P&R video, and now I can't stop saying it... and my mind is adding it to posts I read, to jazz them up.MovingPictures07 wrote:LC, you just made my night.Long Con wrote:Posts like what? Are you referring to MP's quote-gathering, where he literally defends Bass casually a whole bunch of different times?Epignosis wrote:I realize I have no credibility on the subject, but I don't suspect Snow Dog. He posts like that normally.
We now know that Bass wasn't recruited, so SD was right, Bass did just assume something. Why does this have to be defending? This could simply be reasoning. Trying to be a dilligent civilian.MovingPictures07 wrote: The following posts are all the others he makes about Bass, in order.
Snow Dog wrote:Did he? Maybe he just assumed something? I'll try and find that post.Dom wrote:Just curious, how did you react when MP did this?Chris wrote:Snow Dog... I know you're itching to vote for me. Just do it.
I've really given up. Every time I make a post, someone turns it into an issue. I'm distracting from the game . I just want to pack it in.
Do me the favor. Put me out of my misery. Vote for me man...That's not why I'm voting Bass....Snow Dog wrote:I don't feel I can vote bass for holding the same suspicion of Hedge that I do. That'd be unfair. Chris got me convinced (with input from others) that he is jack. But now I'm unsure again.
Dammit this game has got me so paranoid.
He implied knowledge of how the recruitments work, which someone on the team would know.
Isn't SD actually defending Chris here and not Bass?Snow Dog wrote:Yes I found that post. I see nothing there but i want to know what Dom made of it.Chris wrote:Remember, the MM/Epig lynch was a tie on paper, but the hosts said it was not a tie.
Amy knows where she voted... If she voted for Epig, then she knows that The CyberHead found the body.
And Snow was one of the MM voters.
Linki @ Snow: Oh no you don't You don't get to go suddenly find a reason to vote Bass. Bass merely said that he thought there were three recruits using the same logic I did. Odd day recruitments.
Dom, why didn't you find it suspicious that I used that same logic that Bass did. I said it before Bass did even.
Are we still talking about Bass knowing how the recruitment works? Because, as we know, he didn't. SD is correct, Bass was making suppostitions. Now maybe SD knew this because they're teammates. Or, he was just reasoning, like a good civilian would. It seems pretty reasonable to me.Snow Dog wrote:@Dom.
I don't know. It seemed to me he was just making suppositions. Certainly not enough to warrant a vote(from me anyway) . Seems we'll find out later either way.
This isn't SD defending Bass. This happens after the lynch. And I think he's telling the truth.Snow Dog wrote:It is both reasons. More than one reason. Two reasons. I had doubts about the case and that he was going to be lynched anyway solidified it. I can't understand why you can't understand this process..Chris wrote:Both?Snow Dog wrote:Both reasons.
1 reason sounds like you would vote for him no problem, but he's already got a huge lead.
The other reason says that you won't vote for him because he suspected Hedgie like you did.
You do see the difference in meaning, don't you?
You're bullshitting... badly.
It's how i work anyway.
If I had extra votes I could just as easily have voted bass and be done with it. Hidden votes. But i didn't. For two reasons.
Now stop being so rude. I am a person playing a game here.
Frustration. You guys are stubborn, some of you do wear blinders. I appreciate how he feel here 100%. I could get a headache reading the ridiculous conclusions that have been made this game.Snow Dog wrote:Don't bother man, they've made there minds up and ain't nothing gonna change it.Bass_the_Clever wrote:Why because how I voted?
How the fuck is this post indication that SD is teammates with Bass? It sounds like completely sincere, reasonable frustration to me.Snow Dog wrote:i don't know about bass, but show me how I'm bad. Where does this consensus come from? what evidence? or is it bad info? What trickery is afoot? I despair I really do. No one engages with me besides Chris. I answer accusations and am ignored. this sucks so much.MovingPictures07 wrote:What are you even talking about?Snow Dog wrote:Is everyone here recruited ffs?
You and Bass couldn't be any more bad; it's not even funny. So that makes everyone else recruited?
Again, this just reads like SD genuinely unsure of the case against Bass.Snow Dog wrote:ntyzeek wrote:zeek wrote:What makes you more sure of those two, over Bass?Snow Dog wrote:Kind of I guess. But not as certain as I am of Hedge and now i am getting convinced of DF.
Zeek! You are one of the ones I trust...am i wrong too?
I'm glad you trust me but I feel like if I disagree with you you'll say I've been recruited as well. I haven't, I'm the same old loveable zeek.
I have played with Hedge plentyi of times so i know her but the clincher for me was...she hadn't mentioned me as suspicious all game then suddenly its "Snow DOg" . just felt forced to me. Thev right thing to say..whatever. It pinged the hell out of me. she is bad. I hate this keyboard
DF. Ok not certain of him at all but he seems to fit the bill and the Mast is a prority. The cases on him seem sound. it appeals. seems right.
Bass. i havev read his posts and i don't see it. He could be bad and if he's lynched I hope you are right. Not my top prority though But i hardly know him so maybe i am not seeing the case. think I pkayed with hi once on another site.
Is this defending Bass? Sounds like he is conceding he is wrong.Snow Dog wrote:I have had my head in the sand regarding bass. A switch and then a block. Can he survive a further lynch?
Great game though if a bit stressing and when I was posting this morning I had been drinking and was sooooo tired. How do you manage it Zeek?
Why is this even quoted? MP, quantity is not a substitute for quality.Snow Dog wrote:Is Bass the Master?
Ok, but LC characterised it as SD casually defending Bass, and together one could get the false impression that SD really did defend Bass all those times that you quoted, when most are out of context. I would urge LC to take a closer inspection of the evidence put forth against SD.MovingPictures07 wrote:keys, I only posted every single one so that people could make up their own mind. They're not all notable.
Feel free to disagree then. Sig bet it is.
Here's hoping you also like elderly swingers' sites' ad bannersEpignosis wrote:I happen to like MP's signature.
My great grandma turns 100 in April. She didn't get that way by being a swinger or falling for scams.keys56000000000 wrote:Here's hoping you also like elderly swingers' sites' ad bannersEpignosis wrote:I happen to like MP's signature.
You remind me of Dwight Schrute when you say that.Epignosis wrote:My great grandma turns 100 in April. She didn't get that way by being a swinger or falling for scams.keys56000000000 wrote:Here's hoping you also like elderly swingers' sites' ad bannersEpignosis wrote:I happen to like MP's signature.
No, her thing was threatening trespassers with a loaded handgun. Which she still sleeps with under her pillow.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
No worries, I'm 99% sure it'll be staying the same.Epignosis wrote:I happen to like MP's signature.
Metalmarsh89 wrote:You remind me of Dwight Schrute when you say that.Epignosis wrote:My great grandma turns 100 in April. She didn't get that way by being a swinger or falling for scams.keys56000000000 wrote:Here's hoping you also like elderly swingers' sites' ad bannersEpignosis wrote:I happen to like MP's signature.
No, her thing was threatening trespassers with a loaded handgun. Which she still sleeps with under her pillow.
Why?MovingPictures07 wrote:No worries, I'm 99% sure it'll be staying the same.Epignosis wrote:I happen to like MP's signature.![]()
birdwithteeth11 wrote:I have all the PMs now. Going to start working on the night post and get it up ASAP.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Too funny! That was so Dwight Schrute.MovingPictures07 wrote:Metalmarsh89 wrote:You remind me of Dwight Schrute when you say that.Epignosis wrote:My great grandma turns 100 in April. She didn't get that way by being a swinger or falling for scams.keys56000000000 wrote:Here's hoping you also like elderly swingers' sites' ad bannersEpignosis wrote:I happen to like MP's signature.
No, her thing was threatening trespassers with a loaded handgun. Which she still sleeps with under her pillow.![]()
Snow Dog = Chris Traeger
Epi = Dwight Schrute
?
Snowy specifically does not suspect Bass in most of those posts. He casually suggests that Bass would survive further lynch attempts. "Bass, I have read his posts, and I don't see it" "I don't know about Bass, but..." "Certainly not enough to warrant a vote(from me anyway)" "Yes I found that post. I see nothing there..."keys56000000000 wrote:Ok, but LC characterised it as SD casually defending Bass, and together one could get the false impression that SD really did defend Bass all those times that you quoted, when most are out of context. I would urge LC to take a closer inspection of the evidence put forth against SD.MovingPictures07 wrote:keys, I only posted every single one so that people could make up their own mind. They're not all notable.
Feel free to disagree then. Sig bet it is.