The Syndicate

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 07, 2017 8:52 pm @Kylemii

Why did you vote for Quin?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:32 pmK.

Quin wrote: ↑Tue Nov 07, 2017 7:34 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 07, 2017 7:30 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Tue Nov 07, 2017 7:23 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 07, 2017 3:35 pm @Quin You are 8 FFs ahead of me.

"FF means many things, some already said, I might (most likely will) repeat.
#1. Fist fucking- the act of stuffing a fist up a pussy *owch*
#2. Foot fucking- a type of masturbation that women do to their male partners dick.
#3. Final fantasy- a game played by geeks, such as my boyfriend, that I should probably learn to play.
#4. Fan Fiction- a type of writing that uses already made characters from books and movies and such that have sex, also called slash... gay LOTR ones at www.libraryofmoria.com.
#5. Father fucker- a person who likes to fuck their dad/friend's dad.
#6. Fucking freak- ... me..." (Urban Dictionary, 2004)

Which one are you talking about?

The first one. I'm halfway through FF6. My arm hurts.

Wait until you get to FF9.

Quin wrote: ↑Tue Nov 07, 2017 7:04 pm

dunya wrote: ↑Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:58 pm I don't feel comfortable being part of the apparently easy Quin bandwagon. Sorry to do this, but moving to NewTraditionalist although it's statistically more likely Jack replaced the nonactive scum than the nonactive vanilla townie, I would think.

I do trust sig, but I'm not feeling as great about DDL as I was on the first day. Will try to review my notes.

I don't think it's wise to read into replacement order as a scum tactic. That could be determined in a lot of ways.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Nov 07, 2017 8:58 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 07, 2017 8:52 pm @Kylemii

Why did you vote for Quin?

The same reason I voted for MP. I suspected they were teammates because of how the day 1 lynch went.

MP was so frazzled during the times he was here I guess I thought he might have made a mistake as big as that, now it kind of seems stupid.

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 2:37 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Nov 07, 2017 8:58 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 07, 2017 8:52 pm @Kylemii

Why did you vote for Quin?

The same reason I voted for MP. I suspected they were teammates because of how the day 1 lynch went.

MP was so frazzled during the times he was here I guess I thought he might have made a mistake as big as that, now it kind of seems stupid.

were you not at all moved to change it to a tie between quin and someone who hasn't contributed anything to the game whatsoever?

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 2:43 pmIf I am killed tonight, please investigate Kylemii more and one of the "inactives", now Jack and NewTraditionalist.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 3:07 pm

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 2:43 pmIf I am killed tonight, please investigate Kylemii more and one of the "inactives", now Jack and NewTraditionalist.

Please don't say things like that. Phrases like that give the mafia social tools to work with

Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:39 pm alright. it's business time. 1 - 5, 5 being definitely good, 1 being definitely bad, and 3 being average.

DDL: 2.5
Most of his posts are about game mechanics, he notes to MP that he was lacking baddie reads even though he'd provided none himself, voted sig for asking the cop to play recklessly proactively... just generally ping-y. Like it's mostly gut feel and maybe it's just how he is regularly but there's a definite general pingy-ness there for me. I had him with a lower score before Speedchuck's point about nosebops, i can see how the same tactic could be used as a townie to stir the pot and open up discussion

Dr. Wilgy: ???
LIterally has only posted emoticons? is this normal for Wilgy?

Dunya: 3.5
My gut feel on her is good. Her posts read authentic to me. It's not much more than gut.

Long Con: 3.25
Very thorough and generally positive influence on the thread. He'd be higher but i believe he's very well capable of smoke-screening as a baddie.

MP: 3
he has a lot of posts because of the 1 quote per post thing he did. he's doing work and making shit happen but there's not enough there to sway me either way on him.

NewTraditionist: Null
Only post is about the day 0 vote. Please speak up.

Quin: 2.75
Uneasy but nothing concrete. they say a lot without saying much. throwing out "townie points" is.... i just don't trust that at all. i don't trust that metric

sig: 3.25
actually reads kind of civ to me??? i get where people are coming from with the copclaim suggestion thing but the thing is, he's right. it's mathematically the best choice in a vacuum. other variables exist as well if the cop can reliably wait a cycle and possibly catch a second badboy then like... that's a different matter.

Spacedaisy: 2.5
She's one of the 4 players with only 1 post but she's different in that i usually expect her to be more active than this. she's been around and posting in other places here. I wouldn't vote her over it because i don't think she'd use inactivity as a baddiestrat, but i guess what i'm saying is, hey spacedaisy, come plaaaaay with us. in this space we've made.

Spankgangsta: Null
he's newer, right? come plaaaaaayyyyyyyyy. with us. come out and plaaaaaaaaay

Speedchuck: 3.5
very blunt. I think good? i disagree with some/most of the stuff he says but his posts read as a townie who is trying hard


I see that my reads on Sig and DDL aren't concurrent with the rest of the thread so i'm going to review those two as well as LC

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 3:13 pm having reads is fine

but saying "if i die, do this" puts us both in danger and I'm not really cool with that

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 3:17 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:39 pm alright. it's business time. 1 - 5, 5 being definitely good, 1 being definitely bad, and 3 being average.

DDL: 2.5
Most of his posts are about game mechanics, he notes to MP that he was lacking baddie reads even though he'd provided none himself, voted sig for asking the cop to play recklessly proactively... just generally ping-y. Like it's mostly gut feel and maybe it's just how he is regularly but there's a definite general pingy-ness there for me. I had him with a lower score before Speedchuck's point about nosebops, i can see how the same tactic could be used as a townie to stir the pot and open up discussion

Dr. Wilgy: ???
LIterally has only posted emoticons? is this normal for Wilgy?

Dunya: 3.5
My gut feel on her is good. Her posts read authentic to me. It's not much more than gut.

Long Con: 3.25
Very thorough and generally positive influence on the thread.

MP: 3
he has a lot of posts because of the 1 quote per post thing he did. he's doing work and making shit happen but there's not enough there to sway me either way on him.

NewTraditionist: Null
Only post is about the day 0 vote. Please speak up.

Quin: 2.75
Uneasy but nothing concrete. they say a lot without saying much. throwing out "townie points" is.... i just don't trust that at all. i don't trust that metric

sig: 3.25
actually reads kind of civ to me??? i get where people are coming from with the copclaim suggestion thing but the thing is, he's right. it's mathematically the best choice in a vacuum. other variables exist as well if the cop can reliably wait a cycle and possibly catch a second badboy then like... that's a different matter.

Spacedaisy: 2.5
She's one of the 4 players with only 1 post but she's different in that i usually expect her to be more active than this. she's been around and posting in other places here. I wouldn't vote her over it because i don't think she'd use inactivity as a baddiestrat, but i guess what i'm saying is, hey spacedaisy, come plaaaaay with us. in this space we've made.

Spankgangsta: Null
he's newer, right? come plaaaaaayyyyyyyyy. with us. come out and plaaaaaaaaay

Speedchuck: 3.5
very blunt. I think good? i disagree with some/most of the stuff he says but his posts read as a townie who is trying hard


I see that my reads on Sig and DDL aren't concurrent with the rest of the thread so i'm going to review those two as well as LC

Didn't like this post at all. A townie has no problem at least naming 1 or 2 suspects. MP couldn't pinpoint one this game as scum. Kyle went and basically said everyone was fine and dandy. Reads too much of "I am giving helpful reads and blending in" without actually offering much. Didn't want to cause any backlash from anyone. I consider that a very big mafia read. Townie's don't give two shits who they piss off because they have nothing to hide.

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 2:39 pm speedchuck / daisy / newtraditionalist

where would your votes have been yesterday?

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 3:17 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:39 pm alright. it's business time. 1 - 5, 5 being definitely good, 1 being definitely bad, and 3 being average.

DDL: 2.5
Most of his posts are about game mechanics, he notes to MP that he was lacking baddie reads even though he'd provided none himself, voted sig for asking the cop to play recklessly proactively... just generally ping-y. Like it's mostly gut feel and maybe it's just how he is regularly but there's a definite general pingy-ness there for me. I had him with a lower score before Speedchuck's point about nosebops, i can see how the same tactic could be used as a townie to stir the pot and open up discussion

Dr. Wilgy: ???
LIterally has only posted emoticons? is this normal for Wilgy?

Dunya: 3.5
My gut feel on her is good. Her posts read authentic to me. It's not much more than gut.

Long Con: 3.25
Very thorough and generally positive influence on the thread. He'd be higher but i believe he's very well capable of smoke-screening as a baddie.

MP: 3
he has a lot of posts because of the 1 quote per post thing he did. he's doing work and making shit happen but there's not enough there to sway me either way on him.

NewTraditionist: Null
Only post is about the day 0 vote. Please speak up.

Quin: 2.75
Uneasy but nothing concrete. they say a lot without saying much. throwing out "townie points" is.... i just don't trust that at all. i don't trust that metric

sig: 3.25
actually reads kind of civ to me??? i get where people are coming from with the copclaim suggestion thing but the thing is, he's right. it's mathematically the best choice in a vacuum. other variables exist as well if the cop can reliably wait a cycle and possibly catch a second badboy then like... that's a different matter.

Spacedaisy: 2.5
She's one of the 4 players with only 1 post but she's different in that i usually expect her to be more active than this. she's been around and posting in other places here. I wouldn't vote her over it because i don't think she'd use inactivity as a baddiestrat, but i guess what i'm saying is, hey spacedaisy, come plaaaaay with us. in this space we've made.

Spankgangsta: Null
he's newer, right? come plaaaaaayyyyyyyyy. with us. come out and plaaaaaaaaay

Speedchuck: 3.5
very blunt. I think good? i disagree with some/most of the stuff he says but his posts read as a townie who is trying hard


I see that my reads on Sig and DDL aren't concurrent with the rest of the thread so i'm going to review those two as well as LC

Didn't like this post at all. A townie has no problem at least naming 1 or 2 suspects. MP couldn't pinpoint one this game as scum. Kyle went and basically said everyone was fine and dandy. Reads too much of "I am giving helpful reads and blending in" without actually offering much. Didn't want to cause any backlash from anyone. I consider that a very big mafia read. Townie's don't give two shits who they piss off because they have nothing to hide.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 3:28 pm

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 3:17 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:39 pm alright. it's business time. 1 - 5, 5 being definitely good, 1 being definitely bad, and 3 being average.

DDL: 2.5
Most of his posts are about game mechanics, he notes to MP that he was lacking baddie reads even though he'd provided none himself, voted sig for asking the cop to play recklessly proactively... just generally ping-y. Like it's mostly gut feel and maybe it's just how he is regularly but there's a definite general pingy-ness there for me. I had him with a lower score before Speedchuck's point about nosebops, i can see how the same tactic could be used as a townie to stir the pot and open up discussion

Dr. Wilgy: ???
LIterally has only posted emoticons? is this normal for Wilgy?

Dunya: 3.5
My gut feel on her is good. Her posts read authentic to me. It's not much more than gut.

Long Con: 3.25
Very thorough and generally positive influence on the thread. He'd be higher but i believe he's very well capable of smoke-screening as a baddie.

MP: 3
he has a lot of posts because of the 1 quote per post thing he did. he's doing work and making shit happen but there's not enough there to sway me either way on him.

NewTraditionist: Null
Only post is about the day 0 vote. Please speak up.

Quin: 2.75
Uneasy but nothing concrete. they say a lot without saying much. throwing out "townie points" is.... i just don't trust that at all. i don't trust that metric

sig: 3.25
actually reads kind of civ to me??? i get where people are coming from with the copclaim suggestion thing but the thing is, he's right. it's mathematically the best choice in a vacuum. other variables exist as well if the cop can reliably wait a cycle and possibly catch a second badboy then like... that's a different matter.

Spacedaisy: 2.5
She's one of the 4 players with only 1 post but she's different in that i usually expect her to be more active than this. she's been around and posting in other places here. I wouldn't vote her over it because i don't think she'd use inactivity as a baddiestrat, but i guess what i'm saying is, hey spacedaisy, come plaaaaay with us. in this space we've made.

Spankgangsta: Null
he's newer, right? come plaaaaaayyyyyyyyy. with us. come out and plaaaaaaaaay

Speedchuck: 3.5
very blunt. I think good? i disagree with some/most of the stuff he says but his posts read as a townie who is trying hard


I see that my reads on Sig and DDL aren't concurrent with the rest of the thread so i'm going to review those two as well as LC

Didn't like this post at all. A townie has no problem at least naming 1 or 2 suspects. MP couldn't pinpoint one this game as scum. Kyle went and basically said everyone was fine and dandy. Reads too much of "I am giving helpful reads and blending in" without actually offering much. Didn't want to cause any backlash from anyone. I consider that a very big mafia read. Townie's don't give two shits who they piss off because they have nothing to hide.

I already explained that the scale was 1-5. In this post I listed Quin, Daisy, and DDL as suspects.

You made the same mistake here as.... Was it Speedchuck or MP?

speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 3:24 pm

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 2:39 pm speedchuck / daisy / newtraditionalist

where would your votes have been yesterday?

Quin or NT

speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 3:24 pm

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 2:39 pm speedchuck / daisy / newtraditionalist

where would your votes have been yesterday?

Quin or NT

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 3:17 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:39 pm alright. it's business time. 1 - 5, 5 being definitely good, 1 being definitely bad, and 3 being average.

DDL: 2.5
Most of his posts are about game mechanics, he notes to MP that he was lacking baddie reads even though he'd provided none himself, voted sig for asking the cop to play recklessly proactively... just generally ping-y. Like it's mostly gut feel and maybe it's just how he is regularly but there's a definite general pingy-ness there for me. I had him with a lower score before Speedchuck's point about nosebops, i can see how the same tactic could be used as a townie to stir the pot and open up discussion

Dr. Wilgy: ???
LIterally has only posted emoticons? is this normal for Wilgy?

Dunya: 3.5
My gut feel on her is good. Her posts read authentic to me. It's not much more than gut.

Long Con: 3.25
Very thorough and generally positive influence on the thread. He'd be higher but i believe he's very well capable of smoke-screening as a baddie.

MP: 3
he has a lot of posts because of the 1 quote per post thing he did. he's doing work and making shit happen but there's not enough there to sway me either way on him.

NewTraditionist: Null
Only post is about the day 0 vote. Please speak up.

Quin: 2.75
Uneasy but nothing concrete. they say a lot without saying much. throwing out "townie points" is.... i just don't trust that at all. i don't trust that metric

sig: 3.25
actually reads kind of civ to me??? i get where people are coming from with the copclaim suggestion thing but the thing is, he's right. it's mathematically the best choice in a vacuum. other variables exist as well if the cop can reliably wait a cycle and possibly catch a second badboy then like... that's a different matter.

Spacedaisy: 2.5
She's one of the 4 players with only 1 post but she's different in that i usually expect her to be more active than this. she's been around and posting in other places here. I wouldn't vote her over it because i don't think she'd use inactivity as a baddiestrat, but i guess what i'm saying is, hey spacedaisy, come plaaaaay with us. in this space we've made.

Spankgangsta: Null
he's newer, right? come plaaaaaayyyyyyyyy. with us. come out and plaaaaaaaaay

Speedchuck: 3.5
very blunt. I think good? i disagree with some/most of the stuff he says but his posts read as a townie who is trying hard


I see that my reads on Sig and DDL aren't concurrent with the rest of the thread so i'm going to review those two as well as LC

Didn't like this post at all. A townie has no problem at least naming 1 or 2 suspects. MP couldn't pinpoint one this game as scum. Kyle went and basically said everyone was fine and dandy. Reads too much of "I am giving helpful reads and blending in" without actually offering much. Didn't want to cause any backlash from anyone. I consider that a very big mafia read. Townie's don't give two shits who they piss off because they have nothing to hide.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 3:54 pm Expecting 1 or 1.5 on day one is insane. A 1 would require irrefutable evidence otherwise what's the point of having that part of the scale

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:30 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 3:54 pm Expecting 1 or 1.5 on day one is insane. A 1 would require irrefutable evidence otherwise what's the point of having that part of the scale

why? Why are you so worried to just throw it out there on day 1? Pot stirring. Testing waters. Are you scared to garner a negative reaction? You applauded Wilgy's rainbow reads, so Day 1 reads are not uncommon to you.

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:30 pm You applauded Wilgy's rainbow reads, so Day 1 reads are not uncommon to you.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:38 pm

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:30 pm You applauded Wilgy's rainbow reads, so Day 1 reads are not uncommon to you.

What? Please explain this entire sentence

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:44 pm Why did you think MP Quin was either or?

dunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:47 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:44 pm Why did you think MP Quin was either or?

Because of the voting patterns and total disconnect from each other. When one mafia is totally sinking, the others sink him down, not dance ballet around him. Quin and MP aren't beginners in this, they wouldn't condemn themselves so openly and easily.