The Syndicate

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:25 am The correct answer is DM and LC.

Long Con is trying to find an angle on me to work a credible vote in while avoiding a vote on DM. The voting history and voting thought-process stinks.

Your last sentence is probably more accurate than i'd like to admit. The first two are not true.

It's up to others to decide if I'm trying to find an angle or actually giving good points about you.

But why are you dead set against DarlingMonroe? You voted there once. "Had" a great idea. And voted someone you never even interacted with.

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:26 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:25 am The correct answer is DM and LC.

Long Con is trying to find an angle on me to work a credible vote in while avoiding a vote on DM. The voting history and voting thought-process stinks.

Your last sentence is probably more accurate than i'd like to admit. The first two are not true.

It's up to others to decide if I'm trying to find an angle or actually giving good points about you.

I'm not sold. I've been shit myself because of work.

I more interested in your relationship with DM here. That's the person I think that needs to be..."downsized" this round for anyone to have a fighting chance.

I'm not dead set against that vote at all. I hated their entrance to Day two.

I'll probably just try to trust you in order to not split the vote. Solely based on my history of being completely wrong.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:28 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:26 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:25 am The correct answer is DM and LC.

Long Con is trying to find an angle on me to work a credible vote in while avoiding a vote on DM. The voting history and voting thought-process stinks.

Your last sentence is probably more accurate than i'd like to admit. The first two are not true.

It's up to others to decide if I'm trying to find an angle or actually giving good points about you.

I'm not sold. I've been shit myself because of work.

I more interested in your relationship with DM here. That's the person I think that needs to be..."downsized" this round for anyone to have a fighting chance.

If we screw up once more, we're done.

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:30 am I'm not dead set against that vote at all. I hated their entrance to Day two.

I'll probably just try to trust you in order to not split the vote. Solely based on my history of being completely wrong.

But I've been the person voting out two civilians my damn self. I'm merely trusting the Prime (track or not) and going from there. I have no positive reason to deviate from that at this stage.

So it's customary on other sites for the vote to be locked in final 5 and onward?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:32 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:30 am I'm not dead set against that vote at all. I hated their entrance to Day two.

I'll probably just try to trust you in order to not split the vote. Solely based on my history of being completely wrong.

But I've been the person voting out two civilians my damn self. I'm merely trusting the Prime (track or not) and going from there. I have no positive reason to deviate from that at this stage.

But that's such an easy argument for a Wolf to make.

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:30 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:28 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:26 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:25 am The correct answer is DM and LC.

Long Con is trying to find an angle on me to work a credible vote in while avoiding a vote on DM. The voting history and voting thought-process stinks.

Your last sentence is probably more accurate than i'd like to admit. The first two are not true.

It's up to others to decide if I'm trying to find an angle or actually giving good points about you.

I'm not sold. I've been shit myself because of work.

I more interested in your relationship with DM here. That's the person I think that needs to be..."downsized" this round for anyone to have a fighting chance.

If we screw up once more, we're done.

Isn't that true for any lynch? I don't see how that has anything to do with DarlingMonroe. Lynch any civilian, and civilians lose.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:33 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:30 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:28 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:26 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:25 am The correct answer is DM and LC.

Long Con is trying to find an angle on me to work a credible vote in while avoiding a vote on DM. The voting history and voting thought-process stinks.

Your last sentence is probably more accurate than i'd like to admit. The first two are not true.

It's up to others to decide if I'm trying to find an angle or actually giving good points about you.

I'm not sold. I've been shit myself because of work.

I more interested in your relationship with DM here. That's the person I think that needs to be..."downsized" this round for anyone to have a fighting chance.

If we screw up once more, we're done.

Isn't that true for any lynch? I don't see how that has anything to do with DarlingMonroe. Lynch any civilian, and civilians lose.

I guess I was just vocalizing my turmoil.

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:32 am So it's customary on other sites for the vote to be locked in final 5 and onward?

Yeah, it's been done here from hosts from other places.

Okay, but look at the vote, it was a 3-way tie. You, Abby, and was DM the third?

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:33 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:32 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:30 am I'm not dead set against that vote at all. I hated their entrance to Day two.

I'll probably just try to trust you in order to not split the vote. Solely based on my history of being completely wrong.

But I've been the person voting out two civilians my damn self. I'm merely trusting the Prime (track or not) and going from there. I have no positive reason to deviate from that at this stage.

But that's such an easy argument for a Wolf to make.

That's not even an argument. That's a fact, followed by what I'm doing, followed by why I'm doing it.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:35 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:33 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:32 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:30 am I'm not dead set against that vote at all. I hated their entrance to Day two.

I'll probably just try to trust you in order to not split the vote. Solely based on my history of being completely wrong.

But I've been the person voting out two civilians my damn self. I'm merely trusting the Prime (track or not) and going from there. I have no positive reason to deviate from that at this stage.

But that's such an easy argument for a Wolf to make.

That's not even an argument. That's a fact, followed by what I'm doing, followed by why I'm doing it.

Semantics. You know what I mean, going with a posthumously proven Civ's opinion us very level 1 and above reproach.

*is

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:35 am Okay, but look at the vote, it was a 3-way tie. You, Abby, and was DM the third?

I am aware of the vote count.

No, ok, if you were bad, you'd not have risked the tie, right? You would just vote Abby. I dunno. Does that logic hold with DM's situation?

While I appreciate this LC, it's not how I want to spend my evening. I'm tired. I work from Friday afternoon until an hour ago, waking hours excluded.

You still won't talk about or to DarlingMonroe directly, and I know you're doing your damndest to get a "gotcha" moment out of me.

Why wouldn't DM just vote Abby and not risk it?

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:40 am No, ok, if you were bad, you'd not have risked the tie, right? You would just vote Abby. I dunno. Does that logic hold with DM's situation?

If I were bad, I'd post ten times and then shut the fuck up.

You've got the wrong idea about me, bro, i'm coming around, but take a break, no problem Chat another time we got 48 hours.

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:41 am Why wouldn't DM just vote Abby and not risk it?

I don't know.

Ask DM about it.

Maybe you could DM DM about it!

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:41 am You've got the wrong idea about me, bro, i'm coming around, but take a break, no problem Chat another time we got 48 hours.

Been a long weekend.

I'm going to pour myself a good strong one and chill out.

Give my love to Black Rock and all.

Will do! I've already had a few beverages myself. You better not respond to this. Get outta here!

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:45 am Will do! I've already had a few beverages myself. You better not respond to this. Get outta here!

Yes sir!

(Oops)

Now that Epignosis is gone and will not respond. I will continue this line of thinking I was going on.

Maybe that 3 way tie is very revealing. I kind of hate this now, because it's looking like I'm trying to avoid the DM Lynch. Bear with me though, it's not like that.

Is it reasonable to think that a Wolf in a 3 way tie would just break the tie because the risk is not worth it?

But maybe DM wasn't online at the time. I haven't looked. I'm out in my workshop on my phone. So I'm not doing a bunch of tabs and ISO extra stuff.

Yoooouuuuu

I feel like I need to make a case for each of the players left.

2 good 2 bad in: epi, LC, Dr, robyn

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:49 am Now that Epignosis is gone and will not respond. I will continue this line of thinking I was going on.

Maybe that 3 way tie is very revealing. I kind of hate this now, because it's looking like I'm trying to avoid the DM Lynch. Bear with me though, it's not like that.

Is it reasonable to think that a Wolf in a 3 way tie would just break the tie because the risk is not worth it?

But maybe DM wasn't online at the time. I haven't looked. I'm out in my workshop on my phone. So I'm not doing a bunch of tabs and ISO extra stuff.

I mean, you are kinda starting to win me over as town LC. Because you're exactly right. It's two wolves of Epi/Robyn/Dr. W

DarlingMonroe was not around for the three-way tie, and is not cleared by my theory.

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 3:15 am DarlingMonroe was not around for the three-way tie, and is not cleared by my theory.

wouldn't have my partner in that case alert me to break the tie?

But Wolf partners exist.

Epignosis
2
17%
Voters: robyn, DarlingMonroe
☆Princess Abigail☆
2
17%
Voters: Epignosis, Long Con
Long Con
0
No votes
Voters: None
robyn
0
No votes
Voters: None
DrWilgy
0
No votes
Voters: None
pyxxy
0
No votes
Voters: None
DarlingMonroe
2
17%
Voters: DrWilgy, pyxxy

Only a Wolf partner that wasn't around at EoD makes sense, in this context, for DM to be a Wolf.

DarlingMonroe wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 3:16 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 3:15 am DarlingMonroe was not around for the three-way tie, and is not cleared by my theory.

wouldn't have my partner in that case alert me to break the tie?

They would just break the tie themselves.

Unless it's someone who also wasn't around.

Only Robyn was not around. So it's either a DM-Robyn team, or Wilgy is playing it dangerously (as he has historically) in order to gain this kind of cred.

now you got me thinking, perhaps all the votes were on town, and thus the wolves were just chillin' in didnt bother to break the tie... in that case SUS robyn, you LC, and dr. w all who had no votes

Robyn-Wilgy then.

Well ok. Robyn-Wilgy is my solve then, because of the dynamics of the three-way tie, and going with the idea that the Wolves don't risk losing one of their own when it's very easy to cast a vote to prevent it.

@Epignosis pyxxy's opinion on DM isn't enough for me, and I feel that the vote dynamics of the last elimination are a stronger case. If you think that's wrong, tell me and I'll consider it.

Maybe it's Epignosis and DM, and they got super-lucky with the rand on Abby. It's notable that Epi wasn't voting DM yesterday, despite him hounding me about not eliminating DM. All he could have done, really, is move his vote to bus DM, and I don't think that's particularly in his general wheelhouse to do. And DM wasn't around to switch to Abby... but that doesn't jive because DM's vote stayed on Epi at EoD.

What kind of team has one member that won't bus, and the other that does? One would think they'd come to a mutual decision on whether or not to bus. Plus, with a perfect game so far, was it time to bus? I don't think DM needed to go against Epi there is they are teammates.

So I'll stick with Robyn and Wilgy. Maybe I'm the only one left playing. Robyn peaced out when I voted for her, and has not returned despite being on-site today for another game, so that doesn't engender trust in me.

I think an entire world view shouldn't crumple to the argument "maybe wolves were afk"

Another one [VOTE: DM] aubergine

what the fuck is this

Epignosis
0
No votes
Voters: None
Long Con
0
No votes
Voters: None
robyn
2
25%
Voters: DarlingMonroe, Long Con
DrWilgy
0
No votes
Voters: None
DarlingMonroe
2
25%
Voters: DrWilgy, Epignosis

Elimination will be plurality only, because I'm not an omniscient being capable of running majority on this site.

oh, so votes rn don’t matter, nice

if i had hammer i’d be criminally angry

i think long con should self vote

Of course you would want that, but I'd prefer if the Town won.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 4:21 pm I think an entire world view shouldn't crumple to the argument "maybe wolves were afk"

The dismissive and intentional tone-deafness of this response reassures me that I'm right.

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 6:28 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 4:21 pm I think an entire world view shouldn't crumple to the argument "maybe wolves were afk"

The dismissive and intentional tone-deafness of this response reassures me that I'm right.

Wasn't supposed to be dismissive, apologies.

Just feels that we've been jumping through hoops to get to DM's flip and now we're like "nah" once again.