He could be 3P though. I have the following thoughts about that possibility:
1) his original claim that he was vanilla before claiming he was a vote nullifier. I know he says he was high but it still doesn't sit well with me. Can you be so high that you think your role claim says "vanilla town" instead of having an explanation of a role? He claimed vanilla at 1:49, then a pr at 1:51 at the same time saying he would take a look at me and nut, then at 1:56 said he probably forgot his role because it was so weak. How could he take a look at me and nutella if he's so high he can't read his role card? At 2:07 he said nutella should probably be yeeted, which was the truth but how did he evaluate that being so drunk/high? The whole thing just doesn't sit well with me. It seems like a slip.
2) his role claim seems weak. Who does it benefit besides himself? It keeps him from voting for someone but that someone could be town or mafia. I suspect it is a part of his role but not the whole thing. It just doesn't seem on par with the other roles people have claimed.
3) targeted Radishes N3, the night he died
4) I just don't see a lot of townie helpfulness in his posts
5) chose to vote himself (which was a vote for tutuu) after I explained twice - once to him, once to Mac - why tutuu must be town. It was clear cut. He didn't cite any policy chop beliefs, just voted her to "be sure". As I explained to him, it was a sure thing she was not scum or 3P.
The one thing that kept me from thinking he was rogue was that he claimed the album In Rainbows which was on Herm's list as "1 Scum". He only said that though because PC had said the mafia role blocker was on In Rainbows which was true (Samu). But does that mean there weren't any more non-civilians on that album? [mention]Poison Chan[/mention] can you answer this? If you say there are definitely no more non-civilians on In Rainbows then my suspicion here is wrong.