No matter how much I have to do, I can't help it but check this thread occasionally as a form of brain break, lol.
juliets wrote:RIP zeek, I really enjoyed having you in the game. I hope you'll come back and play again because you were a great addition. Goodbye Made - I can't know for sure that you were bad because I don't have confirmation but I strongly believe you were bad. I also hope you play with us again, you're a lot of fun normally. Maybe just not when you're a baddie.
MP I don't get it. How could your lynch possibly be good for the civs if you are a civ? You've thrown a lot of names out there so it's not like we could track back and say "aha! here's the one he thought was baddie". I think you are probably good and you just can't stand it that some people think you are bad, and you want to prove right away that you are good, kinda like sticking your tongue out at them. Killing a civ takes away a civ vote and whatever power the civ has assuming he has a power. That is not a good thing and I think you are trying to rationalize that somehow it is good. I can understand if it is rl because you have got a lot to do but you say it's not. I don't mean to make you angry, I just want you to put a little more objective thought into it and remove as much emotion as you can.
My vote is likely to go to Enrique today but there is some research I have to do first.
You're correct, information gathering in terms of my suspicions wouldn't be an advantage, though it should be evident that thus far my instincts for baddie hunting have been relatively terrible, so no, I don't think that's a reason it'd be good if I got lynched.
I understand your interpretation, and it's just a little bit of that (wanting to prove people wrong
), but that is not my main reason. RL also factors in just a bit. But both of these reasons are relatively minor.
Refer to my response below to Dom.
And no worries, you're not making me angry at all.
Dom wrote:MovingPictures07 wrote:I see my vote has disappeared.
BR, you've been undecided on me all game, if I remember correctly, now you're convinced I'm a civvie; why is that?
Rox, I'm not acting like EVERYONE wants to lynch me, but I feel within the next few day periods I'm in an inevitable lynch candidate, so I wanted to get it over with because I made a serious assessment and believe it would benefit the civvies for that to happen. Also, I had a really stressful day yesterday, so.
As I said before, I definitely absolutely think Enri is bad, so...
I suppose I'm switching my vote to Enrique.
MP, how is it remotely possible that lynching you, if you are civ, would deb good for the civvies? That is so backward.
I understand why it's difficult to believe... I wouldn't say it's 100% benefit or anything close. Rather, it's a pros/cons or, in accounting or business terminology, a cost-benefit analysis. I firmly believe the possible benefits of my lynch would outweigh the possible costs, even if it's a close call.
It's really difficult to tell you why since I can't really say. You'd just have to trust me.
But it seems at this point people don't want to lynch me, I guess, so whatever. I'm OK with lynching Enrique.
Long Con wrote:I believe MP is Civ. If he's going to become gone from this game, then it's up to the baddies to do it for him. I'm not wasting a lynch on him. In the unlikely event that he's a baddie, then there will be fallout for such a classless deception in future games.
I will vote for Enrique, because he's, like... a baddie.
Odd, I don't remember you declaring this previously either. I appreciate your support, LC, but... how did you come to this conclusion?
SVS is the one who calls out my puppies. And yea. I've grown very fond of Zeek
Fiddler on the Roof
