The Syndicate

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:54 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:04 am Kyle, give me one town read and one scum read. Please and thanks.

Don’t do it Kyle he’s been drawn over to the dark side

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:55 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:48 am maybe the difference is that jay isn't here to be loud and controversial

Sloonei got dis

Do you trust Sloonei? y/n

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:33 am I want to elaborate on my jack read. He's been Wilgying, and that's fine. He's also expressed suspicions and that's good, but I haven't seen him trying to actually push any of his reads. every player that isn't Wilgy who starts out with a self-imposed limitation ends up dropping it as soon as it actually starts to inhibit their play.

if the language used in his one actual text post were accurate to the way he felt about me then why didn't he push for my lynch, specially when he said "eyeroll emoji" and "wolf emoji" about me

Kyle, I would be willing to pursue a Jack vote at this time. It's Day 2 and there are some things that I'm wanting to see before I reveal all my cards, but you can expect me to play them before you lose patience about it, for obvious reasons. I am the eggman, and god save the queen.

what in the world are you talking about

is it something cryptic and mysterious?

nutella wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 2:04 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 2:01 am Let’s lynch nutella

Why

Gotta lynch someone

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 2:07 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:54 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:04 am Kyle, give me one town read and one scum read. Please and thanks.

Don’t do it Kyle he’s been drawn over to the dark side

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:55 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:48 am maybe the difference is that jay isn't here to be loud and controversial

Sloonei got dis

Do you trust Sloonei? y/n

Trust no-one.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:01 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 2:07 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:54 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:04 am Kyle, give me one town read and one scum read. Please and thanks.

Don’t do it Kyle he’s been drawn over to the dark side

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:55 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:48 am maybe the difference is that jay isn't here to be loud and controversial

Sloonei got dis

Do you trust Sloonei? y/n

Trust no-one.

cool but like... do you trust sloonei to be loud and controversial with our best intentions in mind?

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:05 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:01 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 2:07 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:54 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:04 am Kyle, give me one town read and one scum read. Please and thanks.

Don’t do it Kyle he’s been drawn over to the dark side

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:55 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:48 am maybe the difference is that jay isn't here to be loud and controversial

Sloonei got dis

Do you trust Sloonei? y/n

Trust no-one.

cool but like... do you trust sloonei to be loud and controversial with our best intentions in mind?

What?

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:15 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:05 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:01 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 2:07 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:54 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:04 am Kyle, give me one town read and one scum read. Please and thanks.

Don’t do it Kyle he’s been drawn over to the dark side

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:55 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:48 am maybe the difference is that jay isn't here to be loud and controversial

Sloonei got dis

Do you trust Sloonei? y/n

Trust no-one.

cool but like... do you trust sloonei to be loud and controversial with our best intentions in mind?

What?

????

[mention]MacDougall[/mention] do you have a read on Sloonei? do you trust sloonei to be an effective shit disturber/town leader in this game?

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:44 am @MacDougall do you have a read on Sloonei? do you trust sloonei to be an effective shit disturber/town leader in this game?

He seems to be his usual self but tinfoil is always a thing with the sloons and the jays.

Purpose of the question now plz?

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:48 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:44 am @MacDougall do you have a read on Sloonei? do you trust sloonei to be an effective shit disturber/town leader in this game?

He seems to be his usual self but tinfoil is always a thing with the sloons and the jays.

Purpose of the question now plz?

because you said "don't trust sloonei" and "let's rely on sloonei" in two different posts 60 seconds apart

i was curious about your viewpoint

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:56 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:48 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:44 am @MacDougall do you have a read on Sloonei? do you trust sloonei to be an effective shit disturber/town leader in this game?

He seems to be his usual self but tinfoil is always a thing with the sloons and the jays.

Purpose of the question now plz?

because you said "don't trust sloonei" and "let's rely on sloonei" in two different posts 60 seconds apart

i was curious about your viewpoint

No I didn't.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:55 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:48 am maybe the difference is that jay isn't here to be loud and controversial

Sloonei got dis

How does this equal "let's rely on Sloonei"?

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:56 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:56 am
because you said "don't trust sloonei" and "let's rely on sloonei" in two different posts 60 seconds apart

i was curious about your viewpoint

No I didn't.

.....

you said "don't trust him he's gone to the dark side" in regards to Sloonei asking me for a couple of reads and then "Sloonei's got this" in regards to town leadership and content creation

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:58 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:55 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:48 am maybe the difference is that jay isn't here to be loud and controversial

Sloonei got dis

How does this equal "let's rely on Sloonei"?

how does it not?

i think i maybe misunderstood your post? i thought you were advocating Sloonei as a trustworthy shit-disturber.

All I was saying was Sloonei is an adequate replacement for jay when it comes to being 'loud and controversial'. Your words. I made no comment as to how I felt about his trustworthiness or alignment.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 4:51 am All I was saying was Sloonei is an adequate replacement for jay when it comes to being 'loud and controversial'. Your words. I made no comment as to how I felt about his trustworthiness or alignment.

understood

though i think it will be important to have multiple shit-disturbers

I don't got dis. I'm hella busy. You guys got dis tho.

Kyle and mac, you two seem to have totaklt differing views on nutella but you haven't addressed those reads much. Also, how do two of you feel about each other?

We've got an extra 24 hours this phase. Let's use it.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:58 pm Ah yes, I recall.

I voted LC, breaking the tie there, but LC voted last second, making it a tie again.

Was this before or after I moved my vote?

rabbit8 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 11:23 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:58 pm Ah yes, I recall.

I voted LC, breaking the tie there, but LC voted last second, making it a tie again.

Was this before or after I moved my vote?

I don't know.

I'm voting MacDougall.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:38 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:27 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:19 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:05 pm Hot take ambray and sloonei are scum mates gg

Tell me more

you're asking all these questions to the point of sounding fake

idk the chance that you're actually teammates is probably pretty low, especially with all this interaction right after the game thread opens on day 0, but still I could see it as a possibility based on this behavior. and making a bold assertion like this should stimulate the discussion. hence the hot take

U bad

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:39 pm I am Merry and I got to start the game with a red peek on nutella.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:51 pm nutella is bad. Confirmed.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:51 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:06 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:51 pm nutella is bad. Confirmed.

No. I'm not bad. You're either making shit up (about a role that doesn't even have a power) or you for some reason mysteriously got false info on day 0. I'm gonna go with making shit up. Whether that's for a discussion-stimulating pro-civ motive or a scum anti-civ motive is yet to be seen... but if you want to lynch me it will only hurt the civs.

Nah my red peek says that it is definitely not false info in the PM.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:06 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:04 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:53 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:33 pm i also don't think we should be so relaxed about roleclaiming. doing it helps the mafia narrow down who frodo is, and the role list also has additional civ roles "intended for mafia claims" so i don't think roleclaiming should even necessarily be a reason to trust someone.

You're bad too btw.

2 scum found.

why do you think Kyle is bad? He's expressing a very civ-minded strategic thought in this post

No he isn't. He's expressing something that sounds like that that is far more likely to have been thought of by a scum player trying to think of their opportunities and he has implied that I was legitimately role claiming rather than fake claiming, realised it and then made that afterthought part of the post to counteract it, then he looked at his post and thought he'd done a good job cleaning it up but he hadn't unfortunately.

Also I have a red peek.

MacDougall went on about a "red peek," which I figured was his way of generating something to talk about.

Instead of examining the posts people made with respect to nutella and his peek, MacDougall said this:

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:00 am

nutella wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 2:04 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 2:01 am Let’s lynch nutella

Why

Gotta lynch someone

MacDougall had a chance to put nutella in the running to be lynched Day 1:

DFaraday
3
18%
Voters: rabbit8, timmer, Long Con

Long Con
3
18%
Voters: Sloonei, Ambray, Epignosis

nutella
2
12%
Voters: Glorfindel, novaselinenever

Sloonei
1
6%
Voters: MacDougall

But he didn't take it. MacDougall voted Sloonei.

I want to know why.

I think I'd like to hear the answer to that, as well. Lynch votes that don't mesh with what people posted, especially when the lynch is close, are VERY interesting...

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:07 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:06 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:01 am And I explained my vote. Sloonei is saying I didn't justify my vote when I did. Maybe he doesn't understand analogies.

He clearly understands musicals.

Hey Sloonei, do you know what analogies are?

TELL ME MORE TELL ME MORE

An analogy is like a thought with another thought's hat on. I am looking for subtantial reasons for your Long Con vote.
Or substantial reasons why you won't be voting him today.

Name one other person Day 1 who had substantial reasons for their vote. Name one.

marmot wrote:MacDougal

Long Con wrote:Linguistic arguements? Large words.

Whoa there Tex, where's my linkback? Is this quote legit?

I mean, for starters, I certainly didn't say "arguements" in any quote ever.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:33 am I want to elaborate on my jack read. He's been Wilgying, and that's fine. He's also expressed suspicions and that's good, but I haven't seen him trying to actually push any of his reads. every player that isn't Wilgy who starts out with a self-imposed limitation ends up dropping it as soon as it actually starts to inhibit their play.

if the language used in his one actual text post were accurate to the way he felt about me then why didn't he push for my lynch, specially when he said "eyeroll emoji" and "wolf emoji" about me

Marmot wrote:

Sauron's Army [3]

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:08 pm Whoa there Tex, where's my linkback? Is this quote legit?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:13 pm I'm voting MacDougall.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:38 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:27 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:19 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:05 pm Hot take ambray and sloonei are scum mates gg

Tell me more

you're asking all these questions to the point of sounding fake

idk the chance that you're actually teammates is probably pretty low, especially with all this interaction right after the game thread opens on day 0, but still I could see it as a possibility based on this behavior. and making a bold assertion like this should stimulate the discussion. hence the hot take

U bad

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:39 pm I am Merry and I got to start the game with a red peek on nutella.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:51 pm nutella is bad. Confirmed.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:51 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:06 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:51 pm nutella is bad. Confirmed.

No. I'm not bad. You're either making shit up (about a role that doesn't even have a power) or you for some reason mysteriously got false info on day 0. I'm gonna go with making shit up. Whether that's for a discussion-stimulating pro-civ motive or a scum anti-civ motive is yet to be seen... but if you want to lynch me it will only hurt the civs.

Nah my red peek says that it is definitely not false info in the PM.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:06 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:04 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:53 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:33 pm i also don't think we should be so relaxed about roleclaiming. doing it helps the mafia narrow down who frodo is, and the role list also has additional civ roles "intended for mafia claims" so i don't think roleclaiming should even necessarily be a reason to trust someone.

You're bad too btw.

2 scum found.

why do you think Kyle is bad? He's expressing a very civ-minded strategic thought in this post

No he isn't. He's expressing something that sounds like that that is far more likely to have been thought of by a scum player trying to think of their opportunities and he has implied that I was legitimately role claiming rather than fake claiming, realised it and then made that afterthought part of the post to counteract it, then he looked at his post and thought he'd done a good job cleaning it up but he hadn't unfortunately.

Also I have a red peek.

MacDougall went on about a "red peek," which I figured was his way of generating something to talk about.

Instead of examining the posts people made with respect to nutella and his peek, MacDougall said this:

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:00 am

nutella wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 2:04 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 2:01 am Let’s lynch nutella

Why

Gotta lynch someone

MacDougall had a chance to put nutella in the running to be lynched Day 1:

DFaraday
3
18%
Voters: rabbit8, timmer, Long Con

Long Con
3
18%
Voters: Sloonei, Ambray, Epignosis

nutella
2
12%
Voters: Glorfindel, novaselinenever

Sloonei
1
6%
Voters: MacDougall

But he didn't take it. MacDougall voted Sloonei.

I want to know why.

So because I made a joke I should have been forced to vote for nutella despite finding Sloonei more suspicious? Cool. Stick your vote up your butt.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:54 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:04 am Kyle, give me one town read and one scum read. Please and thanks.

Don’t do it Kyle he’s been drawn over to the dark side

What was the joke?

And if you find Sloonei more suspicious, why are you voting nutella?

The red peek was just a joke obviously. I am voting nutella today for no reason. I haven't really focused much on the games for several days as I have been working so I've just been posting dumb shit. I'll try a bit more tomorrow when I am at my desk at work. Presuming I don't get lynched today.

Don't have much to contribute other than I'm still uneasy over the LC 'bandwagon' situation.

Sloonei's posts I don't like just as a vibe as I struggle to see whether they posts as a civ throwing mud and seeing what sticks or a baddie just stirring trouble. However, from how others have reacted this seems his typical game style so hard to judge.

Jack's posts are going to get old pretty quick. I'm not looking to lynch him at all right now, but I question whether this is normal behaviour for him? I think it would be pretty easy to get the ball rolling as an easy lynch. If he is civ, I don't really know how he's helping himself or others with his posts..

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 10:28 am I don't got dis. I'm hella busy. You guys got dis tho.

Kyle and mac, you two seem to have totaklt differing views on nutella but you haven't addressed those reads much. Also, how do two of you feel about each other?

We've got an extra 24 hours this phase. Let's use it.

I don't think Mac and I having different views on things is that surprising, based on my experience playing with him. We have different approaches toward the game and especially towards reading players.

Mac himself seems more relaxed than how I'm used to seeing him so far. He seems to be making more jokes than I've seen him do before, but the jokes are still intermixed with prods of suspicion. I don't see anything in particular that sticks out about him as suspicious. Were a gun placed against my head I'd put him in the town bucket, I think.

Ambray wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 5:28 pm Don't have much to contribute other than I'm still uneasy over the LC 'bandwagon' situation.

Sloonei's posts I don't like just as a vibe as I struggle to see whether they posts as a civ throwing mud and seeing what sticks or a baddie just stirring trouble. However, from how others have reacted this seems his typical game style so hard to judge.

sloonei is very much the kind of player that aims to create discussion and pull players back into discussion when they're not quite in it. I don't know if I've seen his mafia play.

Jack's posts are going to get old pretty quick. I'm not looking to lynch him at all right now, but I question whether this is normal behaviour for him? I think it would be pretty easy to get the ball rolling as an easy lynch. If he is civ, I don't really know how he's helping himself or others with his posts..

this isn't something i've seen from Jack before. I've mostly viewed him as a seriousbusinesstype player. In a recent game there was a day phase where every almost every player was cursed at once. making cases, sharing ideas, and communicating were made significantly more difficult. I can't understand why Jack would want to recreate that struggle voluntarily.

i don't think his apparent personal challenge is alignment indicative by itself, i don't want to live in a world where players are discouraged from fucking off and play mafia using only pictures of cats or whatever, but I also don't think he should be excused if his contribution isn't what it should be.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 5:13 pm The red peek was just a joke obviously. I am voting nutella today for no reason. I haven't really focused much on the games for several days as I have been working so I've just been posting dumb shit. I'll try a bit more tomorrow when I am at my desk at work. Presuming I don't get lynched today.

Jack wrote:

Kyle wrote:Pictures of cats

what do you have against cats?

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 5:13 pm The red peek was just a joke obviously. I am voting nutella today for no reason. I haven't really focused much on the games for several days as I have been working so I've just been posting dumb shit. I'll try a bit more tomorrow when I am at my desk at work. Presuming I don't get lynched today.

I didn't take it as a joke. I didn't take it as serious, but not a joke either. I thought you were going somewhere with the "red peek." You didn't go anywhere.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 8:54 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 5:13 pm The red peek was just a joke obviously. I am voting nutella today for no reason. I haven't really focused much on the games for several days as I have been working so I've just been posting dumb shit. I'll try a bit more tomorrow when I am at my desk at work. Presuming I don't get lynched today.

I didn't take it as a joke. I didn't take it as serious, but not a joke either. I thought you were going somewhere with the "red peek." You didn't go anywhere.

Really?

rabbit8 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 9:20 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 8:54 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 5:13 pm The red peek was just a joke obviously. I am voting nutella today for no reason. I haven't really focused much on the games for several days as I have been working so I've just been posting dumb shit. I'll try a bit more tomorrow when I am at my desk at work. Presuming I don't get lynched today.

I didn't take it as a joke. I didn't take it as serious, but not a joke either. I thought you were going somewhere with the "red peek." You didn't go anywhere.

Really?

Really.

I can't believe that. Why you lying?

rabbit8 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 9:30 pm I can't believe that. Why you lying?

What am I lying about?

You didn't think he was going somewhere with that shit....

rabbit8 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 9:51 pm You didn't think he was going somewhere with that shit....

Listen old timer.

MacDougall comes from a place where people make up shit to generate discussion. Ask JaggedJimmyJay or Sloonei or whoever came from their world.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:31 am Kyle is with the Russian Police. Discuss.

That's civilian JJJ slinging shit at civilian Kylemii, and Sloonei followed suit by slinging shit at Kylemii.

You can read all about it here.

MacDougall comes from the same community. I expected him to follow up on his bullshit. He doubled down on it today. None of that makes sense to me.

Listen spring chicken.

None of that makes sense to me.

Even if he followed up on it I doubt you thought he was going somewhere with it. Since you knew he was slinging shit for the sake of slinging shit. Why didn't you just say that?

rabbit8 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 10:27 pm Listen spring chicken.

None of that makes sense to me.

Even if he followed up on it I doubt you thought he was going somewhere with it. Since you knew he was slinging shit for the sake of slinging shit. Why didn't you just say that?

My assumption was that he was slinging shit to sling shit. He called it a joke. That's not the same thing.

Where would he go with it? This is the line I have a question about. Just randomly accuse people based on some assumed bullshit?

rabbit8 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 10:33 pm Where would he go with it? This is the line I have a question about. Just randomly accuse people based on some assumed bullshit?

I said as much already. People like JJJ, Sloonei, MacDougall, et al. come into a thread early and lay down some bullshit on people, and then analyze how people react.

It isn't about catching mafia. It's about generating connections among players so that when that first mafia gets lynched, they have something to look back on and find teammates.

I think MacDougall was feigning this strategy. He did it at first and now claims it was a joke. Joke or not, there is something there for him to analyze. He does not strike me as a civilian, no.