Page 30 of 84

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 4:51 pm
by Long Con
Long Con wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Bullzeye wrote:
Dom wrote:Bass-- do you have any idea why MP made contradictory statements and didn't answer my questions? Any explanation would be nice.
Why would he have an explanation?
Actually, this reminds me of when TH replaced in for Roxy in Film Directors. Dom was suspicious of Roxy, so he essentially asked TH to reread Roxy and make a case on her (himself).

Btw, Dom was bad in that game. :srsnod:
Noteworthy. LEt's remember this in the future in case it becomes relevant, since MM won't be around to remind us. :( Sorry, Marshy, I believed in you. Not 100% a dick. :noble:
Wait a sec, I just reread this and realized the situation you were talking about. It was me that asked TH to do a case on himself, not Dom. :srsnod:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 4:52 pm
by fingersplints
Were you bad then, LC? :grin:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 4:54 pm
by Long Con
fingersplints wrote:Were you bad then, LC? :grin:
Nope, I was the only Civ in the game. Well, the longest-lived, anyway. :sigh:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 4:54 pm
by Bass_the_Clever
Dom wrote:Bass-- do you have any idea why MP made contradictory statements and didn't answer my questions? Any explanation would be nice.
If I had to guess I would say real life was messing his game up.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 4:55 pm
by Marmot
Long Con wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Bullzeye wrote:
Dom wrote:Bass-- do you have any idea why MP made contradictory statements and didn't answer my questions? Any explanation would be nice.
Why would he have an explanation?
Actually, this reminds me of when TH replaced in for Roxy in Film Directors. Dom was suspicious of Roxy, so he essentially asked TH to reread Roxy and make a case on her (himself).

Btw, Dom was bad in that game. :srsnod:
Noteworthy. LEt's remember this in the future in case it becomes relevant, since MM won't be around to remind us. :( Sorry, Marshy, I believed in you. Not 100% a dick. :noble:
Wait a sec, I just reread this and realized the situation you were talking about. It was me that asked TH to do a case on himself, not Dom. :srsnod:
It was? I don't rememer yours, but I do remember Dom picking TH apart for some similar ideas. Maybe he latched onto your case then.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 4:56 pm
by Long Con
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Dom wrote:Bass-- do you have any idea why MP made contradictory statements and didn't answer my questions? Any explanation would be nice.
If I had to guess I would say real life was messing his game up.
I would tend to agree, although it doesn't make him seem more Civ to me. With so little energy for the game, defaulting to a tactic that worked so well for him as a baddie in the last game may have been what happened. He wouldn't have tried it as a baddie so soon if he had been mentally keen for Mafia, but given his condition... maybe!

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 4:58 pm
by juliets
Zombarella wrote:
Zombarella wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:I'm less convinced of MM's civness than I was earlier today. His own admission of "giving up" last night and his not-so-awesome case against TH (merely intimating that someone might have btsc with someone else is not enough in this particular set-up, and I thought the attempts to construe that possible BTSC as necessarily baddie based on "Day 1 stuff" was not particularly convincing) have me questioning my earlier judgement of MM....but honestly, it's still not enough that I'm ready to vote for him.
Of course, at this point it doesn't really matter, since he seems to be as good as lynches anyway. I wish some more viable candidates would have come up so that I wouldn't feel as though I'm wasting my vote regardless of what I do. :sigh:
This post. You earlier said you think I'm not bad, but now are waffling based on things that happened before you said you think I'm not bad. That is why I don't understand. And you are accusing juliets of "going with the masses", even though she was one of the few to vote me Day 1, but whatever.

Also, the enlarged part of that post reminds me an awful lot of a certain instance in Death Note. I'm sure Zomba knows what I'm talking about.
Zomba, just want to point this post out to you while you're here. :D
I saw it before and I'm trying to figure out what you mean.
Oh - you mean that Juliets is looking for a bandwagon rather than making a case. Good point. I would consider voting for her. But for now, I'm just going to hold my vote.
No, No, NO I was not looking for a bandwagon but I was looking for a lot of people to say they were going to vote MM because I didn't want to be part of a small number in case he was the millionaire. The millionaire gets points for every vote he gets that doesn't lynch him. When I got to the thread this morning I saw that people were voting MM instead of just indicating they would vote him so I knew it was safe to join in. Even Canuck said she didn't suspect me for voting with the masses. Have you been reading the thread?

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 4:58 pm
by Marmot
Canucklehead wrote:
rabbit8 wrote:At least tell us who you planned to vote for. Before the post goes up. :suspish:
Is this directed at me?
I don't know who I was going to vote for....which is why I hadn't voted yet. I guess I may have ended up going with juliets? Or maybe a warning vote for a low poster? That's something I often do when I'm at a loss. I really dunno who it would have been, probably someone silly based on a last minute panic.
It wouldn't have been MM, though, just to piss him off. :p
It doesn't really matter much to me; I'll be dead here soon anyway.

It's the rest of the players you have to answer to after that. :grin:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 4:59 pm
by juliets
Zombarella wrote:
Zombarella wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:I'm less convinced of MM's civness than I was earlier today. His own admission of "giving up" last night and his not-so-awesome case against TH (merely intimating that someone might have btsc with someone else is not enough in this particular set-up, and I thought the attempts to construe that possible BTSC as necessarily baddie based on "Day 1 stuff" was not particularly convincing) have me questioning my earlier judgement of MM....but honestly, it's still not enough that I'm ready to vote for him.
Of course, at this point it doesn't really matter, since he seems to be as good as lynches anyway. I wish some more viable candidates would have come up so that I wouldn't feel as though I'm wasting my vote regardless of what I do. :sigh:
This post. You earlier said you think I'm not bad, but now are waffling based on things that happened before you said you think I'm not bad. That is why I don't understand. And you are accusing juliets of "going with the masses", even though she was one of the few to vote me Day 1, but whatever.

Also, the enlarged part of that post reminds me an awful lot of a certain instance in Death Note. I'm sure Zomba knows what I'm talking about.
Zomba, just want to point this post out to you while you're here. :D
I saw it before and I'm trying to figure out what you mean.
Oh - you mean that Juliets is looking for a bandwagon rather than making a case. Good point. I would consider voting for her. But for now, I'm just going to hold my vote.
No, No, NO I was not looking for a bandwagon but I was looking for a lot of people to say they were going to vote MM because I didn't want to be part of a small number in case he was the millionaire. The millionaire gets points for every vote he gets that doesn't lynch him. When I got to the thread this morning I saw that people were voting MM instead of just indicating they would vote him so I knew it was safe to join in. Even Canuck said she didn't suspect me for voting with the masses. Have you been reading the thread?

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 4:59 pm
by Marmot
juliets wrote:
Zombarella wrote:
Zombarella wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:I'm less convinced of MM's civness than I was earlier today. His own admission of "giving up" last night and his not-so-awesome case against TH (merely intimating that someone might have btsc with someone else is not enough in this particular set-up, and I thought the attempts to construe that possible BTSC as necessarily baddie based on "Day 1 stuff" was not particularly convincing) have me questioning my earlier judgement of MM....but honestly, it's still not enough that I'm ready to vote for him.
Of course, at this point it doesn't really matter, since he seems to be as good as lynches anyway. I wish some more viable candidates would have come up so that I wouldn't feel as though I'm wasting my vote regardless of what I do. :sigh:
This post. You earlier said you think I'm not bad, but now are waffling based on things that happened before you said you think I'm not bad. That is why I don't understand. And you are accusing juliets of "going with the masses", even though she was one of the few to vote me Day 1, but whatever.

Also, the enlarged part of that post reminds me an awful lot of a certain instance in Death Note. I'm sure Zomba knows what I'm talking about.
Zomba, just want to point this post out to you while you're here. :D
I saw it before and I'm trying to figure out what you mean.
Oh - you mean that Juliets is looking for a bandwagon rather than making a case. Good point. I would consider voting for her. But for now, I'm just going to hold my vote.
No, No, NO I was not looking for a bandwagon but I was looking for a lot of people to say they were going to vote MM because I didn't want to be part of a small number in case he was the millionaire. The millionaire gets points for every vote he gets that doesn't lynch him. When I got to the thread this morning I saw that people were voting MM instead of just indicating they would vote him so I knew it was safe to join in. Even Canuck said she didn't suspect me for voting with the masses. Have you been reading the thread?
Hey juliets, what are these points you speak of? :ponder:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:01 pm
by Long Con
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Bullzeye wrote:
Dom wrote:Bass-- do you have any idea why MP made contradictory statements and didn't answer my questions? Any explanation would be nice.
Why would he have an explanation?
Actually, this reminds me of when TH replaced in for Roxy in Film Directors. Dom was suspicious of Roxy, so he essentially asked TH to reread Roxy and make a case on her (himself).

Btw, Dom was bad in that game. :srsnod:
Noteworthy. LEt's remember this in the future in case it becomes relevant, since MM won't be around to remind us. :( Sorry, Marshy, I believed in you. Not 100% a dick. :noble:
Wait a sec, I just reread this and realized the situation you were talking about. It was me that asked TH to do a case on himself, not Dom. :srsnod:
It was? I don't rememer yours, but I do remember Dom picking TH apart for some similar ideas. Maybe he latched onto your case then.
Here is the post I'm talking about.
Long Con in Film Director's Mafia wrote:TH, we have not done well this game. We've only lynched one baddie, and it's Day 9. How many are left, like 8 or 9 players? Surely the baddies have accidentally killed each other at some point, but it's really hard to know. A lot of the prevailing suspicions have ended up wrong, except for Metalmarsh. Canuck defended Metalmarsh quite a bit, so take that however you like. We need to know what the baddies have been doing to be at this point in the game in such a good position.

Metalmarsh was Uwe Boll, who locks the thread. He did do a couple of times, including during his own lynch when he was up 5 votes to 3 over DF.

Roxy was not above suspicion, so neither are you... she was a big suspect, actually.

TH, why don't you play devil's advocate for us, and go through Roxy's posts to make a case that she was a baddie? :eye: I think it's the best way for you to join the game. Make a good case, and then, if you can, make a better case for someone else. Maybe me, if you like.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:04 pm
by juliets
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
juliets wrote:
Zombarella wrote:
Zombarella wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:I'm less convinced of MM's civness than I was earlier today. His own admission of "giving up" last night and his not-so-awesome case against TH (merely intimating that someone might have btsc with someone else is not enough in this particular set-up, and I thought the attempts to construe that possible BTSC as necessarily baddie based on "Day 1 stuff" was not particularly convincing) have me questioning my earlier judgement of MM....but honestly, it's still not enough that I'm ready to vote for him.
Of course, at this point it doesn't really matter, since he seems to be as good as lynches anyway. I wish some more viable candidates would have come up so that I wouldn't feel as though I'm wasting my vote regardless of what I do. :sigh:
This post. You earlier said you think I'm not bad, but now are waffling based on things that happened before you said you think I'm not bad. That is why I don't understand. And you are accusing juliets of "going with the masses", even though she was one of the few to vote me Day 1, but whatever.

Also, the enlarged part of that post reminds me an awful lot of a certain instance in Death Note. I'm sure Zomba knows what I'm talking about.
Zomba, just want to point this post out to you while you're here. :D
I saw it before and I'm trying to figure out what you mean.
Oh - you mean that Juliets is looking for a bandwagon rather than making a case. Good point. I would consider voting for her. But for now, I'm just going to hold my vote.
No, No, NO I was not looking for a bandwagon but I was looking for a lot of people to say they were going to vote MM because I didn't want to be part of a small number in case he was the millionaire. The millionaire gets points for every vote he gets that doesn't lynch him. When I got to the thread this morning I saw that people were voting MM instead of just indicating they would vote him so I knew it was safe to join in. Even Canuck said she didn't suspect me for voting with the masses. Have you been reading the thread?
Hey juliets, what are these points you speak of? :ponder:
That's how we did it with Mr. Pop - he got points for votes. I'm assuming the same here since it is a Mr Pop role, though Mr. Pop got some extra points besides just votes.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:07 pm
by juliets
I should explain that Mr. Pop was a role in a BR/LC one of their recruitment games that was a brilliant role and played to the hilt by aapje. I will never forget that role. I had never seen a role that got stuff for getting votes before.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:08 pm
by Marmot
Long Con wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Bullzeye wrote:
Dom wrote:Bass-- do you have any idea why MP made contradictory statements and didn't answer my questions? Any explanation would be nice.
Why would he have an explanation?
Actually, this reminds me of when TH replaced in for Roxy in Film Directors. Dom was suspicious of Roxy, so he essentially asked TH to reread Roxy and make a case on her (himself).

Btw, Dom was bad in that game. :srsnod:
Noteworthy. LEt's remember this in the future in case it becomes relevant, since MM won't be around to remind us. :( Sorry, Marshy, I believed in you. Not 100% a dick. :noble:
Wait a sec, I just reread this and realized the situation you were talking about. It was me that asked TH to do a case on himself, not Dom. :srsnod:
It was? I don't rememer yours, but I do remember Dom picking TH apart for some similar ideas. Maybe he latched onto your case then.
Here is the post I'm talking about.
Long Con in Film Director's Mafia wrote:TH, we have not done well this game. We've only lynched one baddie, and it's Day 9. How many are left, like 8 or 9 players? Surely the baddies have accidentally killed each other at some point, but it's really hard to know. A lot of the prevailing suspicions have ended up wrong, except for Metalmarsh. Canuck defended Metalmarsh quite a bit, so take that however you like. We need to know what the baddies have been doing to be at this point in the game in such a good position.

Metalmarsh was Uwe Boll, who locks the thread. He did do a couple of times, including during his own lynch when he was up 5 votes to 3 over DF.

Roxy was not above suspicion, so neither are you... she was a big suspect, actually.

TH, why don't you play devil's advocate for us, and go through Roxy's posts to make a case that she was a baddie? :eye: I think it's the best way for you to join the game. Make a good case, and then, if you can, make a better case for someone else. Maybe me, if you like.
Interesting, and if you look a little before that post, you'll see a similar post from Dom that occurred here.
Dom in Film Director's Mafia wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:Okay so where does that leave us :P
why do you think bass thinks you're bad?
Noteworthy I guess. Drawing comparisons I realize isn't always reliable, but taken with a grain of salt, they can be useful.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:10 pm
by Epignosis
juliets wrote:I should explain that Mr. Pop was a role in a BR/LC one of their recruitment games that was a brilliant role and played to the hilt by aapje. I will never forget that role. I had never seen a role that got stuff for getting votes before.
Sure you have. In X-Men, Bishop could kill someone if he got enough votes without getting lynched. Never happened though.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:11 pm
by Epignosis
Epignosis wrote:
juliets wrote:I should explain that Mr. Pop was a role in a BR/LC one of their recruitment games that was a brilliant role and played to the hilt by aapje. I will never forget that role. I had never seen a role that got stuff for getting votes before.
Sure you have. In X-Men, Bishop could kill someone if he got enough votes without getting lynched. Never happened though.
Ah, you said "had." Read that as "have." Ignore me. :derp:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler Polls

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:18 pm
by thellama73
WHo is still the Blond Beast of Bremen?

Poll ended at Tue Mar 24, 2015 4:15:48 pm

A Person
0
No votes

bea
0
No votes

birdwithteeth11
0
No votes

Bullzeye
0
No votes

Canucklehead
0
No votes

DFaraday
0
No votes

Dom
0
No votes

Elohcin
0
No votes

Epignosis
1
Long Con (6)
5%

fingersplints
0
No votes

Golden
0
No votes

juliets
0
No votes

LizKeen
0
No votes

Long Con
0
No votes

Metalmarsh89
15
Epignosis (4), Turnip Head (5), Golden (7), DFaraday (8), Metalmarsh89 (9), S~V~S (10), fingersplints (11), juliets (12), A Person (14), Elohcin (15), rabbit8 (16), Dom (18), Bullzeye (19), Sophie (20), DisgruntledPorcupine (21)
71%

Movingpictures07
0
No votes

rabbit8
0
No votes

ShepinWolfsClothing
0
No votes

Sophie
0
No votes

S~V~S
0
No votes

Turnip Head
2
Vompatti (13), MovingPictures07 (17)
10%

Vompatti
0
No votes

Zomberella12
0
No votes

Sterling Archer (Host/Mod/Dead/NP)
3
thellama73 (1), blindfaeth (2), Black Rock (3)
14%


Total votes : 21

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:24 pm
by thellama73
Night 1
Image
LizKeen said: "Mr. Fung, do you know if the ivory, jade and amber would be dangerous if they were in the hands of the wrong team?"
Wah Hung Fung, King of Chinatown was most gracious with his answer: "Ivory, jade, and amber are very beautiful substances, indeed, but they are entirely harmless. Have no fear."

Unfortunately, Metalmarsh89 should have probably had a little fear, because while this conversation was happening, he was being lynched in the background.

Metalmarsh89 has been lynched. He was Chief O'Toole.

"Um, maybe we better not stick around here," someone said, sheepishly.

You have 24 hours to send in your night PMs and to vote in the poll.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:25 pm
by thellama73
Also, BR 2.0, I saw your vote and it was counted. Don't worry.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:25 pm
by Marmot
RIP me. Good luck civvies.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:29 pm
by Black Rock
thellama73 wrote:Also, BR 2.0, I saw your vote and it was counted. Don't worry.
Thank you, I tried to make it big for you.

RIP MM, I knew you wouldn't kill on night 1 again. The truce stays in tact. :hugs:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:29 pm
by Turnip Head
I'm really sorry MM :( Rest in peace.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:32 pm
by Golden
I'm back.

Sorry MM. I was intending to come in and make an MM/LC case too, although I actually thought LC was the better bet - I thought he could just as easily be intending to set MM up as actually be his teammate. I put my vote on MM when I did because I did think there was a reasonable chance MM was the millionaire and I didn't want to risk that being true and him not being lynched. By the time you had enough votes that you were going to die, it became apparent from your conduct that you were civ, but it often does once people move from survival mode to just helping everyone as much as possible before they die.

FWIW, I have really enjoyed playing with you both games so far. I hope I get to play with you for longer sometime soon.

More to come - lots happened on day. I had lots of thoughts, it was very painful having to be quiet.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:33 pm
by Marmot
Golden wrote:I hope I get to play with you for longer sometime soon.
One of these days I'll make it past Day 2. XD

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:37 pm
by juliets
As I said, I'm sorry my judgement was poor. RIP MM, hopefully I'll play with you again soon.

Welcome back Golden! You've been missed. Can't wait to see what you have to say.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:38 pm
by juliets
Is anyone else having trouble with these pages loading slowly?

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:41 pm
by Golden
Well, JC, one thing I will say is I do not get the suspish of you at all and I'm kinda looking sideways at it.

I thought you have been very clear and consistent throughout. You voted MM on day one. You said you were hesitant to vote for him on day two because you didn't want to give him votes that didn't lynch him in case he was the millionaire. And then you voted him when it was clear he did get enough votes. I have to admit I have to go back and do a reread of exactly who was suspecting you on that.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:42 pm
by Long Con
Only when my own Internet is slow.

RIP MM!

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:46 pm
by Golden
Welcome back BR! Welcome DP and Bass. Sorry to see you go, Bea. I really thought you were thinking in this game so I was sad to see you go, but congrats on the promotion. I'm sorry that wolfy went but I doubt he will be back - it must have been too much reading for him. And sorry, MP, that you need a break but I know it comes to us all :bighug: if there is one thing I wished I had been in the thread for it was to support MP through his read... I was around and really wanted to be able to post and encourage you. But I couldn't.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:51 pm
by Canucklehead
Golden wrote:Well, JC, one thing I will say is I do not get the suspish of you at all and I'm kinda looking sideways at it.

I thought you have been very clear and consistent throughout. You voted MM on day one. You said you were hesitant to vote for him on day two because you didn't want to give him votes that didn't lynch him in case he was the millionaire. And then you voted him when it was clear he did get enough votes. I have to admit I have to go back and do a reread of exactly who was suspecting you on that.
I think it was only me :)

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:56 pm
by Golden
Thanks Canuck.

I am likely to be slightly vague until I do a read back today, because yesterday was one of the most exciting days of my entire life - my beloved NZ cricket team made their first ever world cup final. As the Black Caps go, so my mental health follows. I am very happy but also pretty much unable to focus on anything.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:00 pm
by Canucklehead
Golden wrote:Thanks Canuck.

I am likely to be slightly vague until I do a read back today, because yesterday was one of the most exciting days of my entire life - my beloved NZ cricket team made their first ever world cup final. As the Black Caps go, so my mental health follows. I am very happy but also pretty much unable to focus on anything.
And what a match it was!! Thrilling. Elliott was electric

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:05 pm
by Golden
Canucklehead wrote:
Golden wrote:Thanks Canuck.

I am likely to be slightly vague until I do a read back today, because yesterday was one of the most exciting days of my entire life - my beloved NZ cricket team made their first ever world cup final. As the Black Caps go, so my mental health follows. I am very happy but also pretty much unable to focus on anything.
And what a match it was!! Thrilling. Elliott was electric
Canuck! Don't tell my wife, but I think I just fell in love with you!!! You know cricket!

I have been telling everyone who will listen for the last couple of years that they need Elliott in the team. A Wellingtonian being the man of the game :) I can't even. I think I'm tearing up!

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:10 pm
by Canucklehead
Golden wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:
Golden wrote:Thanks Canuck.

I am likely to be slightly vague until I do a read back today, because yesterday was one of the most exciting days of my entire life - my beloved NZ cricket team made their first ever world cup final. As the Black Caps go, so my mental health follows. I am very happy but also pretty much unable to focus on anything.
And what a match it was!! Thrilling. Elliott was electric
Canuck! Don't tell my wife, but I think I just fell in love with you!!! You know cricket!

I have been telling everyone who will listen for the last couple of years that they need Elliott in the team. A Wellingtonian being the man of the game :) I can't even. I think I'm tearing up!
XD Don't get too excited, I'm definitely a cricket bandwagon jumper. I'm very new to the sport (this is my first world cup) and come by it second hand (the bf is the real fan), but I find it FASCINATING and am liking it more and more the more I watch and learn. :)

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:12 pm
by Golden
Well, welcome to the game! It's a good time to be coming to it, last nights game was one of the best you could ever see. Special stuff.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:15 pm
by Golden
OK, so now we need to pick another street.

I'm glad we didn't waste the Archer street opportunity (thanks LizKeen). No one was focussed on agreeing a question to ask the Chinese man, and I wasn't sure if we were going to get anything. Instead, I think we got something which sort of suggested that the celestials are as harmless as they look.

I'm gonna vote 22nd street again, since I think the police station might be a good place to get intel on the mafia.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:18 pm
by Golden
I also note LizKeens ear horns told her we should avoid an easy lynch.

I have to say, I interpreted that as being a reference to either a) SVS (based on beas point at the start of the night that the will created a target on her back) or b) Zombs (because she really did seem like an easy target). They were the people who looked like easy lynches to me.

I'm not sure how the ear horns could warn against ANY easy lynch, since you never know what the town will do the next day and who might see a lynch train against them. So my assumption is that the person giving the message (be it player or host) had someone specific in mind they were looking to protect.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:23 pm
by fingersplints
I'm sticking with Clark Street.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:25 pm
by Canucklehead
I'm sticking it out on Rudolph :srsnod:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:32 pm
by Bass_the_Clever
So I dont have the time or energy to read everything that happen before I replaced in, so if anyone could give me a good place to start and the highlights it would be very helpful.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:33 pm
by Epignosis
Michigan Avenue for me.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:38 pm
by Long Con
It starts with a Will that blindfaeth revealed, believing that it implicated the Will's writer as The Millionaire, due to there being a large sum of money involved. (Correct me with exact wording if that's not quite right). A lot of blah blah blah ensued regarding the wisdom and purpose and probable effect of revealing the Will. It ended up with BF getting a few votes, and BF revealed that Zombarella's name is on the Will. Then BF was lynched, a Civvie.

S~V~S was the first to vote BF, so she got possession of the Will. S~V~S said the Will says something more along the lines of "The holder of the Will will get [Zomba's] items when she dies".

That's how I remember that stuff without going back to see the exact quotes.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:38 pm
by Elohcin
RIP MM. I should have just voted elsewhere, I knew it. Not that it would have mattered.
thellama73 wrote:Effective immediately, Bass_the_Clever is replacing Movingpictures07, and the host is beginning to take it personally.
Don't. I think the knew participation scores are motivating players to either play or get out :) Its much better than having a lot of players who aren't participating.

I am going to go with 22nd Ave.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:38 pm
by Long Con
Epignosis wrote:Michigan Avenue for me.
I as well, to keep an eye on Epig. :eye:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:40 pm
by Golden
I don't really think llama is taking it personally.

And by the way, whoever missed bass subbing in (Canuck again?)... someone quoted llamas post saying BR was subbing in for bea the very post after, so for a while it took me a while to see where bass had subbed in to, so I don't blame you for missing it. It was actually a little visually confusing.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:52 pm
by Bass_the_Clever
voted for clark st.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:52 pm
by S~V~S
MM, if I ever say I can read you, fishslap me, K? :fishslap:

I am now a Marmot. RIP MM.

I sucked as a civ in Film, and I suck still :(

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:53 pm
by S~V~S
Went with Wabash, cause I like the word Wabash.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:55 pm
by Marmot
S~V~S wrote:MM, if I ever say I can read you, fishslap me, K? :fishslap:

I am now a Marmot. RIP MM.

I sucked as a civ in Film, and I suck still :(
:haha: Fair enough. You weren't too shabby in Film Director though.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 2]

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 7:00 pm
by rabbit8
RIP MM.