Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
It's frustrating when people are right in their suspicions, but for the wrong reasons, isn't it?S~V~S wrote:I meant seriously, one of your reasons for suspecting me was that I was No U-ey, and that was bullshit.
I would buy one.Epignosis wrote:No-U bars by Eloh. Enjoy that No U-ey goodness, with a satisfying, lynchy center.
Do you mean when he said he was voting her, me or mp for not liking halloween?thellama73 wrote:Good. Let's trade.S~V~S wrote: And now I have talked myself out of voting for her and will instead be likely voting for you.
(Also, Made brought up your name at 6:01, you said you were voting for him at 6:56)
I do mean that, but I mean it in a more or less jokey way.fingersplints wrote:Do you mean when he said he was voting her, me or mp for not liking halloween?thellama73 wrote:Good. Let's trade.S~V~S wrote: And now I have talked myself out of voting for her and will instead be likely voting for you.
(Also, Made brought up your name at 6:01, you said you were voting for him at 6:56)
Well, I'm not voting for her anyway, so there's nothing to worry about.S~V~S wrote:You are wrong. Dead wrong. And for the record, I think trapping people is weak, even when that isn't what actually happened.
I remember when you said No U's were bullshit, lol. Now you are voting for civs based on it.Epignosis wrote:No-U bars by Eloh. Enjoy that No U-ey goodness, with a satisfying, lynchy center.
I'd buy that for a dollar!Epignosis wrote:No-U bars by Eloh. Enjoy that No U-ey goodness, with a satisfying, lynchy center.
Becasue he always thinks I am bad, I guess.juliets wrote:Epi I see you voted for SVS - can you tell us why? If I missed it I apologize.
The first post of hers that bothered me was this one:juliets wrote:Epi I see you voted for SVS - can you tell us why? If I missed it I apologize.
This sounds like she is trying to include herself with the civilians AND create a sense of urgency.S~V~S wrote:All right 2 civs down, not an auspicious start. We need to get a baddie today, or we're toast.
It's also frustrating when people are adamant in their wrong suspicions.thellama73 wrote:It's frustrating when people are right in their suspicions, but for the wrong reasons, isn't it?S~V~S wrote:I meant seriously, one of your reasons for suspecting me was that I was No U-ey, and that was bullshit.
Not as frustrating. Why are you so sure SVS is good?fingersplints wrote:It's also frustrating when people are adamant in their wrong suspicions.thellama73 wrote:It's frustrating when people are right in their suspicions, but for the wrong reasons, isn't it?S~V~S wrote:I meant seriously, one of your reasons for suspecting me was that I was No U-ey, and that was bullshit.
I love that line so much.Roxy wrote:I'd buy that for a dollar!Epignosis wrote:No-U bars by Eloh. Enjoy that No U-ey goodness, with a satisfying, lynchy center.
But she could also be mad because she is a civvie? I feel like you are now doing what you did to me the first day. Why are you jumping on others suspicions like this? First MP now Epithellama73 wrote:I am reading SVS as angry that she is being caught for BS reasons. I recognize it from myself. I don't really mind being lynched as a baddie if the civs did good detective work. I HATE it when I get lynched for the wrong reasons. I think that's what we are seeing here, and I am voting SVS because of it.
I'm not SURE anyone other than myself is good. But I have spent half this game frustrated for people being wrong about me and not listening to me. This seems exactly the same to me. SVS is sounding reasonable. You are not.thellama73 wrote:Not as frustrating. Why are you so sure SVS is good?fingersplints wrote:It's also frustrating when people are adamant in their wrong suspicions.thellama73 wrote:It's frustrating when people are right in their suspicions, but for the wrong reasons, isn't it?S~V~S wrote:I meant seriously, one of your reasons for suspecting me was that I was No U-ey, and that was bullshit.
Personally, I get madder when I am bad. That's just my experience, but I think SVS and me are a lot alike.fingersplints wrote:But she could also be mad because she is a civvie? I feel like you are now doing what you did to me the first day. Why are you jumping on others suspicions like this? First MP now Epithellama73 wrote:I am reading SVS as angry that she is being caught for BS reasons. I recognize it from myself. I don't really mind being lynched as a baddie if the civs did good detective work. I HATE it when I get lynched for the wrong reasons. I think that's what we are seeing here, and I am voting SVS because of it.
Since the No U thing was wrong, why are you so sure I am not?thellama73 wrote:Not as frustrating. Why are you so sure SVS is good?fingersplints wrote:It's also frustrating when people are adamant in their wrong suspicions.thellama73 wrote:It's frustrating when people are right in their suspicions, but for the wrong reasons, isn't it?S~V~S wrote:I meant seriously, one of your reasons for suspecting me was that I was No U-ey, and that was bullshit.
Epignosis wrote:The first post of hers that bothered me was this one:juliets wrote:Epi I see you voted for SVS - can you tell us why? If I missed it I apologize.
This sounds like she is trying to include herself with the civilians AND create a sense of urgency.S~V~S wrote:All right 2 civs down, not an auspicious start. We need to get a baddie today, or we're toast.
Also, I could see her icing MP.
This whole game is just butting heads, no one is looking at all sides.fingersplints wrote:It's also frustrating when people are adamant in their wrong suspicions.thellama73 wrote:It's frustrating when people are right in their suspicions, but for the wrong reasons, isn't it?S~V~S wrote:I meant seriously, one of your reasons for suspecting me was that I was No U-ey, and that was bullshit.
Me too I use it a lotEpignosis wrote:I love that line so much.Roxy wrote:I'd buy that for a dollar!Epignosis wrote:No-U bars by Eloh. Enjoy that No U-ey goodness, with a satisfying, lynchy center.
Ok so why do you keep conveniently waiting until someone brings up a suspicion before posting about it? That is not very civvie like behavior. The civvies need to work together in the thread. Not hoard their suspicions til the last momentthellama73 wrote:Personally, I get madder when I am bad. That's just my experience, but I think SVS and me are a lot alike.fingersplints wrote:But she could also be mad because she is a civvie? I feel like you are now doing what you did to me the first day. Why are you jumping on others suspicions like this? First MP now Epithellama73 wrote:I am reading SVS as angry that she is being caught for BS reasons. I recognize it from myself. I don't really mind being lynched as a baddie if the civs did good detective work. I HATE it when I get lynched for the wrong reasons. I think that's what we are seeing here, and I am voting SVS because of it.
I don't remember when Rob first said he suspected her, but I certainly did not jump on it. I suspected her a long time before I posted about it.
Of course I'm not sounding reasonable. Have you met me?fingersplints wrote:SVS is sounding reasonable. You are not.
I was not intending to "hoard" anything. There's not a lot of time in this game, and I can't immediately post everything I am thinking. I don't think it is very convenient at all, actually.fingersplints wrote: Ok so why do you keep conveniently waiting until someone brings up a suspicion before posting about it? That is not very civvie like behavior. The civvies need to work together in the thread. Not hoard their suspicions til the last moment
No but I have met SVSthellama73 wrote:Of course I'm not sounding reasonable. Have you met me?fingersplints wrote:SVS is sounding reasonable. You are not.
Probably because I am not frustrated.Roxy wrote:SVS is sounding the most genuine in her frustration and llama is all cool as a cucumber.
I am immediately posting everything I am thinkingthellama73 wrote:I was not intending to "hoard" anything. There's not a lot of time in this game, and I can't immediately post everything I am thinking. I don't think it is very convenient at all, actually.fingersplints wrote: Ok so why do you keep conveniently waiting until someone brings up a suspicion before posting about it? That is not very civvie like behavior. The civvies need to work together in the thread. Not hoard their suspicions til the last moment
Additionally, there are good reasons not to let people know you are onto them too early.
Then, and please please please don't take this the wrong way. You are thinking a lot less things than I am. It is physically impossible for me to type everything I am thinking about this game in the designated hour. I have to filter.fingersplints wrote: I am immediately posting everything I am thinking
Then you don't know me at all. I tend to stay cooler when i am bad, I win way more games bad than civ, unless someone asshats me and I have problems handing confrontation sometimes for various reasons. So if you are reading this as baddie frustration you are dead wrong.thellama73 wrote:Rox, I agree that she sounds genuine in her frustration. THAT's a big part of why I suspect her.
I am confident right now, which is a good place to be. Although I am a little less confident now that I see I am one vote away from being killed.Roxy wrote:Oh but I do think you are frustrated a bit you just are hiding it - your post tone has improved immensely since the very first time we played. Its harder to see the real intent of your posts.
You should be able to type a bunch of it though is all I am saying. How does not mentioning suspicions til nearly the end of the lynch helpful? The only purpose it has is so that the person you "suspect" has no time to respond or retaliate.thellama73 wrote:Then, and please please please don't take this the wrong way. You are thinking a lot less things than I am. It is physically impossible for me to type everything I am thinking about this game in the designated hour. I have to filter.fingersplints wrote: I am immediately posting everything I am thinking
No she isn't. There was no No U, and there is no baddie anything.thellama73 wrote:Also, I see that I already have two votes. I urge others not to vote for me please. SVS is the droids you're looking for.
Less than a half hour in is not "nearly the end of the lynch."fingersplints wrote:You should be able to type a bunch of it though is all I am saying. How does not mentioning suspicions til nearly the end of the lynch helpful? The only purpose it has is so that the person you "suspect" has no time to respond or retaliate.thellama73 wrote:Then, and please please please don't take this the wrong way. You are thinking a lot less things than I am. It is physically impossible for me to type everything I am thinking about this game in the designated hour. I have to filter.fingersplints wrote: I am immediately posting everything I am thinking
I'm not even sure you are bad. I just don't think that holding onto suspicions is a good thing to do.
Also I was kind of just joking because I don't really have much of a filter to begin with. I just blurt out whatever I thinkthellama73 wrote:Then, and please please please don't take this the wrong way. You are thinking a lot less things than I am. It is physically impossible for me to type everything I am thinking about this game in the designated hour. I have to filter.fingersplints wrote: I am immediately posting everything I am thinking
Less than half an hour is more than half. So if someone just decided to start posting well into Day 2 of a lynch that'd be ok by you?thellama73 wrote:Less than a half hour in is not "nearly the end of the lynch."fingersplints wrote:You should be able to type a bunch of it though is all I am saying. How does not mentioning suspicions til nearly the end of the lynch helpful? The only purpose it has is so that the person you "suspect" has no time to respond or retaliate.thellama73 wrote:Then, and please please please don't take this the wrong way. You are thinking a lot less things than I am. It is physically impossible for me to type everything I am thinking about this game in the designated hour. I have to filter.fingersplints wrote: I am immediately posting everything I am thinking
I'm not even sure you are bad. I just don't think that holding onto suspicions is a good thing to do.