The Syndicate

Jan wrote:

Glorfindel wrote:

Jan wrote:I would like to see one out of Metalmarsh89 and Turnip Head gone. I think I'm voting both.

Hey, Jan I was wondering if you had any rationale for your votes? Sorry if you did and I missed it...
By the way, it's awesome to be playing with you again old friend

They're the loudest out of everyone else. I was actually considering JJJ as well, but this message sent to the GM smells of a scumplay. Idk.

What do you mean? The message sent to the thread was from a civ role.

nutella wrote:

Jan wrote:

Glorfindel wrote:

Jan wrote:I would like to see one out of Metalmarsh89 and Turnip Head gone. I think I'm voting both.

Hey, Jan I was wondering if you had any rationale for your votes? Sorry if you did and I missed it...
By the way, it's awesome to be playing with you again old friend

They're the loudest out of everyone else. I was actually considering JJJ as well, but this message sent to the GM smells of a scumplay. Idk.

What do you mean? The message sent to the thread was from a civ role.

How do you know?

Scotty wrote:

Russtifinko wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:Bubbles and MM's votes smell the fishiest to me. I want to go back and investigate those.

Scotty my man, I'm sorry I ever doubted you. You are the hero we need. Please be my sensei.

So I was gonna say this wasn't true and Scotty could still be a Yellow Turban, but then I realized he would've likely lost his duel had he been. So I'm prepared to give Scotty some civ cred barring evidence to the contrary.

Who's to say I'm not on Wilgy's team? I mean, I'm not, but why exclude that as a possibility?

I appreciate the civ label because I am, but your defense of me is slightly hollow.

I could also be anything, and just rolled better than Wilgy, so this argument is not the best way to guard my alignment.

Oh, damn you're right! More good ideas from Scotty.

Now stop crushing my ideas, please.

Jan wrote:I would like to see one out of Metalmarsh89 and Turnip Head gone. I think I'm voting both.

You don't think they're bad, you just want them gone?

Jan wrote:

nutella wrote:

Jan wrote:

Glorfindel wrote:

Jan wrote:I would like to see one out of Metalmarsh89 and Turnip Head gone. I think I'm voting both.

Hey, Jan I was wondering if you had any rationale for your votes? Sorry if you did and I missed it...
By the way, it's awesome to be playing with you again old friend

They're the loudest out of everyone else. I was actually considering JJJ as well, but this message sent to the GM smells of a scumplay. Idk.

What do you mean? The message sent to the thread was from a civ role.

How do you know?

Someone hasn't read the roles. Epi literally posted the picture of the role with the message, so we know it was from that role.

nutella wrote:Top candidates for my votes are MM, Dom, and maybe Russ or Bubbles. MM is looking more and more suspicious to me, I already bought JJJ's case and now all of MM's responses are rather disturbingly cavalier and many of his recent posts I have found suspicious in and of themselves. Earlier I said I didn't like either Dom's or Bubbles' votes; I'm pretty convinced that Bubbles is being her usual self but that doesn't preclude her being bad. Dom is just being incredibly annoying and not really providing sufficient content imo due to his obnoxious posting gimmick, and I am still perplexed by his voting behavior. And I'm keeping Russ on my list as well, since he hasn't given me a great impression overall, and I look forward to seeing what he has to contribute today.

Speaking of contributing, there are numerous players I would love to hear more from. INH, Niju, Bullz, Dunny, Timmer... where you at?

Surprise, surprise, nutella thinks Dom is annoying so she wants him lynched.

(c) Paid for by Dom/Nju 2016

DFaraday wrote:Dom's responses haven't made him look better to me. I'm going to go ahead and vote Dom and MM.

DFaraday is not to be trusted, folks. Mark my words-- he is bad, believe me. This confirms it.


He does absolutely nothing to quantify this feeling that my responses haven't made me look better. He is looking for a reason to vote for me, despite the fact that his point about me suspecting Bass was totally bunk in the first place.

(c) Paid for by Dom/Nju 2016

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Actually I do have one ping for Dom.

Dom wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Dom wrote:Folks, don't trust Lyin' Scotty and Tricky Jay. Lyin' Scotty looked for an opportunity to seize power without any sort of content. Tricky Jay has used bad thinking all game. Not good, folks, not good.

I don't necessarily think you're bad Dom, I'd just like to have a conversation. What have I said or done that you haven't liked?

My distrust of you, Tricky Jay comes from you campaigning for yourself for prefect. That seems wildly out of character for you.

(c) Paid for by Dom/Nju 2016

I'll channel our host here. That's more suspicious than the average adverb. I also don't know why someone who has played Mafia with me before is saying it's out of character for me to make myself the center of attention.

I regret nothing, but I guess this might be a fair criticism. But I didn't do anything wrong. See, I didn't like the tone of your posts. Day one, we say things-- maybe not in the best way.

(c) Paid for by Dom/Nju 2016

Quin wrote:I've not entirely excluded MP from my suspicion pool but I don't have anything new to adjust my read yet, and I don't want to tunnel based off of a Day 1 ping. I'll give him more time.

One of my votes will be going to marmot. I find it interesting that he's being defensive against 3J about his counter-productive Wilgy votes, rather than being pro-active and questioning me, who was the one who put that part of the argument together. I don't think he's tried to scum hunt at all since he came under fire.

I'm also voting Dom, based on the ping I got from an earlier post (just ISO me - I also mention the marmot there). He abandoned a discussion about something he thought was so clearly suspicious when prodded.

Folks, this is absolute garbage. Wanna see what Quin originally said about me?

Quin wrote: I don't like Dom's vote either. Not gonna quote it, because I don't feel like looking at huge chunks of text right now. I've written two reports in four days, with massive lack-of-tooth aches in between, if I might add.

So folks, Quin has got nothing substantial to say about me at all! Sad !

(c) Paid for by Dom/Nju 2016

To the haters who say I'm hiding behind a gimmick-- take this !


I am posting more, creating more discussion, and trying to baddie hunt more than many, many people out there. It's all out there, folks. You can see it for yourself. People who make this criticism are looking for an easy place to vote.

Jan wrote:

Glorfindel wrote:

Jan wrote:I would like to see one out of Metalmarsh89 and Turnip Head gone. I think I'm voting both.

Hey, Jan I was wondering if you had any rationale for your votes? Sorry if you did and I missed it...
By the way, it's awesome to be playing with you again old friend

They're the loudest out of everyone else. I was actually considering JJJ as well, but this message sent to the GM smells of a scumplay. Idk.

Sorry?

Dom wrote:

Quin wrote:I've not entirely excluded MP from my suspicion pool but I don't have anything new to adjust my read yet, and I don't want to tunnel based off of a Day 1 ping. I'll give him more time.

One of my votes will be going to marmot. I find it interesting that he's being defensive against 3J about his counter-productive Wilgy votes, rather than being pro-active and questioning me, who was the one who put that part of the argument together. I don't think he's tried to scum hunt at all since he came under fire.

I'm also voting Dom, based on the ping I got from an earlier post (just ISO me - I also mention the marmot there). He abandoned a discussion about something he thought was so clearly suspicious when prodded.

Folks, this is absolute garbage. Wanna see what Quin originally said about me?

Quin wrote: I don't like Dom's vote either. Not gonna quote it, because I don't feel like looking at huge chunks of text right now. I've written two reports in four days, with massive lack-of-tooth aches in between, if I might add.

So folks, Quin has got nothing substantial to say about me at all! Sad !

(c) Paid for by Dom/Nju 2016

Not quite nothing. I can pull up the posts I'm referring to if you'd like.

Nerolunar wrote:Glorfindel seems to go out of his way to say "my friend" in nearly every post. Is he projecting his usual friendly civ playstyle? Also hey Matty

I forgot to vote yesterday, sorry about that.

Hey Jan! I didn't realize it was you. It is a pleasure playing with you

Hey, Magnus It's great to have you back playing with us again And no, I'm certain that you know me well enough by now to expect me to be courteous to my fellow players
I notice that you missed the vote at EoD 1. I'm just wondering - were you simply undecided about for whom you'd vote or was there some other reason?

Quin wrote:

Dom wrote:

Quin wrote:I've not entirely excluded MP from my suspicion pool but I don't have anything new to adjust my read yet, and I don't want to tunnel based off of a Day 1 ping. I'll give him more time.

One of my votes will be going to marmot. I find it interesting that he's being defensive against 3J about his counter-productive Wilgy votes, rather than being pro-active and questioning me, who was the one who put that part of the argument together. I don't think he's tried to scum hunt at all since he came under fire.

I'm also voting Dom, based on the ping I got from an earlier post (just ISO me - I also mention the marmot there). He abandoned a discussion about something he thought was so clearly suspicious when prodded.

Folks, this is absolute garbage. Wanna see what Quin originally said about me?

Quin wrote: I don't like Dom's vote either. Not gonna quote it, because I don't feel like looking at huge chunks of text right now. I've written two reports in four days, with massive lack-of-tooth aches in between, if I might add.

So folks, Quin has got nothing substantial to say about me at all! Sad !

(c) Paid for by Dom/Nju 2016

Not quite nothing. I can pull up the posts I'm referring to if you'd like.

Fibbin' Quin! You said you spoke about this earlier and you barely mentioned it in passing.

Dom wrote:

Quin wrote:

Dom wrote:

Quin wrote:I've not entirely excluded MP from my suspicion pool but I don't have anything new to adjust my read yet, and I don't want to tunnel based off of a Day 1 ping. I'll give him more time.

One of my votes will be going to marmot. I find it interesting that he's being defensive against 3J about his counter-productive Wilgy votes, rather than being pro-active and questioning me, who was the one who put that part of the argument together. I don't think he's tried to scum hunt at all since he came under fire.

I'm also voting Dom, based on the ping I got from an earlier post (just ISO me - I also mention the marmot there). He abandoned a discussion about something he thought was so clearly suspicious when prodded.

Folks, this is absolute garbage. Wanna see what Quin originally said about me?

Quin wrote: I don't like Dom's vote either. Not gonna quote it, because I don't feel like looking at huge chunks of text right now. I've written two reports in four days, with massive lack-of-tooth aches in between, if I might add.

So folks, Quin has got nothing substantial to say about me at all! Sad !

(c) Paid for by Dom/Nju 2016

Not quite nothing. I can pull up the posts I'm referring to if you'd like.

Fibbin' Quin! You said you spoke about this earlier and you barely mentioned it in passing.

So... I did speak about it? Thanks for clarifying.

Please address why you abandoned your stance that something 3J said was so obviously suspicious the moment you were questioned about it.

Quin wrote:

Dom wrote:

Quin wrote:

Dom wrote:

Quin wrote:I've not entirely excluded MP from my suspicion pool but I don't have anything new to adjust my read yet, and I don't want to tunnel based off of a Day 1 ping. I'll give him more time.

One of my votes will be going to marmot. I find it interesting that he's being defensive against 3J about his counter-productive Wilgy votes, rather than being pro-active and questioning me, who was the one who put that part of the argument together. I don't think he's tried to scum hunt at all since he came under fire.

I'm also voting Dom, based on the ping I got from an earlier post (just ISO me - I also mention the marmot there). He abandoned a discussion about something he thought was so clearly suspicious when prodded.

Folks, this is absolute garbage. Wanna see what Quin originally said about me?

Quin wrote: I don't like Dom's vote either. Not gonna quote it, because I don't feel like looking at huge chunks of text right now. I've written two reports in four days, with massive lack-of-tooth aches in between, if I might add.

So folks, Quin has got nothing substantial to say about me at all! Sad !

(c) Paid for by Dom/Nju 2016

Not quite nothing. I can pull up the posts I'm referring to if you'd like.

Fibbin' Quin! You said you spoke about this earlier and you barely mentioned it in passing.

So... I did speak about it? Thanks for clarifying.

Please address why you abandoned your stance that something 3J said was so obviously suspicious the moment you were questioned about it.

If you read my posts you'd see that that is, not, in fact what I ahve done, believe me.

I don't feel like Dom is bad, so sending him to fight the Marmot isn't jiving with me.

I don't think Marmot is a good candidate either. I don't like that the case has trace elements of Wilgy wifom in it. Wilgy is a savant of causing wifom to work the way he wants. I feel like he would be expecting Metalmarsh to get suspicion from that post. I also think Metalmarsh is playing the game way too casual considering his situation.

The only person with a vote who I am feeling neg about is Russtifinko. So I will be voting for Russ and trusting my feel on Dunny from Day 1.

Dom wrote:

Quin wrote:

Dom wrote:

Quin wrote:

Dom wrote:

Quin wrote:I've not entirely excluded MP from my suspicion pool but I don't have anything new to adjust my read yet, and I don't want to tunnel based off of a Day 1 ping. I'll give him more time.

One of my votes will be going to marmot. I find it interesting that he's being defensive against 3J about his counter-productive Wilgy votes, rather than being pro-active and questioning me, who was the one who put that part of the argument together. I don't think he's tried to scum hunt at all since he came under fire.

I'm also voting Dom, based on the ping I got from an earlier post (just ISO me - I also mention the marmot there). He abandoned a discussion about something he thought was so clearly suspicious when prodded.

Folks, this is absolute garbage. Wanna see what Quin originally said about me?

Quin wrote: I don't like Dom's vote either. Not gonna quote it, because I don't feel like looking at huge chunks of text right now. I've written two reports in four days, with massive lack-of-tooth aches in between, if I might add.

So folks, Quin has got nothing substantial to say about me at all! Sad !

(c) Paid for by Dom/Nju 2016

Not quite nothing. I can pull up the posts I'm referring to if you'd like.

Fibbin' Quin! You said you spoke about this earlier and you barely mentioned it in passing.

So... I did speak about it? Thanks for clarifying.

Please address why you abandoned your stance that something 3J said was so obviously suspicious the moment you were questioned about it.

If you read my posts you'd see that that is, not, in fact what I ahve done, believe me.

I don't believe you.

Jan wrote:

Also, where is Sig?

At uni :P

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

sig wrote:Okay, I think it is an equal probability, or it is possible that it is more likely for mafia to do that. True a townie could come in and screw it up, but I think that is highly unlikely. If it was planned ahead of time.

Frankly I think it's already unlikely that a baddie team decided in BTSC to concoct a "Buscemi eyes" scheme in the first place. The entire conversation starts with that complete speculation.

Any conversation to do with prefect voting does, why do you seem to be discounted this view.

Turnip Head wrote:I've come around a lot on the dueling thing. I've now seen its merits. If we ever have a consensus mafia read, we should force them to challenge Scotty the People's Champion.

Metalmarsh89, would you like to duel Scotty?

I don't like this for two reasons.

One is Scotty is seen as a solid civ why sacrifice him? This seems like a plus for the mafia in case they come out on top.
Two why should we have one player go over and over again? This seems like a good way for said player to die since at some point the dice aren't going to go in your favor.

sig wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

sig wrote:Okay, I think it is an equal probability, or it is possible that it is more likely for mafia to do that. True a townie could come in and screw it up, but I think that is highly unlikely. If it was planned ahead of time.

Frankly I think it's already unlikely that a baddie team decided in BTSC to concoct a "Buscemi eyes" scheme in the first place. The entire conversation starts with that complete speculation.

Any conversation to do with prefect voting does, why do you seem to be discounted this view.

Turnip Head wrote:I've come around a lot on the dueling thing. I've now seen its merits. If we ever have a consensus mafia read, we should force them to challenge Scotty the People's Champion.

Metalmarsh89, would you like to duel Scotty?

I don't like this for two reasons.

One is Scotty is seen as a solid civ why sacrifice him? This seems like a plus for the mafia in case they come out on top.
Two why should we have one player go over and over again? This seems like a good way for said player to die since at some point the dice aren't going to go in your favor.

I like sig already.

I'm going to hold back on voting for the time.

I find JJJ a little pingy, due to his logic on the day 0 votes, but he is being active and seems civvie. I think we should keep an eye on him and maybe have him duel soon.
Dom as well my gut is reading scum, I think he is being scummy with his posting style, and I think he is getting a free pass by some players for the way he is posting. It is in little clips so he appears active, but content wise he isn't giving us much at all. I feel like he is attempting to fly under the radar, yet not be accused of being inactive.
MM for the reasons laid out by JJJ, I'd rather not lynch MM today though.
Jan slightly for his most recent post wondering why I wasn't active. This is also a minor ping though.
TH for his thoughts on Scotty.

Matty seems civvie so far.
Mac and DF both look good imo also, this is mainly a gut feel.
The last few people who voted for Wilgy are most likely not on his team, but they still could be mafia.

I don't see how bubbles vote was that bad, it seems like typical bubbles to me?

linki: Why? or was that sarcastic.....

sig wrote:I'm going to hold back on voting for the time.

I find JJJ a little pingy, due to his logic on the day 0 votes, but he is being active and seems civvie. I think we should keep an eye on him and maybe have him duel soon.
Dom as well my gut is reading scum, I think he is being scummy with his posting style, and I think he is getting a free pass by some players for the way he is posting. It is in little clips so he appears active, but content wise he isn't giving us much at all. I feel like he is attempting to fly under the radar, yet not be accused of being inactive.
MM for the reasons laid out by JJJ, I'd rather not lynch MM today though.
Jan slightly for his most recent post wondering why I wasn't active. This is also a minor ping though.
TH for his thoughts on Scotty.

Matty seems civvie so far.
Mac and DF both look good imo also, this is mainly a gut feel.
The last few people who voted for Wilgy are most likely not on his team, but they still could be mafia.

I don't see how bubbles vote was that bad, it seems like typical bubbles to me?

linki: Why? or was that sarcastic.....

You were the first to call out TH for his 'let's keep pitting Scotty up against whoever' thing. I thought the exact same thing when I read it.

aaa okay, what do you think that says about TH?

IF he is mafia I could see him wanting to eliminate Scotty and having him duel would/could do that. Espaiclly if for some reason the mafia tried to NK him and it failed. Yes this is extreme tin foil hat, but I don't see why you'd say we should force someone to duel over and over again.

sig wrote:aaa okay, what do you think that says about TH?

IF he is mafia I could see him wanting to eliminate Scotty and having him duel would/could do that. Espaiclly if for some reason the mafia tried to NK him and it failed. Yes this is extreme tin foil hat, but I don't see why you'd say we should force someone to duel over and over again.

I think it's just bad logic. I don't have a reason to suspect him outside of this yet, but I need to give him more attention.

--
My internet is having issues again (frankly it has been all morning) so I'm going to give up on mafia for a few hours and hope it sorts itself out.

sig wrote:aaa okay, what do you think that says about TH?

IF he is mafia I could see him wanting to eliminate Scotty and having him duel would/could do that. Espaiclly if for some reason the mafia tried to NK him and it failed. Yes this is extreme tin foil hat, but I don't see why you'd say we should force someone to duel over and over again.

Okay, cool... and what if I'm not mafia?

I think your brain might be too focused on your studies, Young siggy-san. The winner of a duel gets NK protection and the prize of their choice. We already know Scotty has what it takes to defeat warrior doctors. We could build Scotty into a living legend.

So if you're a civ and think Scotty is a civ too (as postulated in your post), why exactly would that be a bad thing? Why do you go the tinfoil route instead?

Turnip Head wrote:

sig wrote:aaa okay, what do you think that says about TH?

IF he is mafia I could see him wanting to eliminate Scotty and having him duel would/could do that. Espaiclly if for some reason the mafia tried to NK him and it failed. Yes this is extreme tin foil hat, but I don't see why you'd say we should force someone to duel over and over again.

Okay, cool... and what if I'm not mafia?

I think your brain might be too focused on your studies, Young siggy-san. The winner of a duel gets NK protection and the prize of their choice. We already know Scotty has what it takes to defeat warrior doctors. We could build Scotty into a living legend.

So if you're a civ and think Scotty is a civ too (as postulated in your post), why exactly would that be a bad thing? Why do you go the tinfoil route instead?

I forgot about the NK protection, I still however think it is a bad idea. Not to mention a double edged sword. What is Scotty isn't a civ we would be giving him all sorts of goodies which would/could damage town.

sig wrote:I'm going to hold back on voting for the time.

I find JJJ a little pingy, due to his logic on the day 0 votes, but he is being active and seems civvie. I think we should keep an eye on him and maybe have him duel soon.
Dom as well my gut is reading scum, I think he is being scummy with his posting style, and I think he is getting a free pass by some players for the way he is posting. It is in little clips so he appears active, but content wise he isn't giving us much at all. I feel like he is attempting to fly under the radar, yet not be accused of being inactive.
MM for the reasons laid out by JJJ, I'd rather not lynch MM today though.
Jan slightly for his most recent post wondering why I wasn't active. This is also a minor ping though.
TH for his thoughts on Scotty.

Matty seems civvie so far.
Mac and DF both look good imo also, this is mainly a gut feel.
The last few people who voted for Wilgy are most likely not on his team, but they still could be mafia.

I don't see how bubbles vote was that bad, it seems like typical bubbles to me?

linki: Why? or was that sarcastic.....

Quantify your findings on me.

All the haters are coming out against me because of the way I sound-- it's reverse n00bism

Fair enough sig, so you think it's a bad idea.

But you're saying you suspect me because you don't agree with me .

(And yes, if Scotty isn't a civ, then we need to lynch him. And nominating him for the duel is like, our only way to do that )

Turnip Head wrote:Fair enough sig, so you think it's a bad idea.

But you're saying you suspect me because you don't agree with me .

(And yes, if Scotty isn't a civ, then we need to lynch him. And nominating him for the duel is like, our only way to do that )

I don't suspect you for not agreeing with me, I suspect you for pushing one player to be brought up again and again, it seems like a witch hunt.


I do feel better about you though and won't be voting for you today.

I'm so lost.

timmer wrote:I'm so lost.

What is troubling you timmer-san... mechanics or suspicions?

sig wrote: One is Scotty is seen as a solid civ why sacrifice him?

Is he now? News to me.

sig wrote: MM for the reasons laid out by JJJ, I'd rather not lynch MM today though.

Why not?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

reywaS wrote:I miss playing with you guys.

You should certainly sign up for one. We've got a couple cooking right now.

I want to...but I'm afraid I won't be able to properly keep up. The last 2 I tried to play I got buried in posts and couldn't catch up. Impressive list of players here.

Turnip Head wrote:Fair enough sig, so you think it's a bad idea.

But you're saying you suspect me because you don't agree with me .

(And yes, if Scotty isn't a civ, then we need to lynch him. And nominating him for the duel is like, our only way to do that )

So do you think I am civ or not? I've not gotten a straight answer from you so far this game- just that I can defeat Doctors [who are definitely not doctors]

Turnip Head wrote:

timmer wrote:I'm so lost.

What is troubling you timmer-san... mechanics or suspicions?

Mechanics and the sheer volume of the game. I don't know how to follow such a wordy game. But I'll get engaged soon I just need a day of.

MacDougall wrote:I don't think Marmot is a good candidate either. I don't like that the case has trace elements of Wilgy wifom in it. Wilgy is a savant of causing wifom to work the way he wants. I feel like he would be expecting Metalmarsh to get suspicion from that post. I also think Metalmarsh is playing the game way too casual considering his situation.

Understandable. I don't feel super great following a Wilgy WIFOM thread either. The only reason it didn't mean nothing to me is that the party in question is MM -- Wilgy's best competition on The Syndicate for WIFOM champion. I think there's also WIFOM in MM's content; he spoke more of Wilgy than anyone else perhaps despite Wilgy having made no memorable posts at all during his lifespan.

I'd like MM to continue talking with me so I can sort out my feelings,

I'm still really not keeping up with the game and tend to read a handful of recent posts each time I pop in, so my opinion is relatively uninformed.

But Dom and marmot do not seem like good bets to me. They seem contributory. I'll probably be looking to vote to keep them off the block.

Put Crooked Dfaraday on the dueling platform.

Or sig.

I'm sorry, it seems I've lost the ability to quote anyone here for the moment

Dom, if I may make an observation - during this current Day phase, you've referred to Quin as "Fibbin' Quin". You accused DFaraday of being bad and said that he can't be trusted. You inferred some skepticism against Nutella for having said that she wants to lynch you because she found you annoying. You told 3J that you distrust him and referred to him repeatedly as 'Tricky Jay'. You referred to Scotty on a number of occasions as 'Lyin' Scotty'. These are five players in whom I currently have confidence (in differing degrees) in terms of their alignment. You are coming under fire at the moment (perhaps wrongly) but I think it's the tone of your responses concerns me here and I don't know that it's doing you a lot of favours.

You even accused me of knowing 'secrets' (which is not true) in response to my somewhat naive assertion that the lack of an NK last Night phase was the consequence of baddie absenteeism and followed that with "Or what do you want all of us-- the regular people-- to think." 'Regular people'? Really? I'm frankly left wondering just how 'regular' you are after that comment

Further, at EoD 1, Sorsha said that she wouldn't vote for you and in the same post came up with the absurd notion (as far as I'm concerned at least) that it was better to vote between our three Prefects. Your response was "Look at my Sorsha over here! Just look at my Sorsha!" I trust your response reflected your opinion of her support for you and not of her approach to the vote (which incidentally she didn't follow through on).

I really hadn't considered you a viable candidate this Day Phase but find myself second guessing myself a little. You say you're trying to contribute and I think I can see that. I'm just not sure...

Glorfindel wrote:

Nerolunar wrote:Glorfindel seems to go out of his way to say "my friend" in nearly every post. Is he projecting his usual friendly civ playstyle? Also hey Matty

I forgot to vote yesterday, sorry about that.

Hey Jan! I didn't realize it was you. It is a pleasure playing with you

Hey, Magnus It's great to have you back playing with us again And no, I'm certain that you know me well enough by now to expect me to be courteous to my fellow players
I notice that you missed the vote at EoD 1. I'm just wondering - were you simply undecided about for whom you'd vote or was there some other reason?

That, and I simply forgot to do it.

I'm glad we got a baddie though, but I'm still undecided for today. There are so many players and I'm struggling keeping track of what's going on. I kinda regret signing up but the setup looks really interesting. I'm keen on laying low and getting hold of this game for a while. It may look scummy but

I do however believe Scotty is good, at least in a GTH kind of sense.

Anyone going to be here in maybe... an hour or two? I'll probably try catching up then and it'd be nice to know if at least someone else will be here to bounce stuff off of. I still need to get some more work done before I can call it quits and goof off on this game for a bit.

I'll probably be around.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'll probably be around.

On another note, 100 posts per page is brilliant. I only have a little over a handful of pages to read. :P

The best thing about 100 ppp is that it makes ISOs much easier to navigate. CTRL+Fing 4 pages for a high-posting player is so much less exhausting than CTRL+Fing 12 pages.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Catching up. MP looks angrier than his hsual self. Wonder if that is alignme t indicative.

I don't think so. I see a progression that nets frustration:

1. Encounter minor pings, question players about them, decide they seem fine.

2. Put reads in the thread.

3. Immediately get crap from multiple people for putting reads in the thread (but but but it's SO EARLY)

4. Eyerolls for days

5. Respond to annoying accusations with visible evidence of being annoyed.

I'm fine with MP right now.

I'll try not to dwell much on my... unfortunate implosion, but this, combined with an already really stressful state I was in for RL reasons, is pretty much exactly what happened.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:The best thing about 100 ppp is that it makes ISOs much easier to navigate. CTRL+Fing 4 pages for a high-posting player is so much less exhausting than CTRL+Fing 12 pages.

OMG, I hadn't even thought of that. Awesome!

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:MP always gets crap. Yet he is usually very patient. He is brraking way faster than usual.

I am?

If there's one word in the English language that does NOT describe me, it's "patient".

I hope you all don't mind that I'm just going to keep posting as I read and will likely spam the fuck out of this game. Some of you may skim it really quickly, but no one will read a super gigantic post that I make at the end of this, and I've noticed in recent games that I prefer to broadcast my thoughts in real time anyway.

It's more... transparent. Take that, MM!