Re: Battlestar Galactica Mafia - Day Three
Posted: Sun May 15, 2016 3:53 am
S~V~S - Pluheeze ansuh muh kwushtion.
Deeeerp.
Deeeerp.
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
He might be. What makes you hesitate to believe it?a2thezebra wrote:Unless he actually is confirmed town, but I find that hard to believe.
What about sig's posts do you like?Glorfindel wrote:Yeah, I've got to agree with 3J here. I'm Town, I now believe that I was wrong about LC, I am pretty confident Sig is Town and I've not observed any reason to suspect JaggedJimmy. You, however are a different case as that last sentence is one of the most stark cases of the pot calling the kettle black I've witnessed in a very long time...JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Could you please explain all of these reads individually? I'd like to know why you find all four of these names suspicious independent of one another, beyond the blanket sentences you've provided at the bottom here.SokothQultuq wrote:Interesting suspicions.
So far I'm somewhat convinced based on what I've seen and observed of people that I feel
Glorfindel
Long Con
Sig
JaggedJimmyJay
might fit into the baddie department based on some of the conversations that have been had. Some are more willing to help than others. Avoid certain subjects or knee jerk on some.
The underlined. If someone is almost confirmed town but not quite, that usually means it's a setup.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:He might be. What makes you hesitate to believe it?a2thezebra wrote:Unless he actually is confirmed town, but I find that hard to believe.
What makes you think he is "almost" confirmed town?a2thezebra wrote:The underlined. If someone is almost confirmed town but not quite, that usually means it's a setup.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:He might be. What makes you hesitate to believe it?a2thezebra wrote:Unless he actually is confirmed town, but I find that hard to believe.
No I didn't. I don't think he's remotely confirmed. I don't know what that word is happening right now. Why are you talking about the potential that Long Con is or isn't a confirmed townie?a2thezebra wrote:You just admitted it by using the word "might". Someone is either confirmed or they're not, if there's any room for doubt then the word "confirmed" becomes meaningless.
Which question?a2thezebra wrote:Why did you wait that long to ask that question?
Which previous question?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Which question?a2thezebra wrote:Why did you wait that long to ask that question?
I am here right now asking you things right now. Answer my previous question please.
You're clearly bad. Good talk.a2thezebra wrote:Which previous question?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Which question?a2thezebra wrote:Why did you wait that long to ask that question?
I am here right now asking you things right now. Answer my previous question please.
I am here right now asking you things right now. Answer my previous question please.
You're either bad or you suck at reading me or both. I literally (yes, literally) wouldn't even think to do the above if I was bad.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:You're clearly bad. Good talk.a2thezebra wrote:Which previous question?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Which question?a2thezebra wrote:Why did you wait that long to ask that question?
I am here right now asking you things right now. Answer my previous question please.
I am here right now asking you things right now. Answer my previous question please.
I've asked you numerous questions on this page, I literally don't know which one you mean. I also asked you a question that you've now discarded twice in favor of pretending I'm the one avoiding questions.a2thezebra wrote:You're either bad or you suck at reading me or both. I literally (yes, literally) wouldn't even think to do the above if I was bad.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:You're clearly bad. Good talk.a2thezebra wrote:Which previous question?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Which question?a2thezebra wrote:Why did you wait that long to ask that question?
I am here right now asking you things right now. Answer my previous question please.
I am here right now asking you things right now. Answer my previous question please.
Also lol at you asking "which question" when I could've only been referring to one question.
I was once accused of pretzel logic in this game. Allow me to give you the pretzel trophy. You deserve it more.a2thezebra wrote:Pretending? You literally didn't answer. You're the one that pretended not to know which one I was referring to.
If you ask someone five or six questions and after you ask the last one the person you're asking asks you why it took you that long to ask it, which question do you think the person you're asking would be referring to? Never mind that the very question about the question clearly indicates which question is being referred to by the nature of the question itself.
I asked that last because I think I might already know the answer, and I had the opportunity to corner you before getting there. I don't think it makes any sense for you to be discussing Long Con as if there's any potential he's confirmed, and it's my task to squeeze your mindset out of you.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Why are you talking about the potential that Long Con is or isn't a confirmed townie?
I didn't actually say that I 'liked' his posts my friend LOL! The thing is, I've played enough games with him now at this site and others to have a pretty good sense of when he's good and when he's not. He did make some comments early on that piqued my interest but they were (in my assessment) indicative of a 'disconnection' with much of the discussion that had been going on here. Sig has made no secret of the fact of his heavy study/assignment workload at the moment which I am willing to accept as a genuine explanation for those comments.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:What about sig's posts do you like?Glorfindel wrote:Yeah, I've got to agree with 3J here. I'm Town, I now believe that I was wrong about LC, I am pretty confident Sig is Town and I've not observed any reason to suspect JaggedJimmy. You, however are a different case as that last sentence is one of the most stark cases of the pot calling the kettle black I've witnessed in a very long time...JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Could you please explain all of these reads individually? I'd like to know why you find all four of these names suspicious independent of one another, beyond the blanket sentences you've provided at the bottom here.SokothQultuq wrote:Interesting suspicions.
So far I'm somewhat convinced based on what I've seen and observed of people that I feel
Glorfindel
Long Con
Sig
JaggedJimmyJay
might fit into the baddie department based on some of the conversations that have been had. Some are more willing to help than others. Avoid certain subjects or knee jerk on some.
I'm not handing you that. You're terrified of this question.a2thezebra wrote:Why do you think?
Yes, terrified that I'll be mislynched because of your arrogance.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'm not handing you that. You're terrified of this question.a2thezebra wrote:Why do you think?
Instead of concerning yourself with some unfounded perception of my personality, maybe you could answer the question?a2thezebra wrote:Yes, terrified that I'll be mislynched because of your arrogance.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'm not handing you that. You're terrified of this question.a2thezebra wrote:Why do you think?
You don't know what my read is on you. I don't need your bows. I need your answer.a2thezebra wrote:No. I want to see you become even more convinced that I'm bad because I'm not bowing down before you.
Because it will help me to determine the sincerity or insincerity of your comment.a2thezebra wrote:Why do you need it?
I didn't actually say that I 'liked' his posts my friend LOL! The thing is, I've played enough games with him now at this site and others to have a pretty good sense of when he's good and when he's not. He did make some comments early on that piqued my interest but they were (in my assessment) indicative of a 'disconnection' with much of the discussion that had been going on here. Sig has made no secret of the fact of his heavy study/assignment workload at the moment which I am willing to accept as a genuine explanation for those comments.[/quote]Glorfindel wrote:What about sig's posts do you like?
Could you please share an example of one of sig's posts that you feel fits this description?Glorfindel wrote:I didn't actually say that I 'liked' his posts my friend LOL! The thing is, I've played enough games with him now at this site and others to have a pretty good sense of when he's good and when he's not. He did make some comments early on that piqued my interest but they were (in my assessment) indicative of a 'disconnection' with much of the discussion that had been going on here. Sig has made no secret of the fact of his heavy study/assignment workload at the moment which I am willing to accept as a genuine explanation for those comments.
I have been insincere in this back and forth. I did pretend to read you as "obviously bad". You're not ignorant to why I might do that. You're indignant about my strategy, associating it with my personality exterior to Mafia, and seemingly pouting about it instead of having a meaningful dialogue with me. If you're town, that's a frustrating thing. If you're not, it's very easy to see why you'd behave that way.a2thezebra wrote:I mean given that you've been openly insincere throughout this back-and-forth, that's only fair.
So Say We All!JaggedJimmyJay wrote:EBWOP
Could you please share an example of one of sig's posts that you feel fits this description?Glorfindel wrote:I didn't actually say that I 'liked' his posts my friend LOL! The thing is, I've played enough games with him now at this site and others to have a pretty good sense of when he's good and when he's not. He did make some comments early on that piqued my interest but they were (in my assessment) indicative of a 'disconnection' with much of the discussion that had been going on here. Sig has made no secret of the fact of his heavy study/assignment workload at the moment which I am willing to accept as a genuine explanation for those comments.
It just seems that he would come in after something of an extended absence and make remarks like this about issues which by that stage of the discussion (in my opinion) seem to have been done and dusted. I'm not saying his comments were wrong or anything but perhaps more pertinent had he been on earlier to make them.sig wrote:Also @LC I don't see how I'm a cylon for not wanting to just send out the only two civ pilots to die without any thought. Which is what it seemed like was happening at first.
I don't really doubt your opinion, no. At least not its sincerity. I am a little suspicious of sig for his interactions with nutella.Glorfindel wrote:I notice reading back, that there were some exchanges between the two of you - do you doubt my opinion of him? Despite those exchanges, I don't consider either of to be Mafia.
So Say We All!JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I don't really doubt your opinion, no. At least not its sincerity. I am a little suspicious of sig for his interactions with nutella.Glorfindel wrote:I notice reading back, that there were some exchanges between the two of you - do you doubt my opinion of him? Despite those exchanges, I don't consider either of to be Mafia.
We already know Epi is a Cylon and his identity, what more information is he expecting to gain from lynching him As for his assertion that the whole resurrection ship thing was a ploy created by the Cylons To me, this is indicative of someone struggling to keep up as a consequence of external factors, not Mafia alignment.sig wrote:Okay so I'm considering three people for today.
LC...
Zebra...
Epi, He is an outed Cylon and with the ship gone I'd like to see if we can lynch him and how he will flip. If he flips mafia then we know most cylons are bad. I also think he could've been the one to kill Ika, seeing how Ika was pushing to lynch Epi again. So I'm leaning towards mafia on Epi.
So here is a thought, in past games civs or mafia members could create events, usually polls but I've seen events before. Could there be no resurrection ship and this is all a ploy created by the cylons?
Maybe Epi just had a lynch proof power or something?
I don't see the reasons for a nutella lynch or for Rico.
My apologies for having voted for you last Day phase LC. Whilst I do think you are Town, I'm also fairly certain that you are wrong about Sig and Jimmy and I suspect even Ricochet. I won't be voting for you or any of them come EoD.Long Con wrote:As the resident Confirmed Civ, I still think sig is bad. Rico, sig, JJJ... all bad.
I might have missed it, but how do we know that you are confimed civ?Long Con wrote:As the resident Confirmed Civ, I still think sig is bad. Rico, sig, JJJ... all bad.
Apology accepted - just don't let it happen again. I worked hard to achieve Confirmed Civ status, and I don't need any loose ends upsetting my reign of terror!Glorfindel wrote:My apologies for having voted for you last Day phase LC. Whilst I do think you are Town, I'm also fairly certain that you are wrong about Sig and Jimmy and I suspect even Ricochet. I won't be voting for you or any of them come EoD.Long Con wrote:As the resident Confirmed Civ, I still think sig is bad. Rico, sig, JJJ... all bad.
Sshhhh.... best not to call too much attention to it.Nerolunar wrote:I might have missed it, but how do we know that you are confimed civ?Long Con wrote:As the resident Confirmed Civ, I still think sig is bad. Rico, sig, JJJ... all bad.
Yes, but we didn't know what alignment Epi was. At that time since nobody else was lynched I thought we'd see who was bad. For the record I'm still not agaisnt an Epi lynch. Also it could've been a ploy created by the cylons to distract us like a troll event. :PGlorfindel wrote:So Say We All!JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I don't really doubt your opinion, no. At least not its sincerity. I am a little suspicious of sig for his interactions with nutella.Glorfindel wrote:I notice reading back, that there were some exchanges between the two of you - do you doubt my opinion of him? Despite those exchanges, I don't consider either of to be Mafia.
May I call you Jimmy? 3J seems a little impersonal... Looking at his interactions with Nutella kinda proves my point. Take this post:We already know Epi is a Cylon and his identity, what more information is he expecting to gain from lynching him As for his assertion that the whole resurrection ship thing was a ploy created by the Cylons To me, this is indicative of someone struggling to keep up as a consequence of external factors, not Mafia alignment.sig wrote:Okay so I'm considering three people for today.
LC...
Zebra...
Epi, He is an outed Cylon and with the ship gone I'd like to see if we can lynch him and how he will flip. If he flips mafia then we know most cylons are bad. I also think he could've been the one to kill Ika, seeing how Ika was pushing to lynch Epi again. So I'm leaning towards mafia on Epi.
So here is a thought, in past games civs or mafia members could create events, usually polls but I've seen events before. Could there be no resurrection ship and this is all a ploy created by the cylons?
Maybe Epi just had a lynch proof power or something?
I don't see the reasons for a nutella lynch or for Rico.
Long Con wrote:As the resident Confirmed Civ, I still think sig is bad. Rico, sig, JJJ... all bad.