Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert

[MacDougall]

Golden thinks sig is bad and resigns to interactively analyse.

I offer that I already have and found, among others, Spacedaisy wanting.

Spacedaisy does a catch up post that Golden vehemently disagrees with and finds it weird.

Golden diverts away from his plan to microanalyse Daisy herself.

Golden gives her a town read.

The progression is illogical.

That’s because it’s not accurate in the least.

Put I give her a townread at the top.

Delete me diverting any plan to divert away from microanalysing her, because I have that plan.l and haven’t diverted away from it in the least. I could see a world in which daisy is pocketing me and I remain very open to the possibility, for now. I’ll have a firmer view either way only by microanalysis.

Add me reiterating my current read at the bottom.

Then you have the progression correct.

Semantics

[Golden]

You can't have the wrong progression, call the progression illogical, and then say it's semantics.

You literally said I diverted away from my plan to microanalyse Daisy. That was a pure falsehood. That's not semantics.

Question: Why was sig your bottom read before we came into today?

[MacDougall]

You can't have the wrong progression, call the progression illogical, and then say it's semantics.

You literally said I diverted away from my plan to microanalyse Daisy. That was a pure falsehood. That's not semantics.

Question: Why was sig your bottom read before we came into today?

Ignorance. I explained it at length. Read the thread.

[Golden]

You can't have the wrong progression, call the progression illogical, and then say it's semantics.

You literally said I diverted away from my plan to microanalyse Daisy. That was a pure falsehood. That's not semantics.

Question: Why was sig your bottom read before we came into today?

Ignorance. I explained it at length. Read the thread.

It wouldn't be hard for you to point it out.

[MacDougall]

If I didn't know any better it sounds like you think I am fake in my sig read?

[Turnip Head]

[mention]MacDougall[/mention]
[mention]Scotty[/mention]
[mention]Golden[/mention]

It's pretty simple, musketeers. I need only one more thing to happen in order to win the game (and leave it), and that thing I need to do is like... it's a fuckin slam dunk.

So I could just do that, and just be done with it, orrrrrr I can stick around and haunt my friends through time.

T H E
C H O I C E
I S
Y O U R S

[ColinIsCool]

I was gonna say that I didn’t understand why people believe Turnip Head, but then again when he drew a wolf in One Hour Werewolf he just said he was a wolf. So maybe I should believe him too.

[Kylemii]

or we could just lynch actually turnip head. it might be really funny.

[MacDougall]

You can't have the wrong progression, call the progression illogical, and then say it's semantics.

You literally said I diverted away from my plan to microanalyse Daisy. That was a pure falsehood. That's not semantics.

Question: Why was sig your bottom read before we came into today?

Ignorance. I explained it at length. Read the thread.

It wouldn't be hard for you to point it out.

First came a gut ping.

Then I observed his townie tinfoil was absent. He was more stoic under pressure than in other games. He seemed informed.

[Golden]

If I didn't know any better it sounds like you think I am fake in my sig read?

As with Daisy, with you I have a town read that I am entirely willing to re-evaluate at any given time.

I don't know the why of any of your reads, whether through the fact you haven't explained them or the fact I missed them. From my perspective both explanations are possible. I was just asking you to provide that why. I wasn't being in the slightest bit combative but the fact that you are does ping me a little I have to admit.

[Quin]

oh i missed eod

[Quin]

Let's do something more fun.

sig and INH are Booker DeWitt and Comstock. That is to say, both have been swept away by the Luteces. They're not here.

Who gets your vote and why?

Yes, I want to step away from the sig and INH drama. I feel it is distracting us from actually getting a scum lynch. Didn't Quin start this whole thing? I don't know if I want to keep Quin around. I feel like he introduced a class-A distraction to get suspicions off of his team.

this is fun

[Golden]

oh i missed eod

Nah you missed 'an event' that was not EoD.

[MacDougall]

Aside from Scotty I don't trust anyone

[Ricochet]

Hello. I am infiltrating this game solely to reach out to potential replacement(s) for my own ongoing game, Courage (someone who isn't already playing in it, of course). I don't have a lot of options on the table in that regard. Contact me in private if interested. Thanks. Bye.

[Quin]

oh i missed eod

Nah you missed 'an event' that was not EoD.

but i love events

[Golden]

Aside from Scotty I don't trust anyone

Why would you trust scotty but not me.

[Quin]

I think sig will come back.

[Quin]

He was adamant he won't be killed and the way the host post is written sounds like his vanishing was self-inflicted.

[Choutas]

Im without internet if i dont fix it tomorrow ill ask to be replaced

[MacDougall]

Aside from Scotty I don't trust anyone

Why would you trust scotty but not me.

Your read of him is only part of why I trust him. I trust the way he is reading the game. I trust the way he is approaching the game.

[Choutas]

I wish i had time to read all the posts and contribute.
I dont like how most guys are going soft and tame. The feel i have about Mac is that hes baddie this game. Goldens defense reads as genuine.
Scotty is a null read last game he proved hes incredibly tough to read correctly and he puzzles me even more in this one.
The guys who ask to be voted or for their conditions to be met should have pointa deducted and be considered dangerous.s
I wont put a placeholder vote, i need to read more and i ask to be forgiven foe not commiting enough.

[Choutas]

or we could just lynch actually turnip head. it might be really funny.

Is he scum though?
Are you?
It would be funny if you are both.

[Kylemii]

or we could just lynch actually turnip head. it might be really funny.

Is he scum though?
Are you?
It would be funny if you are both.

what was your goal in making this post?

[Kylemii]

im town and turniphead is likely an indie like he says. im 90% confident

[ColinIsCool]

im town and turniphead is likely an indie like he says. im 90% confident

How?

[Epignosis]

I've been in the attic on account of a clogged AC drain pipe. I'll be with you all momentarily.

[MacDougall]

I wish i had time to read all the posts and contribute.
I dont like how most guys are going soft and tame. Wot. The feel i have about Mac is that hes baddie this game. Take off the tinfoil hat. Goldens defense reads as genuine.
Scotty is a null read last game he proved hes incredibly tough to read correctly and he puzzles me even more in this one. He's obviously town.
The guys who ask to be voted or for their conditions to be met should have pointa deducted and be considered dangerous.s
I wont put a placeholder vote, i need to read more and i ask to be forgiven foe not commiting enough.

Vote me then

[Turnip Head]

Town doesn't need me and I don't need town. I'll probably let Kyle walk me on a leash but that's all I can muster.

[MacDougall]

What do you need to have happen in order to get your wincon?

[speedchuck]

DAY 1:
N/A

NIGHT 1:

[Epignosis]

I don’t agree with the recurring idea that we’ll just get rid of both signand inh to be safe. Quin’s posts should have been the catalyst for a decision, not a non-decision.

It's denial and fear-mongering with no real potential results IMO. I realize I'm not exactly unbiased, but I'd feel more comfortable if the town lynched people because of legitimate in-thread reasons when we have no flips to go off of, instead of contested info-dropping hearsay which won't truly be proven one way or the other until dead peoples' roles are revealed. The former is productive and can generate conversations, while the second won't actually give us any information while serving as a major distraction.

Yet the the latter has produced the former, no?

By the way, your script needs work.

[Turnip Head]

What do you need to have happen in order to get your wincon?

Correctly predict one more election.

[MacDougall]

What do you need to have happen in order to get your wincon?

Correctly predict one more election.

Did you correctly predict sig?

[Turnip Head]

What do you need to have happen in order to get your wincon?

Correctly predict one more election.

Did you correctly predict sig?

Yup

[Epignosis]

The fact that both sig and INH have attacked the intel, rather than each other, bodes poorly.

That's what I've been saying.

[Golden]

Mac, why’d you vote sig to get the item when he was bottom of your reads?

Epi, why’d you go for bribery?

Daisy, Luna, Kyle - also want to know why you voted for sig.

I’m starting with a review of this group of five.

[Golden]

I guarantee baddies will be in there.

[Golden]

Current gth rankings from most likely to be bad to least likely to be bad, before ISOs.

Luna
Kyle
Epi
Daisy
Mac

[Turnip Head]

Mac is clearly bad lol

[ColinIsCool]

What do you need to have happen in order to get your wincon?

Correctly predict one more election.

That seems like a rather easy wincon. I think you’re being a little misleading at best.

[MacDougall]

What do you need to have happen in order to get your wincon?

Correctly predict one more election.

Did you correctly predict sig?

Yup

At what point do you submit your prediction and in what format?

[MacDougall]

Mac, why’d you vote sig to get the item when he was bottom of your reads?

Epi, why’d you go for bribery?

Daisy, Luna, Kyle - also want to know why you voted for sig.

I’m starting with a review of this group of five.

I was trying to win the election for a while and then I had a random change of heart when he made me feel like him winning would be a richer game experience at least by which time I had also coincidentally realised I had little chance of winning so I thought fuck it, I have no idea what the outcome of the night vote will be anyway and I am just being contrarian, give the kid his win.

[MacDougall]

Mac is clearly bad lol

1. I am not, let alone clearly.
2. What is this based on?

[ColinIsCool]

I am also interested in the answers to Mac’s questions.

[Turnip Head]

What do you need to have happen in order to get your wincon?

Correctly predict one more election.

That seems like a rather easy wincon. I think you’re being a little misleading at best.

I know dude tell me about it

[ColinIsCool]

OK, I will tell you about it.

I’m a vote predictor. I get an extra vote on days following a night poll where I successfully predict the winner.

So why would your wincon be something that I should reasonably be expected to do a few times over?

Nah. You’re not telling the truth.

[Turnip Head]

This would be more fun for me if I could just continue my nihilistic roleplay instead of talking about my dumb role more

[Turnip Head]

OK, I will tell you about it.

I’m a vote predictor. I get an extra vote on days following a night poll where I successfully predict the winner.

So why would your wincon be something that I should reasonably be expected to do a few times over?

Nah. You’re not telling the truth.

Let's get you elected Colin. Start the countdown.

[Quin]

NICE