Having been reading a lot, everytime Sloonei says something like, "I am not engaged with the thread" when he misstates the facts, I want to vote for him. He is the second top poster (tied with me so maybe now third), and he is always coming up with theories.
I call BS on "I am not engaged". It is beginning to feel like an easy excuse to slide out of misrepresentation of the facts.
Two weeks ago:
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Mar 26, 2018 1:15 am
I've been less engaged with this game since the merge happened for a handful of RL reasons. I'll come back to it soon, but I've also been feeling a bit complacent since that one day I was in Pikachu. we still have lost more mafia than civilians in this game.
This is from his last post, some 200 posts later
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 09, 2018 12:52 am
It is understandable that this thread has gone quiet. I know I'm guilty of feeling complacent given our numbers, and I'm probably not the only one. We've also just got a handful of players (again, myself included) who wre going through some busy times and can't be here a ton. We're still in good shape, but we're gonna have a hard time winning this game if we don't figure out how to put the last few pieces in place.
He is pretty much saying the same thing. I gotta say I have not trusted him since I first read Cerberus, and I still don't. I am not feeling complacent, I feel like I am trying to talk to a wall at times when it comes to Sloonei. He claims to not be engaged, but whenever someone proposes something contrary to his mindset, he pushes back against it.
It almost feels like he's saying, "It's OK to be complacent, don't pay attention"
I have gotten to the point where every opinion he expresses, I *automatically* find myself questioning it. This makes me realize I don't trust him one brass cent.