Ok, so I was getting some "vibes" about Boomslang... these vibrations of masterful intuition hummed to me that Boomslang might be hinting that he is the Face of Boe. But the fact that, at this point in the game, has only said there's 2 Civs he trusts and has given us no baddies... quite frankly, at this point in the game, I would expect the Face of Boe to be more of a leader in the thread.
So I looked back over his posts and there were some things I noticed. These are in chronological order:
Boomslang wrote:juliets wrote:juliets wrote:I was making a statement for the lie detector, Boe, if he she wanted to check it. Also someone, I think Made, asked several people including me about the contrast in our good and bad alignment behavior. Someone, maybe llama, maybe someone else, answered the question immediately. My impression was thats why they were making that statement. I just can't remember who it was. I think tha'ts what you may be remembering and if i had to guess I would say it was llama.
Boomslang wrote:Nevertheless, the statement makes a pretty firm commitment to a "civ" game. Because if Boe does check it, and finds it to be false, things could get awfully hairy for you. Unless you're an indy role with some secret that blocks lie detection... Hatter's insanity could be related. Just throwing that out there for consideration.
I don't think we disagree. I am making a firm commitment to a "civ" game. Maybe I'm missing your point but I think we agree.
I don't disagree. I'm just saying that making an absolute commitment to saying "I am civ" is painting a target on your back for being NK'ed, unless you have powers to prevent it (or are not in fact civ).
We have this exchange... so, if Boomslang is the Face of Boe, and clearly aware of a statement to detect, why hasn't he spoken up about juliets in any way? She's not really part of the Supertrust Club, her name is still being thrown around as a possible baddie. Where's Boomslang's opinion?
Boomslang wrote:I really am having trouble figuring out what to say this lynch. Obviously, I'm somewhat happy that Dom is getting attention, because I sure as hell don't deserve the tunnel vision hunt he's been throwing my way ever since Day 1. But jumping on that will make me seem bad, so... maybe I better keep my opinions to myself.
Boomslang wrote:Dom wrote:Note: next time I'm getting heat-- I'll just say I can't play for a week-- no one will vote for me.
(Not saying Bass is lying, I'm just pointing out how dumb that is)
Agreed. In the interest of making Bass a more valid option for discussion and to forestall a Dom bandwagon picking up steam, I'll vote now.
Dom was after Boom all game, which could have been an extended distancing thing, but he still tries to save Dom in the two-man lynch...
Boomslang wrote:Caught up, frankly still unsure what's going on. Just let it be noted that Dom has been gunning for me this whole game; I think that burnishes my civvie cred a bit.
...and still tries to make sure he gets his full allotment of cred. Which would probably have been more deserved had he voted for Dom in the two-man lynch.
Boomslang wrote:MP argues that we don't need to kill him to win. However, we don't need him alive to win, and his unknown qualities worry me. Voting MP
A seeming indication that Boomslang doesn't know any baddies... and to me, voting MP when you know he's indy is a nice way for a baddie to not ruffle any Civvie feathers.
Boomslang wrote:I know that Spacedaisy, Long Con, and myself are not bad. Talk amongst yourselves as to why/how I would say this.
Busts out the serious role-suggestion possibility. Note that The Sorcerers had The Necromancer, who learns the role of people they kill. So if they had killed Boe somewhere along the line, it would be an easy, practically inevitable plan for one of them to try to role-hint at being Boe.