Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert

Moderator: Community Team

User avatar
sig
bolt sbit mpo
Posts in topic: 217
Posts: 8577
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:13 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1351

Post by sig »

Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:50 pm
sig wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:44 pm
Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:44 pm
Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 9:57 pm sig, at what point did you ever forget that I was in this?
I answered that, when I made a list ranking all the player from civ to mafia you weren't on it I forgot you.
So that qualifies as "keep forgetting?"
sig wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 9:13 pm and wow I keep forgetting that Epi is in this game, and he didnt do any day 1 shenanigans. I'd put him as Mafia maybe on my list.
Your words.

"Keep forgetting" is a tense that implies you have habitually done this. This remark came after you made that list. When did you forget me before?
I feel like you're arguing semantics here, i forgot you when I was brainstorming players and thinking what they did that would be civvie or mafia. It took me a few minutes to do I kept forgetting.
ImageImage
Image
Image
User avatar
sig
bolt sbit mpo
Posts in topic: 217
Posts: 8577
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:13 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1352

Post by sig »

lol if INH is an indy and all these pages of us arguing has been useless
ImageImage
Image
Image
User avatar
Epignosis
Skeletor
Posts in topic: 316
Posts: 40710
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:59 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1353

Post by Epignosis »

I'd say INH is independent and sig is bad. Lynch both. Move on.

Then Quin for good measure.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
User avatar
Epignosis
Skeletor
Posts in topic: 316
Posts: 40710
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:59 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1354

Post by Epignosis »

This is some sloppy shit from sig. That's all I've got to say.

[VOTE: insertnamehere] aubergine
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
User avatar
Lunalee
Loan Shark
Posts in topic: 56
Posts: 2573
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:20 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1355

Post by Lunalee »

Golden wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:50 pm Now I'm worried about what luna does to speedchuck in the privacy of their own home when speed puts timers on the polls. I feel like we've walked in on something.
I like to know how long I can procrastinate deciding on my vote.
Luna's Wins/Losses
Spoiler: show
Jobs
Ancient Greece Mafia - civilian - loss
U-Pick Mafia - mafia - loss
Retrocausality Mafia - mafia - loss
Mega Man Mafia - mafia - win
Hogwarts Mafia - civilian - loss
Side Missions
Image Mafia - civilian - loss
Courage the Cowardly Dog Mafia - civilian - loss
Heists
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me - civilian - loss
Friends Mafia - civilian - loss
Daily Fantasy Mafia - civilian - win
Everyone's Insane! - mafia - win
Space Force - civilian - loss
Burglaries
Murder on the Owl Express - third party - loss
Operation Refrigerator Restoration - civilian - win
One Hour Werewolf - Tanner - loss
Awful Overplayed Dadrock Mafia - civilian - loss
Dethy Game - civilian - loss
Special Games
Two-Headed Monster Mafia - civilian - win
User avatar
Quin
Indecent Bastard
Posts in topic: 192
Posts: 10895
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
Location: The Future

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1356

Post by Quin »

Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:53 pm I'd say INH is independent and sig is bad. Lynch both. Move on.

Then Quin for good measure.
:nicenod:
Lunalee wrote: Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:13 amQuin's ISO is full of posts that are actually trying to be helpful to the game. This doesn't look like town Quin.
ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Golden
The Coward
Posts in topic: 614
Posts: 20125
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1357

Post by Golden »

If inh is indy I don't see him as threatening. If those words are a slip they will be full truth, which would also mean he isn't a threat to civilians.
Spoiler: show
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
Image
Canucklehead wrote:Civ Golden is a hurricane of self-assurance.
G-Man wrote: Coward
User avatar
sig
bolt sbit mpo
Posts in topic: 217
Posts: 8577
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:13 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1358

Post by sig »

Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:53 pm I'd say INH is independent and sig is bad. Lynch both. Move on.

Then Quin for good measure.
16 players

You're trying to decide the next three lynches in a game where we might not even have 5 phases?

like we're down to 14. Nutella was a night action so high chane she's civ and I'd say Zeph is civ we're down to 14. IF Quin and INH are civs along with me who am I civ we'd be down to 8 players.

Like this level of lynch planning makes me very uncomfortable with you Epi.
ImageImage
Image
Image
User avatar
sig
bolt sbit mpo
Posts in topic: 217
Posts: 8577
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:13 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1359

Post by sig »

Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:54 pm This is some sloppy shit from sig. That's all I've got to say.

[VOTE: insertnamehere] aubergine

:meany:
ImageImage
Image
Image
User avatar
MacDougall
Out of my scumrange
Posts in topic: 592
Posts: 39786
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1360

Post by MacDougall »

sig wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:53 pm lol if INH is an indy and all these pages of us arguing has been useless
Doesn't rationalise your behaviour one bit. What it does is make your irrational behaviour forgiveable.
User avatar
sig
bolt sbit mpo
Posts in topic: 217
Posts: 8577
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:13 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1361

Post by sig »

When I'm right at End game about this I'll make sure to be super salty dw
ImageImage
Image
Image
User avatar
MacDougall
Out of my scumrange
Posts in topic: 592
Posts: 39786
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1362

Post by MacDougall »

Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:53 pm I'd say INH is independent and sig is bad. Lynch both. Move on.

Then Quin for good measure.
Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:54 pm This is some sloppy shit from sig. That's all I've got to say.

[VOTE: insertnamehere] aubergine
Nah dog. Nah. This ain't cool at all.
User avatar
Golden
The Coward
Posts in topic: 614
Posts: 20125
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1363

Post by Golden »

MacDougall wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:56 pm
sig wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:53 pm lol if INH is an indy and all these pages of us arguing has been useless
Doesn't rationalise your behaviour one bit. What it does is make your irrational behaviour forgiveable.
Why would it make his behaviour forgiveable? As has been pointed out, if he's civilian it would make just as much sense for him to presume inh is indy or mafia from the outset.
Spoiler: show
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
Image
Canucklehead wrote:Civ Golden is a hurricane of self-assurance.
G-Man wrote: Coward
User avatar
ColinIsCool
Hitman
Posts in topic: 376
Posts: 4804
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2018 12:33 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1364

Post by ColinIsCool »

If INH is indie claiming, then why the hell does sig still look so bad?
Image
User avatar
Kylemii
Bodice of Reason
Posts in topic: 353
Posts: 11433
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 8:50 pm
Gender: male
Preferred Pronouns: he/him

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1365

Post by Kylemii »

Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:48 pm
Golden wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:45 pm
Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:39 pm By the way, in case it eluded anybody's attention, INH all but claimed not to be a civilian.
It did elude my attention. Could you point this out?

Because if INH is indy it's not impossible that sig is town and just being suspicious because that's how he does things.
I'm surprised nobody has said anything.
insertnamehere wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:42 am I thought Scotty's D1 voting pattern was weird and suspicious enough for me to vote for him, however, if he later went against what made me suspicious, I was open to changing it to someone else.

Quin is trying to put me in a situation where I either post the details of my role, proving that I'm not a threat to the civilians, or he's gonna make me look like a confirmed baddie, and serve my head on a platter.

But apparently the first is malevolent blackmail, and the second is okay, kosher civ behavior.


Linki:
Quin wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:34 am Why should I care about your role? Scum gets fakeclaims.
What? I thought fake-claims were more character based. Like, if everyone said the name of their role, and three of the names were obvious bad guys in time-travel related tales, then fakeclaims would allow them to at least appear as simpatico, non-enemy sounding roles. That's how I used them in the games I've hosted. I'm not familiar with fake-claims including fake abilities.

Well, what the fuck do you want from me, Quin? If literally nothing I can say about myself or my role could change anything, fuck it.

Might as well ignore you then.
oh. that seems like an extremely important detail
User avatar
sig
bolt sbit mpo
Posts in topic: 217
Posts: 8577
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:13 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1366

Post by sig »

MacDougall wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:57 pm
Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:53 pm I'd say INH is independent and sig is bad. Lynch both. Move on.

Then Quin for good measure.
Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:54 pm This is some sloppy shit from sig. That's all I've got to say.

[VOTE: insertnamehere] aubergine
Nah dog. Nah. This ain't cool at all.
Yeah if you think I'm mafia why move to an Independent?

[mention]Golden[/mention] What do you think of the lynch chain that Epi/Mac are trying to make
ImageImage
Image
Image
User avatar
Golden
The Coward
Posts in topic: 614
Posts: 20125
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1367

Post by Golden »

Somehow Mac and I are never of one mind and also always of one mind. I kind of love it.
Spoiler: show
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
Image
Canucklehead wrote:Civ Golden is a hurricane of self-assurance.
G-Man wrote: Coward
User avatar
Epignosis
Skeletor
Posts in topic: 316
Posts: 40710
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:59 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1368

Post by Epignosis »

sig wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:56 pm
Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:53 pm I'd say INH is independent and sig is bad. Lynch both. Move on.

Then Quin for good measure.
16 players

You're trying to decide the next three lynches in a game where we might not even have 5 phases?

like we're down to 14. Nutella was a night action so high chane she's civ and I'd say Zeph is civ we're down to 14. IF Quin and INH are civs along with me who am I civ we'd be down to 8 players.

Like this level of lynch planning makes me very uncomfortable with you Epi.
News flash:

I don't care how uncomfortable you are with me. Get comfortable.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
User avatar
sig
bolt sbit mpo
Posts in topic: 217
Posts: 8577
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:13 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1369

Post by sig »

Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:58 pm
sig wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:56 pm
Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:53 pm I'd say INH is independent and sig is bad. Lynch both. Move on.

Then Quin for good measure.
16 players

You're trying to decide the next three lynches in a game where we might not even have 5 phases?

like we're down to 14. Nutella was a night action so high chane she's civ and I'd say Zeph is civ we're down to 14. IF Quin and INH are civs along with me who am I civ we'd be down to 8 players.

Like this level of lynch planning makes me very uncomfortable with you Epi.
News flash:

I don't care how uncomfortable you are with me. Get comfortable.
lol nah I love you epi dw. :p
ImageImage
Image
Image
User avatar
Epignosis
Skeletor
Posts in topic: 316
Posts: 40710
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:59 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1370

Post by Epignosis »

Golden wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:55 pm If inh is indy I don't see him as threatening. If those words are a slip they will be full truth, which would also mean he isn't a threat to civilians.
I suspect you again.

The first thing a caught mafia does in that scenario is claim to be independent. You're defending him.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
User avatar
MacDougall
Out of my scumrange
Posts in topic: 592
Posts: 39786
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1371

Post by MacDougall »

Golden wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:57 pm
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:56 pm
sig wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:53 pm lol if INH is an indy and all these pages of us arguing has been useless
Doesn't rationalise your behaviour one bit. What it does is make your irrational behaviour forgiveable.
Why would it make his behaviour forgiveable? As has been pointed out, if he's civilian it would make just as much sense for him to presume inh is indy or mafia from the outset.
No sorry it doesn't make him town, it makes his bad play forgiveable in the sense that I can forgive that he missed INH's indie claim since I did too. If he didn't miss his indie claim then his play is both bad AND poor. In this case it's bad AND understandable.
User avatar
Quin
Indecent Bastard
Posts in topic: 192
Posts: 10895
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
Location: The Future

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1372

Post by Quin »

We should lynch sig today to avoid this whole Day 3/Day 4 whatever the fuck he's spewing. He's also the worst looking of the two.

Leave INH alive until Day 4. This is important. Please.
Lunalee wrote: Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:13 amQuin's ISO is full of posts that are actually trying to be helpful to the game. This doesn't look like town Quin.
ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
MacDougall
Out of my scumrange
Posts in topic: 592
Posts: 39786
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1373

Post by MacDougall »

Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:59 pm
Golden wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:55 pm If inh is indy I don't see him as threatening. If those words are a slip they will be full truth, which would also mean he isn't a threat to civilians.
I suspect you again.

The first thing a caught mafia does in that scenario is claim to be independent. You're defending him.
In my opinion the first thing a caught Mafia does in that scenario is question the validity of the information (ala Sig). A caught independent would almost certainly roleclaim at that juncture. A mafia to indie claim at that point before going after the validity of the information ... no doesn't seem right.
User avatar
Epignosis
Skeletor
Posts in topic: 316
Posts: 40710
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:59 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1374

Post by Epignosis »

sig wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:56 pm
Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:53 pm I'd say INH is independent and sig is bad. Lynch both. Move on.

Then Quin for good measure.
16 players

You're trying to decide the next three lynches in a game where we might not even have 5 phases?

like we're down to 14. Nutella was a night action so high chane she's civ and I'd say Zeph is civ we're down to 14. IF Quin and INH are civs along with me who am I civ we'd be down to 8 players.

Like this level of lynch planning makes me very uncomfortable with you Epi.
And just to be clear, yes, yes I am trying to decide the next three lynches. And the three after that. Any issue with that?
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
User avatar
MacDougall
Out of my scumrange
Posts in topic: 592
Posts: 39786
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1375

Post by MacDougall »

Quin wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:00 pm We should lynch sig today to avoid this whole Day 3/Day 4 whatever the fuck he's spewing. He's also the worst looking of the two.

Leave INH alive until Day 4. This is important. Please.
I fail to see how his looks are relevant here Quin. Rude.
User avatar
sig
bolt sbit mpo
Posts in topic: 217
Posts: 8577
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:13 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1376

Post by sig »

Quin wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:00 pm We should lynch sig today to avoid this whole Day 3/Day 4 whatever the fuck he's spewing. He's also the worst looking of the two.

Leave INH alive until Day 4. This is important. Please.

lol you guys don't get it day 3 has already happened. I'm not getting lynched today no matter what.

ALso why leave INH alive until day 4
ImageImage
Image
Image
User avatar
Golden
The Coward
Posts in topic: 614
Posts: 20125
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1377

Post by Golden »

Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:59 pm
Golden wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:55 pm If inh is indy I don't see him as threatening. If those words are a slip they will be full truth, which would also mean he isn't a threat to civilians.
I suspect you again.

The first thing a caught mafia does in that scenario is claim to be independent. You're defending him.
Here we go with the 'defending teammates' again. Just like I was defending Zeph yesterday by voting FOR inh, eh :rolleyes:
Spoiler: show
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
Image
Canucklehead wrote:Civ Golden is a hurricane of self-assurance.
G-Man wrote: Coward
User avatar
MacDougall
Out of my scumrange
Posts in topic: 592
Posts: 39786
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1378

Post by MacDougall »

Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:01 pm
sig wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:56 pm
Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:53 pm I'd say INH is independent and sig is bad. Lynch both. Move on.

Then Quin for good measure.
16 players

You're trying to decide the next three lynches in a game where we might not even have 5 phases?

like we're down to 14. Nutella was a night action so high chane she's civ and I'd say Zeph is civ we're down to 14. IF Quin and INH are civs along with me who am I civ we'd be down to 8 players.

Like this level of lynch planning makes me very uncomfortable with you Epi.
And just to be clear, yes, yes I am trying to decide the next three lynches. And the three after that. Any issue with that?
I'm cool with figuring out who we're lynching on day 8 right now given what this game is. Paradox police being the Mafia implies that time vandalising is a civilian duty here.
User avatar
Epignosis
Skeletor
Posts in topic: 316
Posts: 40710
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:59 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1379

Post by Epignosis »

MacDougall wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:01 pm
Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:59 pm
Golden wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:55 pm If inh is indy I don't see him as threatening. If those words are a slip they will be full truth, which would also mean he isn't a threat to civilians.
I suspect you again.

The first thing a caught mafia does in that scenario is claim to be independent. You're defending him.
In my opinion the first thing a caught Mafia does in that scenario is question the validity of the information (ala Sig). A caught independent would almost certainly roleclaim at that juncture. A mafia to indie claim at that point before going after the validity of the information ... no doesn't seem right.
As I said, lynch both.

Neither one responded with any enthusiasm. One all but claimed harmless independent (which we won't know if we lynch him) and the other questioned the message (which we won't know is true if we lynch him).

Get rid of both, says I.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
User avatar
sig
bolt sbit mpo
Posts in topic: 217
Posts: 8577
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:13 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1380

Post by sig »

Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:01 pm
sig wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:56 pm
Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:53 pm I'd say INH is independent and sig is bad. Lynch both. Move on.

Then Quin for good measure.
16 players

You're trying to decide the next three lynches in a game where we might not even have 5 phases?

like we're down to 14. Nutella was a night action so high chane she's civ and I'd say Zeph is civ we're down to 14. IF Quin and INH are civs along with me who am I civ we'd be down to 8 players.

Like this level of lynch planning makes me very uncomfortable with you Epi.
And just to be clear, yes, yes I am trying to decide the next three lynches. And the three after that. Any issue with that?
Maybe?

Preplanned when we don't have any flips is imo isn't helpful to civs especially when you'd be passing all three off of one PM
ImageImage
Image
Image
User avatar
Golden
The Coward
Posts in topic: 614
Posts: 20125
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1381

Post by Golden »

Also epi - provide an example of what you claim (mafia claim independent in situations like this). It would never have even occurred to me, but I also disagree, because if anything inh didn't 'claim' indy but 'slip' indy.
Spoiler: show
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
Image
Canucklehead wrote:Civ Golden is a hurricane of self-assurance.
G-Man wrote: Coward
User avatar
Quin
Indecent Bastard
Posts in topic: 192
Posts: 10895
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
Location: The Future

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1382

Post by Quin »

Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:03 pm
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:01 pm
Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:59 pm
Golden wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:55 pm If inh is indy I don't see him as threatening. If those words are a slip they will be full truth, which would also mean he isn't a threat to civilians.
I suspect you again.

The first thing a caught mafia does in that scenario is claim to be independent. You're defending him.
In my opinion the first thing a caught Mafia does in that scenario is question the validity of the information (ala Sig). A caught independent would almost certainly roleclaim at that juncture. A mafia to indie claim at that point before going after the validity of the information ... no doesn't seem right.
As I said, lynch both.

Neither one responded with any enthusiasm. One all but claimed harmless independent (which we won't know if we lynch him) and the other questioned the message (which we won't know is true if we lynch him).

Get rid of both, says I.
I insist that you desist.
Lunalee wrote: Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:13 amQuin's ISO is full of posts that are actually trying to be helpful to the game. This doesn't look like town Quin.
ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Golden
The Coward
Posts in topic: 614
Posts: 20125
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1383

Post by Golden »

[VOTE: Epignosis] aubergine
Spoiler: show
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
Image
Canucklehead wrote:Civ Golden is a hurricane of self-assurance.
G-Man wrote: Coward
User avatar
sig
bolt sbit mpo
Posts in topic: 217
Posts: 8577
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:13 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1384

Post by sig »

Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:03 pm
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:01 pm
Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:59 pm
Golden wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:55 pm If inh is indy I don't see him as threatening. If those words are a slip they will be full truth, which would also mean he isn't a threat to civilians.
I suspect you again.

The first thing a caught mafia does in that scenario is claim to be independent. You're defending him.
In my opinion the first thing a caught Mafia does in that scenario is question the validity of the information (ala Sig). A caught independent would almost certainly roleclaim at that juncture. A mafia to indie claim at that point before going after the validity of the information ... no doesn't seem right.
As I said, lynch both.

Neither one responded with any enthusiasm. One all but claimed harmless independent (which we won't know if we lynch him) and the other questioned the message (which we won't know is true if we lynch him).

Get rid of both, says I.

I'm enthusiastic though? Just not to blindly follow someone info dumping which may be true and was potentially a message sent by soemoen else.

IF it's 100% quin who did it i say bring on the INH lynch since ik i'm not mafia.
ImageImage
Image
Image
User avatar
MacDougall
Out of my scumrange
Posts in topic: 592
Posts: 39786
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1385

Post by MacDougall »

Sig are you a civilian? Yes or no?

If you are a civilian what will be the outcome of lynching you today? Is the outcome positive or negative? Why?

If you are a civilian does your continued existence beyond day 3 reap any benefit to the civilian cause?
User avatar
MacDougall
Out of my scumrange
Posts in topic: 592
Posts: 39786
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1386

Post by MacDougall »

To those of you not named Epignosis or Golden.

If one of them is bad, who is it?
User avatar
MacDougall
Out of my scumrange
Posts in topic: 592
Posts: 39786
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1387

Post by MacDougall »

I do not believe either are bad for posterity.
User avatar
Golden
The Coward
Posts in topic: 614
Posts: 20125
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1388

Post by Golden »

Epi goes from voting his apparent mafia read to his indy read. Then claims his indy read is a mafia read. But if so, what's his sig read been all about, because this all started with the two clearly not being compatible with each other?

And Epi still wants to lynch both of them... even though he now apparently thinks INH is bad, with no evidence that sig would be indy...

His logic is all over the place inconsistent.
Spoiler: show
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
Image
Canucklehead wrote:Civ Golden is a hurricane of self-assurance.
G-Man wrote: Coward
User avatar
Golden
The Coward
Posts in topic: 614
Posts: 20125
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1389

Post by Golden »

Also if anyone thinks I'm inh's teammte...

Go reread day one.
Spoiler: show
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
Image
Canucklehead wrote:Civ Golden is a hurricane of self-assurance.
G-Man wrote: Coward
User avatar
sig
bolt sbit mpo
Posts in topic: 217
Posts: 8577
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:13 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1390

Post by sig »

MacDougall wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:06 pm Sig are you a civilian? Yes or no?

If you are a civilian what will be the outcome of lynching you today? Is the outcome positive or negative? Why?

If you are a civilian does your continued existence beyond day 3 reap any benefit to the civilian cause?

Yes

there's no outcome of lynching me today since it won't happen but if it did it would be negative since you'd loose a civ, but there wouldn't be some cataclysmic event

yes in the sense that I'd be here to post and engage. However, it's not like some role actives if I'm alive after day 3.

Also I think y'all might've read a little bit to deep into my d/n 1 posts. :p
ImageImage
Image
Image
User avatar
sig
bolt sbit mpo
Posts in topic: 217
Posts: 8577
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:13 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1391

Post by sig »

MacDougall wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:06 pm To those of you not named Epignosis or Golden.

If one of them is bad, who is it?
Epi
ImageImage
Image
Image
User avatar
Quin
Indecent Bastard
Posts in topic: 192
Posts: 10895
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
Location: The Future

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1392

Post by Quin »

MacDougall wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:06 pm To those of you not named Epignosis or Golden.

If one of them is bad, who is it?
Golden.
Lunalee wrote: Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:13 amQuin's ISO is full of posts that are actually trying to be helpful to the game. This doesn't look like town Quin.
ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Golden
The Coward
Posts in topic: 614
Posts: 20125
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1393

Post by Golden »

Quin wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:10 pm
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:06 pm To those of you not named Epignosis or Golden.

If one of them is bad, who is it?
Golden.
If I'm bad Quin is bad.

You can lie detect that motherfucker to the bank.
Spoiler: show
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
Image
Canucklehead wrote:Civ Golden is a hurricane of self-assurance.
G-Man wrote: Coward
User avatar
MacDougall
Out of my scumrange
Posts in topic: 592
Posts: 39786
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1394

Post by MacDougall »

sig wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:09 pm
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:06 pm Sig are you a civilian? Yes or no?

If you are a civilian what will be the outcome of lynching you today? Is the outcome positive or negative? Why?

If you are a civilian does your continued existence beyond day 3 reap any benefit to the civilian cause?

Yes

there's no outcome of lynching me today since it won't happen but if it did it would be negative since you'd loose a civ, but there wouldn't be some cataclysmic event

yes in the sense that I'd be here to post and engage. However, it's not like some role actives if I'm alive after day 3.

Also I think y'all might've read a little bit to deep into my d/n 1 posts. :p
So if we attempt to lynch you today, it just fails? Or it redirects? Does the second person get lynched instead? What do you expect the outcome to be? Just your continued existence and a fart video?

So you are saying that all of your role stops being relevant come day 3?

If you are a civilian then us wasting a lynch on you here is a bad idea. Given we have several other people who have role claimed, perhaps the civilian duty you have here is to actually just enlighten us as to what it is that you do?
User avatar
Epignosis
Skeletor
Posts in topic: 316
Posts: 40710
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:59 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1395

Post by Epignosis »

Golden wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:04 pm Also epi - provide an example of what you claim (mafia claim independent in situations like this). It would never have even occurred to me, but I also disagree, because if anything inh didn't 'claim' indy but 'slip' indy.
I'm not providing a thing. I have no interest. I've seen it. You don't believe me? Fine.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
User avatar
ColinIsCool
Hitman
Posts in topic: 376
Posts: 4804
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2018 12:33 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1396

Post by ColinIsCool »

Am I wrong to think INH is not claiming or slipping indie in that post? I interpreted it as “I could tell you my role but then I’d be a goner” but I can’t figure out what exactly he meant.
Image
User avatar
Epignosis
Skeletor
Posts in topic: 316
Posts: 40710
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:59 pm

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1397

Post by Epignosis »

Golden wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:08 pm Epi goes from voting his apparent mafia read to his indy read. Then claims his indy read is a mafia read. But if so, what's his sig read been all about, because this all started with the two clearly not being compatible with each other?

And Epi still wants to lynch both of them... even though he now apparently thinks INH is bad, with no evidence that sig would be indy...

His logic is all over the place inconsistent.
Don't give a
Spoiler: show
shit.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
User avatar
MacDougall
Out of my scumrange
Posts in topic: 592
Posts: 39786
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1398

Post by MacDougall »

ColinIsCool wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:14 pm Am I wrong to think INH is not claiming or slipping indie in that post? I interpreted it as “I could tell you my role but then I’d be a goner” but I can’t figure out what exactly he meant.
He specifically said "I'm not a threat to the townies".

When has a civilian ever said that?
User avatar
Quin
Indecent Bastard
Posts in topic: 192
Posts: 10895
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
Location: The Future

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1399

Post by Quin »

Golden wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:11 pm
Quin wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:10 pm
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:06 pm To those of you not named Epignosis or Golden.

If one of them is bad, who is it?
Golden.
If I'm bad Quin is bad.

You can lie detect that motherfucker to the bank.
are you looking for a repeat of phenon because if so i am probably going to cry
Lunalee wrote: Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:13 amQuin's ISO is full of posts that are actually trying to be helpful to the game. This doesn't look like town Quin.
ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
MacDougall
Out of my scumrange
Posts in topic: 592
Posts: 39786
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

#1400

Post by MacDougall »

Epignosis are you actually a doctor or were you talking shit? Because there's a bit of an elephant in the room here given Scotty seems to be counter claiming.
Post Reply

Return to “Previous Jobs”