[ENDGAME] The Office Mafia

#1851

LoRab wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:
LoRab wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:If TH + Lorab get DF lynched, and he flips civ, they're gonna be my top two suspects for tomorrow.

Just putting that out there.
I voted the player I suspected most. I stand behind my vote. I don't have a baddie vibe from Splints, so I didn't vote there, although she seems to have the clear majority.

Why would disagreeingon suspicion make someone your top suspect?

If somebody helps to lynch a civilian for what seems to me like weak reasoning, I see that as cause to suspect them.
So if Splints flips civ, will you suspect everyone who voted for her?

not necessarily everyone, but I'll re-read the posts of the votes and see who decided to jump on a bandwagon, and who was seemingly genuine.

#1852

Day Six - Clean Up In Accounting

Fingersplints was lynched. She was Oscar.
You have 23 hours from the time of this post to get your PMs in. There is no night poll.

#1853

wow, a seemingly random lynch with more than half of the players voting for one person, most of which saying in their posts "I just don't see a better option, so I guess out of the people who have votes, I'll go with FS," DIDN'T produce a dead baddie.

Color me shocked and awed.

#1854

We're fucked.

#1855

is it too late to declare bankruptcy?

#1856

I made that.

Just for you.

You're welcome.

I am weird.

And yes, I am aware.

Welcome to Dead Land splintsy.

#1857

Well shit. RIP splints.

I take full responsibility for my vote. It was not a fully informed decision but I wasn't around for most of the day today.

This has been one of the worst games I've ever played in terms of closing the deal. At this point I might as well be putting $100 on the Black 6. I'll never forget that time I shouldn't have taken my money away at the last second on that Black 6. Would have been $3400 richer. But no. I chickened out. Like a pragmatist. I wanna be a dreamer again

I'm taking a shot in the dark tomorrow at one of the inactives. Maybe they're not pulling the strings but there HAS to be a few lurking. HAS TO BE.

i dunno

#1858

Fuck splintsy.

I'm sorry.

#1859

insertnamehere wrote:is it too late to declare bankruptcy?

Or initiate Mulholland?

Tfw I reached an episode called "Mafia" and I genuinely imagined it would be a crazy office party game, ending with Dwight chasing everyone with his crossbow.

Pretty funneh episode, nonetheless.

#1860

fingersplints spent a lot of time talking about the civ redirector role in relatiom to svs and turned out to have that role, there's a strong possibility she was behind that. Looking though her iso for any breadcrumbs, i'm not finding much; how is that typically done here?

#1861

#1862

Why is there no night poll? Is this all the roles we get revealed?

#1863

insertnamehere wrote:

You're bad.

#1864

Turnip Head wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:
You're bad.

no u

#1865

y u no post?

#1866

Sorry Splints. I was way off base about you.

#1867

#DeadThread

#ReturnTheThreadToTheDead

#HighestPostingDeadieGetsARezz

#DeadRedThread

#1868

If I'm still, y'know, alive tomorrow, expect me to post an analysis on everyone who voted FS.

#1869

Night Six - STAY FUCKING CALM

Serge has been killed.
It is now Day Seven. You have 48 hours to lynch someone.

#1870

insertnamehere wrote:Timmer, I've come around on, and began to view as genuine, although I'd like to see some more non-INH opinions.

insertnamehere wrote:Because I'm a NO U'ing scumlord, I've decided to vote for timmer.

Explain yo self.

#1871

timmer wrote: and I don't see a case on df

You don't see it, or you don't agree with it? Because I posted a long ass case, and it would be nice to know what you thought of it other than "not seeing it", because that makes me feel like you didn't even read it.

#1872

Ok bye serge.
I have no idea why eliminating someone who probably quit is a good strategy for Mafia but I'm done reading into the kills this game because they make as much sense as Freedom Fries.

I'll be boring into everyone I can this day phase. Gotta start discussion from somewhere.

It seems like the well of revealed roles has run dry. There's still 6 roles unrevealed. We know one is the Strangler, who was probably indie. We can assume there has to be a Michael, Dwight, and maybe Kelly? That leaves 2 ??? Roles out there. Could be 1 indie/1 Mafia. If that's the case, that would make this a 17 civ game, with 4 indies and 5 baddies. Does that look right? I'm not good with balance.
If I'm to assume that at least 1 of leetic/SVS is bad, then that leaves us with hypothetically 8-9 non-Mafia and 3-4 Mafia. I just literally can't believe we haven't lynched a single Mafia yet and have to leave it up to assumptions that x # has been NK'd. But whatcha gonna do.

I guess what I just worked out in my head is: we can still pull it out.

Turnip Head wrote:We're fucked.

Not yet bucko.

Anyone want to go around the prayer circle and say if they're bad? I won't tell

#1873

So I'll go ahead and explain my splints vote since I did a piss-poor job of explaining it.

TH I am not so sure I was reading DFaraday as bad. I can't quite place it but his responses have not been as...measured? I guess? As when I called him out as bad in Arkham.
Splints jumped right on your case of DF and started citing things he said via bwt lynch. It felt like she was using him as a scapegoat. And since I didn't (and still don't really) suspect DF as much as others, I figured splints was the perp.

I REALLY want to hear more from enrique, espers (who is alive apparently yay!), and Spacedaisy. Especially Spacedaisy for her tack on vote for splints at the end.

Hell, for all I know, TH and Drum are a duo and I'm just too chicken to push that further. Gahhh

#1874

I don't know DrumBeats' role and you should feel free to pursue that suspicion. I've been giving him the benefit of the doubt since the SVS incident and maybe that was a mistake. I do think it's likely that splints got SVS killed, but if that's the case, she should have left breadcrumbs as to who she targeted that night, as that would be our killer.

#1875

Been AFK pretty much all day. My thoughts haven't really changed since the last lynch. I also need to sleep before I actually think about anything.

#1876

Turnip Head wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:Timmer, I've come around on, and began to view as genuine, although I'd like to see some more non-INH opinions.

insertnamehere wrote:Because I'm a NO U'ing scumlord, I've decided to vote for timmer.
Explain yo self.

I posted this before I went back and ISO'd both of 'em, do you understand? When I read both of their post histories, I realized that my earlier conjecture was wrong, okay?

Can anyone spot anything weird with my posts? Am I gonna have to do this for the entire day?

#1877

I'm gonna do an analysis of everyone who voted FS, and their reasons for doing so, okay? This damned curse may make it a bit harder, but I have to figure that whoever cursed me wanted to avoid scrutiny of those people, right?

I'm gonna start with Epignosis, okay?

He doesn't post anything about her until July 8th, and then he jumps on her for what are in my mind, little things about post semantics and etiquette, you see?

Epignosis wrote:
fingersplints wrote:I think they are pretty good points, and would be interested in hearing DF's response.

fingersplints wrote:I'm liking the points against Timmer. I'm not feeling like this is his civvie game, but I'm hoping it isn't that he is just busy. I find he searches for baddies more actively then this as a civvie. Something feels off.

fingersplints wrote:Epi, I think you have a point about Matt. I didn't like Matt's day 0 interactions, but I have a hard time articulating my thoughts without it seeming a bit "no u"ish.

I'm sad rabbit died without me getting a chance to vote him. I'd consider voting for Matt, but for the time being I'm going to vote leetic for now. I haven't played any Mafia this year, and I'm scared of getting modkilled for missing votes.
I'm noticing a trend here.

Regarding that last post, you were more concerned with how you would look rather than articulating your thoughts. Why?

Epignosis wrote:I don't see how anyone gets "I'm literally never concerned with 'how I look' when posting" from "I didn't like Matt's day 0 interactions, but I have a hard time articulating my thoughts without it seeming a bit 'no u"ish.'"

Then he says that he believes DF and FS are both baddie teammates, do you still believe that DF is bad, Epignosis?

He switches his vote from DF to FS, and then comments about how dead the thread is, am I getting this right? He's also the first one to vote for FS, kicking the whole doomed bandwagon off, capiche?

It seems to me like he pulled this suspicion out of thin air, and tried to find any little reason he could to suspect her because he knew that she could get lynched, you follow me?

#1878

Next up is Scotty, you get me?

Scotty is someone who I've gotten a good read on this entire game, so his vote here has me going whaaaaa?

He himself admits that he didn't explain his FS vote very well, and he explains it in his most recent post, can you dig it?

Scotty wrote:So I'll go ahead and explain my splints vote since I did a piss-poor job of explaining it.

TH I am not so sure I was reading DFaraday as bad. I can't quite place it but his responses have not been as...measured? I guess? As when I called him out as bad in Arkham.
Splints jumped right on your case of DF and started citing things he said via bwt lynch. It felt like she was using him as a scapegoat. And since I didn't (and still don't really) suspect DF as much as others, I figured splints was the perp.

His couple of posts about FS before his vote do in fact jive with this explanation, and it is one that seems sound to me, as someone who believes DF to be un-worthy of lynch, but I don't see why he couldn't of just explained this earlier?

#1879

insertnamehere wrote:Then he says that he believes DF and FS are both baddie teammates, do you still believe that DF is bad, Epignosis?

Yep.

Regarding fingersplints:

INH (I dunno, feel kinda good)

DrumBeats (Bad)
Enrique (Bad)
DFaraday (Bad)
Scotty (Bad)
Turnip Head (Bad)

That's five people who called fingersplints bad. Did you voice any complaint then?

insertnamehere wrote:I like how you didn't exclude my "dunno" for myself

Nope.

What about shortly after?

insertnamehere wrote:I don't like how TH and DB are both falling back to their respective pet cases with DF and Scotty, both of whom I actually trust more than I do TH and DB.

Nope.

You didn't raise an objection to the fingersplints lynch until it was imminent.

insertnamehere wrote:aaaand now there's a weak-ass splints bandwagon. great.

Five people called fingersplints bad, and you didn't criticize or scrutinize that fact until after the votes are cast. Over an hour before that, you defended DF using intimidation:

insertnamehere wrote:If TH + Lorab get DF lynched, and he flips civ, they're gonna be my top two suspects for tomorrow.

Just putting that out there.

You didn't lift a finger in her defense until it was too late. Your "effort" is almost comical:

insertnamehere wrote:
Spacedaisy wrote:I'm not silenced, many apologies. I'm failing at multitasking. I voted and went to post, but at the same time I was trying to rush into the Syndicate Sim, which I am exceedingly late to, and I had some computer glitch issues at the same time which shut all my windows, so I forgot to post. Frankly I have no good reason for voting Splints. I have no good reason for anything, nor any great desire for anything. I simply tossed my vote out in an effort to not miss the vote.
we got seven minutes left in case you want to change it.

No, you were really okay with fingersplints getting lynched.

You were not okay with DFaraday getting lynched.

#1880

Epignosis wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:Then he says that he believes DF and FS are both baddie teammates, do you still believe that DF is bad, Epignosis?
Yep.

Regarding fingersplints:

INH (I dunno, feel kinda good)

DrumBeats (Bad)
Enrique (Bad)
DFaraday (Bad)
Scotty (Bad)
Turnip Head (Bad)
That's five people who called fingersplints bad. Did you voice any complaint then?

No, because I was neutral on FS's alignment, and wasn't really leaning one way or the other, wasn't it obvious? Plus those were GTH reads, which I also consider dumb and pointless, so I try not to let them influence my analysis, m'kay?

insertnamehere wrote:I like how you didn't exclude my "dunno" for myself
Nope.

What's your point here? I don't think GTH reads mean jack squat, so what?

What about shortly after?

insertnamehere wrote:I don't like how TH and DB are both falling back to their respective pet cases with DF and Scotty, both of whom I actually trust more than I do TH and DB.
Nope.

Are you Chuck Testa? No? Then could you not say 'Nope' to random posts without providing any context as to what you mean?

You didn't raise an objection to the fingersplints lynch until it was imminent.

Because I wasn't sure what the outcome would be, and I didn't have any opinion on fingersplints, you feel me? I'm sorry that my objection to a mislynch was too late for your tastes, but seeing as you started the mislynch, maybe you should hesitate before you throw any more stones inside your glass house, y'know?

insertnamehere wrote:aaaand now there's a weak-ass splints bandwagon. great.
Five people called fingersplints bad, and you didn't criticize or scrutinize that fact until after the votes are cast.

That was in GTH reads, which I don't pay attention to, okay? Plus I objected to the FS lynch and thought it was too weak, I'm sorry that you felt those objections were too late to stop you from lynching a civilian, but shouldn't you have known better?

Over an hour before that, you defended DF using intimidation:

not intimidation, just me saying that I thought a certain lynch train was suspicious, you dig?

insertnamehere wrote:If TH + Lorab get DF lynched, and he flips civ, they're gonna be my top two suspects for tomorrow.

Just putting that out there.
You didn't lift a finger in her defense until it was too late.

Do you want me to copy & paste what I said earlier? I'm sorry that you felt those objections were too late to stop you from lynching a civilian, but shouldn't you have known better?

Your "effort" is almost comical:

I'm sorry that you felt those objections were too late to stop you from lynching a civilian, but shouldn't you have known better? Your effort to lynch a baddie could also be considered comical, right?

insertnamehere wrote:
Spacedaisy wrote:I'm not silenced, many apologies. I'm failing at multitasking. I voted and went to post, but at the same time I was trying to rush into the Syndicate Sim, which I am exceedingly late to, and I had some computer glitch issues at the same time which shut all my windows, so I forgot to post. Frankly I have no good reason for voting Splints. I have no good reason for anything, nor any great desire for anything. I simply tossed my vote out in an effort to not miss the vote.
we got seven minutes left in case you want to change it.
No, you were really okay with fingersplints getting lynched.

Do you have any actual basis for this? Because I don't see it, maybe you forgot to include it? Maybe instead of trying to blame people who didn't vote for FS for her lynch, maybe you should try and defend yourself?

You were not okay with DFaraday getting lynched.

No, I was not, and I am not, becuase I don't think he's scum, you get it?

#1881

Epignosis, what happened? You used to be so much better at the Blame Game than this, y'know?

#1882

INH- comma splicing his way through the question curse.

You were feebly trying to take the moral high ground when fingersplints got lynched. Yet you say you were "neutral" on her, and that you didn't know what the outcome would be?

Shaw.

insertnamehere wrote:wow, a seemingly random lynch with more than half of the players voting for one person, most of which saying in their posts "I just don't see a better option, so I guess out of the people who have votes, I'll go with FS," DIDN'T produce a dead baddie.

Color me shocked and awed.

Even though five people called her bad, you call her lynch seemingly random. I get you don't care about "gun to head," and neither do I, but the fact remains that five people called her bad, so it wasn't a random lynch.

I believe you knew she was good, and that you wanted her lynched. You put nothing more than a token effort to stop her lynch, and that consisted of telling spacedaisy she had seven minutes to change her vote- as though that would have done anything. You didn't make an effort to get anybody else lynched instead. You didn't try to convince anyone to not vote fingersplints. So your rant is hollow, and I'm looking right through it.

#1883

What INH said about DFaraday:

Scotty (Good)
Enrique (Good)
DrumBeats (Good)
DFaraday (Good) - self

Turnip Head (Bad)

INH (I dunno)

No opinion then, but when the pressure came against DFaraday, INH suddenly had one.

#1884

Epi, correct me if I'm wrong, but your only case on me seemed to be the notion that Splints and I were baddie teammates. Now that's been disproved, do you have anything for me to work with beyond the notion that INH and I are baddie teammates?

#1885

DFaraday wrote:Epi, correct me if I'm wrong, but your only case on me seemed to be the notion that Splints and I were baddie teammates. Now that's been disproved, do you have anything for me to work with beyond the notion that INH and I are baddie teammates?

You called INH good and fingersplints bad. Any reasoning behind that?

#1886

DFaraday wrote:Epi, correct me if I'm wrong, but your only case on me seemed to be the notion that Splints and I were baddie teammates. Now that's been disproved, do you have anything for me to work with beyond the notion that INH and I are baddie teammates?

Talk to me about today's lynch.

#1887

Epignosis wrote:
DFaraday wrote:Epi, correct me if I'm wrong, but your only case on me seemed to be the notion that Splints and I were baddie teammates. Now that's been disproved, do you have anything for me to work with beyond the notion that INH and I are baddie teammates?
You called INH good and fingersplints bad. Any reasoning behind that?

I thought she was coattail riding, and he has just felt genuine to me.

#1888

Turnip Head wrote:
DFaraday wrote:Epi, correct me if I'm wrong, but your only case on me seemed to be the notion that Splints and I were baddie teammates. Now that's been disproved, do you have anything for me to work with beyond the notion that INH and I are baddie teammates?
Talk to me about today's lynch.

I suspect all 4 baddies are still alive, so I'm going to try to figure out what combinations would make sense later today. Off the top of my head, I'd guess it's a mix of Daisy, Espers, Timmer, Bea, and Lorab. But that's without any actual analysis, I'll get to that in a bit.

#1889

DFaraday wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
DFaraday wrote:Epi, correct me if I'm wrong, but your only case on me seemed to be the notion that Splints and I were baddie teammates. Now that's been disproved, do you have anything for me to work with beyond the notion that INH and I are baddie teammates?
Talk to me about today's lynch.
I suspect all 4 baddies are still alive, so I'm going to try to figure out what combinations would make sense later today. Off the top of my head, I'd guess it's a mix of Daisy, Espers, Timmer, Bea, and Lorab. But that's without any actual analysis, I'll get to that in a bit.

So after the fingersplints lynch, does INH still feel genuine to you? It seems that way, since you didn't name him off the top of your head.

#1890

Epignosis wrote:INH- comma splicing his way through the question curse.

I have to get through it somehow, y'know?

You were feebly trying to take the moral high ground when fingersplints got lynched. Yet you say you were "neutral" on her, and that you didn't know what the outcome would be?

I was neutral on FS, but I thought that the bandwagon on her was sudden, and without good cause, and therefore I found it suspicious, do you understand? I allowed the chance that I was wrong completely, in the case that FS was bad, and her accusers were genuine, but every weak post made by her accusers felt more and more fake to me, ya dig?

Shaw.

Did you forget the "P?"

insertnamehere wrote:wow, a seemingly random lynch with more than half of the players voting for one person, most of which saying in their posts "I just don't see a better option, so I guess out of the people who have votes, I'll go with FS," DIDN'T produce a dead baddie.

Color me shocked and awed.
Even though five people called her bad, you call her lynch seemingly random. I get you don't care about "gun to head," and neither do I, but the fact remains that five people called her bad, so it wasn't a random lynch.

You correctly identified that I ignored the GTH reads completely, but now you suspect me for not taking them into account? Also, did the idea that I found the reasons behind people's suspicion about her random and weak ever pop into your head? Oh wait, I forgot that you're in full tunnel-vision, I accept no responsibility for anything mode, right?

I believe you knew she was good, and that you wanted her lynched. You put nothing more than a token effort to stop her lynch, and that consisted of telling spacedaisy she had seven minutes to change her vote- as though that would have done anything. You didn't make an effort to get anybody else lynched instead. You didn't try to convince anyone to not vote fingersplints. So your rant is hollow, and I'm looking right through it.

I made a case on timmer that I thought made sense, but nobody responded to it, so that's one blatantly wrong point, you hear? I just can barely believe you're attempting to shift the blame off of yourself and onto me for being too "late" with my objections, okay? I knew Daisy was online because I just finished playing the Sim with her, so I thought maybe she'd check the thread and change her vote, right?

#1891

So what we have here is the driving force and initial vote behind a civilian lynch trying to shift the blame and suspicion from himself to someone who (contrary to what he claims) genuinely tried to stop it, does everyone see this? His only two points are: He was too late to stop me from lynching a civilian, and therefore it's his fault, and he thinks DF isn't bad, so, therefore they must be in cahoots, did I get it all right? This is an absolutely barmy case, alright?

#1892

Epignosis wrote:What INH said about DFaraday:

Scotty (Good)
Enrique (Good)
DrumBeats (Good)
DFaraday (Good) - self

Turnip Head (Bad)

INH (I dunno)
No opinion then, but when the pressure came against DFaraday, INH suddenly had one.

You're once again presuming that I gave a damn about the GTH reads, okie-doke?

#1893

can everyone guess how much i hate this stupid fucking curse?

#1894

insertnamehere wrote:So what we have here is the driving force and initial vote behind a civilian lynch trying to shift the blame and suspicion from himself to someone who (contrary to what he claims) genuinely tried to stop it, does everyone see this? His only two points are: He was too late to stop me from lynching a civilian, and therefore it's his fault, and he thinks DF isn't bad, so, therefore they must be in cahoots, did I get it all right? This is an absolutely barmy case, alright?

Do you think I should be lynched, INH?

#1895

DFaraday wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
DFaraday wrote:Epi, correct me if I'm wrong, but your only case on me seemed to be the notion that Splints and I were baddie teammates. Now that's been disproved, do you have anything for me to work with beyond the notion that INH and I are baddie teammates?
Talk to me about today's lynch.
I suspect all 4 baddies are still alive, so I'm going to try to figure out what combinations would make sense later today. Off the top of my head, I'd guess it's a mix of Daisy, Espers, Timmer, Bea, and Lorab. But that's without any actual analysis, I'll get to that in a bit.

You think all of the baddies are in the inactive camp?

I'm also in agreement with Scotty that at lease one mafia is dead, but I think it is between Eloh, Leetic, and SVS. I'm hypothesizing that the Scranton Strangler could have been involved, I doubt he was in the game that long without strangling somebody, civ or mafia.

#1896

DrumBeats wrote:
DFaraday wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
DFaraday wrote:Epi, correct me if I'm wrong, but your only case on me seemed to be the notion that Splints and I were baddie teammates. Now that's been disproved, do you have anything for me to work with beyond the notion that INH and I are baddie teammates?
Talk to me about today's lynch.
I suspect all 4 baddies are still alive, so I'm going to try to figure out what combinations would make sense later today. Off the top of my head, I'd guess it's a mix of Daisy, Espers, Timmer, Bea, and Lorab. But that's without any actual analysis, I'll get to that in a bit.
You think all of the baddies are in the inactive camp?

I'm also in agreement with Scotty that at lease one mafia is dead, but I think it is between Eloh, Leetic, and SVS. I'm hypothesizing that the Scranton Strangler could have been involved, I doubt he was in the game that long without strangling somebody, civ or mafia.

You don't think 3J could have been bad?

#1897

insertnamehere wrote:So what we have here is the driving force and initial vote behind a civilian lynch trying to shift the blame and suspicion from himself to someone who (contrary to what he claims) genuinely tried to stop it, does everyone see this? His only two points are: He was too late to stop me from lynching a civilian, and therefore it's his fault, and he thinks DF isn't bad, so, therefore they must be in cahoots, did I get it all right? This is an absolutely barmy case, alright?

From what I understand his suspicion is based on the fact that he finds your defense of him to be not be genuine, and a way for you to distance yourself from the lynch. I need to look into your ISO on my own to check this, but from what I was seeing of his, I have to agree.

#1898

Epignosis wrote:
DrumBeats wrote:
DFaraday wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
DFaraday wrote:Epi, correct me if I'm wrong, but your only case on me seemed to be the notion that Splints and I were baddie teammates. Now that's been disproved, do you have anything for me to work with beyond the notion that INH and I are baddie teammates?
Talk to me about today's lynch.
I suspect all 4 baddies are still alive, so I'm going to try to figure out what combinations would make sense later today. Off the top of my head, I'd guess it's a mix of Daisy, Espers, Timmer, Bea, and Lorab. But that's without any actual analysis, I'll get to that in a bit.
You think all of the baddies are in the inactive camp?

I'm also in agreement with Scotty that at lease one mafia is dead, but I think it is between Eloh, Leetic, and SVS. I'm hypothesizing that the Scranton Strangler could have been involved, I doubt he was in the game that long without strangling somebody, civ or mafia.
You don't think 3J could have been bad?

I honestly think he was independent, but it's technically possible for any death before the strangler to be mafia imo.

#1899

Looking at INH, the timing of the FS defense is a bit odd, I agree. Because INH wasn't really convinced until just before FS was set to be lynched.

And looking back on the INH/Epi interaction - the "Nope"s seem to be about statements that are just false INH. You said I counted your self dunno, but I didn't. Just my guess on it.

Regarding Epi though, him bringing up the GTH reads makes me wonder. He has only commented on them in his case against INH. Yet, iirc, Epi was the first one to bring focus to Fingersplints yesterday. It makes me wonder if Epi brought suspicion on FS due to our GTH reads, since FS was the only one that seemed to be scumread across the board.

#1900

DrumBeats wrote:Looking at INH, the timing of the FS defense is a bit odd, I agree. Because INH wasn't really convinced until just before FS was set to be lynched.

And looking back on the INH/Epi interaction - the "Nope"s seem to be about statements that are just false INH. You said I counted your self dunno, but I didn't. Just my guess on it.

Regarding Epi though, him bringing up the GTH reads makes me wonder. He has only commented on them in his case against INH. Yet, iirc, Epi was the first one to bring focus to Fingersplints yesterday. It makes me wonder if Epi brought suspicion on FS due to our GTH reads, since FS was the only one that seemed to be scumread across the board.

Because of the underlined, I didn't actually do the italicized. I just got shit going.

Who's getting a pink slip?