The Syndicate

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 8:42 pm**

you are correct. It is discouraging. It's also discouraging how the wagon piled on, and I don't understand Floyd, Luke's, and Tranqs votes for you. I don't think I'm going to change my vote at this point, unless something really convincing comes up. I understand you are at a frustrated point of not caring, but if you would please discuss these following players with all your current thoughts (even short synopsis on your thoughts would help at this point), if you are civ, and there is any chance of us winning, it will help us in the end.

MM, Boomslang, Choutas, Luke, and Tranq

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 8:42 pm**

DrWilgy wrote:Ok... so this is based on the image of early game votes and general habits. Mafia tend to not vote along side their teammates early game, they also tend not to vote for their teammates early. By these means, X player is most likely not on a team with A, B, C. I'll leave the dead and myself in for reference but color us.

Didn't you bus your teammate on Day 2 in Talking Heads? :P

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 8:43 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:Tranq. For whichever civs that are voting for me today, you're going to have hell to pay for the rest of the game if I'm lynched.

Tell me more about Tranq.

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 8:43 pm**

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:I think FZ checked DrWilgy, per her comment on Day 1. I think zebra is civ.

Matt think Matt is bad though. I'll quote the post that pinged me.

Linki: Don't die bea
Any day now
Sorry, I only just got a seat with an outlet.

No need to be sorry I'm just being that person

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 8:46 pm**

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Ok... so this is based on the image of early game votes and general habits. Mafia tend to not vote along side their teammates early game, they also tend not to vote for their teammates early. By these means, X player is most likely not on a team with A, B, C. I'll leave the dead and myself in for reference but color us.
Didn't you bus your teammate on Day 2 in Talking Heads? :P

Yeah, but the stats came afterwards

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:01 pm**

DrWilgy wrote:you are correct. It is discouraging. It's also discouraging how the wagon piled on, and I don't understand Floyd, Luke's, and Tranqs votes for you. I don't think I'm going to change my vote at this point, unless something really convincing comes up. I understand you are at a frustrated point of not caring, but if you would please discuss these following players with all your current thoughts (even short synopsis on your thoughts would help at this point), if you are civ, and there is any chance of us winning, it will help us in the end.

MM, Boomslang, Choutas, Luke, and Tranq

MM - Refer to my case using MM's ISO. Nothing has changed, except that since I think at this point that you are more likely to be bad than he is, it's less likely that he's bad based solely on my gut feeling that the interactions between you two earlier in the day were not staged. Since these reads are meant to help you guys "in the end" consider that this could change if you are revealed to be civ, while on the other hand if he is revealed to be civ I really think people should wake up and look at you already.

Boosmslang - No specific pings so I haven't mentioned him yet, but GTH I would actually say he's bad. I don't like how he said this:

Boomslang wrote:RIP FZ. Hardmode is right when the cop goes down on the first night... sigh.

a2thezebra wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Wait a second. Zebra, are you saying that you read the thread, read that I proposed a CFD, didn't know what it ment, read that Tranq had to google search it, didn't google search it yourself in the 24 hours we had between phases, and are just now concerned with what a CFD is, when it involves you?
Correct. Your case against me was that unconvincing. I didn't even care enough to respond to it and also didn't care enough to worry about whatever a CFD is to know that if it meant any kind of trouble for me and it was your suggestion to the rest of town, it wasn't going to happen.
Now this is an interesting post. Especially when it regards vocabulary that became important to following the thread. That kind of cockiness might come from knowing that you've got two other people in your corner (the rest of the mafia) who won't board your wagon. If the case was so unconvincing, it should have been easy to refute, right?

...but then let it go and later said I was simply frustrated and was most likely civilian. That seems like a convoluted arc of an opinion. I also fail to see his suspicions of Choutas.

Choutas - I think he's civ. The only ping I've had on him was one I had while catching up in the thread, and it was erased as I caught up further.

Luke - From the impression I've gotten from him so far he seems like one of those players who could easily be misinterpreted based on his preferred method of gameplay. So far I haven't been given a reason to think he's bad.

Tranq - Tranq has rubbed me the wrong way from the beginning but I don't like stating reads that are based on nothing more than my gut in the thread, until I have enough material to work with in trying to justify them to everyone else. So since MM has also asked for me to elaborate, let's take a trip through Tranq's ISO:

Tranq wrote:Bea

Fluff.

Tranq wrote:A no lynch sounds rather boring. How about a 13-way tie?

Fluff.

Tranq wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:I saw a boomslang... I wonder where it went.
I know where it went

Fluff?

Tranq wrote:I'm moving my vote away from Bea.

Who should i vote for?

Fluff.

Tranq wrote:Sure why not.

Revenge-vote for Choutas.

Fluff.

Tranq wrote:Rude. I'm in the top 10 posters this game!

Precisely. And it's all fluff. Including this. That's a problem.

Tranq wrote:That's a silly question. If i move my vote to bcornett24, it would be 6 to 3, so i'd have to answer with a no.

Half fluff, half mediocre reasoning.

Tranq wrote:
Boomslang wrote:why the Choutas vote other than simple revenge?
I asked who to vote for and DrWilgy responded.

Two Pets in one Sound.

Fluff which makes one go

at previous posts.

Tranq wrote:Chou is the 2nd Pet

Fluff.

Tranq wrote:I had to google that but ok.

Fluff.

Tranq wrote:CFD

Fluff.

Tranq wrote:Temp-voting Zebra for now. Vote may change when i'm actually able to read through the thread, hopefully later today.

The only post of the entire day (which I remind you is almost over) as well as blatantly unjustified yet on a building wagon. This is the cherry on top. Tranq is fitting that perfect blend that I mentioned MM was in earlier (though now admittedly less so) of having enough posts to avoid lurker accusations from others but having little enough content to avoid having posts that one could call out as scum-motivated or use to find connections to teammates later on.

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:06 pm**

Oh, and the last one is as good as fluff too.

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:08 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:
Enrique wrote:Feel better, bea. Don't worry about the game, your health comes first

I'm not really worried about Tranq. Call it a gut feeling, but I feel an evil Tranq would at least be trying to pull some strings. I think he just doesn't have anything to say yet.
Or maybe he hasn't found any strings to pull. Current thoughts on me/Wilgy?

I still think he's good. As for you, I'm not all that comfortable moving my vote somewhere else and letting the baddies pile up on it and control this lynch when it's already looking settled.

Is there really that much separating Tranq and Choutas? They both seem to be playing the same game to me. Disregarding post count (I don't really pay attention to that), their contributions so far are practically the same.

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:11 pm**

Here's a couple reasons I don't want to lynch zebra today.

1) I don't think she's bad. I accused her of kick-starting the day too quickly with a case against me, but in reality, her post came over 30 minutes after the night post. That's plenty of time to do research.
2) Zebra's wagon is pulling too far ahead for my liking. Whether she is mafia or civilian, if she wins the lynch in landside fashion, the information we could gain would be less useful. In a landslide, it's easier for voters to "hide" in the wagon, because that is the only viable lynch option. However, if there is a second competing wagon, that will force baddies to be more "careful" with their votes, and can be especially insightful in a mafia lynch.
3) Lynching active players early on is detrimental. Notice how the day started off with myself pointing a finger at DrWilgy, him pointing a finger at zebra, and she pointing a finger at me. Unforunately, that led to players picking sides in that debate, and it most players sided with Wilgy.

I'll leave my vote on Tranq. Zebra is right, he's too fluffy.

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:13 pm**

Enrique wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Enrique wrote:Feel better, bea. Don't worry about the game, your health comes first

I'm not really worried about Tranq. Call it a gut feeling, but I feel an evil Tranq would at least be trying to pull some strings. I think he just doesn't have anything to say yet.
Or maybe he hasn't found any strings to pull. Current thoughts on me/Wilgy?
I still think he's good. As for you, I'm not all that comfortable moving my vote somewhere else and letting the baddies pile up on it and control this lynch when it's already looking settled.

Is there really that much separating Tranq and Choutas? They both seem to be playing the same game to me. Disregarding post count (I don't really pay attention to that), their contributions so far are practically the same.

So you'd rather lynch zebra who is contributing over Tranq or Choutas who have not contributed?

Why do you think the baddies will pile on after your vote somewhere else?

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:18 pm**

Enrique wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Enrique wrote:Feel better, bea. Don't worry about the game, your health comes first

I'm not really worried about Tranq. Call it a gut feeling, but I feel an evil Tranq would at least be trying to pull some strings. I think he just doesn't have anything to say yet.
Or maybe he hasn't found any strings to pull. Current thoughts on me/Wilgy?
I still think he's good. As for you, I'm not all that comfortable moving my vote somewhere else and letting the baddies pile up on it and control this lynch when it's already looking settled.

Is there really that much separating Tranq and Choutas? They both seem to be playing the same game to me. Disregarding post count (I don't really pay attention to that), their contributions so far are practically the same.

So you would prefer a "settled" mislynch to a justified but riskier potential baddie lynch? Good to know. As for the Tranq/Choutas comparison I think it's much more difficult to justify perceiving Chouta's ISO as deceitful or scummy in general when up against Tranq's. Choutas seems rather flustered with the direction the game is going in similar to myself. I never base my reads off of post count myself; I can have a strong town read on a person with one post and a strong scum read on a person with one post as well.

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:21 pm**

Choutas wrote:I don't really know what to think of the Wilgy/Zebra/Marmot convos. The Marmot plays exactly like he did in TH, I lean town on him for that. Wilgy's first post that MM quoted doesn't look good. Does he always posts like that in all games? Zebra mirrors well what I saw from him in TH. He's a good player though I'm sure he's capable of doing that as scum so I''ll have to watch for the slight details that might give that away.
I'm voting for Wilgy until a better case forms.

This post alone, regardless of how you feel about its content, puts Choutas in a much better position than Tranq. This is actual content that could be analyzed and argued with. Tranq has offered nothing of substance whatsoever.

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:23 pm**

Checked this again, and fixed an error.

DrWilgy wrote:X Player - Is not on team with A,B,C
Zebra - FZ, Matt F, Bcornett
Bcornett - FZ, Boomslang, Floyd, Zebra, Matt
Bea - Tranq //bea had not voted by this time
Boomslang - Luke, Bcornett, Floyd
Choutas - Me, Tranq
Me - Choutas, Enrique
Enrique - Metalmarsh, Luke, Me
FZ - Bcornett, Zebra, Matt
Luke - Boomslang, Bcornett, Floyd, Metalmarsh, Enrique
Matt - FZ, Zebra
MetalMarsh - Luke, Enrique
Floyd - Luke, Boomslang, Bcornett
Tranq - Choutas, Bea

Zebra, Bea, Anyone who isn't Matt or Tranq
Zebra, Boomslang, Anyone who isn't Luke, Matt, or Floyd
Zebra, Choutas, Anyone who isn't Tranq or Matt
Zebra, Enrique, Anyone who isn't MM, Luke, or Matt
Zebra, Luke, Not Boomslang, Not Floyd, Not MM, Not Matt, nor Enrique
Zebra, MM, not Luke, not Matt, nor Enrique
Zebra, Floyd, not Luke, not Matt, nor Boomslang
Zebra, Tranq, not Matt, not Choutas, or Bea
Bea, Boomslang, anyone who isn't Tranq, Luke, or Floyd
Bea, Choutas, anyone who isn't Tranq
Bea, Enrique, anyone who isn't Tranq, MM, or Luke
Bea, Luke, anyone who isn't Tranq, Boomslang, Floyd, MM, or Enrique
Bea, Matt, anyone who isn't Tranq or Zebra
Bea, MM, anyone who isn't Tranq, Luke, or Enrique
Bea, Floyd, anyone who isn't Tranq, Luke, Matt or Boomslang
Boomslang, Choutas, anyone who isn't Tranq, Luke, or Floyd
Boomslang, Enrique, anyone who isn't MM, Luke, or Floyd
Boomslang, Matt, anyone who isn't Luke, Floyd, or Zebra
Boomslang, MM, anyone who isn't Luke, Floyd, or Enrique
Boomslang, Tranq, anyone who isn't Luke, Floyd, Choutas, or Bea
Choutas, Enrique, anyone who isn't Tranq, MM, or Luke
Choutas, Luke, anyone who isn't Tranq, Boomslang, Floyd, MM, or Enrique
Choutas, Matt, anyone who isn't Tranq or Zebra
Choutas, MM, anyone who isn't Tranq, Luke, or Enrique
Choutas, Floyd, anyone who isn't Tranq, Luke, Matt or Boomslang
Enrique, Matt, anyone who isn't MM, Luke or Zebra
Enrique, Floyd, anyone who isn't MM, Luke, Matt, or Boomslang
Enrique, Tranq, anyone who isn't MM, Luke, Choutas or Bea
Luke, Matt, and Tranq
Matt, MM, anyone who isn't Zebra, Luke, or Enrique
Matt, Floyd, anyone who isn't Zebra, Luke, or Boomslang
Matt, Tranq, anyone who isn't Zebra, Choutas, or Bea
MM, Floyd, anyone who isn't Luke, Enrique, Luke, or Boomslang
MM, Tranq, anyone who isn't Luke, Enrique, Choutas or Bea
Floyd, Tranq, anyone who isn't Luke, Boomslang, Choutas or Bea

I think I hit every baddie combination possible, based on my analysis. It's interesting that Luke, Matt, and Tranq, is the only baddie combination that is possible if Luke and Matt are on a team. Someone double check my work plz.

I'll look at all the liki now...

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:30 pm**

Out of these combinations, which ones seem the most likely to everyone?

My most likely is still the same from yesterday, Zebra, Boomslang, and Choutas.

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:33 pm**

My favorite combination would have to be "Boomslang, Tranq, anyone who isn't Luke, Floyd, Choutas, or Bea" since it leaves room for you.

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:34 pm**

Or, alternatively, MM.

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:35 pm**

I like that one too, but because it leaves room for MM...

linki - d'oh, ya beat me to it

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:36 pm**

So vote for Tranq.

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:37 pm**

In fact since it leaves room for me as well, it's interesting that you said MM instead of the person you're voting for.

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:39 pm**

The thing is, you and MM being on the same team is possible based on early day 1, but I still doubt it. Not something I've looked hard into though. Just a gut feeling based upon your interactions.

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:41 pm**

Oh right, I forgot which game I'm in. Here you go town, remember to bump it when I'm dead:

a2thezebra wrote:In fact since it leaves room for me as well, IT'S INTERESTING THAT YOU SAID MM INSTEAD OF THE PERSON YOU'RE VOTING FOR

linki: But the suggestion doesn't involve me and MM being on the same team, it involves me being on the same team as Boomslang and Tranq.

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:44 pm**

Oh! I know what was missed. I didn't explain that I have an

on MM.

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:47 pm**

Zebra, you posted enough to counter my previous read; that's why I let that suspicion drop. I'm changing my vote to Tranq in hopes of countering the other wagon, which I don't like.

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:49 pm**

That still doesn't justify why you think that's a likely option because of him and not, again, the person you're voting for. But then again these vote-based statistic-heavy analyses of yours aren't always the best tools to decipher what's actually going on in the first place...

Spoiler: show

DrWilgy wrote:~AceofSpaces: TheFloyd73 (4) 3%

~bcornett24: FZ. (19), Sorsha (21), Epignosis (26), bea (27), Golden (36), Long Con (38) 16%

~Devin the Omniscient: rundontwalk (7) 3%

~Diiny: Devin the Omniscient (6), thellama73 (24) 5%

~DrWilgy: Ricochet (23) 3%

~JaggedJimmyJay: Rbzmncaeaei (37) 3%

~Long Con: Choutas (12), sig (16), seaside (17), DrWilgy (18), motel room (31), bcornett24 (32),
JaggedJimmyJay (34), Russtifinko (35) 21%

~Matt F: Roxy (15) 3%

~Metalmarsh89: Bullzeye (20) 3%

~seaside: Metalmarsh89 (2), Strawhenge (10) 5%

~Sorsha: Matt F (25), Elohcin (33) 5%

~thellama73: MacDougall (13), Diiny (28), espers (30) 8%

<<<~~~~~>>>
Start: Votes required to 50% kill LC (3) { (brackets represent killing point)
MM puts Seaside at 1 *marker(2)*
-Where has MM been since?
-Votes to kill LC +1 (4)

Floyd ties it with AceofSpaces at 1 *marker(4)*
-LC is currently at a safe spot with +4

Devin ties it with Diiny at 1 *marker(6)*
-LC is currently at a safe spot with +4

RDW ties it with Devin at 1 *marker(7)*
-LC is currently at a safe spot with +4

Strawhenge gives seaside the lead at 2 *marker(10)*
-Votes to kill LC +1 (5)

Choutas is the 1st of final votes on LC *marker(12)*
-Votes to kill LC -1 (4)

MacDougall votes Llama *marker(13)*
-LC is currently at a safe spot with +4
Roxy votes Matt F *marker(15)*
-LC is currently at a safe spot with +4

Sig Seaside and DrWilgy give LC lead at 4 *marker(16,17,18)*
-Votes to kill LC -3 (1)

First vote for bcornett by FZ *marker(19)*,
-LC is currently at a safe spot with +1

Bullzeye first vote for MM *marker(20)*,
-LC is currently at a safe spot with +1

Sorsha for bcornett *marker(21)*
-LC is currently at a safe spot with +1

Rico on me for 1 *marker(23)*
-LC is currently at a safe spot with +1

Llama on Diiny *marker(24)*
-LC is currently at a safe spot with +1

Matt F on Sorsha *marker(25)*
-LC is currently at a safe spot with +1

Epi and Bea on bcornett *marker(26, 27)*
-Votes to kill LC +2 (3)

Dinny and Espers on llama *marker(28, 30)*
-LC is currently at a safe spot with +3

Motel room and cornett on LC *marker(31, 32)*
-Votes to kill LC -2 (1)

Elohcin on Sorsha *marker(33)*
-LC is currently at a safe spot with +3

JJJ and Russ on LC *marker(34,35)*
-Votes to kill LC -2 (-1)
}
LC is no longer safe

Golden on Cornett *marker(36)* {
-Votes to kill LC +1 (0)

Zebra DOESN’T save LC at *(37)*
-LC is in danger at 0

LC tries to save himself… } End

Now, I created a point system to analyze this based upon my personal scumtells:

Increasing LC's survival number gets 1 scumpoint
Leaving LC on a + number without affecting it gets 2 scumpoints
Increasing LC's survival number from -1 to 0 gets 3 scumpoints
Increasing LC's survival number from 0 to 1 gets 4 scumpoints

leaving LC's survival number on 0 gets no points

Decreasing LC's survival number by 1 gets -1 scumpoint
Leaving LC on a - number without affecting it gets -2 scumpoints
decreasing LC's survival number from 1 to 0 gets -3 scumpoints
decreasing LC's survival number from 0 to -1 gets -4 scumpoints

Points are multiplied by a value determined by their timing, or marker number, here's the key:
Marker 0-5 = *1
Marker 5-15 = *2
Marker 15-25 = *3
Marker 25-35 = *4
Marker 35+ = *5
(greater value is non-inclusive, i.e. marker 5 would be ruled as *2)

Final scumpoint values without organization:
MM: 1
Floyd: 2
Devin: 4
RDW: 4
Strawhenge: 2
Choutas: -2
MacDougall: 4
Roxy: 6
Sig: -3
Seaside: -3
DrWilgy: -3
FZ: 6
Bullzeye: 6
Sorsha: 6
Rico: 6
Llama: 6
Matt F: 8
Epi: 4
Bea: 4
Dinny: 8
Espers: 8
Motel Room: -4
Bcornett: -4
Elohchin: 8
JJJ: -12
Russ: -20
Golden: 15
Zebra: 0

Now organized with color:
Russ -20
JJJ -12
Bcornett -4
Motel Room -4
DrWilgy -3
Sig -3
Seaside -3
Choutas -2
Zebra 0
MM 1
Floyd 2
Strawhenge 2
Devin 4
RDW 4
MacDougall 4
bea 4
Epi 4
Roxy 6
FZ 6
Bullzeye 6
Sorsha 6
Rico 6
Llama 6
Matt F 8
Dinny 8
Espers 8
Elohchin 8
Golden 15
Vote changed to Golden

I'm going to bed now... that took me afew hours...

...so perhaps the real team isn't even on that list of yours.

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:51 pm**

Boomslang wrote:Zebra, you posted enough to counter my previous read; that's why I let that suspicion drop. I'm changing my vote to Tranq in hopes of countering the other wagon, which I don't like.

I don't buy it. Post count doesn't mean a thing and I think you know that. I rarely see civs let their suspicions drop before their targets even acknowledge the issue they brought up. If you really changed my mind based on my posts then I would be interested to see a specific post that inspired you to.

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:54 pm**

*changed your mind

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:58 pm**

Ok zeeb I will follow. Tranq it is. He can call me a nub later if he so desires. It's my title and I wear it well.

I'm still dying. Work is stupid. I hate pizza.

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:01 pm**

See here's the thing though, I was scum then, I had no goal in making those stats other than wanting to look like a civ. I'm trying my best to use the analyses to figure out who scum team is.

I missed a step of the dance Zebra, do forgive me, and allow me to fully explain why I like that option.

Boomslang - I'm suspicious of Boomslang from yesterday, his thoughts of me defending Tranq threw me for a loop. Honestly it's lingering doubt, and I haven't reassessed him since.

Tranq - You make a good point on tranq, but I disagree with lynching a wallflower at this point, I feel that chances are higher that we will hit a civ if we lynch tranq today, rather than you. Lynching a mafia is too important at this time for me to take that chance.

MM, or you being the leading suspicions of the "anyone who isn't" category is the last slot, but If you are the baddie though in that trio, I would assume Zebra, Boomslang, and Choutas to be more likely than Zebra, Boomslang, Tranq and didn't mention you over MM.

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:06 pm**

bea wrote:Ok zeeb I will follow. Tranq it is. He can call me a nub later if he so desires. It's my title and I wear it well.

I'm still dying. Work is stupid. I hate pizza.

Are you a member of mafia bea?

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:15 pm**

DAY 2

Who killed FZ.?

Poll ended at Mon Nov 16, 2015 8:15:10 pm

a2thezebra
5
DrWilgy (2), Enrique (6), TheFloyd73 (8), Luke11646 (9), Tranq (10) 31%
bea
0
No votes
Boomslang
0
No votes
Choutas
0
No votes
DrWilgy
1
Choutas (5) 6%
Enrique
0
No votes
Luke11646
0
No votes
Matt F
0
No votes
Metalmarsh89
0
No votes
TheFloyd73
1
Matt F (7) 6%
Tranq
4
a2thezebra (13), Metalmarsh89 (14), Boomslang (15), bea (16) 25%
Wouldn't it be nice if I knew? (deadies, non-players)
4
bcornett24 (3), Sorsha (4), FZ. (11), Golden (12) 25%
Wouldn't it be nice if I didn't know? (host)
1
MovingPictures07 (1) 6%
Total votes : 16

Posted: **Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:16 pm**

"That's Not Z"

I had to prove that I could make it alone
But that's not me
I wanted to show how independent I'd grown now
But that's not me

I could try to be big in the eyes of the thread
What matters to me is what I could be before I was dead

I'm a little bit scared
Cause I haven't been lynched in a long time
You needed my vote
And I know that I left at the wrong time
The spectators I tell them
Tell 'em what I was up to said that's not me

I went through all kinds of changes
Took a look at corpse and said that's not me
I miss my bod and the posters I've known
And every night as I laid there alone I did dream

I once had a dream
So I posted and hunted for the scum
I soon found out that my townie life wasn't so pretty
I'm glad I went now I'm that much more sure that we're ready

I once had a dream
So I posted and hunted for the scum

a2thezebra has been lynched. She was a vanilla civilian and "That's Not Me".

It is now Night 2. You have 24 hours to silently mourn the death of a2thezebra. If you are the mafia, send in your kill.

Posted: **Tue Nov 17, 2015 10:22 pm**

"Don't Talk (Put Your Head on My Marmot)"

I can hear so much in your sighs
And I can see so much in your eyes
There are words we both could say
But don't talk, put your head on my marmot

Come close, close your eyes and be still
Don't talk, take my marmot, let it hear your heart beat
Being here with you feels so right
We could live forever tonight
Lets not think about tomorrow
And don't talk put your head on my marmot

Come close, close your eyes and be still
Don't talk, take my marmot, listen to its heart beat
Listen, listen, listen...

Don't talk, put your head on my marmot
Don't talk, close your eyes and be still
Don't talk, put your head on my marmot
Don't talk, close your eyes and be still
Don't talk, put your head on my marmot

Metalmarsh89 has been killed by the mafia. He was a vanilla civilian and "Don't Talk (Put Your Head on My Shoulder)".

It is now Day 3. You have 48 hours to lynch someone.

Posted: **Tue Nov 17, 2015 10:28 pm**

MovingPictures07 wrote:"Don't Talk (Put Your Head on My Marmot)"

Entirely disturbing.

Posted: **Tue Nov 17, 2015 10:29 pm**

Golden wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:"Don't Talk (Put Your Head on My Marmot)"
Entirely disturbing.

Posted: **Tue Nov 17, 2015 11:00 pm**

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
bea wrote:Ok zeeb I will follow. Tranq it is. He can call me a nub later if he so desires. It's my title and I wear it well.

I'm still dying. Work is stupid. I hate pizza.
Are you a member of mafia bea?

No. I am not. Also rip.

Posted: **Tue Nov 17, 2015 11:40 pm**

RIP Zebra, I feel awful that I've helped lynch a fellow civ.

Posted: **Wed Nov 18, 2015 12:57 am**

Welp... I'm going to take a step back and relook things. I'll let y'all discuss without me for awhile.

Posted: **Wed Nov 18, 2015 1:05 am**

RIP Zebra and Marsh

Okay, I'm still down with a Floyd lynch, but after reviewing the polls, I think a read on Wilgy and Tranq is a good idea. I noticed they both voted Zebra on Day 1, avoiding the bcornett lynch and then both helped lynch Zebra on Day 2. I remember Wilgy made the statistical post about how the mafia doesn't vote together early, so I'm wondering if that was a nice little "haha see what I did there?" move by him. I'm pretty sure Wilgy also slightly defended Tranq early in the game too. I'll reread both but that'd be swell if everyone did the same.

bea - Do you have any suspicions? What do you think of Wilgy, Tranq, and Floyd?

Posted: **Wed Nov 18, 2015 2:18 am**

DrWilgy wrote:Welp... I'm going to take a step back and relook things. I'll let y'all discuss without me for awhile.

Wait, what, seriously? We just lost two of our biggest voices witj A2Z and MM and at this point we have hardly any direction. We need all the disussion possible or we're completely and utterly doomed.

Zebra, I'm sorry I couldn't get back in time. I left my vote on you not because I thought it'd be a mislynch (obviously), but I was afraid I was being manipulated and thought it'd be safer to stick to my guns.

Clearly I was wrong. RIP.

Posted: **Wed Nov 18, 2015 2:22 am**

Do you have any current thoughts Enrique? I noticed you just lectured Wilgy for leaving suddenly but then you didn't voice any real thoughts of your own either.

Posted: **Wed Nov 18, 2015 2:30 am**

My most prominent thought is that I'm really bad at Mafia, and I should probably look over this whole Tranq dealio ASAP, and well... pretty much revisit everyone else bc at this point I'm just lost.

Posted: **Wed Nov 18, 2015 7:14 am**

Who was the guy the Marmot and the Zebra voted? Wilgy.
Wilgy

Posted: **Wed Nov 18, 2015 9:20 am**

Man, it's an animal slaughterhouse out there... RIP MM and Zebra.

Regarding Wilgy and Tranq, I don't think they're both mafia, based on this post alone:

Tranq wrote:
Boomslang wrote:why the Choutas vote other than simple revenge?
I asked who to vote for and DrWilgy responded.

Two Pets in one Sound.

WIFOM nonwithstanding, I doubt that mafia teammates would acknowledge that direct influence so clearly. Especially with Tranq being such a low poster, where every post can be scrutinized. I don't like how Wilgy is deciding to step back after the bad lynch result, but I really don't like how Tranq just shrugged off his Zebra vote as temporary very early in the day, then never bothered to explain it or move it to someone else. It was a close lynch, and when he saw the momentum gathering against him, I think he figured it'd be better to lay low and maintain his advantage than try to defend himself.

That won't work this time around. *votes Tranq* Calling you out.

Posted: **Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:37 am**

Choutas wrote:Who was the guy the Marmot and the Zebra voted? Wilgy.
Wilgy

Why?

Yeah, I need to back off. I will answer questions, but need time to think. I tunneled way too hard, also I'm an idiot. Maybe backing off will give the non idiots time to post.

Posted: **Wed Nov 18, 2015 3:24 pm**

Choutas - Besides Wilgy, what are you thinking? The bulk of your posts aren't about much, and in the few that you suspect Wilgy, you say "Voting Wilgy until a better case forms" and then "Voting Wilgy cuz two dead civs voted for him".

Posted: **Wed Nov 18, 2015 6:00 pm**

Boomslang wrote:I don't like how Wilgy is deciding to step back after the bad lynch result, but I really don't like how Tranq just shrugged off his Zebra vote as temporary very early in the day, then never bothered to explain it or move it to someone else. It was a close lynch, and when he saw the momentum gathering against him, I think he figured it'd be better to lay low and maintain his advantage than try to defend himself.

I ended up being afk for the rest of the day. Beer-related reasons

I have a gut civ read on DrWilgy and Enrique. No idea on who's bad so far.

Posted: **Wed Nov 18, 2015 6:27 pm**

DrWilgy wrote:
Choutas wrote:Who was the guy the Marmot and the Zebra voted? Wilgy.
Wilgy
Why?

Yeah, I need to back off. I will answer questions, but need time to think. I tunneled way too hard, also I'm an idiot. Maybe backing off will give the non idiots time to post.

Well that's one way to avoid responsibility.

Posted: **Wed Nov 18, 2015 6:38 pm**

Matt F wrote:Choutas - Besides Wilgy, what are you thinking? The bulk of your posts aren't about much, and in the few that you suspect Wilgy, you say "Voting Wilgy until a better case forms" and then "Voting Wilgy cuz two dead civs voted for him".

His logic kinda makes sense to me. Since yesterday, most opposition to Wilgy has disappeared. I don't know if Choutas is right but that's not a terrible case to make.

Posted: **Wed Nov 18, 2015 6:48 pm**

What responsibility am I avoiding? as far as I can tell, the everyone has been avoiding that responsibility as well.

It's been 5 hours since my last post, there have been 4 posts since. That is less than one post per hour since I've taken a step back.

I've been asking Choutas to explain his suspicion on me for the past 2-3 irl days, and I still haven't seen anything.

Boomslang what don't you like about me stepping back?

A note: It's now 7-3, and we have 2 more chances to lynch a baddie.

Posted: **Wed Nov 18, 2015 6:50 pm**

Enrique wrote:
Matt F wrote:Choutas - Besides Wilgy, what are you thinking? The bulk of your posts aren't about much, and in the few that you suspect Wilgy, you say "Voting Wilgy until a better case forms" and then "Voting Wilgy cuz two dead civs voted for him".
His logic kinda makes sense to me. Since yesterday, most opposition to Wilgy has disappeared. I don't know if Choutas is right but that's not a terrible case to make.

What case?

The Syndicate

[END] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [POLLS] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [NIGHT 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [NIGHT 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [NIGHT 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 2] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Pet Sounds Mafia

Re: [DAY 3] Pet Sounds Mafia