I yell about Puddy all Day 1, get ignored, and now I have no idea why he's getting landslided. I don't like it. I'll be here shortly.
If you voted for Puddy I want a real, substantial explanation.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:45 pm
by Nicol Bolas
Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:41 pm
I yell about Puddy all Day 1, get ignored, and now I have no idea why he's getting landslided. I don't like it. I'll be here shortly.
If you voted for Puddy I want a real, substantial explanation.
It's because we're all mafia taking him down as an easy target.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:55 pm
by Julinook
I really hate the present trend.
Day 1 -- Jerry yells about Puddy, it isn't acknowledged.
Day 2 -- Puddy in line for easy lynch (yes, it's easy), Jerry yells about Peterman, it is hardly acknowledged.
What's the deal? I've been out all night with Marla, and I tell you what I think she might be ready soon.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:58 pm
by Julinook
J Peterman wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 5:25 pmAh, so agreeing with someone and bringing up a point about their unexplained "suspicion" is now piggybacking, eh? You know what I think, Jerry? I think you're on the wagon, doing the hard stuff. Yamyam. White lotus. Shanghai Sally. And now you're flip-flopping away again because I've agreed with suspicion against the very fellow you were accusing not hours ago? Balderdash, I say.
I need a few moments to check on my brownies (they were at Henry VIII's wedding, can you believe it?) and make sure no one's snuck in my office to steal them. I will return again.
Awful post. You've complained about my suspicion of you, implied that I am myself suspicious for it ("flip-flopping", "balderdash") without actually saying it, and ignored the meat of my grievance against you with this highlighted strawman.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:58 pm
by November
I like this Seinfeld character, so I'll put my vote back on Peterman for the time being. I only had it on Puddy because I thought it was closing time and didn't want any funny business wiry my own head on the chopping block. Big Stein's not falling for that one!
It is a bit curious that Peterman is also voting for Puddy. But if Puddy is a mobster I wouldn't put it past his buddies to hang him out to dry. Easy Big Stein, easy! Don't want to get ahead of ourselves now. It's best to wait and see how it all plays out. But that's something to be on the lookout for!
David Puddy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:03 pm
I'm all caught up. I think mafia are taking me down as an easy target.
Even my three year nephew, Khaled, could have prepared such a defense. And I already have him in the back, scrubbing the floor.
Absolute garbage, your worst post of the game, Soup Nazi. Instead of paying any mind to the possibility that a guy who has attracted 5 vaguely-explained votes late in a phase might actually be an easy target, you've pretended his defense was ever going to be "better" than it was. What would you expect Joe Civilian to say in this situation?
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:05 pm
by Julinook
Moreover, 3 of the 4 votes presently on Puddy were made by players who are clearly not here at EOD. And we're going to give the guy shit for saying he's an easy target?
He is an easy target. I don't struggle at all to believe there's mafia presence on his wagon. Given his behavior in a vacuum I might not be resistant right now, because I have had suspicions about him. But the development of this bandwagon smells horrible to me.
David Puddy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:03 pm
I'm all caught up. I think mafia are taking me down as an easy target.
Even my three year nephew, Khaled, could have prepared such a defense. And I already have him in the back, scrubbing the floor.
Absolute garbage, your worst post of the game, Soup Nazi. Instead of paying any mind to the possibility that a guy who has attracted 5 vaguely-explained votes late in a phase might actually be an easy target, you've pretended his defense was ever going to be "better" than it was. What would you expect Joe Civilian to say in this situation?
I was just noting the zero fucks he is giving all the same. And why wouldn't I be allowed to expect to hear more than that from anyone under such trial? What should I pay any mind to? I've asked for more tells on the guy and then everyone continued to pile on. Who are you to dictate, in my own place, what to judge or not of people's responses.
Insult me one more time and I'll throw you out of this soup place myself.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:10 pm
by November
Come to think of it, Seinfeld, I see reason to suspect all of the Puddy voters independent of this bandwagon! Granted, they're not the only ones. But that's a shady bunch! Let's put our heads together on this Peterson thing! What do you think's the most damning thing he's done?
David Puddy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:03 pm
I'm all caught up. I think mafia are taking me down as an easy target.
Even my three year nephew, Khaled, could have prepared such a defense. And I already have him in the back, scrubbing the floor.
Absolute garbage, your worst post of the game, Soup Nazi. Instead of paying any mind to the possibility that a guy who has attracted 5 vaguely-explained votes late in a phase might actually be an easy target, you've pretended his defense was ever going to be "better" than it was. What would you expect Joe Civilian to say in this situation?
I would expect Joe Civilian to march his butt in here and talk. He could start by answering my calls, but he's too busy "answering the Lord's call." I bet that one shows up as "out of area."
David Puddy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:03 pm
I'm all caught up. I think mafia are taking me down as an easy target.
Even my three year nephew, Khaled, could have prepared such a defense. And I already have him in the back, scrubbing the floor.
Absolute garbage, your worst post of the game, Soup Nazi. Instead of paying any mind to the possibility that a guy who has attracted 5 vaguely-explained votes late in a phase might actually be an easy target, you've pretended his defense was ever going to be "better" than it was. What would you expect Joe Civilian to say in this situation?
I would expect Joe Civilian to march his butt in here and talk. He could start by answering my calls, but he's too busy "answering the Lord's call." I bet that one shows up as "out of area."
Since when has Joe Civilian ever done that?
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:14 pm
by November
I want Puddy to speak up. Regardless of how we feel about this bandwagon, he's got the spotlight and he's not using it. Big Stein wants to see some fight in the man!
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:14 pm
by Chuck
Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:55 pm
I really hate the present trend.
Day 1 -- Jerry yells about Puddy, it isn't acknowledged.
Day 2 -- Puddy in line for easy lynch (yes, it's easy), Jerry yells about Peterman, it is hardly acknowledged.
What's the deal? I've been out all night with Marla, and I tell you what I think she might be ready soon.
I know the show has your name on it and all, but if you could be any less King of Fuck Mountain with this "nobody is acknowledge who I want to lynch, when I want to lynch them", that'd be bi'anqalaysūn.
This isn't improving my image of you. You're swaying multiple sides and act angry at others not following in sync with you.
If Poodoo turns citizen, this post looks timed to yell "I told you so". Which could come from a mobster all the same.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:14 pm
by Julinook
George Steinbrenner wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:10 pm
Come to think of it, Seinfeld, I see reason to suspect all of the Puddy voters independent of this bandwagon! Granted, they're not the only ones. But that's a shady bunch! Let's put our heads together on this Peterson thing! What do you think's the most damning thing he's done?
George Steinbrenner wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:10 pm
Come to think of it, Seinfeld, I see reason to suspect all of the Puddy voters independent of this bandwagon! Granted, they're not the only ones. But that's a shady bunch! Let's put our heads together on this Peterson thing! What do you think's the most damning thing he's done?
You've been suspecting everyone except for two people. You have no real suspects, you're just throwing dart from your coco bollo desk, trying to act managerial.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:16 pm
by November
[mention]Elaine Benes[/mention] [mention]The Soup Nazi[/mention] [mention]Frank Costanza[/mention] Talk to me about J Peterman. David Puddy's not the only shady guy in the room. Beating the dead horse around him isn't helping us right now.
Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:55 pm
I really hate the present trend.
Day 1 -- Jerry yells about Puddy, it isn't acknowledged.
Day 2 -- Puddy in line for easy lynch (yes, it's easy), Jerry yells about Peterman, it is hardly acknowledged.
What's the deal? I've been out all night with Marla, and I tell you what I think she might be ready soon.
I know the show has your name on it and all, but if you could be any less King of Fuck Mountain with this "nobody is acknowledge who I want to lynch, when I want to lynch them", that'd be bi'anqalaysūn.
This isn't improving my image of you. You're swaying multiple sides and act angry at others not following in sync with you.
If Poodoo turns citizen, this post looks timed to yell "I told you so". Which could come from a mobster all the same.
I don't give a shit if I look arrogant, or whatever you're insinuating. I think this bandwagon is highly suspect and I'm going to say why. Four people have votes on a guy that I made the subject of a farcical tunnel on Day 1, right now, and I have no idea why. That doesn't bother you? Do you know why those votes are on him?
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:17 pm
by Chuck
Little Man Costanza is so far out of field with his vote, I might as well take pity on him and giving him some soup to go, in case he reaches the Poles in his sidelining.
George Steinbrenner wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:10 pm
Come to think of it, Seinfeld, I see reason to suspect all of the Puddy voters independent of this bandwagon! Granted, they're not the only ones. But that's a shady bunch! Let's put our heads together on this Peterson thing! What do you think's the most damning thing he's done?
You've been suspecting everyone except for two people. You have no real suspects, you're just throwing dart from your coco bollo desk, trying to act managerial.
Cast a wide net, that's what I always say. Once my people have more information I'll start to see things more clearly but right now you never can be too careful. Every one of you has the potential to be lying to me.
David Puddy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:03 pm
I'm all caught up. I think mafia are taking me down as an easy target.
Even my three year nephew, Khaled, could have prepared such a defense. And I already have him in the back, scrubbing the floor.
Absolute garbage, your worst post of the game, Soup Nazi. Instead of paying any mind to the possibility that a guy who has attracted 5 vaguely-explained votes late in a phase might actually be an easy target, you've pretended his defense was ever going to be "better" than it was. What would you expect Joe Civilian to say in this situation?
I would expect Joe Civilian to march his butt in here and talk. He could start by answering my calls, but he's too busy "answering the Lord's call." I bet that one shows up as "out of area."
Since when has Joe Civilian ever done that?
David Puddy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:27 pm
**grunts**
Since when does Joe Mafia become a mutt when he's asked to weigh in on the people voting for him? Always when, that's when.
Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:55 pm
I really hate the present trend.
Day 1 -- Jerry yells about Puddy, it isn't acknowledged.
Day 2 -- Puddy in line for easy lynch (yes, it's easy), Jerry yells about Peterman, it is hardly acknowledged.
What's the deal? I've been out all night with Marla, and I tell you what I think she might be ready soon.
I know the show has your name on it and all, but if you could be any less King of Fuck Mountain with this "nobody is acknowledge who I want to lynch, when I want to lynch them", that'd be bi'anqalaysūn.
This isn't improving my image of you. You're swaying multiple sides and act angry at others not following in sync with you.
If Poodoo turns citizen, this post looks timed to yell "I told you so". Which could come from a mobster all the same.
I don't give a shit if I look arrogant, or whatever you're insinuating. I think this bandwagon is highly suspect and I'm going to say why. Four people have votes on a guy that I made the subject of a farcical tunnel on Day 1, right now, and I have no idea why. That doesn't bother you? Do you know why those votes are on him?
I do not share the same interest in that lynch as those four people do. I do not control their will and moves, only whether they will get any soup or not. I reiterate that I have analyzed Puder, then asked for more, then received squat. They will receive judgement tomorrow, should this prove a mislynch.
George Steinbrenner wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:10 pm
Come to think of it, Seinfeld, I see reason to suspect all of the Puddy voters independent of this bandwagon! Granted, they're not the only ones. But that's a shady bunch! Let's put our heads together on this Peterson thing! What do you think's the most damning thing he's done?
You've been suspecting everyone except for two people. You have no real suspects, you're just throwing dart from your coco bollo desk, trying to act managerial.
Cast a wide net, that's what I always say. Once my people have more information I'll start to see things more clearly but right now you never can be too careful. Every one of you has the potential to be lying to me.
David Puddy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:03 pm
I'm all caught up. I think mafia are taking me down as an easy target.
Even my three year nephew, Khaled, could have prepared such a defense. And I already have him in the back, scrubbing the floor.
Absolute garbage, your worst post of the game, Soup Nazi. Instead of paying any mind to the possibility that a guy who has attracted 5 vaguely-explained votes late in a phase might actually be an easy target, you've pretended his defense was ever going to be "better" than it was. What would you expect Joe Civilian to say in this situation?
I would expect Joe Civilian to march his butt in here and talk. He could start by answering my calls, but he's too busy "answering the Lord's call." I bet that one shows up as "out of area."
Since when has Joe Civilian ever done that?
David Puddy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:27 pm
**grunts**
Since when does Joe Mafia become a mutt when he's asked to weigh in on the people voting for him? Always when, that's when.
My people tell me this isn't true. They say a cornered mobster is prone to fight. They at least want to go down swinging. That's not to say they can't take one for the team and be silent, but this mindset is a slippery slope.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:21 pm
by Julinook
The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:20 pmThey will receive judgement tomorrow, should this prove a mislynch.
Peterman has been presented as an alternative. Please talk to me about Peterman quickly.
George Steinbrenner wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:10 pm
Come to think of it, Seinfeld, I see reason to suspect all of the Puddy voters independent of this bandwagon! Granted, they're not the only ones. But that's a shady bunch! Let's put our heads together on this Peterson thing! What do you think's the most damning thing he's done?
You've been suspecting everyone except for two people. You have no real suspects, you're just throwing dart from your coco bollo desk, trying to act managerial.
Cast a wide net, that's what I always say. Once my people have more information I'll start to see things more clearly but right now you never can be too careful. Every one of you has the potential to be lying to me.
The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:20 pmThey will receive judgement tomorrow, should this prove a mislynch.
Peterman has been presented as an alternative. Please talk to me about Peterman quickly.
I did. He's sketchy or a complete buffoon.
What makes you prefer to vote for me over him?
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:26 pm
by Chuck
Here you go. One vote for the alternative - since my own alternative is only being voted by an old lady, no thanks to you, Seinfeld. Though Yankeeman is also on Peterman, and Yankeeman is filthy.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:26 pm
by Julinook
Soup voted Puddy. [mention]Elaine Benes[/mention], what of Peterman?
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:27 pm
by Julinook
The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:26 pm
Here you go. One vote for the alternative - since my own alternative is only being voted by an old lady, no thanks to you, Seinfeld. Though Yankeeman is also on Peterman, and Yankeeman is filthy.
My read on Yankeeman is very similar to my read on Soup Nazi -- someone who's easy to suspect for crappy reasons.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:27 pm
by Chuck
Do you suddenly disapprove of any vote cast for that schmuck? Hexy woman has been vocal enough against him. Do you believe he's citizen or not?!
The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:26 pm
Here you go. One vote for the alternative - since my own alternative is only being voted by an old lady, no thanks to you, Seinfeld. Though Yankeeman is also on Peterman, and Yankeeman is filthy.
My read on Yankeeman is very similar to my read on Soup Nazi -- someone who's easy to suspect for crappy reasons.
Bullshitteroni. Nobody suspects him. Nobody sees the truth. Fake news.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:28 pm
by Julinook
The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:27 pm
Do you suddenly disapprove of any vote cast for that schmuck? Hexy woman has been vocal enough against him. Do you believe he's citizen or not?!
I think she's most likely civilian given her claim. It was a bad decision to claim regardless of her alignment, but the dumbness is significantly greater and harder to believe for the mafioso. The other three are gross.
The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:26 pm
Here you go. One vote for the alternative - since my own alternative is only being voted by an old lady, no thanks to you, Seinfeld. Though Yankeeman is also on Peterman, and Yankeeman is filthy.
My read on Yankeeman is very similar to my read on Soup Nazi -- someone who's easy to suspect for crappy reasons.
Bullshitteroni. Nobody suspects him. Nobody sees the truth. Fake news.
I have seen more people suspect Steinbrenner than not in this game. I had to yell to keep him from being hanged on Day 1.
The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:27 pm
Do you suddenly disapprove of any vote cast for that schmuck? Hexy woman has been vocal enough against him. Do you believe he's citizen or not?!
I think she's most likely civilian given her claim. It was a bad decision to claim regardless of her alignment, but the dumbness is significantly greater and harder to believe for the mafioso. The other three are gross.
The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:27 pm
Do you suddenly disapprove of any vote cast for that schmuck? Hexy woman has been vocal enough against him. Do you believe he's citizen or not?!
I think she's most likely civilian given her claim. It was a bad decision to claim regardless of her alignment, but the dumbness is significantly greater and harder to believe for the mafioso. The other three are gross.
I MEANT POODEE!
I'll give it 65-35 civilian-mafia odds. He's not the worst lynch on the table. My reservations are with the wagon.
Re: [DAY 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:31 pm
by Tangrowth
Day 2 has ended. Result will be posted ASAP.
Re: [DAY 1] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:32 pm
by Tangrowth
Day 2 Vote Tally
David Puddy
4
31%
Voters: Frank Costanza, J Peterman, Uncle Leo, Elaine Benes
Elaine Benes
1
8%
Voters: Tim Whatley
Estelle Costanza
0
No votes
Voters: None
Frank Costanza
1
8%
Voters: David Puddy
George Costanza
0
No votes
Voters: None
George Steinbrenner
1
8%
Voters: Estelle Costanza
J Peterman
3
23%
Voters: Jerry Seinfeld, George Steinbrenner, The Soup Nazi
Jackie Chiles
0
No votes
Voters: None
Jerry Seinfeld
0
No votes
Voters: None
Kenny Bania
0
No votes
Voters: None
The Soup Nazi
0
No votes
Voters: None
Uncle Leo
1
8%
Voters: George Costanza
*UNVOTE*
0
No votes
Voters: None
*NO LYNCH*
0
No votes
Voters: None
The Dominicans (hosts, deadies, non-players)
2
15%
Voters: Spacedaisy, MovingPictures07
Total votes: 13
The Soup Nazi wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:26 pm
Here you go. One vote for the alternative - since my own alternative is only being voted by an old lady, no thanks to you, Seinfeld. Though Yankeeman is also on Peterman, and Yankeeman is filthy.
My read on Yankeeman is very similar to my read on Soup Nazi -- someone who's easy to suspect for crappy reasons.
Bullshitteroni. Nobody suspects him. Nobody sees the truth. Fake news.
I've heard my fair share of heckles in this game! They say I'm erratic, all over the place! I say someone needs to stir the pot around here. That's something you should know about, isn't it? You make your soup in one of those big pots? Tell me, how long does it take to make the soup? Do you do it all at once or in individual batches? I have great respect for the restaurant industry. I thought of getting into it myself. I could make a mean lasagna back in my day, Soup Nazi. The secret is in the cheese. You need to add just the right amount to each layer. Not too much, not too little...
Frank, Peterman, and Leo are all shit-listed for that wagon. Elaine I care less about, not only for her claim but also because her's was the only vote I can readily explain.
Re: [NIGHT 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:37 pm
by November
Here's something for us to talk about tonight. Costanza's father loves the soup man. What do you suppose that's all about?
Re: [NIGHT 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:37 pm
by Julinook
I like both Steinbrenner and Soup Nazi more than before. Solid civilian reads.
George Steinbrenner wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:55 pm
J Peterman, What can you tell me about this Elaine Benes? My people say she's an employee of yours. Well, I'd like to know what you have to say about her. My head's still spinning from before!
I like this Steinbrenner fellow. Not afraid to say what he thinks, not afraid to let it all hang out, like a kerchief in a fine suit. As for Elaine, she's a tough one, and she's worked for me for years. On the one hand, she's after Jerry pretty consistently, and that's a job...done. On the other hand, she's gone after Puddy, which I didn't expect after those attacks on Jerry. And a claimed vigilante? Such bold words, Elaine! But I wouldn't put it past a woman who doesn't like The English Patient. It's all almost worth firing her over. Almost.
But not today, because I'm not liking the looks of this Puddy fellow, either. I've said my piece on him, however short, for I am a man of few words. Puddy, you're out.
My people just brought this one to my attention too. How many positions can this man take in one answer without actually answering? I tell you, I thought Ms. Benes made my head spin, but this Peterman is in a league of his own. Big Stein's getting dizzy!
Re: [NIGHT 2] Seinfeld Mafia
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:39 pm
by Chuck
Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:37 pm
I like both Steinbrenner and Soup Nazi more than before. Solid civilian reads.
Insh'allah, I'm thrilled I moved from one guy who wasn't going to be lynched to another guy who wasn't going to be lynched and that suddenly makes me better in your eyes.
Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:37 pm
I like both Steinbrenner and Soup Nazi more than before. Solid civilian reads.
Insh'allah, I'm thrilled I moved from one guy who wasn't going to be lynched to another guy who wasn't going to be lynched and that suddenly makes me better in your eyes.
You're afraid to make judgment calls based upon the things people say. I'm not. I don't care about your vote.
Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:37 pm
I like both Steinbrenner and Soup Nazi more than before. Solid civilian reads.
Insh'allah, I'm thrilled I moved from one guy who wasn't going to be lynched to another guy who wasn't going to be lynched and that suddenly makes me better in your eyes.
You're afraid to make judgment calls based upon the things people say. I'm not. I don't care about your vote.
What are you talking about. I made judgement calls on everybody today.
Jerry Seinfeld wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:37 pm
I like both Steinbrenner and Soup Nazi more than before. Solid civilian reads.
Insh'allah, I'm thrilled I moved from one guy who wasn't going to be lynched to another guy who wasn't going to be lynched and that suddenly makes me better in your eyes.
You're afraid to make judgment calls based upon the things people say. I'm not. I don't care about your vote.
What are you talking about. I made judgement calls on everybody today.
You've griped about my turn on Elaine, my turn on Puddy, my judgment of you, my judgment of Steinbrenner, and plenty more. You've griped because I have made judgment calls quickly, in the moment, independent of analytic content -- something you don't like to do. You never have in my experience, Soup Nazi. It's not your style.