how do you reconcile this fact with VETOING THE PLAYERS THAT CAUSED THE DAY ONE MISELIMilario wrote: ↑Tue Nov 08, 2022 12:38 amactually ill address this before i goMacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Nov 07, 2022 10:24 pmPorscha is a very wolfy slot, who I have a history of accurately reading, that has not hit their town tells and that was a day 1 wagon that the person we miselimmed wanted us to eliminate. Cham was excessively mafia towards the end of the day.ilario wrote: ↑Mon Nov 07, 2022 10:20 pm ftr im going to veto hard against any pushes on porcha,seven, santy, dya, nook, alison today. do i think this grouping is pure? probably not. but i think theres probably only 1 mafia here, 2 if we are very lucky but probably more like just 1 but worst case 0. but i think if we solve in this grouping we are most likely gonna spend a lot of days hitting villas only to maybe find a wolf after 3-4 days. its not efficient and game-losing play.
This post (and almost every post you've made today) is very suspect.
You provide no reasoning for this list and just expect your insistence to be agreed upon at face value. Almost all of these slots are questionable. Your veto is irrational. If you want to defend them if they get wagoned, defend them. I am sorry but you are not in a position to veto anything.
You feel like a very obvious wolf to me.
my vetos is based on a threadstate read. the thread is a mess and its very chaotic. it doesnt feel like a game where town is stomping and that we have a bunch of wolves cornered in poe. that is how semis d1 felt, this feels more like cats vs dogs d1, or the sabi invititational d1, or finals d1. i dont think town is winning rn and i dont think the thread would be where it is if there was a bunch of wolves in those names i listed. do u disagree mac?
fuck me