Buffy the Vampire Slayer: At the Hellmouth (End Game)

[nutella]

rabbit, timmer is dead lol and was adam

[juliets]

I am going to move my vote from lap to either nova or DF. I need to think a little more before I do.

[rabbit8]

Yeah, I fucked up the two, to, too shit, fuck off.



Link, oh shit nutella! I was just being honest, want me to lie?

[rabbit8]

Oh, he couldn't kill, blah. Fuck. I was wrong.

[nutella]

Yeah, I fucked up the two, to, too shit, fuck off.



Link, oh shit nutella! I was just being honest, want me to lie?

No but I think you should at least read the first post and/or all phase-end host posts so you have the slightest idea of who is even still in the game much less what is going on.

[rabbit8]

Yeah, I fucked up the two, to, too shit, fuck off.



Link, oh shit nutella! I was just being honest, want me to lie?

No but I think you should at least read the first post and/or all phase-end host posts so you have the slightest idea of who is even still in the game much less what is going on.

No, I was going to do day night 1 with minimal info but your @ shit got me.

[nutella]

What I didn't even @ you lol

[MacDougall]

Tbh Nova and DF have the scent of that random player who gets chinese fire drill lynched at the end of day because the actual candidates manage to somehow wriggle themselves off the hook that results in everyone posting "oh dang" and such after the day is over.

For once can we lynch someone that it takes balls to lynch? I often daydream about just somehow convincing half the thread to vote Jimmy or Sloonei just because it's so random that it's likely to work. All the same old players always getting knocked off gets boring.

[LoRab]

[mention]rabbit8[/mention] Eye me all you want.

And yes, a non-poster who was voting, and coming in at the right time to vote, was suspicious enough to me day one to vote there.

In the meantime, I'm voting Chuck for the moment. In part because I don't have a bad read on LA and would rather see someone I suspect be lynched.

[nutella]

Tbh Nova and DF have the scent of that random player who gets chinese fire drill lynched at the end of day because the actual candidates manage to somehow wriggle themselves off the hook that results in everyone posting "oh dang" and such after the day is over.

For once can we lynch someone that it takes balls to lynch? I often daydream about just somehow convincing half the thread to vote Jimmy or Sloonei just because it's so random that it's likely to work. All the same old players always getting knocked off gets boring.

Does speedchuck not fit that? Though I guess you mean for the second person as well. I just ask that it's not me.

[rabbit8]

What I didn't even @ you lol

I keep getting notices, hum... IDK I suck at this tonight. Why do I get read at the top if you don't @?

[nutella]

rabbit8 Eye me all you want.

And yes, a non-poster who was voting, and coming in at the right time to vote, was suspicious enough to me day one to vote there.

In the meantime, I'm voting Chuck for the moment. In part because I don't have a bad read on LA and would rather see someone I suspect be lynched.

Hey, keep in mind that the top 2 people will be lynched, so chuck is already up there and if you don't want me to be lynched too it would be more helpful if you vote for nova at the moment.

[MacDougall]

Let's talk about Kyle. He's a big name, capable of a big game and I barely feel like he's posted in this game. I find that lame.

[nutella]

oh rabbit you also get notifications if you're quoted (also not me but I guess someone quoted you)

[nutella]

oh I did quote you after that lol

[nutella]

Let's talk about Kyle. He's a big name, capable of a big game and I barely feel like he's posted in this game. I find that lame.

I could lynch Kyle. I have not been at all inspired by his play so far.

[LoRab]

rabbit8 Eye me all you want.

And yes, a non-poster who was voting, and coming in at the right time to vote, was suspicious enough to me day one to vote there.

In the meantime, I'm voting Chuck for the moment. In part because I don't have a bad read on LA and would rather see someone I suspect be lynched.

Hey, keep in mind that the top 2 people will be lynched, so chuck is already up there and if you don't want me to be lynched too it would be more helpful if you vote for nova at the moment.

That makes more sense, actually. Moving vote now.

[sig]

Nutella you were just defending DF, what changed?

[rabbit8]

oh I did quote you after that lol

Trying to make the old noob look bad, eh?




This is a joke, in case you can't read........sarcasm.

[nutella]

Nutella you were just defending DF, what changed?

I didn't like his explanation. I assumed he had misread the role but he said that he had read it a long time ago and misremembered. That is different and sounds less plausible imo.

[sig]

KYle hasn't stood out, but he hasn't done anything scummy. I'd rather wait to lynch him.

linki: It just seems like backpedaling now that your on the chopping block.

[rabbit8]

rabbit8 Eye me all you want.

And yes, a non-poster who was voting, and coming in at the right time to vote, was suspicious enough to me day one to vote there.

In the meantime, I'm voting Chuck for the moment. In part because I don't have a bad read on LA and would rather see someone I suspect be lynched.

But srsly, the lack of is

Anyone who's ever played with lorab should agree.....

[Kylemii]

Tunnelvisions would be days and days of going after the same person, not 12 hours.

the only player allowed to argue semantics with me is epignosis. you're looking down a tunnel at Speedchuck where you're only seeing how his actions make sense in a baddie's perspective. there are other perspectives, can you really say you're considering them all?

Plus the last time I felt like this about Jack in (I forget the theme, he was Nutellas teammate) and I kept dropping it becasue "tunnelvision" and I was right, he was bad. So if I think I am right, then why would I not be true to myself.

because speedchuck isn't jack and being right about jack several months ago in some random game doesn't make you more or less likely to be right about Speedchuck in a different game.

So if I could not vote for Chuck, I might vote for you. Just being honest here. Give me some names, Kyle, and it might change.

seriously svs?

[nutella]

KYle hasn't stood out, but he hasn't done anything scummy. I'd rather wait to lynch him.

linki: It just seems like backpedaling now that your on the chopping block.

I want to survive, so at this point I am hoping people will vote for anyone who is likely to get more votes than me. I don't have much reason to think DF is town. I know that I am town and I really, really, really do not want to get lynched.

[LoRab]

And, in thinking about this as I voted, I moved my vote to DF, because I find him suspicious and have no idea about novas. And don't feel right voting for someone I don't suspect over someone I do. But it does make sense to not vote the top vote getter, but someone who might be able to nudge up.

linkitis: I don't twirl all that much any more. Ask anyone who has played the last couple of games I've played--I kind of retired it as a signature move.

[MacDougall]

Speak of the Kylemii.

[nutella]

[mention]MacDougall[/mention] you makin me nervous boy...

[juliets]

Ok, Lorab's point and nutella's point about DF takes me back to him after all so thats where I'm voting.

[MacDougall]

I'm switching to DF

[S~V~S]

Tunnelvisions would be days and days of going after the same person, not 12 hours.

the only player allowed to argue semantics with me is epignosis. you're looking down a tunnel at Speedchuck where you're only seeing how his actions make sense in a baddie's perspective. there are other perspectives, can you really say you're considering them all?

Plus the last time I felt like this about Jack in (I forget the theme, he was Nutellas teammate) and I kept dropping it becasue "tunnelvision" and I was right, he was bad. So if I think I am right, then why would I not be true to myself.

because speedchuck isn't jack and being right about jack several months ago in some random game doesn't make you more or less likely to be right about Speedchuck in a different game.

So if I could not vote for Chuck, I might vote for you. Just being honest here. Give me some names, Kyle, and it might change.

seriously svs?

Srsly, and I am not the only one it seems.

And I know he isn't Jack, my point was that I doubted my self and I should not have. And I know what tunnelvision is, this is not it.

[lapluie]

Are youuuuuuuuu guys voting for DFaraday for your ownnnnn reasoning or who/what convinced you to vote for them?

[rabbit8]

Tbh Nova and DF have the scent of that random player who gets chinese fire drill lynched at the end of day because the actual candidates manage to somehow wriggle themselves off the hook that results in everyone posting "oh dang" and such after the day is over.

For once can we lynch someone that it takes balls to lynch? I often daydream about just somehow convincing half the thread to vote Jimmy or Sloonei just because it's so random that it's likely to work. All the same old players always getting knocked off gets boring.

Your vote is on DF?

[MacDougall]

That it indeed is.

[rabbit8]

Tunnelvisions would be days and days of going after the same person, not 12 hours.

the only player allowed to argue semantics with me is epignosis. you're looking down a tunnel at Speedchuck where you're only seeing how his actions make sense in a baddie's perspective. there are other perspectives, can you really say you're considering them all?

Plus the last time I felt like this about Jack in (I forget the theme, he was Nutellas teammate) and I kept dropping it becasue "tunnelvision" and I was right, he was bad. So if I think I am right, then why would I not be true to myself.

because speedchuck isn't jack and being right about jack several months ago in some random game doesn't make you more or less likely to be right about Speedchuck in a different game.

So if I could not vote for Chuck, I might vote for you. Just being honest here. Give me some names, Kyle, and it might change.

seriously svs?

Kyle, bad?

[MacDougall]

Are youuuuuuuuu guys voting for DFaraday for your ownnnnn reasoning or who/what convinced you to vote for them?

I believe nutella is a civ. DFaraday was my first ping in the game. I don't want to lynch nutella. Speedchuck I am meh on and he already has a ton of votes.

[Kylemii]

Tunnelvisions would be days and days of going after the same person, not 12 hours.

the only player allowed to argue semantics with me is epignosis. you're looking down a tunnel at Speedchuck where you're only seeing how his actions make sense in a baddie's perspective. there are other perspectives, can you really say you're considering them all?

Plus the last time I felt like this about Jack in (I forget the theme, he was Nutellas teammate) and I kept dropping it becasue "tunnelvision" and I was right, he was bad. So if I think I am right, then why would I not be true to myself.

because speedchuck isn't jack and being right about jack several months ago in some random game doesn't make you more or less likely to be right about Speedchuck in a different game.

So if I could not vote for Chuck, I might vote for you. Just being honest here. Give me some names, Kyle, and it might change.

seriously svs?

Srsly, and I am not the only one it seems.

And I know he isn't Jack, my point was that I doubted my self and I should not have. And I know what tunnelvision is, this is not it.

disagreeing with you doesnt make me mafia

tunneling is assuming you're right about something and ignoring all evidence indicating that your opinion might be wrong.

I have 4 more pages to catch up on. brb

[rabbit8]

how long to vote, I'm dumb and I don't feel like checking my DST settings....

[MacDougall]

Not long. 20 minutes or so?

[rabbit8]

Tunnelvisions would be days and days of going after the same person, not 12 hours.

the only player allowed to argue semantics with me is epignosis. you're looking down a tunnel at Speedchuck where you're only seeing how his actions make sense in a baddie's perspective. there are other perspectives, can you really say you're considering them all?

Plus the last time I felt like this about Jack in (I forget the theme, he was Nutellas teammate) and I kept dropping it becasue "tunnelvision" and I was right, he was bad. So if I think I am right, then why would I not be true to myself.

because speedchuck isn't jack and being right about jack several months ago in some random game doesn't make you more or less likely to be right about Speedchuck in a different game.

So if I could not vote for Chuck, I might vote for you. Just being honest here. Give me some names, Kyle, and it might change.

seriously svs?

Srsly, and I am not the only one it seems.

And I know he isn't Jack, my point was that I doubted my self and I should not have. And I know what tunnelvision is, this is not it.

disagreeing with you doesnt make me mafia

tunneling is assuming you're right about something and ignoring all evidence indicating that your opinion might be wrong.

I have 4 more pages to catch up on. brb

Say what? I fucking hate to defend SVS here, but huh?

I never seen it this way. I mean yeah you could say that after a few days of not seeing different opinions, but 1 day?

If I agreed my opinion was wring because of evidence present by mafia, I would have been steam rolled dozens of times.

I want to vote for you.

[rabbit8]

Not long. 20 minutes or so?

I knew i, I thought I had more time. lol. I'm almost finished.

[S~V~S]

Tunnelvisions would be days and days of going after the same person, not 12 hours.

the only player allowed to argue semantics with me is epignosis. you're looking down a tunnel at Speedchuck where you're only seeing how his actions make sense in a baddie's perspective. there are other perspectives, can you really say you're considering them all?

Plus the last time I felt like this about Jack in (I forget the theme, he was Nutellas teammate) and I kept dropping it becasue "tunnelvision" and I was right, he was bad. So if I think I am right, then why would I not be true to myself.

because speedchuck isn't jack and being right about jack several months ago in some random game doesn't make you more or less likely to be right about Speedchuck in a different game.

So if I could not vote for Chuck, I might vote for you. Just being honest here. Give me some names, Kyle, and it might change.

seriously svs?

Srsly, and I am not the only one it seems.

And I know he isn't Jack, my point was that I doubted my self and I should not have. And I know what tunnelvision is, this is not it.

disagreeing with you doesnt make me mafia

tunneling is assuming you're right about something and ignoring all evidence indicating that your opinion might be wrong.

I have 4 more pages to catch up on. brb

It has nothing to do with disagreeing with me. Sig doesn't agree with me, I feel great about him. It has to do with you have no valid opinions other than saving Chuck.

And again, I know what tunnelvision is. This is not it.

[rabbit8]

That it indeed is.

You side with JC and Lorab?

[MacDougall]

That it indeed is.

You side with JC and Lorab?

Their vote being where it is had no impact on why mine is there. Should it?

[rabbit8]

That it indeed is.

You side with JC and Lorab?

Their vote being where it is had no impact on why mine is there. Should it?

No. Does it?

[MacDougall]

That it indeed is.

You side with JC and Lorab?

Their vote being where it is had no impact on why mine is there. Should it?

No. Does it?

I just said it doesn't?

[juliets]

That it indeed is.

You side with JC and Lorab?

rabbit, I am not bad. You've forgotten how I play.

[Kylemii]

It's moreso the lack of entertaining me and then answering her instead? You're either teammates or you hate me. Knowing that you love me, it's gotta be the former.

well i obviously love you, but i didn't see your line of questioning as being something I could personally contribute to so i opted instead to wait and see how other people responded to it.

Why do you need other’s opinions of things to make your decisions? I’ve always seen you slinging your thoughts out there without restraint. But now?

It's not important rn but this is an inaccurate portrayal of my playstyle. I have never been known for slinging thoughts without restraint, not since like 2010

[rabbit8]

That it indeed is.

You side with JC and Lorab?

Their vote being where it is had no impact on why mine is there. Should it?

No. Does it?

I just said it doesn't?

Did you though?

That it indeed is.

You side with JC and Lorab?

rabbit, I am not bad. You've forgotten how I play.

My mind is going. The other day I made coffee. Hours later I asked my wife if it was old.....


But I hate to admit defeat, and your lack of word salad is hurtful and tellin, I think.

But who knows, apparently Lorab doesn't spin anymore.

[rabbit8]

It's moreso the lack of entertaining me and then answering her instead? You're either teammates or you hate me. Knowing that you love me, it's gotta be the former.

well i obviously love you, but i didn't see your line of questioning as being something I could personally contribute to so i opted instead to wait and see how other people responded to it.

Why do you need other’s opinions of things to make your decisions? I’ve always seen you slinging your thoughts out there without restraint. But now?

It's not important rn but this is an inaccurate portrayal of my playstyle. I have never been known for slinging thoughts without restraint, not since like 2010

That's not what I've noticed since I've been back. Though, its a rather small sample size.

Maybe, without restraint, was the wrong way to put it. Massive word salad is what I've seen from civ Kyle. Better?

[juliets]

My lack of word salad, lol? Is hurtful? I don't know what that means but you know I never want to be hurtful.