nutella wrote: ↑Sun Jun 07, 2020 9:37 pm
Mac your turn for a "why"
So I went to change my scrap vote from you to myself but somehow because it was now day the votamadood votes for Motobot and I uh left it there because science.
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:18 pm
Wow, I got blasted with four attacks last night. Makes Sloonei's crap vote on me look really bad, since I have extra votes today.
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:18 pm
Wow, I got blasted with four attacks last night. Makes Sloonei's crap vote on me look really bad, since I have extra votes today.
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:18 pm
Wow, I got blasted with four attacks last night. Makes Sloonei's crap vote on me look really bad, since I have extra votes today.
One thing about Myo is that she's never even denied or addressed the idea that tedxtr blocked her kill on night 2. Absolute radio silence on that, the most damning piece of evidence in the entire game. That is very incriminating. [VOTE:
myo] aubergine
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jun 08, 2020 10:26 am
One thing about Myo is that she's never even denied or addressed the idea that tedxtr blocked her kill on night 2. Absolute radio silence on that, the most damning piece of evidence in the entire game. That is very incriminating. [VOTE:
myo] aubergine
Let's shorten this day.
Ummm, I’ve not said anything because the rules state that you cannot reveal information. I assume this extends to revealing any PMs or lack of PMs from the host regarding being the target of actions.
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jun 08, 2020 10:26 am
One thing about Myo is that she's never even denied or addressed the idea that tedxtr blocked her kill on night 2. Absolute radio silence on that, the most damning piece of evidence in the entire game. That is very incriminating. [VOTE:
myo] aubergine
Let's shorten this day.
Ummm, I’ve not said anything because the rules state that you cannot reveal information. I assume this extends to revealing any PMs or lack of PMs from the host regarding being the target of actions.
You can say "I don't know if ted targeted me or not, but I didn't target anyone that night with anything. Some other force must have stopped the kill." Or "I know people suspect me because of ted's reveal, and I can't prove to you that it wasn't me, but here are some other explanations as to why the kill might have failed."
Instead, you haven't even acknowledged the issue. That looks bad to me.
To be fair, I would not be surprised if the rule against info-dumping is not completely new to Myo (not many sites play with that rule in place). So I can understand and sympathize with a hesitance to talk about it. I don't view that as a point for or against her in any way.
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jun 08, 2020 8:15 pm
To be fair, I would not be surprised if the rule against info-dumping is not completely new to Myo (not many sites play with that rule in place). So I can understand and sympathize with a hesitance to talk about it. I don't view that as a point for or against her in any way.
View it as moot, because the vote goes to Myo today either way.
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jun 08, 2020 8:15 pm
To be fair, I would not be surprised if the rule against info-dumping is not completely new to Myo (not many sites play with that rule in place). So I can understand and sympathize with a hesitance to talk about it.
NOT TO MENTION that that point itself, if applicable, is the most incriminating thing out there against Myo.
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jun 08, 2020 8:15 pm
To be fair, I would not be surprised if the rule against info-dumping is not completely new to Myo (not many sites play with that rule in place). So I can understand and sympathize with a hesitance to talk about it.
NOT TO MENTION that that point itself, if applicable, is the most incriminating thing out there against Myo.
yes. "Myo was roleblocked" is the closest thing to substantial evidence we collectively have to go off of.
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jun 08, 2020 8:15 pm
To be fair, I would not be surprised if the rule against info-dumping is not completely new to Myo (not many sites play with that rule in place). So I can understand and sympathize with a hesitance to talk about it.
NOT TO MENTION that that point itself, if applicable, is the most incriminating thing out there against Myo.
yes. "Myo was roleblocked" is the closest thing to substantial evidence we collectively have to go off of.
Not what I meant.
What I meant is, that if Myo thought she couldn't discuss information she knew (such as "Myo tried to kill someone and was blocked on night 2"), then the lack of discussion is extremely incriminating. If it weren't true, then there would be no prohibition against discussing it.
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jun 08, 2020 8:15 pm
To be fair, I would not be surprised if the rule against info-dumping is not completely new to Myo (not many sites play with that rule in place). So I can understand and sympathize with a hesitance to talk about it.
NOT TO MENTION that that point itself, if applicable, is the most incriminating thing out there against Myo.
yes. "Myo was roleblocked" is the closest thing to substantial evidence we collectively have to go off of.
Not what I meant.
What I meant is, that if Myo thought she couldn't discuss information she knew (such as "Myo tried to kill someone and was blocked on night 2"), then the lack of discussion is extremely incriminating. If it weren't true, then there would be no prohibition against discussing it.
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jun 08, 2020 8:15 pm
To be fair, I would not be surprised if the rule against info-dumping is not completely new to Myo (not many sites play with that rule in place). So I can understand and sympathize with a hesitance to talk about it.
NOT TO MENTION that that point itself, if applicable, is the most incriminating thing out there against Myo.
yes. "Myo was roleblocked" is the closest thing to substantial evidence we collectively have to go off of.
Not what I meant.
What I meant is, that if Myo thought she couldn't discuss information she knew (such as "Myo tried to kill someone and was blocked on night 2"), then the lack of discussion is extremely incriminating. If it weren't true, then there would be no prohibition against discussing it.
this feels too close to a gray area for me.
Then let's dial it back and call it moot again, and lynch her for the formally proper reasons.
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jun 08, 2020 10:26 am
One thing about Myo is that she's never even denied or addressed the idea that tedxtr blocked her kill on night 2. Absolute radio silence on that, the most damning piece of evidence in the entire game. That is very incriminating. [VOTE:
myo] aubergine
Let's shorten this day.
Ummm, I’ve not said anything because the rules state that you cannot reveal information. I assume this extends to revealing any PMs or lack of PMs from the host regarding being the target of actions.
You can say "I don't know if ted targeted me or not, but I didn't target anyone that night with anything. Some other force must have stopped the kill." Or "I know people suspect me because of ted's reveal, and I can't prove to you that it wasn't me, but here are some other explanations as to why the kill might have failed."
Instead, you haven't even acknowledged the issue. That looks bad to me.
I’m actually totally lost with the point you’re trying to make here. My interpretation of the rule was that I was not allowed to discuss at all, if I had or had not received any sort of PM from the host. Like theorising vaguely about items/roles is okay, but actively discussing with any additional info that you have (in my case, that I didn't receive any sort of message informing me that I was jailed or doctor saved) it is not. Hence, why I didn’t respond, since I thought it constituted rulebreaking as I wouldn't be vaguely theorising but actually revealing information.
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jun 08, 2020 10:26 am
One thing about Myo is that she's never even denied or addressed the idea that tedxtr blocked her kill on night 2. Absolute radio silence on that, the most damning piece of evidence in the entire game. That is very incriminating. [VOTE:
myo] aubergine
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jun 08, 2020 10:26 am
One thing about Myo is that she's never even denied or addressed the idea that tedxtr blocked her kill on night 2. Absolute radio silence on that, the most damning piece of evidence in the entire game. That is very incriminating. [VOTE:
myo] aubergine
Let's shorten this day.
That actually makes sense.
[VOTE:
Myo] aubergine
It does not make sense re: my interpretation of the no sharing information rule. I’m on mobile so have no clue how to multilink comments but it should only be a few comments above.
