Re: STAR WARS Mafia [Day 0]
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 7:51 pm
If everyone votes I can end the poll and get the game going.
You Americans and your Thanksgivings!DharmaHelper wrote:HOST NOTE: With American Thanksgiving coming up, it is extremely likely there will be an extension/delay during that phase. For my convenience, please let me know if this will be an issue.
Well I got someone to start baddie hunting, so I guess it was successful in that sense at least.Russtifinko wrote:2) DDL, I can't decide whether it's civ-ish or a baddie move to run through all the possible ways you'd catch a baddie based on the planet mechanic before we get a chance to actually use any of the methods. Consider me slightly pinged, there.
Thursday the 26thEnrique wrote:What day is Thanksgiving? Is it this Sunday? That's the one that's always on a Sunday right?
Wow, isn't that nice Floyd,TheFloyd73 wrote:You Americans and your Thanksgivings!DharmaHelper wrote:HOST NOTE: With American Thanksgiving coming up, it is extremely likely there will be an extension/delay during that phase. For my convenience, please let me know if this will be an issue.
Epi would tell us two lynches are more in the towns interest than one, so I guess we should vote for DomDfaradayMovingPictures07 wrote:Also, I think Dom and DFaraday are on the same line, just so you know.
I get what you're saying DDL, and I appreciate your efforts to look for certain strategies (assuming these efforts are genuine, but I'll get to that in a bit), but I don't think I fully understand your logic here.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Well I got someone to start baddie hunting, so I guess it was successful in that sense at least.Russtifinko wrote:2) DDL, I can't decide whether it's civ-ish or a baddie move to run through all the possible ways you'd catch a baddie based on the planet mechanic before we get a chance to actually use any of the methods. Consider me slightly pinged, there.
Well I like to discuss tactics. Not the first game I've done that. In any case, I have no intention of using such methods as failproof evidence of anyone being mafia, while ignoring other evidence. I just want to have them in mind in case we need to use them later, or maybe help people have their own ideas on how we can use the game mechanics to find mafia.
I agree with DFaraday. But more importantly, how would we able to find a pattern? What pattern? Assuming you're right and the empire knows which planet will be destroyed (which I wouldn't be too sure that that assumption is correct) that only means, as you said, they would only have to be cautious with that particular planet. One planet. So where's the pattern we're looking for? And you seem to be tip-toeing a bit here with your reasoning. Proposing a method of finding baddies only to follow it up with "so it wouldn't be conclusive evidence" makes me wonder why bring up that potential tactic in the first place? It seems like you're just saying things like this to appear as if you're contributing. And you make it worse by excusing that this imaginary pattern could be copied for each phase, so again, what's the point? And finally, how would you, and you mention you specifically rather than town as a whole, (why?) be able to get mafiosos to play in an unorthodox way to be spotted? Or am I simply misunderstanding your reasoning here? Please help me out here. Finally, to return to the original post:Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Well I'm assuming the empire mafia knows what the planet is going to be destroyed is, so that means they wouldn't have to worry about being the last ones to vote in the other phases, but would have to worry in that specific phase where the planet explodes. I'm speculating that we could try to find that pattern. Of course there would be other players avoiding voting last, so it wouldn't be a conclusive evidence.DFaraday wrote:I'm sure there would be plenty of civs as well as baddies who would avoid voting rather than risk being the last vote, so I'm not sure how that would make a player suspicious. Placing their own interests ahead of the town, sure, but not baddie per se.
Of course, now that I've said that, they could also worry about it in every single phase just to attempt to mask the pattrn. Then again, if I get mafiosos to play in a non-optimal way just to avoid being found, that's a profit.
I love metagaming.
I'm not a fan of players hiding behind their meta especially in response to slight pings. Consider me slightly pinged as well.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Not the first game I've done that.
I second that. It's as if George Lucas has edited a version of Star Wars that strays from the original theatrical cut even further. :PMovingPictures07 wrote:Nice host post, DH.
You're taking this Death Star enthusiasm to an uncomfortable extreme, Matt. Are you saying everyone who voted for the Death Star should be ignored when they appear suspicious?Matt F wrote:Why are we being mean to Dragon? He voted Death Star
a2thezebra wrote:I second that. It's as if George Lucas has edited a version of Star Wars that strays from the original theatrical cut even further. :PMovingPictures07 wrote:Nice host post, DH.
They still are actually.MovingPictures07 wrote:Also, I think Dom and DFaraday are on the same line, just so you know.
I think I know what you're talking about, there's one that does the same for me - alphabetizes partially, goofs the rest for unclear reasons.DharmaHelper wrote: I will "Fully alphabetize" the next one. I ran the players list through an online alphabetizer and it goofed I guess so whatever you guys know who is who.
I think its treating lowercase letters as lower priority. Dumb.Ricochet wrote:I think I know what you're talking about, there's one that does the same for me - alphabetizes partially, goofs the rest for unclear reasons.DharmaHelper wrote: I will "Fully alphabetize" the next one. I ran the players list through an online alphabetizer and it goofed I guess so whatever you guys know who is who.
If it's easier for you, you can just alphabetize the letter of my name instead of my full name.DharmaHelper wrote: I will "Fully alphabetize" the next one. I ran the players list through an online alphabetizer and it goofed I guess so whatever you guys know who is who.
Uncomfortable extreme? C'mon, I was just havin' a little fun Zeebs.a2thezebra wrote:You're taking this Death Star enthusiasm to an uncomfortable extreme, Matt. Are you saying everyone who voted for the Death Star should be ignored when they appear suspicious?Matt F wrote:Why are we being mean to Dragon? He voted Death Star
89aaehlmmrst?Metalmarsh89 wrote:If it's easier for you, you can just alphabetize the letter of my name instead of my full name.DharmaHelper wrote: I will "Fully alphabetize" the next one. I ran the players list through an online alphabetizer and it goofed I guess so whatever you guys know who is who.
That's the one!Golden wrote:89aaehlmmrst?Metalmarsh89 wrote:If it's easier for you, you can just alphabetize the letter of my name instead of my full name.DharmaHelper wrote: I will "Fully alphabetize" the next one. I ran the players list through an online alphabetizer and it goofed I guess so whatever you guys know who is who.
a2thezebra wrote:I get what you're saying DDL, and I appreciate your efforts to look for certain strategies (assuming these efforts are genuine, but I'll get to that in a bit), but I don't think I fully understand your logic here.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Well I got someone to start baddie hunting, so I guess it was successful in that sense at least.Russtifinko wrote:2) DDL, I can't decide whether it's civ-ish or a baddie move to run through all the possible ways you'd catch a baddie based on the planet mechanic before we get a chance to actually use any of the methods. Consider me slightly pinged, there.
Well I like to discuss tactics. Not the first game I've done that. In any case, I have no intention of using such methods as failproof evidence of anyone being mafia, while ignoring other evidence. I just want to have them in mind in case we need to use them later, or maybe help people have their own ideas on how we can use the game mechanics to find mafia.
I agree with DFaraday. But more importantly, how would we able to find a pattern? What pattern? Assuming you're right and the empire knows which planet will be destroyed (which I wouldn't be too sure that that assumption is correct) that only means, as you said, they would only have to be cautious with that particular planet. One planet. So where's the pattern we're looking for? And you seem to be tip-toeing a bit here with your reasoning. Proposing a method of finding baddies only to follow it up with "so it wouldn't be conclusive evidence" makes me wonder why bring up that potential tactic in the first place? It seems like you're just saying things like this to appear as if you're contributing. And you make it worse by excusing that this imaginary pattern could be copied for each phase, so again, what's the point? And finally, how would you, and you mention you specifically rather than town as a whole, (why?) be able to get mafiosos to play in an unorthodox way to be spotted? Or am I simply misunderstanding your reasoning here? Please help me out here. Finally, to return to the original post:Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Well I'm assuming the empire mafia knows what the planet is going to be destroyed is, so that means they wouldn't have to worry about being the last ones to vote in the other phases, but would have to worry in that specific phase where the planet explodes. I'm speculating that we could try to find that pattern. Of course there would be other players avoiding voting last, so it wouldn't be a conclusive evidence.DFaraday wrote:I'm sure there would be plenty of civs as well as baddies who would avoid voting rather than risk being the last vote, so I'm not sure how that would make a player suspicious. Placing their own interests ahead of the town, sure, but not baddie per se.
Of course, now that I've said that, they could also worry about it in every single phase just to attempt to mask the pattrn. Then again, if I get mafiosos to play in a non-optimal way just to avoid being found, that's a profit.
I love metagaming.
I'm not a fan of players hiding behind their meta especially in response to slight pings. Consider me slightly pinged as well.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Not the first game I've done that.