Mafia: A World Reborn Game Thread - Game Over

#1901

TheFloyd73 wrote:You seem quite eccentric and excited that Luke is dead. Why's that?

I'm quite excited that Luke is dead. Why?

Luke was bad. A killer. A sneaky sonofabitch.

I'm glad he's dead.

Any questions?

#1902

If I get night killed by the bad guys I become the antichrist and all the bad guys powers become mine and I become unkillable and unlynchable and Epignosis is forced to come to the bonfire party and watch me tweak my nips for a millenium.

#1903

Hosts - Will you be posting the poll in the polls thread?

#1904

#1905

Epignosis wrote:
TheFloyd73 wrote:You seem quite eccentric and excited that Luke is dead. Why's that?
I'm quite excited that Luke is dead. Why?

Luke was bad. A killer. A sneaky sonofabitch.

I'm glad he's dead.

Any questions?

What part of eccentric do you not understand?

#1906

eccentric

noun
a disc or wheel mounted eccentrically on a revolving shaft in order to transform rotation into backward-and-forward motion, e.g., a cam in an internal combustion engine.

I don't find EPi to be acting eccentric, it seems genuine to me,

#1907

TheFloyd73 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
TheFloyd73 wrote:You seem quite eccentric and excited that Luke is dead. Why's that?
I'm quite excited that Luke is dead. Why?

Luke was bad. A killer. A sneaky sonofabitch.

I'm glad he's dead.

Any questions?
What part of eccentric do you not understand?

<__<

>__>

I'm an English teacher. I think understand all part.....s?

#1908

Ha Engrish teacher just made a dumb dumb.

#1909

sig wrote:eccentric

noun
a disc or wheel mounted eccentrically on a revolving shaft in order to transform rotation into backward-and-forward motion, e.g., a cam in an internal combustion engine.

That's Epi in a nutshell. Revolving his shaft in a backward and forward motion.

#1910

Nice lynches today! I voted no in the poll, I'm busy, unable to post much more but I've followed my pocket suspicions as best I can, I don't see why I should be punished for working long shifts.

#1911

I don't like this night poll. I happen to agree in principle with Golden that it might turn out to be a good thing for us to focus on the less vocal...but since I am super-less-vocal, I don't want my neck on the line. In a mafia battle between altruism and self-preservation, I'm ashamed to say my altruism rarely wins out

#1912

Good result

#1913

RIH Luke.

Epignosis wrote:Hey Lorab,

What do you think of Luke?

HE'S DEAD.

I think he's bad, and I'm glad he's gone. I wasn't around for he main case against him, so I can't really speculate what I would have thought of it. When I catch up in full, I'm glad to elaborate on my theoretical, after the fact thoughts.

Mixed feelings on the poll. On the one hand, I believe in drawing out low posters. On the other, my main suspects are in the top posting half.

#1914

OK. I voted no. My bigger suspects are in the top posters. And I'd rather focus on those players at the moment about who there is reason to find suspciion. Other than suspcting people because they are low posting, which will be an undercrurrnt of focusing only on those posters. I'm a bit buzzed, so hoping that makes sense.

#1915

Voted no. Let's keep things open just in case; most lynches so far have been against low posters anyways.

#1916

Voted no. I don't think it's ever a great idea to restrict lynches that much. Plus because sometimes baddies are low posters doesn't mean they can't be high posters too. I think the high posters are just as likely to be randomly assigned a baddie role as a low poster, and I honestly don't think most of the people in this game really change how much they post based on affiliation.

#1917

Oh cum is also fingersplints too

#1918

#1919

I am sorry I was a total no show yesterday, I have a family situation going on right now and that took precedence. I will get back up to speed today.

Bye Luke, BIH Awful sounding role.

And Death to Low posters!

#1920

Highest posters:

MacDougall 216
Epignosis 173
Golden 138
HamburgerBoy 118
Matt F 94
sig 88
S~V~S 82
juliets 80
Dom 75
Turnip Head 69
Bullzeye 63
Metalmarsh89 62

Bottom half:

Sorsha 51
LoRab 49
Typhoony 39
TheFloyd73 33
Tranq 27
fingersplints 25
Draconus 24
Bass_the_Clever 22
DrWilgy 21
Canucklehead 17
DFaraday 14
timmer 13

How about a double lynch in which one of each group gets lynched?

#1921

I voted yes, restricting the vote to include LoRab makes me happy. All my bonfire friends are in the top half as well. I will protect my bros!

#1922

No ofcourse.
No good reason to vote yes imo.

#1923

Way to go everyone. I stand corrected about two lynches being a bad thing.
I will be voting no.

#1924

I am voting no. For people who replaced in like Draconus I don't think it's fair. Plus I just don't want the lynch restricted.

#1925

Voted no, I don't want restrictions on who to vote for.

#1926

I've liked Matt's answers to me, plan not to lynch him tomorrow.

#1927

Can I hear someone's reasoning for voting yes?

#1928

I have three main reasons, the people I find more suspicious are in the bottom half, I'm not in the bottom half which would remove me from the poll, and this would allow us to focus on other players as well as not have as many people focus only on me. I've seen a few players focus only on getting me lynched or only voting for me this would require them to vote for other people and give us some insight about them.

#1929

An example of this is DFaraday half of there in game posts have been about me or related to me, and they've repeatedly voted for me. This would require them to vote elsewhere and talk about other players.

#1930

@Floyd what do you think about Mac you mentioned him being Inactive and getting modkilled thus not worth voting for earlier this game. Know that this won't be happening what do you think of him?

#1931

Just got home. Toured the Harry Potter studios in Watford yesterday, got to see all the actual stuff from the films and drank a glass of Butterbeer... Not what I'd been expecting! Fun weekend all in all

Gonna catch up later today or perhaps tomorrow as I'm feeling quite exhausted from travelling all day today. I will vote against having an all-low poster lynch because I don't see the value of only being able to lynch a quiet player.

#1932

DrWilgy wrote:I voted yes, restricting the vote to include LoRab makes me happy. All my bonfire friends are in the top half as well. I will protect my bros!

Can you explain why you want me voted out? You have yet to say that except to pop in and say I'm bad, unless I missed an explanation somewhere.

#1933

sig wrote:An example of this is DFaraday half of there in game posts have been about me or related to me, and they've repeatedly voted for me. This would require them to vote elsewhere and talk about other players.

I actually am planning to look over other people today (not to say I think you're civ now, but I have seemed a bit tunnely, looking back).

I don't see limiting our lynch options as a good thing, though. Suppose all the baddies are in the top half? That's unlikely, but it's still good to have the potential to vote anyone we suspect.

#1934

Typhoony wrote:No ofcourse.
No good reason to vote yes imo.

LoRab wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:I voted yes, restricting the vote to include LoRab makes me happy. All my bonfire friends are in the top half as well. I will protect my bros!
Can you explain why you want me voted out? You have yet to say that except to pop in and say I'm bad, unless I missed an explanation somewhere.

Nope

#1935

#1936

DrWilgy wrote:
Typhoony wrote:No ofcourse.
No good reason to vote yes imo.

LoRab wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:I voted yes, restricting the vote to include LoRab makes me happy. All my bonfire friends are in the top half as well. I will protect my bros!
Can you explain why you want me voted out? You have yet to say that except to pop in and say I'm bad, unless I missed an explanation somewhere.
Nope

So you want to lunch me for no good reason? Or at least not one that you're willing to share?!

As a civ, that is frustrating to say the least. It also doesn't particularly worry me because if others suspect me, and say why, I am happy to be questioned and answer concerns. I have nothing to hide. :Lorab:

#1937

LoRab wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Typhoony wrote:No ofcourse.
No good reason to vote yes imo.

LoRab wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:I voted yes, restricting the vote to include LoRab makes me happy. All my bonfire friends are in the top half as well. I will protect my bros!
Can you explain why you want me voted out? You have yet to say that except to pop in and say I'm bad, unless I missed an explanation somewhere.
Nope
So you want to lunch me for no good reason? Or at least not one that you're willing to share?!

As a civ, that is frustrating to say the least. It also doesn't particularly worry me because if others suspect me, and say why, I am happy to be questioned and answer concerns. I have nothing to hide. :Lorab:

Why as a civ is that frustrating? Would it be not frustrating as a baddie? This post does nothing for you... What was it's purpose?

#1938

DrWilgy wrote:
LoRab wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Typhoony wrote:No ofcourse.
No good reason to vote yes imo.

LoRab wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:I voted yes, restricting the vote to include LoRab makes me happy. All my bonfire friends are in the top half as well. I will protect my bros!
Can you explain why you want me voted out? You have yet to say that except to pop in and say I'm bad, unless I missed an explanation somewhere.
Nope
So you want to lunch me for no good reason? Or at least not one that you're willing to share?!

As a civ, that is frustrating to say the least. It also doesn't particularly worry me because if others suspect me, and say why, I am happy to be questioned and answer concerns. I have nothing to hide. :Lorab:
Why as a civ is that frustrating? Would it be not frustrating as a baddie? This post does nothing for you... What was it's purpose?

The purpose was to respond to your post. I tend to respond to posts to me or about me, or at least I try to. It's a long standing habit.

And yes, it is more frustrating to me as a civ. Suspicion as a civ is generally more frustrating to me because I know that whatever the reasons they don't add up to an accurate conclusion. And for someone to suspect me for no reason, it is all the more frustrating because it leaves me no room to explain myself.

#1939

sig wrote:@Floyd what do you think about Mac you mentioned him being Inactive and getting modkilled thus not worth voting for earlier this game. Know that this won't be happening what do you think of him?

I got nothing against him at this stage, I was frankly mentioning that he was being inactive.

#1940

^Can you talk a bit about why voted Yes in the poll? The post you made doesn't exactly explain it well:

TheFloyd73 wrote:I frankly couldn't care less about who has to vote, but I voted yes anyway.

#1941

Luke11646 wrote:
BUGLABUSH wrote:Luke is mafia
Yeah, I'm mafia and I have BTSC with you.

BUGLABUSH wrote:Haha knew it

Mmm hmm.

Draconus wrote:
juliets wrote:I am torn about Luke because he could easily be just an inactive civ like Draconus was asking about or like others have said he could be hiding behind his low posts. Tranq pointed out the few questions Luke asked but there is no digging for info like I would expect from someone who asks questions. There's just not a lot there (though SVS makes a good point that he has posted more than Canuck who voted for him for not being present). Despite some reservations (like this is feeling like a bandwagon) I'm going to go ahead and vote Luke and change my vote if something else comes up that I feel is a better vote.
Thank you for bringing this back up! I don't like this bandwagon that has quickly formed.

Draconus wrote:Thank you to both SVS and Typhoony. That was very helpful. I'm getting more and more uncomfortable with the Luke bandwagon, so I'm moving my vote again. nutella

Mmm hmm.

#1942

Tranq wrote:^Can you talk a bit about why voted Yes in the poll? The post you made doesn't exactly explain it well:

TheFloyd73 wrote:I frankly couldn't care less about who has to vote, but I voted yes anyway.

I kinda figured that I'm in the bottom half of posters, so it doesn't affect me with either result.

#1943

TheFloyd73 wrote:
Tranq wrote:^Can you talk a bit about why voted Yes in the poll? The post you made doesn't exactly explain it well:

TheFloyd73 wrote:I frankly couldn't care less about who has to vote, but I voted yes anyway.

I kinda figured that I'm in the bottom half of posters, so it doesn't affect me with either result.

Ummmm....I'm confused. it actually has an impact on you. I don't get why you'd want to be on the poll with half of the players listed as opposed to with all of them listed.

#1944

DrWilgy wrote:
Typhoony wrote:No ofcourse.
No good reason to vote yes imo.

You're missing an eye bro.

Here, have another one

#1945

Also where the fuck is MetalMarsh?

Dude hasn't posted in days, still manages to be in the top half of posters yet I can't remember anything he has posted except for checking if polls has changeable votes like almost every day.

#1946

The interaction between Luke/Bug is interesting Epi. I was going to say "perhaps Luke's team told him to say that to Bug", but those posts are within 10 minutes of each other. Add to that the Drac stuff...

My only problem with the theory and it's a small problem. Bug and Luke are friends. If Bug was on Luke's team, do you think he would've had more of a motivation to play?

#1947

Matt F wrote:The interaction between Luke/Bug is interesting Epi. I was going to say "perhaps Luke's team told him to say that to Bug", but those posts are within 10 minutes of each other. Add to that the Drac stuff...

My only problem with the theory and it's a small problem. Bug and Luke are friends. If Bug was on Luke's team, do you think he would've had more of a motivation to play?

No. I've invited many people to sign up here and play, and they hate it and never come back.

#1948

Epignosis wrote:
Matt F wrote:The interaction between Luke/Bug is interesting Epi. I was going to say "perhaps Luke's team told him to say that to Bug", but those posts are within 10 minutes of each other. Add to that the Drac stuff...

My only problem with the theory and it's a small problem. Bug and Luke are friends. If Bug was on Luke's team, do you think he would've had more of a motivation to play?
No. I've invited many people to sign up here and play, and they hate it and never come back.

BUGLA won't be back, I didn't think he would enjoy Mafia much. Luke looks like he'll be here to stay.

#1949

TheFloyd73 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Matt F wrote:The interaction between Luke/Bug is interesting Epi. I was going to say "perhaps Luke's team told him to say that to Bug", but those posts are within 10 minutes of each other. Add to that the Drac stuff...

My only problem with the theory and it's a small problem. Bug and Luke are friends. If Bug was on Luke's team, do you think he would've had more of a motivation to play?
No. I've invited many people to sign up here and play, and they hate it and never come back.
BUGLA won't be back, I didn't think he would enjoy Mafia much. Luke looks like he'll be here to stay.

Based on BULGA's input before being replaced, do you think BULGA's replacement should be lynched?

#1950

LoRab wrote:
TheFloyd73 wrote:
Tranq wrote:^Can you talk a bit about why voted Yes in the poll? The post you made doesn't exactly explain it well:

TheFloyd73 wrote:I frankly couldn't care less about who has to vote, but I voted yes anyway.

I kinda figured that I'm in the bottom half of posters, so it doesn't affect me with either result.
Ummmm....I'm confused. it actually has an impact on you. I don't get why you'd want to be on the poll with half of the players listed as opposed to with all of them listed.

^This

Who to lynch? 24 hour day!