Golden wrote:If bubbles is bad, I'm prefectly happy to give you partial credit, zebra. My point, though, is specifically meta, in that bubbles more or less leaps out of her skin to claim she is civ in every game.
I know, I was half-joking since we had different points anyway. If that does go so strongly against her meta I could see myself voting for her tomorrow. But today I haven't seen another lynch candidate that comes close to BUGLA's uncompromising nonsense.
Really? You are saying with a straight face that Buglabash's silly posts give you a scum read?
Bug is an island. Dom is absolutely petrified of being lynched day 1 and until he realised the potential he was in absolute cruise mode.
And if I am suspect to anyone please vote for me. I welcome it.
Linki: Did you just admit to knowing Epi was civ? Are you really failing to understand? I have a town read on Epi who I trust is a good enough player to know what he is talking about when he says he has a scum read on you. Not an ideal lynch reason but my preferred candidates are off the poll.
a2thezebra wrote:Epi's case against Dom might be great for all I know, but that's just the problem, I can't know. It's meta-based. It makes no sense to echo a meta-based case when you yourself aren't familiar with the meta of the lynch candidate, especially when you were the one boasting earlier about how poor the reasoning against BUGLA is.
Your rationalisation is bizarre. I am putting faith in an Epi town read and his scumdar. I don't have a read on Dom but he does. I haven't said I agree with his case I am deferring to him in lieu of my options.
I like that his lynch is not easily forthcoming too.
So you admit that you don't even have a read on the person you're voting for, and that you've hand-picked someone who you think is town to decide your opinions for you in a game where there are no guarantees of any alignment of your own, but MY rationalization is bizarre.
MacDougall wrote:Golden doesn't this look like your day 1 overreaction scum tell?
Um...
linki@Sorsha - He's begging for it. He brought it on himself.
Your inability to see how the sense and reason in what I am doing is what is bizarre. Why so protective of Dom?
Fell asleep and almost missed the vote! Glad I woke in time.
Don't have an opinion on Dom, yet. And Epi is not always right, so I hesitate to go along with him just because he sounds sure. He always sounds sure.
Don't feel good about voting someone who is brand new to the site, because it doesn't seem friendly. And can't rembember who said Buga would play the newbie card if they had BTSC, it could also be the opposite (I tend to suspect people who play the newbie card). So, I suspect him and Bananana, but I'm not ready to vote them.
I'm going to go with Mac. My suspicion of him is fairly low level, but I don't have huge suspicion of anyone right now. And I have to vote somewhere. It's kind of a --hey, dude, I'm watching you kind of vote.
You made three weird implication of implication posts already in one day using the exact same language, and at least searching the last game you didn't do that even once. It comes off as passive-aggressive and twisting the intent of those posts. E.g. when nutella first says she's "curious about the Epi/Dom discussion" and you ask if that means she suspects you. Then in her reply she says that your style is consistent and doesn't clue in on an alignment. That's simply a statement. It doesn't necessarily imply any of the things you're trying to make it.
BUGLABUSH is too scared to fake scumhunting, hence the silly approach. I don't buy it for a second. If you have original reasons for voting Dom why didn't you state them when voting for Dom? I am not sure whether your glaring inconsistencies are weak town play or revolutionary scum play.
linki@Mac 1 - See, you've got some nerve insinuating that I'm protecting Dom when really I'm just attacking your poorly justified vote. Dom is one of my suspicions based on his recent content, but I don't think he is more likely to be scum than BUGLA and I think if he's not then he could provide us with some good content later on. I have given more reasons to be suspicious of him but not vote for him than you given reasons to vote for him at all. Good reasons, I should clarify.
linki@Mac 2 - Others have voted for Banana instead of Bug, why not call them out? My imaginary protecting of Dom is less apparent than your irrational singling out of him to justify your anti-vote.
linki@Mac 3 - I'm not going to vote for you for not liking your play, I'm going to vote for you if I think you're scum. Defensive much?
a2thezebra wrote:BUGLABUSH is too scared to fake scumhunting, hence the silly approach. I don't buy it for a second. If you have original reasons for voting Dom why didn't you state them when voting for Dom? I am not sure whether your glaring inconsistencies are weak town play or revolutionary scum play.
linki@Mac 1 - See, you've got some nerve insinuating that I'm protecting Dom when really I'm just attacking your poorly justified vote. Dom is one of my suspicions based on his recent content, but I don't think he is more likely to be scum than BUGLA and I think if he's not then he could provide us with some good content later on. I have given more reasons to be suspicious of him but not vote for him than you given reasons to vote for him at all. Good reasons, I should clarify.
linki@Mac 2 - Others have voted for Banana instead of Bug, why not call them out? My imaginary protecting of Dom is less apparent than your irrational singling out of him to justify your anti-vote.
linki@Mac 3 - I'm not going to vote for you for not liking your play, I'm going to vote for you if I think you're scum. Defensive much?
MacDougall wrote:How the fuck after this is Banana the lynch leader. Holy shit that is such an obvious counterwagon. Town plz.
Finally something I can agree with you on. I don't like this at all and I think most of the votes for Banana are super weak. Banana is just as much of a newbie as BUGLA but BUGLA has given much more reason to be lynched.
NANANANANANA_BANANA flew high in the sky, indifferent to the trials and tribulations of the many folk below in the realm. He looked down on the Infectious Goblin as he cackled, preparing a thick black liquid over a small fire. He saw a glint from the Tarnished Golem as it prepared to speed across the land, driven by a single impulse. He shuddered to see The Darkness enveloping someone, and flew higher.
"To hell with them all," he thought. "I will fly away from here forever!"
Dark Willow narrowed her eyes as she looked down at him, disapproving. With a thought, she bent the laws of physics slightly, and the sun, once so many thousands of miles away, became a shining ball of fire that actually hung in the sky. NANANANANANA_BANANA screeched as his feathers burst into flame, and he plummeted back to the ground with a bone-shattering crunch.
NANANANANANA_BANANA has been lynched. He was the Deadeye Raptor, a Civvie.
It is now Night 1. Please send in your movement PMs and your night powers as well. The sooner, the better.
Still loving that Willow is in the story telling. (Having been Willow in Long Rock's Buffy game, and killed before my time (frigging Kadaj), I appreciate her spirit being kept alive throughout other games)
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Lorab is drunk?
Nah, just an old lady who falls asleep on the couch sometimes. I'm way more entertaining when drunk.
I hate to do this, but I'm going to have to ask to be replaced. Right now RL is too crazy for me to handle 2 games of mafia, or even 1 for that matter. And as much as I normally enjoy this game, trying to play it right now is not enjoyable at all and is just adding more stress on my plate. So I apologize to everyone, but I think I'll be taking a long break from mafia until I truly get recharged and refreshed.
Sorry Banana, RIP. My reasons for voting you just weren't right as it turns out. Please come back and play with us again.
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 3:24 pmAlways good to remember that there is no such thing as a Mafia circumstance that is worth real human emotion. Sometimes it will naturally come out, but it can be contained if we just remember that this is a game on a message board forum that 99.99% of the population of the Earth has never heard of before. No matter how successful anyone is, it means just about nothing.
And I don't recall you saying why. Is it becasue Epi thought I was always bad in LC/BR games and you value his (incorrect) opinion so highly? Which reminds me, I was also a civ in Sandman at RM. And I started out as a vanilla civ in RM3.
Or is it becasue Lorab & I don't think each other is bad? Why exactly did you think that only one of us might be bad? How does that work?
Or is it becasue I voted for Prog in 2 posts instead of one like everyone else?
Skip softly, my moonbeams, for I have heard tell
That the stairs up to heaven lead straight down to hell
Fiddler on the Roof
