Splints, thanks for your thoughts, you have some good insight. Definitely worth keeping in mind. Do you think keys would contribute more if he were civ or no?
keys, I know it's a pros/cons thing regarding your D1 agenda, but there are certainly benefits for an RR to argue against civvies searching each other (don't have to worry about getting knocked out due to hotels, no BTSC to worry about, etc.). The fact that you aren't contributing is really what's grabbing my attention more so than that, to be honest.
bea, thanks for explaining. To be fair, I'm not actively suspecting you that much, I only wondered -- if LC's theory is true, meaning TH is WW and LoRab is a railroad, whether you, as LoRab's possible teammate, would react the way you have. Plus, I was hoping to see more from you re: suspicions by now. I totally get RL though. I understand. But you're misrepresenting me. I don't expect to get a pass from anyone on that. Nor should you. And I'm not saying everyone should not suspect me because I'm busy. Not at all. I just am saying just because I'm posting less than I other times have doesn't make me bad on its own, and that posting volume means nothing. I am still contributing to this game as much as I possibly can, even if my posting frequency has been less. I'd like to feel you (and others) are doing the same, but it's Day 7 and I just feel there's been little hunting going on (see my response to S~V~S for more on this though).
LC, what do you think of the rebuttal that has been made by TH regarding his behavior? Do you still feel as strongly in your assessment?
HannaK wrote:MovingPictures07 wrote:RIP zeek. That's a bummer.
So it seems Llama had LMS conditions after all, even if newly acquired.... I still think that negates my LC/Llama connection though.
There have been good points on the LC/TH front. I find LC's case much more convincing potentially than Llama's. However... I am having trouble discerning one of two possibilities:
1) LC is dead on; TH is WW and LoRab is railroad.
2) LC is incorrect.
I think my gut still leans towards #2, with TH being a civvie since he seems genuine.
That said, I find it really odd Hanna and Bea come in here and say what they have. If #1 was the case, would either of them be so bold as to assert such a thing? It just seems weird to me given both of them have been very nonopinionated all game. Thoughts here?
I guess because I don't really feel that this is an opinion, it's just good logical reasoning that I hadn't thought of myself, which is why I like expressing that I like this line of thinking. Im generally not very good at coming up with my own suspicions based on completely new information, especially in this game because i havent played with you all before which is also why:
MovingPictures07 wrote:And multiple players keep throwing out how badly they want to catch Reds, but I don't see much baddie hunting from most players considering it's Day 7. I know I haven't been amazing myself, but I feel more people should have opinions of others by now. Hanna, for example, keeps stressing all of this, but never throws out any suspects of her own. It's starting to ping me big time.
Yeah it is true that I dont have many solid suspicions, this is because a) statistically there are wayyy more civvies/LMS groups than baddies at this point so I am careful pointing to people as bad b) because I am generally quite weary with my suspicions because they are often either based on logical reasoning (which is hard) or game style (of which I don't have much information apart from the style of players within this game
Thanks, I understand that. It's definitely an unconventional game as well, and I know you're new. But why would you be "careful" pointing to people as bad? I don't understand that. Are you afraid of ruffling feathers?
S~V~S wrote:And MP, you win the prize this game for instances of saying "baddie hunting" and instances of accusing people for lack thereof. The problem with that in this game is that the LMS started out as civvies, and we don't even KNOW if someone is a LMS person at all. Llama is a case in point. He said he was not a baddie, and he apparently was NOT until right before we lynched him, lol. Personally, I think you, LC & TH ALL have teammates. So if you are not LMS already, you soon enough will be. Plus most of the actual baddies, 4 out of 6, started out without BTS, and looking for team association is a major "baddie hunting" tool.
Baddie hunting even became a scary point when boo said the kill would pass, but would not say how. So finding that last Utility, who may leave a trail, would be way easier thana kill that is essentially a needle in a haystack of people who used to be civvies. That was a point the "no searchers" were 100% right about on Day Zero~ at some point we will have to assume we are all, or mostly, LMS.
I am right around the corner from the Reds, the Yellows (no houses...yet, but charging monopoly rents) and the Greens. I can stand one hotel and maybe a house or two with the windfall I got last night, but not much more. We're gonna lost ALOT of people starting tomorrow, especially if the Yellows build.
Well, thanks, LOL, but I get your point. It's funny because I didn't think the game mechanics here would be hard to wrap my head around, and they haven't, but I didn't expect the mechanics to cause so much of a difference in typical mafia gameplay. Especially now with 4 LMS groups... I didn't expect that to happen either. And you make a good point on team association. Even though we've caught Hedge, I feel totally lost when it comes to finding another RR in terms of association. Doesn't help that she didn't post much.
How do you propose lynches be utilized then, out of curiosity?
Black Rock wrote:Turnip Head wrote:I'm just pointing out the facts. It looks like Keys was not around for the missed kill, and returned just before last night's kill.
Good point, does anyone else fit that description?
I'd like to know the answer to this too. I can't think of anyone else off the top of my head, but I am sleepy.
fill a sista up please 
