Page 45 of 169

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:26 pm
by Dom
ColinIsCool wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:16 pm
juliets wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:11 pm
ColinIsCool wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:05 pm juliets, re: that post (the tag feature is finnicky on mobile) — I don’t really remember. If I was “more active” it couldn’t have been by much at all, I’ve been pretty low-key in games for a long time now.
All I can attest to is Nanook perceived you were on him like a dog with a bone. I'm not saying that's evidence that your game there was different than here, to me it just says Nanook's feeling here is genuine, whether it's true or not. I hope that makes sense.
Yeah I get you.

FWIW of those voting for me, NANOOK’s beef feels most earnest. Turbup and Dom less so.

Although I will concede that Dom is right that me quoting myself is not evidence of anything, and I didn’t post it as such.
....what's your point in posting it?
ColinIsCool wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:19 pm
Dom wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:14 pm Colin is bad because he never really caught up but is posting like he did.
Dom is bad because he got a bad rolecard. See, I can do this too!
This... is... not comparable to what I said.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:28 pm
by ColinIsCool
Dom wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:26 pm
ColinIsCool wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:16 pm
juliets wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:11 pm
ColinIsCool wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:05 pm juliets, re: that post (the tag feature is finnicky on mobile) — I don’t really remember. If I was “more active” it couldn’t have been by much at all, I’ve been pretty low-key in games for a long time now.
All I can attest to is Nanook perceived you were on him like a dog with a bone. I'm not saying that's evidence that your game there was different than here, to me it just says Nanook's feeling here is genuine, whether it's true or not. I hope that makes sense.
Yeah I get you.

FWIW of those voting for me, NANOOK’s beef feels most earnest. Turbup and Dom less so.

Although I will concede that Dom is right that me quoting myself is not evidence of anything, and I didn’t post it as such.
....what's your point in posting it?
ColinIsCool wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:19 pm
Dom wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:14 pm Colin is bad because he never really caught up but is posting like he did.
Dom is bad because he got a bad rolecard. See, I can do this too!
This... is... not comparable to what I said.
1) Because I post it a lot when I’m town and it makes me chuckle to myself

2) Yes it is

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:29 pm
by MacDougall
Sorry it's the weekend and weekend is family time so I'm not gonna post much on the weekend. Weekend. Someone wanna give me cliffs?

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:30 pm
by ColinIsCool
Tbh I’m getting heated by the notion that I didn’t read the thread when I spent a few hours doing so, so y’all can do whatever you want, I’ll check the thread later. Mislynch me and my ghost will make fun of you accordingly

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:30 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
Sloonei wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:22 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:16 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:13 pm I could lynch Mac for the crime of being irrelevant.
I'll expand. His involvement in this game has been significant in one arena to my memory -- the Jacktella combat. And his part in that combat was to parrot Jack (both against nutella and in favor of nutella) such that he had no personal accountability for nutella's eventual flip. He left all of it on Jack's lap.

Otherwise, irrelevance.
Hey that’s the thing I said too.

Jay town
Image

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:31 pm
by Dom
ColinIsCool wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:24 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:22 pm
ColinIsCool wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:19 pm
Dom wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:14 pm Colin is bad because he never really caught up but is posting like he did.
Dom is bad because he got a bad rolecard. See, I can do this too!
Whatever you may think of it, what Dom said there is a concrete accusation. Your mockery is not.
It’s an accusation without any merit or evidence, as is mine. I’ll respond to specific questions or accusations based on things I’ve posted but if people are just going to say “you’re bad cause you are” then, God, please, lynch me today.
...It's not without evidence.

You posted you'd catch up. You did so for like maybe a few pages and then disappeared again. You came back with full knowledge of the game, but didn't show your work.
I was wondering if you'd drop by at the end of D1 to make a eerily informed vote. I was robbed of this.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:31 pm
by Dom
...Mac's timing is IMPECCABLE, huh?

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:31 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
Master Radishes wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:25 pmI'm not allowed to be uncertain how to read another player? On D1?

Sloonei's style I find to be closed off. I don't have a good handle on what to make of him. So sue me.
Uncertainty itself is not a crime, but I have to believe that it is authentic.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:32 pm
by Dom
ColinIsCool wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:30 pm Tbh I’m getting heated by the notion that I didn’t read the thread when I spent a few hours doing so, so y’all can do whatever you want, I’ll check the thread later. Mislynch me and my ghost will make fun of you accordingly
who was flipping out over appeals to emotion, agian?

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:32 pm
by Sloonei
MacDougall wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:29 pm Sorry it's the weekend and weekend is family time so I'm not gonna post much on the weekend. Weekend. Someone wanna give me cliffs?
you’re bad

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:32 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
MacDougall wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:29 pm Sorry it's the weekend and weekend is family time so I'm not gonna post much on the weekend. Weekend. Someone wanna give me cliffs?
you're gonna die

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:32 pm
by Master Radishes
ColinIsCool wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:07 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:03 pm Of the present multi-vote wagons (Colin, Mac, Radish) I think Radish is the best lynch.
I am inclined to agree with this. Tonally I do feel like Radishes is playing a similar game to Inception. Also, question for him or for the thread, but when he ISO’d a bunch of people nobody else was talking about, why did he pick those people? Was it prompted?
They were the wagon voters on me last round, ergo potential scum slots.

If I sound similar to Inception, are you saying I'm 3P again?

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:34 pm
by Sloonei
[mention]Master Radishes[/mention] what do you mean when you say that my style is “closed off”? I make a deliberate effort to foster an open and communicative thread environment.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:34 pm
by MacDougall
I see Juliets asked me a thing. I don't know why it's weird tbh. Jack was (is) scummy but in multiball scum are scum hunting so his read is still worth taking stock. Like why would I ignore his read in that context because of an earlier ping? It's day 1 who cares. It's about throwing shit at a wall.

I won't catch up til tomorrow so if there's anything else tag me.

Linki: Oh. What's all this then.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:35 pm
by MacDougall
Dom wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:31 pm ...Mac's timing is IMPECCABLE, huh?
I literally just woke up. I'm in bed in my underpants.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:35 pm
by MacDougall
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:32 pm
MacDougall wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:29 pm Sorry it's the weekend and weekend is family time so I'm not gonna post much on the weekend. Weekend. Someone wanna give me cliffs?
you're gonna die
Why?

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:36 pm
by Dom
Because you are bad.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:37 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
MacDougall wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:35 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:32 pm
MacDougall wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:29 pm Sorry it's the weekend and weekend is family time so I'm not gonna post much on the weekend. Weekend. Someone wanna give me cliffs?
you're gonna die
Why?
Because your biggest role in this game so far has been to cuddle tenderly with Jackofhearts2005.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:37 pm
by MacDougall
Sloonei wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:32 pm
MacDougall wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:29 pm Sorry it's the weekend and weekend is family time so I'm not gonna post much on the weekend. Weekend. Someone wanna give me cliffs?
you’re bad
I'm gonna be pretty sad if I get lynched. I'd appreciate at least being given some idea of why I'm a suspect. Is it because I'm not posting much?

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:38 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
Sloonei wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:32 pm
MacDougall wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:29 pm Sorry it's the weekend and weekend is family time so I'm not gonna post much on the weekend. Weekend. Someone wanna give me cliffs?
you’re bad
Yet you’re comfortable voting with him

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:38 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
Wait you’re sloonei not jay lmao

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:38 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
Oh but it holds true for you too

Jfc you really are the same person

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:39 pm
by Master Radishes
Sloonei wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:34 pm @Master Radishes what do you mean when you say that my style is “closed off”? I make a deliberate effort to foster an open and communicative thread environment.
It's late here and I'm probably going to articulate this poorly, but,

Your style of asking so many questions means I never know what you're thinking. Your posts tend to be short, meaning there's less to read into them. I find the tone of your posts...I dunno, placid. Stuff like that, in some combination.

I'm sure I'll 'get you' eventually.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:39 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
Calling my Mac vote

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:40 pm
by Dom
Mac's vote is... unexpected and transparently baddie.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:40 pm
by MacDougall
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:37 pm
MacDougall wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:35 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:32 pm
MacDougall wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:29 pm Sorry it's the weekend and weekend is family time so I'm not gonna post much on the weekend. Weekend. Someone wanna give me cliffs?
you're gonna die
Why?
Because your biggest role in this game so far has been to cuddle tenderly with Jackofhearts2005.
That's a pretty shitty reason. Good luck if after this many pages we're lynching Mac based on not being productive. Things are different for me now. I can't dedicate hours per day to Mafia. If it takes mislynches to establish to my meta that low production doesn't equal scum so be it.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:40 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:38 pm Oh but it holds true for you too

Jfc you really are the same person
Mac just voted moments ago. I don't really care about that logic anyway -- it is too restrictive.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:41 pm
by Dom
[VOTE: Mac] aubergine

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:41 pm
by MacDougall
Dom wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:40 pm Mac's vote is... unexpected and transparently baddie.
I'm not gonna stick around so I'm voting where it's most likely to be self preservation.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:41 pm
by Sloonei
MacDougall wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:37 pm
Sloonei wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:32 pm
MacDougall wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:29 pm Sorry it's the weekend and weekend is family time so I'm not gonna post much on the weekend. Weekend. Someone wanna give me cliffs?
you’re bad
I'm gonna be pretty sad if I get lynched. I'd appreciate at least being given some idea of why I'm a suspect. Is it because I'm not posting much?
I don’t think lack of activity is alignment indicative for you.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:41 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
MacDougall wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:40 pm That's a pretty shitty reason. Good luck if after this many pages we're lynching Mac based on not being productive. Things are different for me now. I can't dedicate hours per day to Mafia. If it takes mislynches to establish to my meta that low production doesn't equal scum so be it.
That's fine. They're different for me too. I didn't say "not being productive" though.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:41 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:40 pm
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:38 pm Oh but it holds true for you too

Jfc you really are the same person
Mac just voted moments ago. I don't really care about that logic anyway -- it is too restrictive.
Fair nuff

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:42 pm
by MacDougall
Yeah okay. Enjoy your Mac free paradise Dom. Typical shit.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:42 pm
by MacDougall
Oh look I'm being railroaded by Dom and Nanook. I'm in Mafia heaven.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 1]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:42 pm
by Dom
MacDougall wrote: Wed Feb 26, 2020 10:14 pm
juliets wrote: Wed Feb 26, 2020 10:14 pm I'm going to look at Master Radish next and then nutella.
Any reason for the order here considering Nutella is present and Radishes is not?
This is Mac's only post mentioning Radishes.
He is voting Radish.

When he came in, it was 2 on Mac and 3 on Radish.

He voted to make it 4 on radish.

.... why? Just to protect himself? Why Radish? Colin was right there too.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:43 pm
by Dom
MacDougall wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:42 pm Yeah okay. Enjoy your Mac free paradise Dom. Typical shit.
What the fuck is this?

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 1]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:44 pm
by MacDougall
Dom wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:42 pm
MacDougall wrote: Wed Feb 26, 2020 10:14 pm
juliets wrote: Wed Feb 26, 2020 10:14 pm I'm going to look at Master Radish next and then nutella.
Any reason for the order here considering Nutella is present and Radishes is not?
This is Mac's only post mentioning Radishes.
He is voting Radish.

When he came in, it was 2 on Mac and 3 on Radish.

He voted to make it 4 on radish.

.... why? Just to protect himself? Why Radish? Colin was right there too.
I didn't have the vote numbers because I hadn't cast my vote yet. It's impossible for me to do anything right if you are going to attack me in this manner.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:44 pm
by MacDougall
Dom wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:43 pm
MacDougall wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:42 pm Yeah okay. Enjoy your Mac free paradise Dom. Typical shit.
What the fuck is this?
You know exactly what this is.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:45 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
I mean tbf radish is the logical self prez vote yeah? Been pressure on him since yesterday and two Colin voters are saying they’d vote mac (I think you were a Colin voter?)

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:45 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
You guys know you can view the poll without voting right

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:45 pm
by MacDougall
I'm going to ignore you. I don't need this negative bs.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:46 pm
by MacDougall
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:45 pm You guys know you can view the poll without voting right
I probably would have got told I was scum by Dom for that too.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:46 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
Ok time to hibernate again

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:48 pm
by MacDougall
[mention]Jackofhearts2005[/mention], [mention]sig[/mention] why are you voting for me?

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:57 pm
by MacDougall
Oh now nobody wants to talk. Funny that.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:58 pm
by TonyStarkPrime
ColinIsCool wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 6:59 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 6:58 pm
ColinIsCool wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 6:56 pm Still think Tony is bad tbh. One of you freaks that’s always asking for more ISOs to do, go check him out
Any beefs beyond the off-wagon vote?
His exchange with you. I had the same thought about his reads list, wondering where those names came from.
I definitely called out the town ones as they went by and think I had said something about each of the scum ones

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 8:02 pm
by Sloonei
I mentioned earlier that there were a few moments that made me question juliets. Here they are:
Spoiler: show
juliets wrote: Tue Feb 25, 2020 7:43 pm
Sloonei wrote: Tue Feb 25, 2020 7:39 pm
Master Radishes wrote: Tue Feb 25, 2020 6:02 pm
S~V~S wrote: Tue Feb 25, 2020 5:56 pm LOL, no but I love our Turnip, he's one of my faves so that would put you in good company. But alas, you are kind of a grey radish so far.

You have not made much of an impression on me either way, you have not said much if anything on topic, but this post tells me you certainly are aggressive, and I like that.

So tell me, now that you are posting on topic, what about my posts make you think I'm bad?

Linki @Sloonei i, good to know. It felt to me like youwere using him to appear like standard Sloonei, but it's been a while for me, and it's only Zero.
Okay, one more serious-sorta post then I'm going to bed.

Your posts sound like they could have been written by a baddie. E.g. over-explaining thoughts, suggesting what scum are going to try to do as a result of mechanics x, trying to list nearly everyone (even those that haven't checked in)...all traits I see scum do/do myself when scum.

So you go in my pink pile. It's too early to have proper red reads but your posts have, twice now, pinged me.
This is the most significant post in Radish’s ISO and it strikes me as the kind of opportunistic Day 0/1 suspicion that mafia could latch onto. Granted, everyone is new to Radishes here so it’s understandable that he’d lack strong reads early on (it’s not even Day 1 yet), but I don’t see him being much of an assertive presence in here so far. I’d think he’d want to lay the ground work to produce reads, at least.
Sloonei, I don't agree with him about S~V~S but if this is not laying the ground work to produce reads what is? I don't understand what you are expecting from him. Can you explain it a little more?
juliets wrote: Tue Feb 25, 2020 7:51 pm
Sloonei wrote: Tue Feb 25, 2020 7:46 pm
juliets wrote: Tue Feb 25, 2020 7:43 pm Sloonei, I don't agree with him about S~V~S but if this is not laying the ground work to produce reads what is? I don't understand what you are expecting from him. Can you explain it a little more?
I’m saying this is the extent of his reads, and it’s not very inspiring.
Ok. Thanks for the clarification. I don't agree that it's necessary for everyone to have a lot of reads this early but I understand your point.
juliets wrote: Tue Feb 25, 2020 8:36 pm
Sloonei wrote: Tue Feb 25, 2020 8:10 pm
juliets wrote: Tue Feb 25, 2020 7:51 pm Ok. Thanks for the clarification. I don't agree that it's necessary for everyone to have a lot of reads this early but I understand your point.
I certainly would not say that that's the case either. My point is that I have no reason to read Radishes as town. I picked out the most substantial post I could find in his ISO, and there was nothing in it that would be impossible for an evil radish to say or do.
Oh ok, I misinterpreted what you said. Thanks for clarifying, makes sense to me.
First up is this exchange about my early read on Radishes, in which juliets misinterpreted/misrepresented the nature of my read twice. It took us three tries to get on the same page, and that's not something I'm used to experiencing with juliets. I'm not necessarily saying we always see eye to eye, but her first two cracks at my read are both off the mark in a direction that I would not expect from her. The next occurrence was somewhat similar, though not as jarring.
This second one would probably not have registered at all were it not for the similarities to the first episode, likewise the first one probably would not seem so glaring if it was not repeated again later:
juliets wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2020 10:28 pm @Sloonei you mentioned you had mislynched Colin in the past for similar behavior (I think that's what you said). Can you expound on that at all?
I had not said this at the time, though I had said something in the area (and since this question I've dug my heels in a bit more on Colin, so I'm not sure I'd even object to this suggestion). But this marks a second instance in which juliets extrapolated something from my posts that was not there. At this stage, I had mentioned (once, maybe twice) my track record of mislynching Colin as a caution to those who were beginning to suspect him. I was making an effort to refrain from linking his present behavior to past games because I had not looked at his activity in this game closely, so it would have been bogus of me to make any claims like that here. It was noticeable, then, when juliets asked me to explain a read which I'd be consciously avoiding.

Another point I noticed when I was digging for these posts:
Spoiler: show
juliets wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2020 5:59 pm Ok I reviewed Sloonei's post about Master Radishes' "tell me who to ISO" post and JJJ's case post. I started writing this big response but halfway through it occurred to me that I'm really not going to change anyone's mind about MR and I seem to be an outlier in terms of thinking he is town. I look at a post of his and see one thing and others look at it and see something entirely different. So the problem seems to be me.

It has started to remind me of the way I viewed Elephant in Inception. Most of my little surface team came to think he was bad and I was adamant that he was town. I couldn't have been any more sure and thought I knew his role. I ended up dying on that hill because he eventually got lynched and sure enough he was bad.

So maybe that's happening here. I look at MR's comments about Sloonei and understand where he's coming from since he doesn't know Sloonei's meta topped off by the fact Sloonei hasn't been himself because he's sick. JJJ who I respect and am reading town sees his comments about Sloonei and labels them "everywhere and nowhere". That's just one example of what is happening.

So I'll leave it at this: I still don't see MR as bad. I've looked at the points Sloonei and JJJ have made and don't see the same thing they are seeing (I do understand that saying "tell me who to ISO" looks bad but I've done that when I'm too busy and time is short). I'm moving on to spend time on others that I have queasy feelings about so I can hopefully develop some hard mafia reads.
juliets struggles to give a read on Radishes. She explains how she's gone through the process of reading the cases against him, and then makes the point of comparing this situation to a past game where she misread a scum player (Elephant in Inception) as town for the entire game, indicating that she is the problem herself, which would also seem to indicate a commitment of sorts to a negative read on Radishes here and now. But she ends with a town read on him, and casts further doubt about one of my central points against him. I find this progression mildly suspicious, and I also could see it as a potential teammate partnership in the event that one or the other of these two flips bad.

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 8:03 pm
by MacDougall
TonyStarkPrime wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:58 pm
ColinIsCool wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 6:59 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 6:58 pm
ColinIsCool wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 6:56 pm Still think Tony is bad tbh. One of you freaks that’s always asking for more ISOs to do, go check him out
Any beefs beyond the off-wagon vote?
His exchange with you. I had the same thought about his reads list, wondering where those names came from.
I definitely called out the town ones as they went by and think I had said something about each of the scum ones
I don't even understand this

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 8:04 pm
by Sloonei
MacDougall wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:48 pm Jackofhearts2005, sig why are you voting for me?
sig can't post
feel free to respond to his case though

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 2]

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 8:15 pm
by MacDougall
Sloonei wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 8:04 pm
MacDougall wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:48 pm Jackofhearts2005, sig why are you voting for me?
sig can't post
feel free to respond to his case though
Ok thank you.

[mention]sig[/mention] it's true that I profile likely so I can see why you'd think that. Even if you weren't suspecting me I would probably silence you if I had that role because it feels like tradition for me to use irritating roles on you. But unfortunately your logic beyond it being on point for meta doesn't hold up. I didn't read a single post during the night. I didn't even know you were suspecting me during the previous phase until I just read your post when Sloonei linked it, or at least I don't remember it. And my content/tone isn't a scum indicative thing for me.

Be mindful of the fact that I think there are quite a few people who would silence you night 1 who aren't me also. I'm sorry but you're barking up the wrong tree. I think you should probably apply the same logic when considering others though.