Of course anyone could be lying, but being as reserved and holding back with judgement as you were with that top post I quoted vs the extremes of the participants' positions on your rainbow are still v much discrepant imo. When a player one has a townie read on and someone they have a scummy read on clash, you'd generally expect the response to be a little less milquetoast and a tad more pressuring, especially when their subsequent scum read of the scummier player is later cited to the altercation.Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:17 pmEveryone's a potential liar in this game. But everyone's also more likely to be town than scum. MovingPictures is not a 100% confirmed townie, thus he is a potential liar. However, I think he is town, thus he is at the top of my rainbow. Dom had done nothing to stand out as a townie. Others had. Thus Dom was near the bottom of my list.Diiny wrote: ↑Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:13 pm I know in my heart you're scum, sloon. you're my #1 scumspect, followed by elo.
Looks like elo is a more realistic lynch, though. So placing my vote there for now.
Finding that evidence now.
linki- sloon I'm accusing you of calling MP a potential liar and saying you wouldn't put dom on the block just yet and then putting them at the top and bottom of your rainbow respectively minutes later. Ill-developed, disingenuous rainbow/reads. No strong opinions. Combined with timidness I've discussed, over-reliance on quick town-reading on day 1 and what I'm seeing as attempts for validation throughout your ph it's scummy.
what u finkin
I believe that you believe I am scum, so that's good. I'm more interested in your other reads right now though. I have to leave in ~10 minutes so I can't stick around to discuss things with you or anyone else, but please share whatever you can. That goes for everyone. My schedule is opening up this weekend, so I should have more time to dig into this thing.
that paragraph is badly written because it's late, but the point's there.