The Syndicate

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

juliets wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:I also think juliets needs to be examined further

tell me what you want to know - i've currently got a question to boom about his vote

Well post your question first and I will go from there.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

juliets wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:I also think juliets needs to be examined further

tell me what you want to know - i've currently got a question to boom about his vote

Are you bad?

I'm leaning yes here but want to see her response first.

sig wrote:Im not sure about Rico his stick his amusing but could hide baddie thoughts

Ricochet wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

Prove it

Boomslang wrote:I feel Rico is really correct here. Will consider SD again depending on results.

Boomslang wrote:I feel Rico is really correct here. Will consider SD again depending on results.

k so I don't get vibes from Boom and Daisy, good game if you're dupers, but for sanity, I'd rather put them aside

llama tough but maybe he's on the good side as well

have a hunch BWT expected the outcome, so ech

so let me try something with the rest, just by looking at votes:

if team is juliets / elo: Elo went buss D1, juliets never voted; both of them rode the Glor wagon D2; Eloh mislynched MP as well, juliets non-voter D3; juliets voting BWT, but Eloh suddenly turning on juliets D4

=== D4 antagonism from Eloh towards juliets would not make much sense, in game flow context

if team is sig / juliets: sig hardly pulling votes, juliets mostly on bad results' side

=== little side of coordination, could be interpretable both as team or not connected

if team is sig / elohcin: same events, with sig doing little

if perhaps llama is in the mix, antagonism with juliets wouldn't make much sense; then again, he voted Elohcin D1 then went mum on the issue; they both pushed MP to death D3. fishy....

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Alrighty then. Now we know who the baddies are. And I'm voting for one of them now.

*votes juliets*

If the civs want to have a chance to win they should follow my lead.

Ricochet wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Alrighty then. Now we know who the baddies are. And I'm voting for one of them now.

*votes juliets*

If the civs want to have a chance to win they should follow my lead.

Your can either trust me on this lead or the civs probably lose the game. Up to you.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Alrighty then. Now we know who the baddies are. And I'm voting for one of them now.

*votes juliets*

If the civs want to have a chance to win they should follow my lead.

Your can either trust me on this lead or the civs probably lose the game. Up to you.

thellama73 wrote:I agree that it makes no sense for a mafia member to have a lynch save, so BWT is good. That means at least one of his voters is likely bad. Combined with my existent distrust of juliets, I think that makes her mafia.

Ricochet wrote:

thellama73 wrote:I agree that it makes no sense for a mafia member to have a lynch save, so BWT is good. That means at least one of his voters is likely bad. Combined with my existent distrust of juliets, I think that makes her mafia.

Ricochet wrote:

thellama73 wrote:I agree that it makes no sense for a mafia member to have a lynch save, so BWT is good. That means at least one of his voters is likely bad. Combined with my existent distrust of juliets, I think that makes her mafia.

Boomslang wrote:Going with the crowd. Juliets will yield info, if nothing else.

Boomslang wrote:BWT KNEW WHAT HE WAS TALKING ABOUT

thellama73 wrote:The silence is unnerving. You have any pings? I'm a little shaky on Eloh now.