The Syndicate

Black Rock wrote:I feel like I have been talking to you all night in this game and Cars.

I know, right?

Rezzie rezzie rezz please.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Rezzie rezzie rezz please.

No.

Black Rock wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Rezzie rezzie rezz please.

No.

RIP TH

Is there any evidence/reason why Vermont cant be LC, because that seems like the obvious Vermont candidate to me

HannaK wrote:RIP TH

Is there any evidence/reason why Vermont cant be LC, because that seems like the obvious Vermont candidate to me

Why do you say that?

I was thinking the same thing Hanna.

and TH.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

HannaK wrote:RIP TH

Is there any evidence/reason why Vermont cant be LC, because that seems like the obvious Vermont candidate to me

Why do you say that?

Because TH was making a case against LC and how powerful he is (and thus we should lynch him) for days?

I'm not Vermont. I would say Vermont killed TH because he was the most powerful with his hotels. Possibly a frame-up job, which makes me eye HannaK for bringing it up like this.

Long Con wrote:I'm not Vermont. I would say Vermont killed TH because he was the most powerful with his hotels. Possibly a frame-up job, which makes me eye HannaK for bringing it up like this.

If you think TH was the most powerful (though I would argue that you are clearly wrong as he does not have the kill) who do you think is the most powerful now?

Long Con wrote:I'm not Vermont. I would say Vermont killed TH because he was the most powerful with his hotels. Possibly a frame-up job, which makes me eye HannaK for bringing it up like this.

What makes you say that he was powerful? To my knowledge he was a pinkie and had only one hotel (if his claims about not having other teammates was true) and was the first player to almost go bankrupt in the game?

HannaK wrote:

Long Con wrote:I'm not Vermont. I would say Vermont killed TH because he was the most powerful with his hotels. Possibly a frame-up job, which makes me eye HannaK for bringing it up like this.

What makes you say that he was powerful? To my knowledge he was a pinkie and had only one hotel (if his claims about not having other teammates was true) and was the first player to almost go bankrupt in the game?

He also had Indiana Ave with a hotel.

And, fingersplints, Metalmarsh made it clear that Turnip Head had a teammate, surely something drawn from his knowledge as a Utility. We should look back and see who among the living had landed on a Utility, Turnip Head's teammate is among those people. I'm sure that TH would have traded all his properties and prizes to his teammate since he was so much in the spotlight, and had publicly bought a red hotel.

That's the person we need to lynch today.

Long Con wrote:

HannaK wrote:

Long Con wrote:I'm not Vermont. I would say Vermont killed TH because he was the most powerful with his hotels. Possibly a frame-up job, which makes me eye HannaK for bringing it up like this.

What makes you say that he was powerful? To my knowledge he was a pinkie and had only one hotel (if his claims about not having other teammates was true) and was the first player to almost go bankrupt in the game?

He also had Indiana Ave with a hotel.

And, fingersplints, Metalmarsh made it clear that Turnip Head had a teammate, surely something drawn from his knowledge as a Utility. We should look back and see who among the living had landed on a Utility, Turnip Head's teammate is among those people. I'm sure that TH would have traded all his properties and prizes to his teammate since he was so much in the spotlight, and had publicly bought a red hotel.

That's the person we need to lynch today.

I will try to look back, but I am not sure I am willing to trust MM's assessment since he was a baddie and said other false things.

Why do you think someone with properties is more important then someone with a kill? It's still seeming to me like you are trying to draw us away from looking for who has the kill. You have said specifically you are not the player with the kill, but not that you aren't a part of that group.

I bet that LC is part of the group that has the kill and I care more about that than a potential alive teammate of TH who may or may not have inherited some of TH's stuff

I'm willing to vote for LC or bea at this point.

This smells fishy to me.

I think it's much more likely LC was aligned with Llama, making him a Green.

It's odd that Hanna, who has voiced little for most of the game beyond just going with the flow, would propose such a line of thinking.

Why bea, splints?

MovingPictures07 wrote:This smells fishy to me.

I think it's much more likely LC was aligned with Llama, making him a Green.

It's odd that Hanna, who has voiced little for most of the game beyond just going with the flow, would propose such a line of thinking.

with so few people left and the fact that TH who has repeatedly warned us about LC becoming too powerful is now dead i dunno, guess it makes sense to express a strong opinion for once.
I wasn't sure back then about the whole llama / LC thing and I am not now so I would not say he's likely to be part of the greens

Turnip Head wrote: I guess we'll see if anyone inherits the kill. I don't know if I believe LC when he says he didn't bid on Beatdown. The reds spent a lot of money on houses, hotels, and Epi's Chance card, while the baby blues were frugal with their house purchases. These were the two established teams when Beatdown was put up for auction. Smart money says the blues at least tried to get the power.

^Also this makes me think there is a real possibility LC is blue and that his team is in the possession of the beatdown power

HannaK wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:This smells fishy to me.

I think it's much more likely LC was aligned with Llama, making him a Green.

It's odd that Hanna, who has voiced little for most of the game beyond just going with the flow, would propose such a line of thinking.

with so few people left and the fact that TH who has repeatedly warned us about LC becoming too powerful is now dead i dunno, guess it makes sense to express a strong opinion for once.
I wasn't sure back then about the whole llama / LC thing and I am not now so I would not say he's likely to be part of the greens

But wait a minute.

That's not what you've said before.

HannaK wrote:Okay I've been trying to wait around for BWT to come around and answer to the case that's been made but I gotta leave now and so far that case looks the most convincing to me, especially because if (and that already is an if) Long Con is in a set with Llama and another person, they dont have to be a mafia team and especially considering how strong the baddies are right now in terms of money and knowledge, I think lynching (potential) baddies is a priority to lynching potential indysets so I am gonna go ahead and vote for BWT.

HannaK wrote:As I see no point in randomly picking a low poster, I am gonna vote for llama who's evidence for suspicions I do not find convincing and I feel llama might be bad or at the very least potentially part of a LMS group (and considering there are so few baddies left the chances of lynching someone of a LMS group look much better imo)

HannaK wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote: LC and Llama's actions time and time again convince me that they're not acting in the civvies' best interests. They NO U me, Llama is willing to lynch just about anyone that isn't him or LC, and their posts have been full of behavior that fails to satisfy me as genuine.

The only solid reasoning I have right now is that I find the case against LC convincing that he is very likely to be part of a LMS group and as a sole civvie, this is worrying me the most right now, but hey if someone has a really solid case against a player being mafia I am all ears

I thought you were one of my main supporters of the LC/Llama connection.

MovingPictures07 wrote:This smells fishy to me.

I think it's much more likely LC was aligned with Llama, making him a Green.

It's odd that Hanna, who has voiced little for most of the game beyond just going with the flow, would propose such a line of thinking.

You're still on about that then I do not think LC is a green, since I still disagree that he obviously had btsc with llama. I agree with Hanna that he is more likely on the team with the kill.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Why bea, splints?

She has been fairly inactive, yet survived landing on the hotel.
I need to go back over her to see if I see a possible TH connection there. Him having traded off a bunch of stuff is making sense to me. Although, could he have traded off properties as well?

HannaK wrote:

Turnip Head wrote: I guess we'll see if anyone inherits the kill. I don't know if I believe LC when he says he didn't bid on Beatdown. The reds spent a lot of money on houses, hotels, and Epi's Chance card, while the baby blues were frugal with their house purchases. These were the two established teams when Beatdown was put up for auction. Smart money says the blues at least tried to get the power.

^Also this makes me think there is a real possibility LC is blue and that his team is in the possession of the beatdown power

I agree obviously that the Blues got the beatdown.

I just don't think it was LC.

I think it was you.

fingersplints wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:This smells fishy to me.

I think it's much more likely LC was aligned with Llama, making him a Green.

It's odd that Hanna, who has voiced little for most of the game beyond just going with the flow, would propose such a line of thinking.

You're still on about that then I do not think LC is a green, since I still disagree that he obviously had btsc with llama. I agree with Hanna that he is more likely on the team with the kill.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Why bea, splints?

She has been fairly inactive, yet survived landing on the hotel.
I need to go back over her to see if I see a possible TH connection there. Him having traded off a bunch of stuff is making sense to me. Although, could he have traded off properties as well?

Well, I thought maybe I was wrong about it, but upon reflection it really seems to make sense.

Why do you agree with Hanna so much?

You both appear to be making some kind of power play.

Regarding bea, that's a good point. But didn't she say she won the $50 for every player power earlier?

I'm voting Hanna for now. I don't like how inactive and go-with-the-flow Hanna and splints have been, and now that Blue is killing, they're way on the offensive. Smells fishy.

Curious what everyone else is thinking though. I'm open to change my vote. But that's what my gut is STRONGLY telling me and I can't ignore it.

Gotta go study and stuff, be back later!

MovingPictures07 wrote:

HannaK wrote:Okay I've been trying to wait around for BWT to come around and answer to the case that's been made but I gotta leave now and so far that case looks the most convincing to me, especially because if (and that already is an if) Long Con is in a set with Llama and another person, they dont have to be a mafia team and especially considering how strong the baddies are right now in terms of money and knowledge, I think lynching (potential) baddies is a priority to lynching potential indysets so I am gonna go ahead and vote for BWT.

HannaK wrote:As I see no point in randomly picking a low poster, I am gonna vote for llama who's evidence for suspicions I do not find convincing and I feel llama might be bad or at the very least potentially part of a LMS group (and considering there are so few baddies left the chances of lynching someone of a LMS group look much better imo)

HannaK wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote: LC and Llama's actions time and time again convince me that they're not acting in the civvies' best interests. They NO U me, Llama is willing to lynch just about anyone that isn't him or LC, and their posts have been full of behavior that fails to satisfy me as genuine.

The only solid reasoning I have right now is that I find the case against LC convincing that he is very likely to be part of a LMS group and as a sole civvie, this is worrying me the most right now, but hey if someone has a really solid case against a player being mafia I am all ears

I thought you were one of my main supporters of the LC/Llama connection.

In the first post I say that they could be together but not necessarily so

In the second post I say llama might be in a LMS group (not necessarily with llama)

In this third post I say LC might be in a LMS group (not necessarily with llama)

so uhm I wouldnt say I've been the biggest supporter of your theory MP

And please elaborate on how I am fishy and how that matters? You think I have the kill because otherwise I do not get why you would vote for me

Oh sorry MP: I missed your post about saying that I am part of the blues, any reason for that because I can assure you that I am not

MovingPictures07 wrote:

fingersplints wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:This smells fishy to me.

I think it's much more likely LC was aligned with Llama, making him a Green.

It's odd that Hanna, who has voiced little for most of the game beyond just going with the flow, would propose such a line of thinking.

You're still on about that then I do not think LC is a green, since I still disagree that he obviously had btsc with llama. I agree with Hanna that he is more likely on the team with the kill.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Why bea, splints?

She has been fairly inactive, yet survived landing on the hotel.
I need to go back over her to see if I see a possible TH connection there. Him having traded off a bunch of stuff is making sense to me. Although, could he have traded off properties as well?

Well, I thought maybe I was wrong about it, but upon reflection it really seems to make sense.

Why do you agree with Hanna so much?

You both appear to be making some kind of power play.

Regarding bea, that's a good point. But didn't she say she won the $50 for every player power earlier?

"so much?" I agree with Hanna in regards to one thing. That LC isn't a green and is more likely in the group that has the kill. I will consider what you are saying that maybe it is her group with it. TH did go on for days about LC being the most powerful and then is killed. I do not have bts with Hanna.

I am not sure what you mean by power play. The numbers are dwindling, and with the nature of this game if I don't put forth my ideas I could be next. Just trying to play the game

She did say that. If you believe her. It seems like that money would have been used up by now unless she was gaining some other way.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm voting Hanna for now. I don't like how inactive and go-with-the-flow Hanna and splints have been, and now that Blue is killing, they're way on the offensive. Smells fishy.

I have not been "go-with-the-flow"

HannaK wrote:Oh sorry MP: I missed your post about saying that I am part of the blues, any reason for that because I can assure you that I am not

I suppose I misunderstood you re: LC and Llama, but you voted them alongside me for so long, so it just struck me that you've been changing your tune.

I find it most odd that you and splints have come out and are incriminating LC with strong certainty that he's Blue. I don't know. I just don't see how one could narrow down something like that with such confidence, especially when you in particular have seemed so unsure for most of the game.

I thought I could pin down colors, but it's been more difficult than I realized. Unless I am right about LC and Llama, then at least I had one victory.

I just don't see any reason to believe LC is Blue, but I think there's at least something behind his theory to be Green.

fingersplints wrote:[
"so much?" I agree with Hanna in regards to one thing. That LC isn't a green and is more likely in the group that has the kill. I will consider what you are saying that maybe it is her group with it. TH did go on for days about LC being the most powerful and then is killed. I do not have bts with Hanna.

I am not sure what you mean by power play. The numbers are dwindling, and with the nature of this game if I don't put forth my ideas I could be next. Just trying to play the game

She did say that. If you believe her. It seems like that money would have been used up by now unless she was gaining some other way.

Well, that's true. I just mean "so much" like all of a sudden you both are putting forth an idea with very strong certainty. Seems odd to me, especially since it's so sudden. Why do you think LC is a Blue? And just because TH said that, I mean, he could have been right, but if he was a pink, how would he know that? And when asked by BR, he just said it was because of LC's extra votes and because he thought LC purchased the beatdown, right? Unless I'm remembering something wrong. Truth is, how could he know that? I think he said he just strongly suspected it. It could be true, but just because TH went on about it for days and then was killed doesn't confirm it; it could just as easily be a setup.

If you don't have BTSC with Hanna, think about it and let me know what you think. I mean, the way she has come in here and her most recent posts. Then contrast it with all her posts before, content and frequency. Doesn't it seem odd to you?

Re: power play, I meant the following: Like because the numbers are dwindling and TH and MM are dead and the kill has passed, if you and Hanna were both on the Blues, it would benefit you HEAVILY to come in here and lynch LC, because then you have a really good chance of winning the game thereafter. Combined with the change in Hanna's level of certainty and her post frequency, it seems a likely theory. If you take yourself out of the equation, what do you think of it? It's just what my gut is telling me, frankly.

And good point re: bea. She could have lied about that. I will consider. Are there any other points of consideration that make you think she should go?

OK, now, studying and putting away my laptop. See you folks later.

In roughly just over a week, I'll be done with my first semester of PhD. I have to keep telling myself that.

fingersplints wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm voting Hanna for now. I don't like how inactive and go-with-the-flow Hanna and splints have been, and now that Blue is killing, they're way on the offensive. Smells fishy.

I have not been "go-with-the-flow"

Also, maybe this is true, but your posting frequency seems to have jumped just now too, although not near as to the degree of Hanna's. That comment was really much more directed at her, but I thought it applied to you somewhat too.

I'm not a blue, and I don't have the Beatdown.

fingersplints wrote:You have said specifically you are not the player with the kill, but not that you aren't a part of that group.

What? Are you accusing me of trying to sneak past the Lie Detector? Is there a Lie Detect in this game?

That's really stretching it.

Long Con wrote:I'm not a blue, and I don't have the Beatdown.

fingersplints wrote:You have said specifically you are not the player with the kill, but not that you aren't a part of that group.

What? Are you accusing me of trying to sneak past the Lie Detector? Is there a Lie Detect in this game?

That's really stretching it.

I didn't bring up a LD. It is what you had done though

MovingPictures07 wrote:

fingersplints wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm voting Hanna for now. I don't like how inactive and go-with-the-flow Hanna and splints have been, and now that Blue is killing, they're way on the offensive. Smells fishy.

I have not been "go-with-the-flow"

Also, maybe this is true, but your posting frequency seems to have jumped just now too, although not near as to the degree of Hanna's. That comment was really much more directed at her, but I thought it applied to you somewhat too.

I think my posting frequency dropped for the RL reasons I stated, and have gone back to what it was before.

fingersplints wrote:

Long Con wrote:I'm not a blue, and I don't have the Beatdown.

fingersplints wrote:You have said specifically you are not the player with the kill, but not that you aren't a part of that group.

What? Are you accusing me of trying to sneak past the Lie Detector? Is there a Lie Detect in this game?

That's really stretching it.

I didn't bring up a LD. It is what you had done though

The kill being a thing that a player owns wasn't really on my mind, I pictured it as something that a team just... is.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
If you don't have BTSC with Hanna, think about it and let me know what you think. I mean, the way she has come in here and her most recent posts. Then contrast it with all her posts before, content and frequency. Doesn't it seem odd to you?

Re: power play, I meant the following: Like because the numbers are dwindling and TH and MM are dead and the kill has passed, if you and Hanna were both on the Blues, it would benefit you HEAVILY to come in here and lynch LC, because then you have a really good chance of winning the game thereafter. Combined with the change in Hanna's level of certainty and her post frequency, it seems a likely theory. If you take yourself out of the equation, what do you think of it? It's just what my gut is telling me, frankly.

Oh I definitely agree with the fact that I went from not posting a lot to posting a lot today, but maybe rethink your conclusion that I must be blue and think of other possibilities that help explain my 'sudden' interest in lynching LC (although to be fair, I think I've said before I was afraid of LC getting too powerful and I voted for him previously as well).

Oh and sorry for double posting but I was flying pretty below the radar before today so why would I 'risk' that strategy if I were part of the blue team and close to winning. It's the opposite: I really think LC is part of the blue team that has the kill and is thus close to winning this thing

HannaK wrote:Oh and sorry for double posting but I was flying pretty below the radar before today so why would I 'risk' that strategy if I were part of the blue team and close to winning. It's the opposite: I really think LC is part of the blue team that has the kill and is thus close to winning this thing

That's a good strategy, of course, pick the guy who's had the most "heat" and pin it on him, but... I'm not a blue. My hue is a bit warmer. This is all I need to see, I figured you were TH's teammate ever since MM implied it.

*votes HannaK*

HannaK wrote:Oh and sorry for double posting but I was flying pretty below the radar before today so why would I 'risk' that strategy if I were part of the blue team and close to winning. It's the opposite: I really think LC is part of the blue team that has the kill and is thus close to winning this thing

This is WIFOM though.

And it seems WAY more likely to me that the Blues would want to get someone mislynched today, would they not? All they have to do is get someone nonBlue lynched today, NK someone, and then the game should be within grasp.

Why do you think LC is party of the blue team? Because TH said so? You haven't really explained it.

I definitely think you're Blue.

I'll vote for Hanna too. I'd much rather the other two, but I suppose she could be a blue.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

HannaK wrote:Oh and sorry for double posting but I was flying pretty below the radar before today so why would I 'risk' that strategy if I were part of the blue team and close to winning. It's the opposite: I really think LC is part of the blue team that has the kill and is thus close to winning this thing

This is WIFOM though.

And it seems WAY more likely to me that the Blues would want to get someone mislynched today, would they not? All they have to do is get someone nonBlue lynched today, NK someone, and then the game should be within grasp.

Why do you think LC is party of the blue team? Because TH said so? You haven't really explained it.

I definitely think you're Blue.

Yes that is exactly what the blues are doing, except I am not blue and you are basically handing them the game by focusing on me.

Long Con wrote:

HannaK wrote:Oh and sorry for double posting but I was flying pretty below the radar before today so why would I 'risk' that strategy if I were part of the blue team and close to winning. It's the opposite: I really think LC is part of the blue team that has the kill and is thus close to winning this thing

That's a good strategy, of course, pick the guy who's had the most "heat" and pin it on him, but... I'm not a blue. My hue is a bit warmer. This is all I need to see, I figured you were TH's teammate ever since MM implied it.

*votes HannaK*

Both of you are wrong although one is way more wrong than the other one.
Honestly, I am not blue and I am not at all powerful in this game. You're planning to lynch the wrong person, making it really easy for a very powerful team to win this game with their kill but whatever, you'll see when my properties come up that you've made a big big mistake, I am not sure what else to make of it. I am not 100% LC is blue but I know I am not and I do not know what else to say to avoid being lynched except that you lose everything and gain nothing

Also, am I the only one who is really worried about this?:

Long Con wrote:St. James Place - $15
Tennessee Avenue - $15
Boardwalk - $15
Mediterranean Avenue - $15
Water Works - $15
Oriental Avenue - $15
Illinois Avenue - $15
Virginia Avenue - $15
North Carolina Avenue - $15
Pennsylvania Avenue - $15
Kentucky Avenue - $15

voting HannaK.

I have a busy day tomorrow, voted now so I can be sure I don't miss it.

fingersplints wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:This smells fishy to me.

I think it's much more likely LC was aligned with Llama, making him a Green.

It's odd that Hanna, who has voiced little for most of the game beyond just going with the flow, would propose such a line of thinking.

You're still on about that then I do not think LC is a green, since I still disagree that he obviously had btsc with llama. I agree with Hanna that he is more likely on the team with the kill.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Why bea, splints?

She has been fairly inactive, yet survived landing on the hotel.
I need to go back over her to see if I see a possible TH connection there. Him having traded off a bunch of stuff is making sense to me. Although, could he have traded off properties as well?

Oh splintsy - don't mince words, I've been totally uncharacteristically inactive this game.

I've missed so many votes that if this were a sock game he would have killed me three cycles ago.

I've tried, but this is just too involved for me to say much intelligently about it. I've been having problems keeping up with the thread - much less checking out board movements and trying to think through all the implications that entails.

I survived the hotel stay exactly as I said.

When I replaced in - goosey hadn't spent a single penny of any of the money she started with as well as any rent she collected. I won that 7's thing and got a chunk of change and apparently I landed on Chance and got something from that. It was a pretty little chunk of change I would have seriously considered spending had I ever been around for anything that was ever going down.

Have you seen me bid on anything? Like at all? I know there's lots of bts bidding and trading going on, but I was not part of it.

I have no hidden properties. The only thing I own was the property I was given when goosey started this game.

Given what you know about me as a player and given how hard it was in the extra long K-site game for me to keep up, is it *really* that odd that I actually had enough money stockpiled from lack of involvement in the game to survive one hotel stay?

I can promise you if land on another, I won't be so lucky.

Alright I am gonna try one more time to make my case against LC and defend myself and i hope you will actually consider it instead of hopping on my lynchtrain without any good reason (bass, splints).

Regardless or not if LC is blue, he is definitely a very powerful player, the fact that he has so many properties (and clearly has enough money to constantly bid for powers and properties) makes it very likely he can win this game (see my previous post and the fact he was trying to outbid MM on day 11)

Furthermore, TH has been consistenly trying to get LC lynched because of the reasons I listed above

Turnip Head wrote:Should change your votes guys. LC will soon be unstoppable.

Now, the fact that he is clearly very powerful might already be enough to try and lynch LC, but apart from that it is also really interesting that:

Conveniently, Vermont Avenue kills Turnip Head last night

AND that LC is not at all interested in lynching someone who owns the ONLY kill left in the game, but instead wants to go after TH's teammember, of who we are not even sure if he/she has TH's properties:

Long Con wrote:

HannaK wrote:

Long Con wrote:I'm not Vermont. I would say Vermont killed TH because he was the most powerful with his hotels. Possibly a frame-up job, which makes me eye HannaK for bringing it up like this.

What makes you say that he was powerful? To my knowledge he was a pinkie and had only one hotel (if his claims about not having other teammates was true) and was the first player to almost go bankrupt in the game?

He also had Indiana Ave with a hotel.

And, fingersplints, Metalmarsh made it clear that Turnip Head had a teammate, surely something drawn from his knowledge as a Utility. We should look back and see who among the living had landed on a Utility, Turnip Head's teammate is among those people. I'm sure that TH would have traded all his properties and prizes to his teammate since he was so much in the spotlight, and had publicly bought a red hotel.

That's the person we need to lynch today.

No, we need to lynch the person who actually can kill other players, or at least that's how civvies would reason...makes me question LC's priorities.

So regardless or not LC is a blue or not (I still think he can be, just not necessarily so), this makes me vote for Long Con and I am going to do so.


Also, I think it is really intesting that MP definitely thinks I'm blue right after LC votes for me because I am pink, weird MP doesn't come back to that.
Apart from this, I have not much else to say to defend myself, the only 'evidence' for me being a blue (according to MP) is that I suddenly have posted more, I only did that because I feel that LC is really close to winning this game and I wanted to try and do something about that before it was too late...I guess you can lynch me for that but like I said, when you see the result you will be severely disappointed.

I know this game calls for a lynchtrain but apart from MP and LC, I find it really disappointing that the rest just votes for me without any good reason or reasoning or even describe why they are voting for me in more than one sentence...I had sort of expecting otherwise this late in the game but yeah all I can ask is: please read this post and re-consider?

(Also: the voting deadline really sucks for me as I am on UK time and will not stay up till 3 am to see the results so if anyone has any questions for me or anything, I am around to answer them but please do not wait till the last 3 hours because I will simply not be here and I hate if people will mention that as the reason why they vote for me because i cant defend myself then)

I voted for you, because although I would rather vote elsewhere, I was also interested in proving that we are not teammates.

Sorry I keep being busy. Silly life gettingn in the way of playing mafia. Voting HannaK, as tha tseems like the best option right now and I dont wnt to miss anothe vote.