Page 2 of 29

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:48 pm
by Sloonei
insertnamehere wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:32 pm
Sloonei wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:10 pm
novaselinenever wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:59 pm
nutella wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:49 pm
novaselinenever wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:45 pm Good luck !
what does this mean
That I hope we all have a great game and enjoy it.
Town read.
Scum read. :mafia:
Go on.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:50 pm
by insertnamehere
Sloonei wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:48 pm
insertnamehere wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:32 pm
Sloonei wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:10 pm
novaselinenever wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:59 pm
nutella wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:49 pm
novaselinenever wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:45 pm Good luck !
what does this mean
That I hope we all have a great game and enjoy it.
Town read.
Scum read. :mafia:
Go on.
Good luck !

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:58 pm
by nutella
Yeah imo the "Good luck !" post is suspicious at face value

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:00 pm
by Sloonei
nutella wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:58 pm Yeah imo the "Good luck !" post is suspicious at face value
Why?

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:01 pm
by Epignosis
nutella wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:58 pm Yeah imo the "Good luck !" post is suspicious at face value
Is it because of the superfluous space?

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:03 pm
by insertnamehere
Real explanation: I've gotten so bored of the same cycle I go through at the beginning of every game of getting annoyed at everyone's (IMO) pointless reads that at this point I've decided to embrace it and just post random accusatory nonsense until someone does something worthy of actual suspicion.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:10 pm
by Sloonei
insertnamehere wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:03 pm Real explanation: I've gotten so bored of the same cycle I go through at the beginning of every game of getting annoyed at everyone's (IMO) pointless reads that at this point I've decided to embrace it and just post random accusatory nonsense until someone does something worthy of actual suspicion.
:nicenod:

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:34 pm
by nutella
Epignosis wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:01 pm
nutella wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:58 pm Yeah imo the "Good luck !" post is suspicious at face value
Is it because of the superfluous space?
No. It's just... weird to say good luck. Like it sounds like something who's not playing the game would say, or maybe like a civ on their deathbed? It just... came off weird.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:39 pm
by MacDougall
I am Merry and I got to start the game with a red peek on nutella.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:50 pm
by nutella
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:39 pm I am Merry and I got to start the game with a red peek on nutella.
lol what

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:51 pm
by MacDougall
nutella is bad. Confirmed.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:06 pm
by nutella
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:51 pm nutella is bad. Confirmed.
No. I'm not bad. You're either making shit up (about a role that doesn't even have a power) or you for some reason mysteriously got false info on day 0. I'm gonna go with making shit up. Whether that's for a discussion-stimulating pro-civ motive or a scum anti-civ motive is yet to be seen... but if you want to lynch me it will only hurt the civs.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:13 pm
by insertnamehere
nutella wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:06 pm
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:51 pm nutella is bad. Confirmed.
No. I'm not bad. You're either making shit up (about a role that doesn't even have a power) or you for some reason mysteriously got false info on day 0. I'm gonna go with making shit up. Whether that's for a discussion-stimulating pro-civ motive or a scum anti-civ motive is yet to be seen... but if you want to lynch me it will only hurt the civs.
FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:20 pm
by Kylemii
what is a red peek?

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:33 pm
by Kylemii
i also don't think we should be so relaxed about roleclaiming. doing it helps the mafia narrow down who frodo is, and the role list also has additional civ roles "intended for mafia claims" so i don't think roleclaiming should even necessarily be a reason to trust someone.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:43 pm
by nutella
"red peek" means info that someone is bad (a "green peek" is info that someone is good)

and yeah, based on the wording in the OP, the mafia know which roles are not in the game and are thus available for them to claim (I've played one or two other games with this mechanic -- in Mass Effect I was on a baddie team and we were told which roles we could safeclaim)

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:51 pm
by MacDougall
nutella wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:06 pm
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:51 pm nutella is bad. Confirmed.
No. I'm not bad. You're either making shit up (about a role that doesn't even have a power) or you for some reason mysteriously got false info on day 0. I'm gonna go with making shit up. Whether that's for a discussion-stimulating pro-civ motive or a scum anti-civ motive is yet to be seen... but if you want to lynch me it will only hurt the civs.
Nah my red peek says that it is definitely not false info in the PM.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:53 pm
by MacDougall
Kylemii wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:33 pm i also don't think we should be so relaxed about roleclaiming. doing it helps the mafia narrow down who frodo is, and the role list also has additional civ roles "intended for mafia claims" so i don't think roleclaiming should even necessarily be a reason to trust someone.
You're bad too btw.

2 scum found.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:00 pm
by Long Con
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:38 pm
nutella wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:27 pm
Sloonei wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:19 pm
nutella wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:05 pm Hot take ambray and sloonei are scum mates gg
Tell me more
you're asking all these questions to the point of sounding fake

idk the chance that you're actually teammates is probably pretty low, especially with all this interaction right after the game thread opens on day 0, but still I could see it as a possibility based on this behavior. and making a bold assertion like this should stimulate the discussion. hence the hot take
U bad
That was my initial take on it.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:03 pm
by nutella
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:51 pm
nutella wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:06 pm
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:51 pm nutella is bad. Confirmed.
No. I'm not bad. You're either making shit up (about a role that doesn't even have a power) or you for some reason mysteriously got false info on day 0. I'm gonna go with making shit up. Whether that's for a discussion-stimulating pro-civ motive or a scum anti-civ motive is yet to be seen... but if you want to lynch me it will only hurt the civs.
Nah my red peek says that it is definitely not false info in the PM.
Well all I'm saying is if you lynch me you're gonna be disappointed.

Unless you're bad of course. Then it's all fun and games.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:03 pm
by nutella
Long Con wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:00 pm
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:38 pm
nutella wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:27 pm
Sloonei wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:19 pm
nutella wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:05 pm Hot take ambray and sloonei are scum mates gg
Tell me more
you're asking all these questions to the point of sounding fake

idk the chance that you're actually teammates is probably pretty low, especially with all this interaction right after the game thread opens on day 0, but still I could see it as a possibility based on this behavior. and making a bold assertion like this should stimulate the discussion. hence the hot take
U bad
That was my initial take on it.
so you suspect me? why?

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:04 pm
by nutella
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:53 pm
Kylemii wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:33 pm i also don't think we should be so relaxed about roleclaiming. doing it helps the mafia narrow down who frodo is, and the role list also has additional civ roles "intended for mafia claims" so i don't think roleclaiming should even necessarily be a reason to trust someone.
You're bad too btw.

2 scum found.
why do you think Kyle is bad? He's expressing a very civ-minded strategic thought in this post

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:06 pm
by MacDougall
nutella wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:04 pm
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:53 pm
Kylemii wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:33 pm i also don't think we should be so relaxed about roleclaiming. doing it helps the mafia narrow down who frodo is, and the role list also has additional civ roles "intended for mafia claims" so i don't think roleclaiming should even necessarily be a reason to trust someone.
You're bad too btw.

2 scum found.
why do you think Kyle is bad? He's expressing a very civ-minded strategic thought in this post
No he isn't. He's expressing something that sounds like that that is far more likely to have been thought of by a scum player trying to think of their opportunities and he has implied that I was legitimately role claiming rather than fake claiming, realised it and then made that afterthought part of the post to counteract it, then he looked at his post and thought he'd done a good job cleaning it up but he hadn't unfortunately.

Also I have a red peek.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:13 pm
by Long Con
nutella wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:03 pm
Long Con wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:00 pm
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:38 pm
nutella wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:27 pm
Sloonei wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:19 pm
nutella wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:05 pm Hot take ambray and sloonei are scum mates gg
Tell me more
you're asking all these questions to the point of sounding fake

idk the chance that you're actually teammates is probably pretty low, especially with all this interaction right after the game thread opens on day 0, but still I could see it as a possibility based on this behavior. and making a bold assertion like this should stimulate the discussion. hence the hot take
U bad
That was my initial take on it.
so you suspect me? why?
Your post is rife with hip jargon that I don't feel is natural for you. That's not how you usually talk, is it? It just pinged me as possibly forced and fake.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:16 pm
by Kylemii
I'm bad cus I've read the roles and have thought about the negative consequences of roleclaiming in this setup, instead of blindly rushing in?

I didn't imply anything about you, I am warning against further claims or fake claims. Not everything is about you, Mac.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:17 pm
by MacDougall
Kylemii wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:16 pm I'm bad cus I've read the roles and have thought about the negative consequences of roleclaiming in this setup, instead of blindly rushing in?

I didn't imply anything about you, I am warning against further claims or fake claims. Not everything is about you, Mac.
:haha:

Yes it is.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:33 pm
by Kylemii
like to be clear that had pretty much nothing to do with you. the only part of it that referred to your actions was the last part about trust. i could already tell what you were doing with your thing about nutella, whether you are or aren't Merry is irrelevant. :p

I also want to add that if anyone ever sees another player claiming their role, it's probably best to not say anything since the only players who can't safely claim their own roles are probably Gandalf and Frodo.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:53 pm
by Long Con
Kylemii wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:33 pm like to be clear that had pretty much nothing to do with you. the only part of it that referred to your actions was the last part about trust. i could already tell what you were doing with your thing about nutella, whether you are or aren't Merry is irrelevant. :p

I also want to add that if anyone ever sees another player claiming their role, it's probably best to not say anything since the only players who can't safely claim their own roles are probably Gandalf and Frodo.
What? If I see someone claim my role, I should keep quiet?

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:53 pm
by MacDougall
Kylemii wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:33 pm like to be clear that had pretty much nothing to do with you. the only part of it that referred to your actions was the last part about trust. i could already tell what you were doing with your thing about nutella, whether you are or aren't Merry is irrelevant. :p

I also want to add that if anyone ever sees another player claiming their role, it's probably best to not say anything since the only players who can't safely claim their own roles are probably Gandalf and Frodo.
Could you just. Is that because you are Mafia and you are aware that she isn't your teammate?

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:05 am
by Kylemii
Long Con wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:53 pmWhat? If I see someone claim my role, I should keep quiet?
why would scum claim your role when they're apparently already set up with safeclaims
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:53 pmCould you just. Is that because you are Mafia and you are aware that she isn't your teammate?
no it's cus I read the roles. :p there's no role that gets a "red card" on other players. you were doing a jay gambit.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:07 am
by Kylemii
you can't keep suspecting me just cus i read and analyze the roles sometimes.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:15 am
by insertnamehere
Kylemii wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:05 am
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:53 pmCould you just. Is that because you are Mafia and you are aware that she isn't your teammate?
no it's cus I read the roles. :p there's no role that gets a "red card" on other players. you were doing a jay gambit.
*ding ding*

Kyle, that's correct! There's no goddamn reason why Mac would know anyone's role, (unless he's Frodo, whose secret role could theoretically provide rolechecks, or a no-good scummeister) so there's pretty much a 100% chance he's just doing some aggravating instigative gambit that only serves the purpose of muddying the waters and annoying everyone.
Kylemii wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:05 am
Long Con wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:53 pmWhat? If I see someone claim my role, I should keep quiet?
why would scum claim your role when they're apparently already set up with safeclaims
*bzzzzzt*

I'm sorry, Kyle, but you got that one wrong. There are thirteen non-Frodo-or-Gandalf roles, and only ten of them were given to civ players. We have no way of knowing whether or not mafia members received specific civ claims, or if they'll just have to try and choose wisely. Only the mafia members know this. I don't like that you seem to firmly plant yourself on one side, especially when it could provoke civilians to reveal their roles.

Unfortunately for Kyle, he's getting the first INH Eyeball Emoji Award of the game for doing something of legitimate suspiciousness.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:26 am
by Epignosis
INH doesn't get what a safeclaim is.

So he's mocking someone else who does.

That makes INH a civilian.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:34 am
by Jackofhearts2005
Marmot wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 5:03 pm Game note:

I toyed with whether to allow info-dumping and what-have-you in this game. In an effort to allow this, I expanded the possible civilian roles that may exist in this game.
:clap: :clap: :clap:

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:35 am
by Kylemii
insertnamehere wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:15 am
Kylemii wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:05 amwhy would scum claim your role when they're apparently already set up with safeclaims
*bzzzzzt*

I'm sorry, Kyle, but you got that one wrong. There are thirteen non-Frodo-or-Gandalf roles, and only ten of them were given to civ players. We have no way of knowing whether or not mafia members received specific civ claims, or if they'll just have to try and choose wisely. Only the mafia members know this. I don't like that you seem to firmly plant yourself on one side,
it seems like a safe assumption that the mafia would be set up with specific roles to claim, why else would there be exactly 3 spares, and not like... 6 spares or even more spares? What would be the point of allowing role-claims and giving the mafia exactly one fake role each if they just have to guess what it is. The game would be solvable in a single day, that's not fun.

I pretty much assumed it was that way based on context but nutella pointing out that there has been historical precedent for that kind of thing made me more confident in my assumption.
especially when it could provoke civilians to reveal their roles.
hey explain this
Unfortunately for Kyle, he's getting the first INH Eyeball Emoji Award of the game for doing something of legitimate suspiciousness.
:/ what good is the award if you don't even use the eyeball emoji as part of it? c'mon man

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:36 am
by Kylemii
Epignosis wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:26 am INH doesn't get what a safeclaim is.

So he's mocking someone else who does.

That makes INH a civilian.
am i being mocked :(

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:37 am
by Epignosis
Kylemii wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:36 am
Epignosis wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:26 am INH doesn't get what a safeclaim is.

So he's mocking someone else who does.

That makes INH a civilian.
am i being mocked :(
Ask the mocker.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:41 am
by Long Con
Epignosis wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:26 am INH doesn't get what a safeclaim is.

So he's mocking someone else who does.

That makes INH a civilian.
Epignosis uses sound logic to clear someone.

That looks good for him.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:42 am
by Jackofhearts2005
insertnamehere wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:03 pm Real explanation: I've gotten so bored of the same cycle I go through at the beginning of every game of getting annoyed at everyone's (IMO) pointless reads that at this point I've decided to embrace it and just post random accusatory nonsense until someone does something worthy of actual suspicion.
:clap: :clap: :clap:

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:42 am
by Long Con
Kylemii wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:35 am:/ what good is the award if you don't even use the eyeball emoji as part of it? c'mon man
legit

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:45 am
by timmer
Oh hai.

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:45 am
by Jackofhearts2005
Kylemii wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:16 pm I'm bad cus I've read the roles and have thought about the negative consequences of roleclaiming in this setup, instead of blindly rushing in?

I didn't imply anything about you, I am warning against further claims or fake claims. Not everything is about you, Mac.
:clap: :clap: :clap:

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:48 am
by Jackofhearts2005
Long Con wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:53 pm
Kylemii wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:33 pm like to be clear that had pretty much nothing to do with you. the only part of it that referred to your actions was the last part about trust. i could already tell what you were doing with your thing about nutella, whether you are or aren't Merry is irrelevant. :p

I also want to add that if anyone ever sees another player claiming their role, it's probably best to not say anything since the only players who can't safely claim their own roles are probably Gandalf and Frodo.
What? If I see someone claim my role, I should keep quiet?
:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:48 am
by Jackofhearts2005
(This is a thing that I'm doing.)

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:49 am
by timmer
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:48 am (This is a thing that I'm doing.)
:ponder: :ponder: :ponder:

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:51 am
by timmer
Jack, have we been in a game before? I'm rusty as hell, I feel like... no?

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:51 am
by Sloonei
timmer wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:49 am
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:48 am (This is a thing that I'm doing.)
:ponder: :ponder: :ponder:
what're you :ponder: ing about?

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:53 am
by timmer
Sloonei wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:51 am
timmer wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:49 am
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:48 am (This is a thing that I'm doing.)
:ponder: :ponder: :ponder:
what're you :ponder: ing about?
Trying out the "thing"

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:54 am
by Sloonei
timmer wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:53 am
Sloonei wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:51 am
timmer wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:49 am
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:48 am (This is a thing that I'm doing.)
:ponder: :ponder: :ponder:
what're you :ponder: ing about?
Trying out the "thing"
Do you have an opinion of Jack thinging?

Re: [DAY 0] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:55 am
by Kylemii
Jack is Wilgying