Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
Do you have access to the main thread?DharmaHelper wrote:Why do you constantly assume my suspicion of you is only to bait reactions to it
I may vote sign in this thread but I may also get you lynched in the main thread.
Not yet.LoRab wrote:Do you have access to the main thread?DharmaHelper wrote:Why do you constantly assume my suspicion of you is only to bait reactions to it
I may vote sign in this thread but I may also get you lynched in the main thread.
Not really, that was more so a joke as I don't think it's the case. In a closed set up we should play to what we know.Long Con wrote:...but you wouldn't consider your statement as among the scummiest of the game?DrWilgy wrote:Idk. He was here earlier today.Long Con wrote:What if Floyd is silenced?
Floyd isn't a bad vote really. Kinda the same case as Sig in which I'd be OK with him being lynched for the sake of advancing discussion. My reason to vote Sig over Floyd is that Quin thing.
I'm in.DharmaHelper wrote:Uh oh I switched to LC so that Floyd/Sig would be tied
U H O H
Agreed. There's no reason to silence Floyd, since he was contributing almost nothing even before we entered the Hatch.Sorsha wrote:Why on earth would someone silence Floyd?
What about LC's Mac vote was suspicious?DharmaHelper wrote:My vote is on LC for now because:
A) My original points from the first thread
B) His defensive reaction to the "Hm" posts
C) His MacDougall Vote
D) General vibes.
Smells like a bus.Professor Farnsworth wrote:What about LC's Mac vote was suspicious?DharmaHelper wrote:My vote is on LC for now because:
A) My original points from the first thread
B) His defensive reaction to the "Hm" posts
C) His MacDougall Vote
D) General vibes.
Trust is a heavy word. Too early to trust anyone.Quin wrote:Who do you trust among us in the hatch?Black Rock wrote:Well this kinda sucks. I don't have any suspicions of any one in the hatch. Mafia is hard.
timmer wrote:Sorry guys, mega long day, souble shift. My thoughts are the same as this morning. I have another double tmorrow, so I'll tune in around lunch and figure out where my vote will go. I could see a MacD vote, but in case he is silenced, MACD you need to post in other non-mafia areas of the site to show that you are around but can't post in here.
I'm not being lazy.DrWilgy wrote:Idk, same reason why I'd be willing to vote BR, Sig, BWT, or Sriracha. I got a whole lotta null from you.Professor Farnsworth wrote:Wilgy, why did you vote me?
You just happened to be the player in that group to use the "Priz" meme.
I'm hesitant to vote Floyd atm due to me not trusting Quin. I think I'm seeing "Hey, I'm off the ballot! Time to be lazy" Quin.
I'm hesitant to trust LC currently. I've been tone reading him bad. I can't pin point this though, and it's not a vote worthy read.
Lastly I'm finding myself agreeing with DH often. Perhaps too often, and I should reevaluate.
[insert activity]
Her train of thought supports a timmer vote, not a Floyd one. I don't like it much.DharmaHelper wrote:Surely Black Rock hasn't just pulled a quote entirely unrelated to Floyd to justify a vote for him to break the tie and save a teammate.
Surely.
I meant it synonymously with 'civ-read'. Do you have any of them?Black Rock wrote:Trust is a heavy word. Too early to trust anyone.Quin wrote:Who do you trust among us in the hatch?Black Rock wrote:Well this kinda sucks. I don't have any suspicions of any one in the hatch. Mafia is hard.
Sorsha wrote:You think it's LC just to be clear?
Where do you stand on BR?Long Con wrote:This thread turned into an explosion of bullshit, hard to decide where to begin.
Can you explain your thoughts on BK?Sorsha wrote:Llama called me out as bad in the Felt 2 game based on my very first post of the game and my use of smilies/tone so I will put some stock in his read of sig so far this game.DharmaHelper wrote:So Sorsha, of the Hatchies, whom do you suspect, and why?
Black Rock's posts about Mac had me feeling a bit of suspicion towards her yesterday. Without being able to see the main thread its going to be difficult to explain though.
Ah See I really dislike this post, LC literally names the two low posters/inactive players (floyd and BWT) and then the two players who came close to being lynched last phase, Wilgy and myself. He is going after low hanging fruit for sure.Long Con wrote:BWT, Wilgy, sig, Sorsha, Floyd... those are the players that I feel most negative about in this here Hatch. BWT and Floyd are low-posters as I recall, maybe the lowest? Sorsha is down there as well. sig, I think some of his posts made me suspicious. I'd love to be able to look back over that one. And dear Wilgy... maybe I don't suspect Wilgy so much.
This doesn't need to be about low-posters yet though. 48 hours in this Hatch, right?
Yeah good point y'all are just dinosaurs who don't understand youth slang and lingo.Quin wrote:I could vote for Floyd. I dislike the support he gave for your bullshit BTSC thing earlier.DharmaHelper wrote:So quin of our hostages...I mean contemporaries, who do you suspect and why?
I can't recall a single thing Farnsworth has said so far. I could put him in the timmer pile of people I expect content from. timmer is no longer in the timmer pile, FYI.
I want to understand the sig suspicion, but I can already tell you I don't agree that his smiley use is suspicious. He's probably the youngest guy here, and I think smiley use is just the standard for people his age. What else is there?
I do have an unjustified ping for Black Rock. I'm not sure why I have it. I just do. I won't act on it until I can read her main thread posts again.
Why a sig vote?timmer wrote:I could see a Sig vote, I guess he would be my new default choice but I want to flesh some things out. I had noticed a few people mentioning Floyd and the prof as being potentially shady but I don't remember why. Anyone remember?Quin wrote:Who else is a contender for your vote?timmer wrote:Ahh Pisces ftw... that's too bad quin would have been a contender for my vote.
Also I feel pretty good about LC and DH.
I've done nothing that warrants a day 2 lynch, apparently I was to calm when people suspected me, while in reality I just didn't have the time to freak out like I normally would, I used to many smiley faces, and for my thoughts on Scotty.LoRab wrote:OK, agreed with all who stated above that it's really annoying to not be able to see the main thread, in order to see what was said previously. As is obvious, I suspect Wilgy, although less so than Day 1, based on lynch result--knowing that mafia has game-related roles (or at least some mafia), the slip seems less likely to be a slip. That said, his defense still doesn't sit right. And I still don't like that he never answered my question about why he automatically went to the conclsion that the first player to post about being from a game was lying about what game they were from, and what motivation he thinks they would have for lying about what game they were from.
I also suspect sig. Suspicion of him has been brought up a few times. He had one post that definitely pinged me and I didn't mention it at the time because I had cut and pasted a bunch of quotes and then lost them and didn't get around to going back to getting them all again and needed to get on with posting. And I don't remember exactly what it was or why it pinged me. And I realize that isn't at all helpful. And I really wish I could go back and reread his posts now. Dammit.
This is floyd's normal meta though isn't it?timmer wrote:By the way Floyd was reading the thread about an hour ago. His lack of posting now becomes more of an issue when I know he has been here, knows he is in the hatch, and chose to say nothing. It suggests eother complete ennui or he's hanging in btsc somewhere. Either way it doesn't look good.
I'm here. Let's partyLoRab wrote:Thus far, BR, Professor Farnsworth, Sig, and Floyd haven't posted yet. Yes?
Just to track if someone is silenced....or someone is pretending to be.
Long Con wrote:Yes, this.LoRab wrote:Why not? If there is a silencing role or roles, I'd assume that role/those roles would still go through...I don't see why not?DrWilgy wrote:I would hope that silencing wouldn't be a thing in a scenario where we are split into groups.LoRab wrote:Thus far, BR, Professor Farnsworth, Sig, and Floyd haven't posted yet. Yes?
Just to track if someone is silenced....or someone is pretending to be.
I don't think BR is silenced. Hopefully she will get in here. I know she just hasn't played Mafia in a while, so it's hard for her to fit time for it into her normal routine.
DharmaHelper wrote:I sense a disturbance in the force.Sorsha wrote:Why?DharmaHelper wrote:I think I'll take this opportunity to vote LC.
I would like to hear your reasons for thinking either a civ or mafia silencer would target Floyd.Long Con wrote:This thread turned into an explosion of bullshit, hard to decide where to begin.
Weren't you riding my jock D1? What changed?sig wrote:Also quick thing I really don't think lynching Floyd is the way to go, he could be mafia yes, but its hard to tell since he hasn't really posted at all. I know mafia floyd does this, but that was also like his first and second game here which could play into his low posting. If I had to pick a player to lynch I think I'd go with DH and lynch LC. Unless I'm misreading DH and really screwing up my read of LC, I believe LC isn't a civ.
Yeah, I don't want to vote for Floyd if it turns out he's been silenced. It's too early for that.sig wrote:Also quick thing I really don't think lynching Floyd is the way to go, he could be mafia yes, but its hard to tell since he hasn't really posted at all. I know mafia floyd does this, but that was also like his first and second game here which could play into his low posting. If I had to pick a player to lynch I think I'd go with DH and lynch LC. Unless I'm misreading DH and really screwing up my read of LC, I believe LC isn't a civ.
The post is not unrelated to Floyd. Timmer made it clear he meant Floyd when he said Mac. Quit showboating and start playing the game.DharmaHelper wrote:Surely Black Rock hasn't just pulled a quote entirely unrelated to Floyd to justify a vote for him to break the tie and save a teammate.
You are clearly more dedicated to leading a bandwagon than understanding something that takes just a little bit of critical thought.DharmaHelper wrote:I dunno who it could be, but "Here's a post by timmer that doesn't mention Floyd so I suspect Floyd and will vote for him" Doesn't track.
Ok, if it's meta-driven, prove it. You're making it up.sig wrote: I'll be reading over LC logic for lynching me, but a very good rule of thumb with LC is that if he is voting for me he is mafia. This isn't some wild accusation this is a meta driven thought process.
Floyd has been seen reading the thread several times, and has not posted once, despite being discussed. How do you explain this, Sorsha? I agree that he's not a likely silencing target. Maybe a silence got redirected to him. I don't know.Sorsha wrote:I'm also eyeing LC and LoRab for entertaining the thought that Floyd might be silenced.
I don't think she's bad.Quin wrote:Where do you stand on BR?
Are you eyeing me or Lorab here?sig wrote:Long Con wrote:Yes, this.LoRab wrote:Why not? If there is a silencing role or roles, I'd assume that role/those roles would still go through...I don't see why not?DrWilgy wrote:I would hope that silencing wouldn't be a thing in a scenario where we are split into groups.LoRab wrote:Thus far, BR, Professor Farnsworth, Sig, and Floyd haven't posted yet. Yes?
Just to track if someone is silenced....or someone is pretending to be.
I don't think BR is silenced. Hopefully she will get in here. I know she just hasn't played Mafia in a while, so it's hard for her to fit time for it into her normal routine.
This is weird? Bringing up silencing when we literally have no idea if it is real, it's like when people talk about their role to spite the silenced player.
Probably, but not in the way you seem to mean it.DharmaHelper wrote:I sense a disturbance in the force.Sorsha wrote:Why?DharmaHelper wrote:I think I'll take this opportunity to vote LC.
This is very very telling.
Well you were right I guess, also mainly I picked up a few hints and connected a few dots. I also don't remember thinking you were mafia I just disliked your ideas.DharmaHelper wrote:Weren't you riding my jock D1? What changed?sig wrote:Also quick thing I really don't think lynching Floyd is the way to go, he could be mafia yes, but its hard to tell since he hasn't really posted at all. I know mafia floyd does this, but that was also like his first and second game here which could play into his low posting. If I had to pick a player to lynch I think I'd go with DH and lynch LC. Unless I'm misreading DH and really screwing up my read of LC, I believe LC isn't a civ.
I thought our reasons for putting her name out there were the same. Was I wrong?DharmaHelper wrote:It's possible I confused BR's post. Might not be the best place to put a vote.
It was entirely related to Floyd, Timmer cleared that up. I think that post reeks like a teammate talking to a teammate and I think Mac was the other teammate. I think Timmer screwed up and put the wrong teammate into his post.DharmaHelper wrote:Surely Black Rock hasn't just pulled a quote entirely unrelated to Floyd to justify a vote for him to break the tie and save a teammate.
Surely.
I can understand that.Black Rock wrote:I chose to vote Floyd over Timmer because Floyd already had votes and I didn't need to spread the votes out anymore. I suspect them equally.
Was your reason because her post/vote seemed opportunistic and hasty?Quin wrote:I thought our reasons for putting her name out there were the same. Was I wrong?DharmaHelper wrote:It's possible I confused BR's post. Might not be the best place to put a vote.
