Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 3:10 pm
What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?
If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 3:10 pm
What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?
If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
Simon wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:19 pm
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 3:10 pm
What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?
If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
Are they better or worse than nothing?
If it were me, then I would probably wait until the day 1 voting ends, then questions would be asked. I'm just not the person who would want to state the obvious, let alone joke around. I'm usually more serious than that.
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 3:10 pm
What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?
If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 3:10 pm
What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?
If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
Yeah you're right, I kinda over exaggerated. But I previously mentioned that there wasn't a lot to go off of given the current position of this game thus far. So I didn't really find anything much of interest.
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 3:10 pm
What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?
If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
I asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE:
falcon] aubergine
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 3:10 pm
What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?
If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
I asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE:
falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 3:10 pm
What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?
If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
I asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE:
falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 3:10 pm
What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?
If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
I asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE:
falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Why is Simon Town?
What do you mean?
You said I'm being predatory of Simon...which shouldn't matter if he's Maf, right?
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 3:10 pm
What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?
If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
I asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE:
falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Why is Simon Town?
What do you mean?
You said I'm being predatory of Simon...which shouldn't matter if he's Maf, right?
So why is he town?
So, this limp-noodle "gotcha" is supposed to direct attantion away from you? Is that the idea here?
If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
I asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE:
falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Why is Simon Town?
What do you mean?
You said I'm being predatory of Simon...which shouldn't matter if he's Maf, right?
So why is he town?
So, this limp-noodle "gotcha" is supposed to direct attantion away from you? Is that the idea here?
No
My favorite part is how you characterize my question as a limp-noodle gotcha instead of just answering it
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 3:10 pm
What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?
If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
I asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE:
falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Why is Simon Town?
What do you mean?
You said I'm being predatory of Simon...which shouldn't matter if he's Maf, right?
So why is he town?
So, this limp-noodle "gotcha" is supposed to direct attantion away from you? Is that the idea here?
No
My favorite part is how you characterize my question as a limp-noodle gotcha instead of just answering it
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 8:59 pm
Hey LoRab!
Why are you feb smiley if me?
And hi!
I thought I'd get it out of the way early this game. It is a direct reference to last game between us.
LoRab wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 7:52 pm
I ask this as an honest question: what is with the long con votes? I am super tired, so probably not thinking well, but I’m not getting those votes.
Or any others, really, other than several s*it’s and giggles votes.
Yeah, motobot hasn't really explained his yet. You can come to your own conclusion about falcon's, it's all right out there and recent.
LoRab wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 7:52 pm
I ask this as an honest question: what is with the long con votes? I am super tired, so probably not thinking well, but I’m not getting those votes.
Or any others, really, other than several s*it’s and giggles votes.
OH lol I forgot about leetic's vote on me. I don't think we know why for that one either.
I just thunk that typing words to convey your thoughts would be more proactive, in a game as quiet as this, than an emoji implying the existence of thoughts.
Syn wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:18 pm
okay not that specifically but I was going to interrogate the intuition thing and what the alternative is in a low-content D1
Did you decide not to because:
a) falcon did it
b) I called him out negatively about it, or
c) at best, it would be unproductive busy-talk, at worst, the 'predatory' gotcha behaviour that falcon is all about
I just thunk that typing words to convey your thoughts would be more proactive, in a game as quiet as this, than an emoji implying the existence of thoughts.
Syn wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:18 pm
okay not that specifically but I was going to interrogate the intuition thing and what the alternative is in a low-content D1
Did you decide not to because:
a) falcon did it
b) I called him out negatively about it, or
c) at best, it would be unproductive busy-talk, at worst, the 'predatory' gotcha behaviour that falcon is all about
mostly didn't because my first post to Simon was promptly ignored while he was in-thread, and his reply to falcon during that did not seem like it would lead anywhere useful if I repeated myself
I don't really have a lot of experience with LC but he was more agreeable in the game I do remember where he was wolfing. weak gut read says being antagonistic is a good sign?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
I asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE:
falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Why is Simon Town?
What do you mean?
You said I'm being predatory of Simon...which shouldn't matter if he's Maf, right?
So why is he town?
So, this limp-noodle "gotcha" is supposed to direct attantion away from you? Is that the idea here?
No
My favorite part is how you characterize my question as a limp-noodle gotcha instead of just answering it
He should've asked you about your limp noodle instead.